NSTP1 Peer Evaluation Sheet AY 2021-2022
Dear NSTP Student,
As part of your grade for NSTP1, you will be given the opportunity to grade and be graded by your group
mates. Kindly accomplish the sheet below and provide a numerical and objective evaluation of the people you
have closely worked with during the implementation of the course.
You can refer to the table below for guidance.
Peer Evaluation Rubric
20 Points
19 Points
18-15 Points
14-10 Points
9-1 Point/s
0 Point
Is clear and
Is clear and
Rarely
Communicates
Passive
Did not
consistent in
consistent in
communicates
only when
participation in
communicate
communicating
communicating
with the group
asked
all group
with the group
information to
information to
the group
the group
Accomplished
Accomplished
Accomplished
Accomplished
Accomplished
Accomplished
all assigned
majority of the
70% of the
50% of the
minimal
none of the
tasks and
assigned tasks
assigned tasks
assigned tasks
expectations
assigned tasks
responsibilities
and
and
and
from the
and
responsibilities
responsibilities
responsibilities
assigned task
responsibilities
communication
and
responsibilities
Reminders:
1. Accomplish the sheet on time. The information from your peer evaluation will be a major element of
your final grade and submitting on time will greatly help your social engagement lecturer.
2. Be honest and objective. Refrain from giving high scores to your friends and low scores to classmates
that irritated you. Objectively assess everyone’s contribution to the group.
Page 1 of 2
3. Be kind. Give due consideration to the times that your groupmate might have failed your expectation. If
he/she was able to explain his/her condition, it would be better to give him/her the benefit of
compassion.
NSTP 2 Peer Evaluation Sheet
Name of Rater:
Section: A51C
Social Engagement Lecturer: Ms. Jacqueline A. Calimlim
Groupmate’s Full Name
Numerical
Evaluation
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
19
Did the jobs assigned to them
Justification for Numerical Evaluation
Mariella Perez
Andrea Gato
Eusef Cadano
Hannah Pingol
Jamie Mitra
Lorenzo Ortega
Migs Valentino
Miro Altoberos
Submit the form as a PDF Format.
Page 2 of 2