Proposal Evaluation Form Evaluation Form for the Report of Proposed Database Project. (Weighted: 4%)
5
Excellent
4
Exceeds
Expectations
3
Meets
Expectations
2
Needs
Improvement
1
Below
Expectations
Student has
excelled in
performing the
competency,
works
independently.
Student has
completed the
work and
exceeded
activity
requirements.
Student performed
the
competency very well,
was above average in
effectiveness and/or
consistency.
Student performed
the competency at
an acceptable level.
Assistance guidance
from preceptor was
occasionally
necessary.
Student attempted
but did not achieve
competency in all
areas. Needs
improvement.
Unacceptable.
Performance was
below
expectations.
Needs significant
improvement.
Criteria
Score
1
Writing
Style
(Technica
l Skills)
Sentences
aren’t clear
and
continuous
Gramma
r and/or
punctuati
on,
capitaliz
ation
errors.
2
Sentences
are
generally clear
but may have
awkward
structure;
there may be
patterns of
punctuation
errors. Shows
a pattern of
errors in
grammar,
and/or
punctuation.
3
Sentences
are clear but
the reader
may lose
interest in
some
sections of
the paper. A
few errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
and
capitalization,
but not
many.
W
ei
gh
t
4
Sentences
are clear
and hold
the reader’s
interest
with ease.
Good use
of
grammar,
punctuati
on, and
capitaliza
tion.
5
Sentence
s are very
clear and
hold the
reader’s
interest
with
ease.
Excell
ent
use of
gram
mar,
punctuati
on, and
capitaliz
ation.
W
2
Tota
l
Sco
re
T
o
t
a
l
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
Wx
Score
1
0
Complet
eness
(Content
)
● Front
Page
Cover
Many
required
data has
not
displayed.
Some required
data has not
displayed but
not many.
Free from
errors. All
required
data has
been
displayed
.
1
3
● Table
of
Conten
ts
No page
numbers
listed.
Some of the
page
numbers are
in
wrong
position.
All page
numbers
being
entered
accordin
gly.
1
3
●
Membe
rs’
Profile
Many of
the
required
details
have not
been
reported, and
do not have
the
elements
of
creativity
.
Some of
the
required
details
have not
been
reported, but
have the
elements of
creativity.
All required
details have
been
reported in
creative
ways but
there is quite
many errors
made.
1
5
All
required
details
plus
additional
details has
been
reported in
creative
ways, but
there is
still few
errors
made.
All
required
details
with
picture
from
each
group
memb
ers,
plus
additionl
details
has been
reported
in
creative
ways.
Page 1 of 3
Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences
Proposal Evaluation Form
Criteria
Score
1
2
3
4
5
W
e
i
g
h
t
T
o
t
a
l
S
c
o
r
e
W
Wx
Sco
re
T
o
t
a
l
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
●Introducti
on to
Organizatio
n
Organizatio
nal
Backgroun
d
•
Organizationa
l Chart
●
Current
System
Descri
ptions
Poor
description
of facts.
Much
informatio
n is not
provided.
Paragraph
lack of clear
ideas. Not
enough
information
provided
from the
organization
Some
paragraph
s have
clear
ideas,
but the
paragraph
transitions
are
weak.
Provid
e
basic
informatio
n from
the
organiz
ation
Most
paragrap
hs have
clear
ideas,
and
provide
additio
nal
inform
ation
from
the
organiz
ation.
All
paragr
aphs
have
clear
ideas,
and
provide
additio
nal
information
and
necessary
pictures or
images
from the
organizatio
n.
1
5
Not
include
d
employ
ees’
title
position
s or
only
include the
name of
the staff;
not the full
name of
the staff.
The
information
is not
specific
and
related.
Not included
either
employees’
title
positions or
the full
name of the
staff. The
information
is related
but not
specific.
Includ
es all
employees’
title
positions
with the
respective
full name
of the staff.
The chart
has been
illustrated
in a normal
style look.
Includ
es all
employees’
title with
the
respective
full name
of the staff.
The chart
has been
illustrated
in an
interest
ing
style
look.
Includ
es all
employ
ees’
title
positions
with the
respectiv
e full
name of
the staff.
The chart
has been
illustrated
in a
corpor
ate
style
look.
1
5
Conten
t is not
sound.
Content is
sound and
solid;
descripti
on are
present
but not
particular
ly
develope
d or
supported;
some
evidence,
but
usually of
a
generalized
nature. Only
provide
process
flow
chart.
Wellpresen
ted;
descrip
tions
are
detailed,
developed
and
supported
with
evidence
and
details,
mostly
specifi
c.
Exception
ally well
presente
d;
descrip
tions
are
detaile
d, well
develo
ped,
supported
with
specific
evidence &
facts, as
well as
exampl
es.
Exceptio
nally well
presente
d;
descrip
tions
are
detaile
d, well
develo
ped,
suppor
ted
with
specific
evidence
& facts,
as well as
exampl
es and
proces
s flow
chart.
2
1
0
●
Current
Problem
State
ments
Provide
less than
three
statement
s. No
descriptio
ns
and
exampl
es
given.
Provide
wrong
facts.
Provide
less than
three
statements
with brief
descripti
on. No
example
s given.
Irrelevant
explanation
s and
examples
given.
Provid
e three
statements.
No
description
s and
examples
given.
Provid
e three
statem
ents
with
brief
description
for each
statement.
No
examples
given.
Provid
e three
statem
ents
and
large
amounts
of
specific
examples
and
detailed
descrip
tions.
1
5
Page 2 of 3
Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences
Proposal Evaluation Form
Criteria
Score
1
2
3
4
5
W
e
i
g
h
t
T
o
t
a
l
S
c
o
r
e
W
W
x
S
c
o
r
e
T
o
t
a
l
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
●Propos
ed
Databas
e
Objectiv
es
● Initial
Propose
d ERD
●
Referenc
es
1
5
Provide
all
correct
connecti
vities,
labels
and
notati
ons.
2
6
Listed
referenc
es
conform
to APA
style
citatio
n.
Provi
de at
least
three
refere
nces.
1
3
(3
.
0
)
N
A
Provide less
than three
statements.
No descriptions
and
examples
given.
Provide
wrong facts.
Provide
less than
three
statemen
ts with
brief
descrip
tion.
No
exampl
es
given.
Irrelev
ant
explanati
ons and
examples
given.
Provi
de
three
state
ments
No
descripti
ons and
exampl
es
given.
Many errors
in
connectivitie
s,
labels and
notations.
Some
errors
in
connec
tivities,
labels
and
notatio
ns.
The sources
are
not cited
correctly
according to
APA style, nor
listed
correctly.Only
one reference
is listed.
There
may
be a
few errors
in APA
style
citation.
Only two
reference
s are
provided.
Penalty
for late
submissio
n, no
evaluation
form or
issue of
plagiarism
TOTAL SCORE
Provide
three
statem
ents
with
brief
description
for each
statement.
No
examples
given.
Provid
e three
statem
ents
and
large
amounts
of specific
examples
and
detailed
descrip
tions.
6
0
NurAsyira, Nik Ruslawati
Page 3 of 3
Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences