Uploaded by lolmehehe

Omniture Financials Example

advertisement
Joshua Brown
Chad Hicks
Andrew Lamb
Mark Stowe
Xiqi Zheng
Outline







Introduction
External Assessment
Competitive Analysis
Internal Assessment
Strategic Analysis
Recommendation
Questions
Business Case









Operates in the Web Analytics Industry
Headquarters in Orem, Utah
President and CEO Joshua G. James
Shares traded on NASDAQ
2006 Revenues: $79,750,000
Over 500 employees
Over 2,000 customers worldwide
Customers in over 35 countries
Operations in 9 countries
Business Case Continued





Fastest organically growing public software
company
#1 aftermarket return technology IPO of 2006
1.4 Trillion transactions in 2006
Leading on-demand Web analytics provider
by revenue
Omniture products available in English,
Chinese, French, German, and Japanese
History of Industry





Early 1990’s – Web analytic industry begins
1993 – Web Trends and WebsideStory are
industry’s first analytic firms
1994 – IPRO launches first Log Analyzer
program
2001-2003 – 60 suppliers shrinks to 35
suppliers
2004-Current – Coremetrics and Omniture are
industry leaders
History of Omniture







1996 – JP Interactive was founded
1998 – Changed name to SuperStats.com
1999 – Changed name to MyComputer, Inc.
2002 – Omniture is born from MyComputer, Inc.
 Announces release of SiteCatalyst
2004 – Forrester names Omniture industry leader
2006 – Omniture went public
2007 – Omniture acquires Instadia, TouchClarity,
Offermatica and Visual Sciences
Mission Statement
“To help online organizations achieve success
through analytics based optimization.”
Vision Statement
“ To deliver an integrated, comprehensive online
marketing services with a suite of solutions
that allow companies to automate, measure,
manage and optimize marketing results in
real-time.”
Problem Statement
What will it take for Omniture to distance
themselves from competitors as the Web
Analytic’s Industry leader?
General Environment




Industry Overview
What is Demand?
Economic
Demographic




Soci-cultural
Technological
Regulatory/Political
Global
Industry Overview

Major competitors








Coremetrics
Omniture
Google
WebTrends
SPSS
16.9 billion dollar industry
Growing
Relatively new
What is Demand?




Small fraction of business are utilizing web
analytics
Huge potential for growth
21% growth in online advertising revenues for
2007
Positive financial results experienced
Regulatory/Political
Opportunities



Self induced privacy
standards
Municipal internet
investments
Government supports
internet
Threats


Privacy
Regulations
Economic
Opportunities



Online video market to
reach 6.5 billion by 2011
Attractive interest rates
Mobile internet growth
Threats


Low consumer confidence
High chance of recession
Social-cultural
Opportunities



MySpace and Facebook
Online gaming
Lack of communication
barriers
Threats


Privacy
Click Fraud
Technological
Opportunities





Increase in global
technology usage
Increased availability of
broadband and WiFi
PDA’s and SmartPhone’s
Worldwide mobile gaming
Online Video
Threats



Click fraud
Viruses
Blackouts
Global
Opportunities




Expansion
Online shopping
International brand
recognition
China restructured internet
laws
Threats


Lack of infrastructure
Exchange rates
Demographic
Opportunities





Low PC cost
72% of 40+ year olds using
internet at home
Municipal WiFi
Increase computer science
degrees
Global internet growth
Threats


Cultural differences
Privacy
Competitive Environment




Industry Characteristics
Life Cycle Stage
Five Forces Model
Strategic Group
Analysis
Industry Characteristics






Loose oligopoly
Growth opportunities
Increased competition for market share
Expected advertising and retail sales online
Internet Software & Services Industry grew
28.9% in 2006
Expected increase in advertising revenues
over 20% through 2008
Omniture
Industry Life Cycle
Porter 5 Forces Model





Threat of New Entrants
Power of Suppliers
Power of Buyers
Threat of Substitutes
Level of Rivalry
Threat of New Entrants



Relatively low for pre-existing internet based
companies
Constantly changing environment
Increased growth and competition
HIGH
Power of Suppliers

Technological infrastructure


Choice of suppliers is high
Industry companies control the supplier base
LOW

Intellectual capital


Human resources has high control
Employees provide high levels of innovation
HIGH
Power of Buyers


High demand for Web Analytics from few
providers
High customer retention from software
LOW
Threat of Substitutes


Google’s free Web Analytics
Highly customized software with high
switching costs
LOW
Level of Rivalry




Increasing growth and competition
Similar products and services
High switching costs
Minor exit barriers
MODERATE
Industry Attractiveness



Industry revenues are rising
Market is open for new entrants – not
crowded
Growth and competition are increasing
HIGH
Medium
Low
Market Share
High
Strategic Group Analysis
Low
Moderate
Number of Employees
High
Competitive Analysis








Goals
Assumptions
Capabilities
Strategies
Satisfied
Vulnerabilities
Retaliation
Next Move
Coremetrics

Goals





Expand European
operations
Maintain high service
levels
IPO or merger?
Promote brand
recognition
Foster innovation

Assumptions



High global demand
Increased online
shopping (retail)
Customer loyalty
Coremetrics

Capabilities


Flexible packages
Reputable partnerships





IBM
Custom solutions
Strong leadership
Venture capitalists
Retail Market

Strategies



Expand European
market
Aggressive sales and
marketing campaign
Concentrated growth
Coremetrics

Satisfied


Yes
Looking to grow

Vulnerabilities




Lack of competitive
scope
No clear vision
High subscription fees
Limited low end
solutions (SMB)
Coremetrics

Retaliation



Increasing customer
base
Expanding into new
markets
Promoting customer
satisfaction

Next Move



Develop clear vision
Enhance competitive
scope
IPO
Google

Goals



Best in search
Push their ad-system
Global implementation

Assumptions



Continually improve
Release new products
Continue to grow
Google

Capabilities



Very innovative
Strong brand
Cash

Strategies


Focused differentiation
Growth through
acquisition


YouTube
Expand Chinese
markets

Currently Own 2.6% of
Baidu
Google

Satisfied


Yes
Looking to increase
growth

Vulnerabilities


Revenue linked to one
side ad posting
Lawsuits

Book search –
Copyright infringement
Google

Retaliation


Innovation
Free web analytics

Next Move


Mobile phone market
Expand innovative
product base
Key Success Factors
Leadership
(.2)
Brand
(.2)
Innovation
(.25)
Partnerships
Acquisitions
(.2)
Adaptability
(.15)
Total
4
4
4
5
4
4.2
5
4
3.5
4
4
4.1
5
5
5
5
2
4.3
1=Worst 5=Best
Internal Assessment






Culture
Leadership
Organizational Structure
Value Chain Analysis
Core Competencies
Financial Ratio Analysis
Culture





Highly intellectual and emotionally smart
employees
Innovative fast-paced environment
Hypercompetitive and driven employees
Embrace nice people – “mean people suck”
Fun environment – work hard, play hard
Leadership

Josh James





CEO
Co-founder
Started Omniture in 1998
Brigham Young University
Fun – Top priority

John Pestana




Executive VP
Co-founder
President ’98 – ’04
Brigham Young University
Leadership








President Chris Harrington – ‘03
CFO and Executive VP Mike Herring – ‘04
CTO and Executive VP Brett Error – ‘99
Corporate Development Michael Dodd – ‘06
Worldwide Marketing Gail Ennis – ‘05
CLO and Senior VP Shawn Lindquist – ‘05
Business Development John Mellor – ‘03
General Manager Neil Weston – ‘05
Leadership

Increased acquisitions





Offermatica
Instadia
TouchClarity
Visual Sciences
Innovation
Organizational Structure
OMNITURE
Josh James
CEO
Brett Error
CTO
Mike Herring
CFO
Chris Harrington
President, Sales
John Pestana
EVP, Customers
Shawn Lindquist
CLO
Michael Dodd
SVP, Corp Devel
Gail Ennis
SVP, Marketing
John Mellor
SPV, Bus Devel
Neil Weston
SVP, Gen Mgr
Value Chain Analysis
Infrastructure



Strong culture
Innovation
Brand name
Inbound Logistics



Services based company
Technology is critical
HR hiring process:


High volume of requests
Hiring the “best fit”



Innovative
Customer oriented
Motivated
Operations

High operation costs


Delivering high performance IT services


Sales & General Administration
Focusing on services and product base
Omniture University


Regional and Web-based training
Omniture Certified Professional Program

Public and Partner Certifications (SiteCatylist, Implementation,
Sales, Support)
Outbound Logistics

Strong alliances with partners

Partner types


Partner levels


Application, Platform, Services, Value-added
Resellers
Strategic, Platinum, Gold, Silver
Customer focused

“No Web analytics company has more Fortune
200 companies, and Omniture has the highest
customer retention rate in the industry”
Marketing and Sales





High Cost Products; High Performance
B2B Market focused
High revenues
Web Analytics market share leader (2006)
Investing globally through acquisitions

Building brand name
Services



Web Analytics
Online business optimization
Marketing integration


Search marketing


SearchCenter
Consulting



Genesis
Implementation
Best practices
Building customer relations
Core Competencies



Innovation
Acquisitions
Customer relations and loyalty
Financial Analysis
NET INCOME (in millions)
Twelve Months Ending 12/31/06
OMTR
$-7.73
GOOG
$3,953.91
SPSS
$15.14
REVENUES (in millions)
Twelve Months Ending 12/31/06
OMTR
$79.75
GOOG
$ 10,604.92
SPSS
$261.53
Net Income Growth Rate (%)
1500
1000
500
OMTR
0
GOOG
-500
SPSS
-1000
-1500
-2000
2004
2005
2006
OMTR
-1400
-1238
58
GOOG
276
267
1100
SPSS
-40
190
-6
Revenue Growth Rate (%)
2006
SPSS
2005
GOOG
OMTR
2004
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2004
2005
2006
SPSS
58
68
48
GOOG
117
92
72
OMTR
137
108
86
160
Financial Ratio Analysis
ROA
(from previous year)
ROE
(from previous year)
12/31/04
12/31/05
12/31/06
12/31/04
OMTR
-5.36%
-21.72%
-5.31%
OMTR
9%
-22%
-8%
GOOG
14.25%
21.60%
21.41%
GOOG
13%
15%
23%
SPSS
2.81%
7.37%
5.63%
SPSS
4%
9%
7%
CURRENT RATIO
(from previous year)
12/31/04
12/31/05
12/31/06
OMTR
0.92
2.42
2.24
GOOG
7.91
12.08
10.00
SPSS
1.14
1.35
1.80
12/31/05
12/31/06
Financial Analysis
AVG REVENUE PER EMPLOYEE
2006
OMTR
$138,000
GOOG
$666,000
SPSS
$219,000
SPSS Stock
Google Stock
Omniture Stock
Strategic Assessment






SWOT
BCG
General Strategic Orientation
Grand Strategy Clusters
Grand Strategy Selection Matrix
Recommendations


Corporate Strategy
Business Strategy
SWOT
Strengths
-Strong brand awareness
-Culture
-Innovation
-Customer service
-Organizational structure
-Increasing revenues
-Market share
-Distribution channels
-Strategic alliances
-CASH
Opportunities
-Leadership
-Acquire technology
-Foreign market growth
-Strategic alliances
-Demand
-Brand equity
-Product breadth
Weaknesses
-Uncontrolled cost
-No economies of scale
-Vision
Threat
-Google, Yahoo, Coremetrics
-Emerging US recession
-Click Fraud
-Government regulations
-New entrants
-Fast product cycle
SiteCatalyst
Discover
Datawarehouse
Web 2.0 Optimization
General Strategic Orientation
Weaknesses
Turnaround
Defensive
Opportunities
Threats
Aggressive
Diversification
Strength
Grand Strategy Clusters
Weakening Competitive
Position
Turnaround
Merge With Competitors
Liquidation
Rapid Growth
Slow Growth
Concentrated Growth
Vertical Integration
Strategic Alliances
Improving Competitive Position
Grand Strategy Selection Matrix
Weaknesses
Turnaround
Divestiture
Strategic Alliances
Opportunities
Threats
Integration
Diversification
Concentrated Growth
Innovation
Strength
Corporate Level Strategy

Remain in web-analytics industry




Focus on expansion
Gain market share through global acquisitions
Possible mergers and acquisitions of
competitors
Economies of scope
Business Level Strategy



Focused differentiation
Invest in engineering to attract and retain customers
Hire employees based on the following factors






Proven professionalism
Competitiveness
Intelligence
Excellence
Fun
Build upon strong brand
Omniture’s Future





Expansive growth in industry
Increase market share through acquisition
Create clear vision and mission
Expand business operations globally
Strategic partnership with consulting firm
Once you go Omniture you never go back!
DRINKS?
Download