Uploaded by Diego Rios

Research Essay (1)

advertisement
Rios 1
Diego Rios
Mrs. Griggs
AP Lang
10 December 2022
The Overlooked Benefits of Doping in Athletics
For decades countries like Russia and China have attempted to gain the edge in sporting
events like the Olympics by a method of cheating referred to as doping. Doping, which is
common from amateur all the way up to professional sports, typically involves an athlete
consuming banned substances like anabolic steroids and hormones. Despite technological
advances making it easier to catch and regulate performance-enhancing drugs, or PEDs, it is still
a prevalent problem in many sports leagues. However, while doping often has a negative and
cynical connotation, some banned substances have been shown to have significant physical and
mental health benefits. Though drug use among athletes can be seen as giving an “unfair”
advantage and can have a detrimental effect on an athlete’s health, doping should be less strictly
regulated because some recreational and performance enhancing substances can be beneficial to
athletes’ performance and health.
One example of this is certain androgens, or sex hormones, and anabolic steroids can help
improve athlete’s quality of life and speed up recovery, while also having negligible side effects.
A review published to the National Library of Medicine concluded that testosterone
supplementation, often referred to as TRT, had more than several benefits which include
improvements in mood, energy, sense of well-being, cognition, and overall quality of life (Bassil
et al. 431). This shows how androgen supplementation can result in significant health benefits
which could help athletes perform better, while not necessarily being “performance-enhancing”.
Rios 2
Because of this, androgens should be a large factor to consider by anti-doping agencies when it
comes to the wellbeing of their athletes. In a study conducted on rats by the Yale School of
Medicine, they found that anabolic steroids may “enhance the healing process” and “aid in the
healing of muscle contusion [bruise] injury”, concluding that anabolic steroids could potentially
have an “ethical clinical application” in regard to muscle damage (Beiner et al. 2, 9). While the
androgen research proved to have notable mental and cognitive health advantages, anabolic
steroids have been shown to provide considerable physical health benefits like efficiently healing
injuries. Due to this, athletes could hypothetically minimize the number of injuries they endure
and the amount recovery time they need. This, along with the benefits androgens provide,
demonstrates potential reasons doping should be less strictly regulated.
Despite steroids being the most commonly used and abused substances by athletes, they
aren’t the only thing that WADA and other anti-doping organizations are looking for; some
substances, namely growth hormone peptides, can improve bodily functions such as the healing
process while possessing minimal side effects. According to an article from Healthline by Alina
Petre, a sports medicine dietician, peptides can have very remarkable and beneficial effects, and
can even, “prevent blood clots, boost the immune system, protect cells against damage, and
reduce cholesterol, inflammation, and blood pressure.” This shows how peptides, despite being a
banned substance by anti-doping agencies, can provide a plethora of positive health benefits
which could improve athletes’ health and prevent injury. Because of these benefits, athletes and
coaches should push for reconsideration of the anti-doping policies when it comes to peptides. In
reference to the same article, side effects from peptides appear to be minimal and have no longlasting effects; on the contrary, temporary effects like increased appetite, elevated blood sugar
levels, fluid retention, and increased insulin sensitivity appear to be prevalent (Petre). However,
despite these common side effects, symptoms are very minor and can easily be managed, unlike
Rios 3
side effects from anabolic steroids. Because the risk to reward ratio is very favorable, peptides
make for a great supplement for athletes and further supports why doping needs to be regulated
less.
However, though performance enhancing substances are often the key suspects when it
comes to doping, certain recreational drugs also tend to get athletes in trouble. Marijuana, a drug
that is for the most part legal in the United States and in over 30 countries worldwide, can
potentially be beneficial to athletes as it has been shown to reduce stress and improve the focus
of users. According to research conducted by Susan Stoner (ironic right) at the University of
Washington, both THC and CBD, the two main substances found in Marijuana, have been shown
to decrease stress and anxiety (Stoner 1). This shows how Marijuana, which also often has a
negative stigma surrounding it, can actually reduce anxiety and may be more beneficial than it is
detrimental. Because of this, Marijuana usage could help athletes who struggle with anxiety,
which could partially be caused by sport-induced stress. Located later in the same research
article, Stoner later explains how Marijuana intoxication is reportedly associated with the ability
to simultaneously focus on multiple things, while impairing unintentional focus shifts (2). What
this means is that Marijuana enhances focus all around by enabling users to multitask more
effectively while minimizing distractions and getting off topic. This can also be beneficial to
athletes by helping them focus while performing, which supports the argument that recreational
drugs should be less strictly regulated by anti-doping agencies. Athletes often get banned for
using these substances even though they are non-performance-enhancing and sometimes don’t
relate to the sport itself. Sha’carri Richardson, an American sprinter, was suspended from the
Tokyo Olympics in 2021 due to a positive Marijuana test, which she was using to aid with stress
and mental health issues. This is a prime example of an athlete that was reprimanded for using a
banned substance that provided her with no performance-enhancing benefits but was instead
Rios 4
used for improving her own well-being. Occurrences like this further support the argument that
doping should be less-strictly regulated. In 2019, Brooklyn Nets player Wilson Chandler was
suspended from the NBA for taking Ipamorelin, an aforementioned growth-hormone peptide
prescribed by his doctor to aid the healing process and injury rehab. While Ipamorelin does
increase endogenous growth hormone and increase muscle mass, Chandler was reportedly taking
smaller doses which would heal the wound without providing significant athletic benefits. This,
as well as Sha’carri Richardson’s incident, provides solid evidence as to why anti-doping
agencies should be more lenient with certain banned substances, as athletes are often punished
for recreational, non-performance-enhancing usage.
Unfortunately, many people are still calling for a ban on doping because they can
indirectly improve performance by mitigating external factors. Additionally, the majority of
PEDs and anabolic steroids have very severe and often life-long side effects, which can be
detrimental to health without proper usage. However, thanks to the growing amount of steroid
awareness and information due to the internet and social media platforms, there is a vast amount
of knowledge on how to properly use PEDs without experiencing severe side effects. In addition,
the top-level athletes that would likely be using said PEDs would also have top-level physicians
and top-level coaches who know what drugs to use and how to use them safely. While the claim
that these substances can increase muscle mass which would improve performance and could
therefore be abused are technically true, the majority of people who would be using PEDs would
be running dosages that aren’t large enough to facilitate significant muscle growth. This is
because possession of these drugs is illegal without a prescription, and prescription dosages tend
to be for health benefits, not enough to yield considerable anabolism.
In conclusion, doping should be less strictly regulated because some recreational and
performance enhancing substances can be beneficial to athletes’ performance and health.
Rios 5
Androgens, anabolic steroids, growth hormone peptides, and recreational drugs have all been
found to directly improve users’ health and quality of life by improving mood, reducing stress,
and speeding up the healing process. Though there is often a negative stigma that comes with
doping, which is typically due to the negative side effects and frequent abuse that results in
significant performance enhancement, low-dosage and recreational doping should be considered
out of the respect for athletes’ personal well-being.
Rios 6
Works Cited
Bassil, Nazem et al. “The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review.”
Therapeutics and clinical risk management vol. 5,3 (2009): 427-48.
doi:10.2147/tcrm.s3025
Beiner, J M et al. “The effect of anabolic steroids and corticosteroids on healing of muscle
contusion injury.” The American journal of sports medicine vol. 27,1 (1999): 2-9.
doi:10.1177/03635465990270011101
Petre, Alina M. “Peptides for Bodybuilding: Do They Work, and Are They Safe?” Healthline, 3
Dec. 2020, www.healthline.com/nutrition/peptides-for-bodybuilding.
Stoner SA. Effects of Marijuana on Mental Health: Depression. Alcohol & Drug Abuse Institute,
University of Washington, June 2017. URL:
http://adai.uw.edu/pubs/pdf/2017mjdepression.pdf.
Download