Uploaded by Robby Kunar

Case study teenage pregnancy & Rubric

advertisement
N3262 Academic Paper Outline (25% of total grade)
Due: End of Week 4, Saturday November 19th at 23:59hr
(Submit via Brightspace)
Objective
For students to use their critical thinking to assess, analyze and manage a postpartum
problem using their knowledge, skills, and evidenced-based guidelines to support their
practice.
Resources
Perinatal Services BC Practice Guidelines http://www.perinatalservicesbc.ca/
BC and federal government websites, BC Women’s website, peer reviewed articles
Scenario
History
Jane (she/her/hers) is a 12-year-old female with mild intellectual disabilities (mild
decrease in her mental functioning, difficulty expressing herself verbally, needs help to take
care of herself physically, and needs help with her social skills).
Jane’s mother discovered Jane’s abdomen was distended and took her to the family doctor.
A urine pregnancy test was positive. Janes abdomen palpated at approximately 32 weeks
gestation. The father of the baby is unknown.
Jane and her parents were referred to the obstetrical group at BC Women’s Hospital. The
health care team consists of an obstetrician, pediatrician, anesthesiologist, registered
nurses, and child life specialist. All antenatal testing was completed and was normal.
Janes ultrasound indicated a single baby with normal growth parameters for a 32-week
pregnancy. The baby’s internal organs were normal.
Jane is only 12 years old and does not have the maturity to make decisions on her own. A
referral was made for a social worker.
A birth plan was created. The medical team and Janes parents decided Jane would not need
any medical intervention unless it was warranted.
Labor and delivery
Jane arrived at the labor and delivery (L&D) unit at 38 weeks’ gestation in spontaneous,
active labor. She was accompanied by her parents. Her father stayed outside of the
delivery room.
Jane was scared and did not understand why she was experiencing pain. Jane was given an
epidural. The L&D nurse, child life specialist, obstetrician, and mother supported Jane
throughout her labor.
Her pain was well managed with an epidural. Jane had a normal spontaneous vaginal
delivery (SVD) with no complications. There was a small first-degree perineal tear that did
not require suturing.
Third Stage of Labor
Jane was given 10iu of oxytocin I.M. in her left thigh. The third stage of labor was actively
managed, the placenta and membranes were delivered complete by controlled cord
traction. The cord had three blood vessels. Blood loss was approximately 600mLs. Jane was
given an IV 1000mL of Normal Saline (with 10iu of oxytocin in the bag) to reduce the risk
of further blood loss.
Newborn
Jane gave birth to a live, female, APGARS 61, 85, 910 , weight 2990g.
The baby was assessed to have nasal flaring and was grunting and had a reduced oxygen
saturation. The baby was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for
observation for 36hrs.
Jane was seen by the lactation consultant (LC) as the plan was for her to exclusively
breastfeed. The LC supported her with pumping and early feeding for her baby.
Criteria
Discuss specific issues Jane might face in the six-week postpartum period (puerperium).
Consider Jane’s situation using the following headings below.
You must complete headings 1 to 4. You can then choose 1 subject from headings 5 to 7.
Mandatory (4):
1. Postpartum factors (think holistically e.g., physical, mental, emotional and spiritual
well-being) up to six-weeks postpartum
2. Contraception (e.g., What would be a good choice for Jane? Why?)
3. What would be the process if the baby was given up for adoption (e.g., who can
make this decision?).
4. External supports (e.g., social worker, babysitter, community supports)
Optional (1):
5. Family stigma/social barriers
6. Financial supports/entitlements (think of federal, provincial, and other)
7. Legal implications of Jane becoming pregnant at such a young age
Process
Written as an academic paper using APA 7th Edition. Maximum 12 pages.
Use 12 font.
Submission
Submit your assignment by the due date into a Bright Space Drop Box called: Critical
Thinking Paper (and include your full name in the saved document).
N3262 RUBRIC for PAPER
Information 55%
Excellent 25
points
(N/A)
Paper has detailed
information about
relevant issues
Rationale
supports the
information and
issues being
discussed
Good 20 points
Average 15
points
Insufficient 10
points
Paper has less
detailed
information and
misses some
important issues
Insufficient
rationale is
provided for the
issues being
discussed
Paper has very
little information
of relevance
Paper lacks
information and is
often irrelevant
Very little
Rationale is
rationale is
insubstantial
provided and is
and/or lacking
often insubstantial
to the issues
Follows
Guidelines &
Directions 15%
Applicability of
discussion is
excellent
Applicability of
discussion is good
Discussion is not
always applicable
to the subject
Discussion is way
off topic and not
applicable to the
subject
Organization &
Structure, APA
20%
Organization and
structure of the
paper is excellent,
and writing is
very easy to
follow.
Organization and
structure of the
paper is good.
Writing is a little
unstructured and
a little difficult to
follow.
Organization and
structure of the
paper is fair, a
little disorganized,
and unstructured.
The writing is
very difficult to
follow.
Organization and
structure of the
paper is lacking,
and the writing
does not often
make sense.
Paragraphs are
Paragraphs are
Paragraphs are
Paragraphs are
not all well
Grammar and
Punctuation
10 %
very well
organized, and
transitions are
well thought out.
organized, and
transitions are
not always well
thought out.
disjointed, and
lack transition of
thoughts.
APA citations and
references are
used
appropriately and
are accurate.
References are
accurate.
APA citations and
references are
occasionally used
inappropriately or
inaccurately
References have
a few errors or
omissions.
APA citations and
references are
often
inappropriately or
inaccurately
References have
many errors or
omissions.
Paper contains an
occasional
grammatical,
punctuation, and
spelling error.
Paper contains
more than a few
grammatical,
punctuation and
spelling errors
Paper contains
many
grammatical,
punctuation, and
spelling errors.
Language is clear
& precise.
Language lacks
clarity.
Sentences are
consistently
strong
Sentences not
always
consistently
strong.
Language use is
conversational.
Sentences are
consistently weak.
not present, and
there are no
transitions of
thoughts.
APA citations and
references are
used
inappropriately or
inaccurately
References are
have inaccurate
Rules of grammar
usage and
punctuation are
not followed.
Language is very
muddled.
Sentences have
too many
mistakes.
Download