electronics Article Open-Loop Class-BD Audio Amplifiers with Balanced Common-Mode Output Wojciech Kołodziejski * , Stanisław Kuta * and Jacek Jasielski * Department of Electronics, Telecommunications and Mechatronics, University of Applied Sciences in Tarnow, 33-100 Tarnow, Poland * Correspondence: w_kolodziejski@pwsztar.edu.pl (W.K.); st_kuta@pwsztar.edu.pl (S.K.); j_jasielski@pwsztar.edu.pl (J.J.) Citation: Kołodziejski, W.; Kuta, S.; Jasielski, J. Open-Loop Class-BD Audio Amplifiers with Balanced Common-Mode Output. Electronics 2021, 10, 1381. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/electronics10121381 Academic Editor: Raed A. Abd-Alhameed Abstract: This paper presents new architectures and implementations of original open-loop Class-BD audio amplifiers with balanced Common-Mode output. The output stage of each proposed amplifier includes the typical H-bridge with four MOSFETs and four additional MOSFET switches that balance and keep the Common-Mode output constant. The presented amplifiers employ the extended NBDD PWM or PSC PWM modulation scheme. When the output stage is built only on NMOSFET transistors, gate drivers require a floating power supply, using a self-boost charge pump with capacitive isolation of the control signal. The use of complementary MOSFETs in the output stage greatly simplifies gate control systems. The proposed amplifiers were compared to the typical Class-BD configuration, using the optimal NBDD modulation with respect to audio performance of the Differential-Mode (DM) and Common-Mode (CM) outputs. Basic SPICE simulations and experimental studies have shown that the proposed Class-BD amplifiers have similar audio performance to the prototype with the optimal NBDD modulation scheme, while at the same time having a balanced constant voltage CM output, thus eliminating the main contributor to radiation emission. As a result, the filtering of the DM output signals can be greatly simplified, while the filtering of the CM output signals can be theoretically eliminated. Practically, due to the timing errors added by the gate drivers, spikes are generated at the CM output, which are very easy to filter out by the reduced LC output filter, even at very low L. Keywords: Class-BD audio amplifier; Common-Mode (CM) and Differential-Mode (DM) output signals; Natural sampling Class-BD Double sided modulation (NBDD PWM); Phase Shifted Carrier PWM (PSC PWM) Received: 27 April 2021 Accepted: 7 June 2021 Published: 9 June 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 1. Introduction Many works have been dedicated to different kinds of improved PWM methods and Class D power amplifier topologies in order to achieve two of the most important features: high fidelity and high efficiency. Class-D amplifier architectures can generally be divided into two categories: openloop Class-D amplifiers with natural pulse width modulation (NPWM), or its discretetime version known as uniform PWM (UPWM); and closed-loop ones with Sigma–Delta modulation (SDM) and bang–bang control modulation. Depending on the sampling method, PWM schemes are generally categorized in three of the most important classes: natural NPWM, uniform UPWM and linearized PWM (LPWM) [1,2]. In addition, each PWM sampling method also distinguishes one-edge or two-edge PWM, as well as two-level (Class-AD) or three-level (Class-BD) switching. Among four fundamental NPWM schemes, NBDD (Natural sampling Class-BD Double sided) modulation, which is equivalent to the level-three version of Phase Shifted Carrier Pulse Width Modulation (PSC PWM) [1,2], is the best in terms of the DM output and has by far the most 4.0/). Electronics 2021, 10, 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121381 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 most attractive spectral characteristic, which contains much less unwanted spectral com‐ ponents than all other PWM methods. 17 The H‐bridge output stage of the Class‐BD amplifier with the appropriate2 ofNBDD modulator and time domain waveforms of the control signals and output voltages are shown in Figure 1. attractive spectral characteristic, whichtime contains much the less switch unwanted spectral components The control signals contain dead between states where all switches than all other PWM methods. are off to achieve zero voltage switching (ZVS) and to prevent shoot‐through currents. The H-bridge output stage of the Class-BD amplifier with the appropriate NBDD The DM and CM outputs of the NBDD modulation can be expressed after some con‐ modulator and time domain waveforms of the control signals and output voltages are version by in theFigure following Double Fourier Series (DFS) expressions [1–3]: shown 1. 1. Class-BD amplifier, using NBDD PWM modulator:(a) (a)Block Block diagram; diagram; (b) waveforms of: NBDD Figure Figure 1. Class‐BD amplifier, using NBDD PWM modulator: (b)time timedomain domain waveforms of: NBDD and voltages at DM outputs. output output signalssignals and voltages at DM andand CMCM outputs. The control signals contain dead time between the switch states where all switches zero voltage switching (ZVS) and to prevent shoot-through currents. The M and CM outputs of the NBDD modulation mDM can be expressed after some J n ( m n ) n n 2 by sin the following (DFS) expressions [1–3]: m c n Series 4conversion m )t sin Double sin Fourier DM FNBDD (t ) are M cos( m t )achieve offto m DM FNBDD (t) = M cos( m t ) ∞ ∞ m 1 n 1 2 2 2 M (ωm t)− cosmπM Jn ( 2 ) (m+n)π nπ nπ sin sin 2 sin mΩ = ∑ ∑ mπ 2 2 m4 M − c + nωm )t − 2 J m=1 n=± 1 n 2 m 2 n 1 2 t )+ sin 2 m 2 n 1 t sin ( ω 4 = M cos m m c 2 m ∞ ±∞ 2 2 m 1 n 0 2mπM [2m+(2n+1)]π Jn ( 2 ) c + (2n + 1)ωm } t + π +4 ∑ ∑ sin sin 2mΩ { 2mπ 2 2 (1) (1) m =1 n =0 mπM ∞ m M J 0 FCM (t) = 2 ∑ J0 ( mπ2 ) sin mπ cos(mΩc t)+ NBDD 2 m 2 CM sin m=1cos (m2 t ) FNBDD (t ) 2 (2) c m ∞ ∞ 2 Jn( mπM (m+n)π m 1 2 ) +2 ∑ ∑ sin 1 + cos nπ cos mΩ + nω ) t ( ) [( ] mπ c m 2 2 2 m=1 n=±1 (2) M2πF Ωm= c —switching angle frequency, ωm = 2π fm —audio angle frequency, M— where c J m n n 2 index, sin M ∈ [0, 1], 1Jn—Bessel modulation function n-th order. 2 cos n cos (m c ofn m )t m 2 that m 1 n 1 Equation (1) shows effective sampling frequency of the DM output signal is 2without increasing the transition frequency onthe output, and all harmonics doubled around odd multiples of the switching frequency are eliminated. However, the CM output (Equation some drawback, as the frequency spectrum of the NBDD output —switching angle frequency, where c 2(2)) Fc reveals m 2 f m —audio angle frequency, contains the odd harmonics of the switching frequency and their even intermodulation M—modulation index, 𝑀 ∈ 0,1 , 𝐽 —Bessel function of n‐th order. (IM) components. The CM output components are present at full scale, even at a very low Equation shows that effective sampling frequency of the DM output signal is dou‐ level of the (1) modulating signal. bled without increasing the transition frequency on the output, and all harmonics around Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 3 of 17 Fast switching of the output transistors, nearly rail-to-rail high swings, and wide frequency spectrum of PWM signals can lead to high-frequency RF emissions and interference from the output stage, printed circuit board traces, filter and speaker cables, which become inadvertent antennas [4–7]. A properly designed external LC filter, placed as close as possible to the switching output stage, suppresses the unwanted RF effects, limits the amount of the output ripple current, protects the speaker by attenuating the switching frequency, and also reduces EMI [8–10]. The LC filter for the Class-BD amplifier with NBDD modulation must be designed separately for DM and CM components. Filtration of unwanted components of the spectrum at the DM output is very easy because the NBDD frequency spectrum has no harmonics of the switching frequency, and no IM components around odd multiples of the switching frequency. In terms of DM output, NBDD is the best and has, by far, the most attractive spectral characteristics for all the other NPWM methods. However, the frequency spectrum of the NBDD CM output contains the odd harmonics of the switching frequency, and their even IM components (2). The CM output components are present at full scale, even at a very low level of the modulating signal. The IM components around the first harmonic of the switching frequency are the most undesirable because they put strong demands on the CM output signals filtering. The output filter of the Cass-BD amplifier uses, most often, a common mode choke coil instead of two normal inductors, which results in more effective CM output signal suppression because the CM choke coil exhibits much larger impedance for the CM output current than for the DM one [9,10]. In the last decade, filterless Class-D amplifiers have become very popular [10–12]. The output of the filterless Class-D amplifier is directly connected to a load (speaker), and the load itself provides filtering. In many recent studies, the theory behind PWM and different modulation schemes, as well as new linearization methods, have been discussed; thus, high-fidelity improvements and EMI reduction of the filterless Class-D amplifiers have been proposed [6,7,12–16]. An original, Common-Mode Free BD (CMFBD) modulation that keeps the CM output constant is presented in [7]. The DM output of this amplifier has the same performance as that using the optimal NBDD modulation; however, the switching frequency of the power MOSFETs creating the new H-bridge output stage is doubled. A detailed analysis of the presented CMFBD modulation shows that it is equivalent to the Phase Shifted Carrier Pulse Width Modulation (PSC PWM) that is considered as a multi-level PWM method for Class-BD amplifiers [1,2]. Figure 2 shows the circuit diagram of the Class-BD output stage, using the PSCPMW modulation scheme and the block diagram of the PSC PWM modulator that generates all control S1 –S3 signals [2,7]. The H-bridge contains two additional series switches, M5 and M6, connected parallel with the load, which are used to shunt the bi-directional inductive load current when M1–M4 are off and to set both outputs at VDD /2 with the help of shunt resistor Rb connected parallel with M1–M4 transistors. The DM and CM outputs of the PSC PWM modulation can be expressed after some conversion by the following DFS expressions [2,3]: DM ( t ) = M cos( ω t )+ FFSC m mπM ∞ ±∞ Jn ( 2 ) (m+n)π = +2 ∑ ∑ sin 1 − cos ( nπ )] sin m Ω + nω ) t [ [ ] c m mπ 2 m=1 n=±1 = M cos(ωm t)+ ∞ ±∞ Jn ( 2mπM ) [2m+(2n+1)]π 2 +4 ∑ ∑ sin sin 2mΩ + 2n + 1 ω t [{ ( ) ] } c m 2mπ 2 (3) m =1 n =0 CM FFSC (t) = 1 2 (4) Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 Electronics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 17 4 of 17 2. Class-BD amplifier based PSC PWM modulationscheme: scheme: (a) ofof PSC PWM modulator; (b) the FigureFigure 2. Class‐BD amplifier based on on PSC PWM modulation (a) Block Blockdiagram diagram PSC PWM modulator; (b) the output stage; (c) time domain waveforms at the outputs of the modulator and amplifier. output stage; (c) time domain waveforms at the outputs of the modulator and amplifier. Comparing Equations (1) and (2) with the corresponding Equations (3) and (4), as well with Figure 2c, we can see that the DM output of the Class-BD amplifier with the PSC PWM is identical to that one for the mmodulation M optimal NBDD PWM; however, J n n) constant. keeps 2 the (m output PSC PWM CM sin 2 1 cos(n ) sin m c n m )t m of 2PSC PWM modulation is the need to use two additional series mThe 1 n 1 disadvantage switches,M5 and M6, as well as switching power transistors with twice the frequency(3) of M cos(m t ) NBDD modulation, which results in higher switching power losses. In addition, power in 2mshunt M resistors R connected in parallel with the M1–M4 to set both outputs losses occur J n 2m 2n b 1 2 atV4DD /2, which alsosinincrease the rise and times of the PWM output pulses, contributing sin fall 2m c 2 n 1 m t 2m 2 1 n 0 switching to a mfurther increase in power losses. The organization of this paper is as follows. Section 2 presents original architectures and implementations CM of Class-BD 1 audio amplifiers with the balanced CM output. The FFSC (t ) amplifier includes the typical H-bridge with four MOSFETs (4) output stage of each proposed 2 and four additional MOSFET switches that balance and keep the Common-Mode output constant. The Equations presented amplifiers the corresponding extended NBDDEquations PWM or PSC PWM Comparing (1) and (2)employ with the (3) and (4), as modulation schemes. Section 3 presents basic SPICE simulations and experimental studies well as Figure 1b with Figure 2c, we can see that the DM output of the Class‐BD amplifier thePSC proposed amplifiers implemented the complementary MOSFET pairs.how‐ withofthe PWMClass-BD modulation is identical to that on one for the optimal NBDD PWM; Conclusions are given in Section 4. DM FFSC (t ) as M Figure cos(m t ) 1b ever, PSC PWM keeps the CM output constant. disadvantage of with PSC Balanced PWM modulation the need to two additional 2.The Class-BD Amplifiers CM OutputisEmploying theuse Extended NBDD series PWM or PSC PWM Modulation Scheme switches, M5 and M6, as well as switching power transistors with twice the frequency of Figure 3a shows a slightly improved version of the Class-BD audio amplifier withpower a NBDD modulation, which results in higher switching power losses. In addition, balanced CM output [3], using the extended NBDD PWM modulator (Figure 3c). losses occur in shunt resistors Rb connected in parallel with the M1–M4 to set both outputs at V DD 2 , which also increase the rise and fall times of the PWM output pulses, contrib‐ uting to a further increase in switching power losses. The organization of this paper is as follows. Section 2 presents original architectures and implementations of Class‐BD audio amplifiers with the balanced CM output. The output stage of each proposed amplifier includes the typical H‐bridge with four MOSFETs Conclusions are given in Section 4. Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 2. Class‐BD Amplifiers with Balanced CM Output Employing the Extended NBDD PWM or PSC PWM Modulation Scheme 5 of 17 Figure 3a shows a slightly improved version of the Class‐BD audio amplifier with a balanced CM output [3], using the extended NBDD PWM modulator (Figure 3c). 3. Class-BD audio amplifier with balancedCM CMoutput, output, using using the PWM modulator: (a) Topology FigureFigure 3. Class‐BD audio amplifier with balanced theextended extendedNBDD NBDD PWM modulator: (a) Topology the output stage, (b) time domain waveformsatatthe theoutputs outputs of the amplifier. (c) Block diagram of theof the of the of output stage, (b) time domain waveforms themodulator modulatorand and amplifier. (c) Block diagram extended NBDD PWM modulator. Floatinggate gatedriver driver with with galvanic of of thethe control signal. galvanicisolation isolation control signal. extended NBDD PWM modulator. (d)(d) Floating This amplifier consists of a typical H-bridge output stage with four MOSFETs, and This amplifier consists of a typical H‐bridge output stage with four MOSFETs, and four additional MOSFET switches (M5, M6 and M7, M8), separating the H-bridge from fourtheadditional MOSFET switches (M5, M6 and M7, M8), separating the H‐bridge from power supply, and switching the bridge’s power rails to the half-voltage VDD /2, at the the time power supply, and switching the bridge’s poweror rails the half‐voltage VDD/2, intervals in which the MOSFETs of the high-side the to low-side of the H-bridge areat the time intervals in which the MOSFETs of the high‐side or the low‐side of the H‐bridge closed simultaneously. At these states, when M1, M3 transistors of the high-side are on, M7 are closed At these states, when M1, M3 transistors are on, is offsimultaneously. and M8 is on, whereas when M2, M4 transistors of the low-side of arethe on, high‐side M5 is off and is on. frequency of all MOSFETs is the same as for NBDD are modulation, M7M6 is off andThe M8switching is on, whereas when M2, M4 transistors of the low‐side on, M5 is off asThe low switching as that for PSC PWM modulation as shown in Figure 2b.for NBDD modula‐ andi.e., M6twice is on. frequency of all MOSFETs is the same as When all gate drivers UCC27537 have the same turn-on and turn-off propagation tion, i.e., twice as low as that for PSC PWM modulation as shown in Figure 2b. delays (according to the datasheet, it is 17 ns), the modulated PWM waveform at the H-bridge output is undistorted and is only delayed in relation to the control signals. These delays do not have to be the same, as it is necessary to introduce an appropriate delay time on the rising edges of all control signals turning on the MOSFETs, with respect to the falling edges of all control signals turning off the MOSFETs. This allows a zero-switching Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 6 of 17 voltage to be achieved to prevent shoot-through currents during switching processes; however, dead time in particular has the most significant contribution of nonlinearity in the H-bridge output. The optimal turn-on delay time for MOSFETs is a compromise between low shoot-through currents and low switching power losses, and an acceptable THD level at the output of the class D amplifier. To implement this delay, an input AND gate with two Schmitt Trigger inputs of the UCC27537 were used (Figure 3c). Time constant Rd Cd of the circuit connected to one of the inputs of this gate determines the appropriate delay time on the rising edges of control signal turning on the MOSFET. The gate driver output is connected to the gate of the transistor via a resistor RG and an anti-parallel Schottky diode, providing turn-off speed enhancement. The ground GND1 of the PWM controller is isolated from the floating ground GND of the driver, using the digital isolator ISO7420 with an insulating barrier made of silicon dioxide (SiO2). Figure 3c also shows a self-boost charge pump circuit [16], generating the floating power supply for the gate driver of the M2 transistor; the same solution applies to all other MOSFETs. Continuous switching of MCP1 ensures that the isolated and floating charge pump bias supply is available at all times to the corresponding driver, regardless of the modulation index M and without any interference with the desired phase-leg switching sequence. Much simpler solutions for gate control systems can be used when the output stage of the amplifier is implemented on complementary MOSFET pairs. As shown in Figure 4, the gate drivers of all MOSFETs share a common ground GND1 and are directly driven from the NBDD modulator outputs. The block diagram of the NBDD PWM modulator is also simpler (Figure 4d) because the output stage implemented on complementary MOSFET pairs does not need pairs of complementary control signals. Taking into account that M6 and M8 transistors are supplied with a half voltage VDD /2, the supply voltage VDD of this system should be within a limited range, described by the following inequalities: 2|VGS min ||at R DS(on) max > VDD 2 ; VDD < |VGS max | and VDD < |VDS max | (5) At the higher gate voltage |VGSmin |, the drain to source resistance R DS(on)max in the on state is less than a certain value at which the conduction power losses are still acceptable. |VDSmax | and |VGSmax | are the maximum values for complementary MOSFETs, the most common |VGSmax | < |VDSmax |, which result in the following condition: VDD < |VGSmax |. Therefore, it is not possible to use the supply voltage higher than VDSmax : VDD < |VDSmax |. Figure 4c shows a gate drive circuit with a shifted reference voltage level for the control signals that is suitable for the applications with complementary power MOSFETs with the following supply voltage: VDD < |VGS max + VZ | and VDD < |VDSmax | (6) Shown in Figure 4c, the gate driver has the ability to control turn-on and turn-off speeds independently for NMOSFET and PMOSFET. The RG resistor allows adjustment of the MOSFET turn-on speed (RGn allows to adjust the delay time of the rising edges of the PWM signal, while RGp allows to adjust the delay time of the falling edges) independently. During turn-off, the antiparallel Schottky diode shunts out serial resistor RG ; in addition, the gate charge is taken from the parallel CB capacitor charged to the Zener voltage VZ , providing turn-off speed enhancement. During the on-time of the switch, a small DC current flows in the level shifter, keeping the driver biased in the right state. An original Class-BD audio amplifier with a balanced CM output, implemented on complementary MOSFET pairs and employing an extended PSC PWM modulation scheme, is shown in Figure 5a. Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 Electronics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 17 7 of 17 4. Class-BD audio amplifierwith with balanced balanced CM output, using the extended NBDD NBDD PWM modulator and implemented FigureFigure 4. Class‐BD audio amplifier CM output, using the extended PWM modulator and imple‐ on complementary MOSFET pairs: (a) Topology of the output stage. (b) Time domain waveforms at the amplifier outputs, mented on complementary MOSFET pairs: (a) Topology of the output stage. (b) Time domain waveforms at the amplifier andand PWM control signals with delayed turn-onturn‐on times for the NMOS PMOS transistors. (c) Implementation of the and PMOS transistors. (c) Implementation outputs, PWM control signals with delayed times for the and NMOS times of of thethe NMOS and and PMOS. (d) Block diagram of the extended NBDD PWM modulator. of the turn-on turn‐ondelay delay times NMOS PMOS. (d) Block diagram of the extended NBDD PWM modulator. Figure 5b shows the voltage waveforms at the DM and CM outputs of the amplifier, as Shown in Figure 4c, the gate driver has the ability to control turn‐on and turn‐off well as logical combinations of the control signals S1 , S2 and S3 with delayed turn-on times speeds independently for NMOSFET and PMOSFET. RGtheresistor allows adjustment for the NMOS and PMOS transistors. Additionally, in thisThe case, use of complementary of the MOSFET turn‐on speed (R Gn allows to adjust the delay time of the rising edges of transistors in the power stage significantly simplify their control because the gate drivers the ofPWM signal, share whilea common RGp allows to adjust timedriven of thefrom falling edges) inde‐ all MOSFETs ground GND1 the and delay are directly the extended PSC PWM modulator outputs. pendently. During turn‐off, the antiparallel Schottky diode shunts out serial resistor RG; Instead shunting resistors Rb from to setthe both outputsCat VDD /2 (ascharged in Figureto2b), in addition, theofgate charge is taken parallel B capacitor theanZener additional H-bridge was created by M5, M7 and M6, M8 transistors; however, the lower voltage VZ, providing turn‐off speed enhancement. During the on‐time of the switch, a and upper sides of the new H-bridge are connected to the same power supply VDD /2 via small DC current flows in the level shifter, keeping the driver biased in the right state. oppositely polarized Schottky diodes. Two parallel branches of the serial-connected two An original Class‐BD audio amplifier with a balanced CM output, implemented on NMOSFETs (M6, M8) or PMOSFETs (M5, M7) are connected parallel with the load, and are complementary MOSFET pairsinductive and employing extended PSC modulation used to shunt the bi-directional load currentan when M1–M4 are offPWM and to set both scheme, is at shown in The Figure 5a.implementation of the turn-on delay times of the NMOS and outputs VDD /2. same Figure 5b showsasthe voltage waveforms at to the DM the anddelay CM time outputs ofrising the amplifier, PMOS transistors, shown in Figure 4c, allows adjust of the and falling edges of the PWM signal independently. The architecture presented in Figure 5a as well as logical combinations of the control signals S 1 , S 2 and S 3 with delayed can turn‐on be implemented using NMOSFETs, but galvanic isolation the case, transmission of times for the NMOS andonly PMOS transistors. Additionally, ininthis the usepath of comple‐ the control signals as well an isolated and floating bias power supply for gate drivers must mentary transistors in the power stage significantly simplify their control because the gate be provided. drivers of all MOSFETs share a common ground GND1 and are directly driven from the extended PSC PWM modulator outputs. Instead of shunting resistors Rb to set both outputs at V DD 2 (as in Figure 2b), an additional H‐bridge was created by M5, M7 and M6, M8 transistors; however, the lower and upper sides of the new H‐bridge are connected to the same power supply V DD 2 via oppositely polarized Schottky diodes. Two parallel branches of the serial‐connected two Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 both outputs at V DD 2 . The same implementation of the turn‐on delay times of the NMOS and PMOS transistors, as shown in Figure 4c, allows to adjust the delay time of the rising and falling edges of the PWM signal independently. The architecture presented in Figure 5a can be implemented using only NMOSFETs, but galvanic isolation in the transmission 8 of 17 path of the control signals as well an isolated and floating bias power supply for gate drivers must be provided. Figure 5. Class-BD audio amplifier withbalanced balanced CM PSC PWM modulation scheme. (a) A new topology of Figure 5. Class‐BD audio amplifier with CM output, output,using using PSC PWM modulation scheme. (a) A new topology output stage.(b) (b)Implementation Implementation of times of the NMOS and and PMOS. (c) Time waveforms at of thethe output stage. ofthe theturn-on turn‐ondelay delay times of the NMOS PMOS. (c) domain Time domain waveforms the amplifier outputs and PWM control signals with delayed NMOS and PMOS turn-on times (directly at the gates of these at the amplifier outputs and PWM control signals with delayed NMOS and PMOS turn‐on times (directly at the gates of diagram of the extended PSC PWM modulator. these transistors). transistors).(d) (d)Block Block diagram of the extended PSC PWM modulator. 3. Simulation and Measurement Results 3. Simulation and Measurement Results SPICE simulations and experimental studies were used to compare the parameters simulations and experimental studies were used to compare the parameters of SPICE the proposed class BD amplifiers with a balanced CM output with a prototype, using of the proposed class BD amplifiers with a balanced CM output with a prototype, an optimal NBDD modulation scheme. All Class-BD amplifiers were tested for twousing an different optimalswitching NBDD modulation All Class‐BD amplifiers tested for two dif‐ frequencies: Fscheme. or Fc2 = 164 kHz, usingwere with each switching c1 = 328 kHz frequency two different sets ofFload resistance as well as the parameter values of the LC ferent switching frequencies: or , using with each switching 328 kHz F 164 kHz c1 c2 output filter: (1) R = 4 Ω, L = 15 µH, C = 1.8 µF; (2) R = 8 Ω, L = 30 µH, C = 1 µF [8]. L L frequency two different sets of load resistance as well as the parameter values of the LC Since the proposed amplifiers in Figures 4 and 5 are built on complementary MOSFETs, output filter: (1) RL = 4 Ω, L = 15 μH, C = 1.8 μF ; (2) RL = 8 Ω, L = 30 μH, C = 1 μF [8]. and the applied supply voltage VDD = 24 V exceeds the VGSmax voltage (inequality 6), it Since the proposed amplifiers in Figures 4 and 5 are built on complementary was necessary to use a voltage level shifting circuit with a Zener diode (VZ = 6.2 V) to lower MOSFETs, and the applied supply voltage VDD (with = 24 Vthe exceeds theof VGSmax voltage (inequal‐ the control voltage from the gate driver output exception MOSFETs, whose ity sources 6), it was to the usehalf a voltage shiftingVirtual circuitGND with“0” a Zener diode (VZ = 6.2 are necessary connected to voltage level VDD /2—i.e., V). V) to lower from the driver output (with the exception of Figure the 6a,b control show thevoltage time waveforms of gate the PWM control signals generated in one selected period Tc , as well as the drain currents I(M1:D)–I(M4:D) and I(M5:D)–I(M8:D) of the power MOSFETs in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. Optimal turn-on delay times of the transistors were adjusted by selecting the resistance values RGn and RGp (Figures 4c and 5b). Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 (a) MOSFETs, whose sources are connected to the half voltage VDD/2—i.e., Virtual GND “0” V). Figure 6a,b show the time waveforms of the PWM control signals generated in one 9 of 17 selected period Tc, as well as the drain currents I(M1:D)–I(M4:D) and I(M5:D)–I(M8:D) of the power MOSFETs in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. Optimal turn‐on delay times of the transistors were adjusted by selecting the resistance values RGn and RGp (Figures 4c and In our design, for RGp = 68 Ω and RGn = 150 Ω, we obtain the optimal turn-on delay times 5b).ofIn our design, for RGp = 68 Ω and RGn = 150 Ω, we obtain the optimal turn‐on delay the transistors and significant limitation of the shoot-through currents. times of the transistors and significant limitation of the shoot‐through currents. (b) Figure 6. Time waveforms of the PWM control signals generated in one selected period Tc, and the Figure 6. Time waveforms of the PWM control signals generated in one selected period Tc , and the drain currents of the drain currents of the power MOSFETs in the circuits shown: (a) in Figure 4, (b) and Figure 5, respec‐ power MOSFETs in the circuits shown: (a) in Figure 4, (b) and Figure 5, respectively. tively. Figure 7a–cshows shows the efficiency thethe output power versus modulation index Mindex as Figure 7a–c efficiencyand and output power versus modulation M well as THD as a function of the signal frequency for three Class-BD amplifiers: Figure 7a, as well as THD as a function of the signal frequency for three Class‐BD amplifiers: Figure thethe conventional NBDD modulator; Figure 7b, shown in Figure 4 7a, shown shownininFigure Figure1 with 1 with conventional NBDD modulator; Figure 7b, shown in Figure withthe the extended extended NBDD and Figure 7c, 7c, shown in Figure 5 with the the 4 with NBDDPWM PWMmodulator; modulator; and Figure shown in Figure 5 with extended PSC PWM modulator. These characteristics were determined for two different extended PSC PWM modulator. These characteristics were determined for two different switching frequencies, with two sets of load resistance value as well as LC output filter switching frequencies, withfrequency. two setsAs ofwe load value as well as LC output parameter values, for each canresistance see, the output power characteristics of all filter parameter values, for each frequency. As we can see, the output power characteristics three amplifiers are almost identical, while the efficiencies of the two proposed amplifiers, of Electronics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 10 of 17 10 of 17 all three amplifiers are almost identical, while the efficiencies of the two proposed ampli‐ fiers, containing four additional transistor switches to balance the CM outputs, are slightly containing four additional transistor switches to balance the CM outputs, are slightly lower to the efficiency of the prototype NBDD modulator amplifier, due to the additional lower to the efficiency of the prototype NBDD modulator amplifier, due to the additional power conduction states states and and in in the theswitching switchingprocesses processesofofthese theseadditional additional power losses losses in in the the conduction transistor switches. transistor switches. (a) Class‐BD amplifier shown in Figure 1 with conventional NBDD modulator (b) Class‐BD amplifier shown in Figure 4 with extended NBDD PWM modulator (c) Class‐BD amplifier shown in Figure 5 with extended PSC PWM modulator Figure 7. Efficiency and output power vs. modulation index M, as well as THD as a function of the audio signal frequency Figure 7. Efficiency and output power vs. modulation index M, as well as THD as a function of the audio signal frequency for three amplifiers shown (a) in Figure 1, (b) in Figure 4, and (c) in Figure 5, respectively. for three amplifiers shown (a) in Figure 1, (b) in Figure 4, and (c) in Figure 5, respectively. Electronics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 11 of 17 11 of 17 As we can see in Figure 7, all tested amplifiers show, however, slight distortions at the DM outputs, caused by distorted switching sequences generated by the output stages of these amplifiers. Switching timing error in a gate signal, due to turn‐on delay times of As we can in Figurehas 7, allthe tested amplifiers show, however, slight at the the transistors, in see particular, most significant contribution of distortions nonlinearity in DM DM outputs, caused by distorted switching sequences generated by the output stages of output stages. Based on Figure 7a–c, we can observe the following interesting properties. these amplifiers. Switching timing error in a gate signal, due to turn-on delay times of the Thetransistors, proposed in Class‐BD amplifiers have a slightly higher THD than the prototype ampli‐ particular, has the most significant contribution of nonlinearity in DM output fier stages. in Figure 1 with the conventional NBDD modulation. is because the proposed Based on Figure 7a–c, we can observe the following This interesting properties. The amplifiers are controlled by modulators generating control signals with extended proposed Class-BD amplifiers have a slightly higher THD than the prototype amplifiertiming, in giving more timing errors added in each switching period Tc bythe the gate drivers, such as Figure 1 with the conventional NBDD modulation. This is because proposed amplifiers aretime, controlled modulators generating with is extended dead of all control tested signals amplifiers higher timing, for thegiving highermore switch‐ ton toffbyand tr t f . THD timing errors added in each switching period T by the gate drivers, such as dead time, ing frequency Fc1 328 kHz than for Fc 2 164ckHz because relative timing errors are ton /to f f and tr /t f . THD of all tested amplifiers is higher for the higher switching frequency . greater for shorter switching Tcbecause Fc1 = 328 kHz than for Fc2 =period 164 kHz relative timing errors are greater for shorter For example, 8a–c shows the simulated THD + N frequency responses in the switching periodFigure Tc . Figure simulated THD + at N frequency responses in the band upFortoexample, 30 kHz for 8a–c the shows three the tested amplifiers two switching frequencies kHzFfor the three tested amplifiers at two switching frequencies F = 328 kHz M c1 and , modulating frequency , modulation index Fc1 band 328 up kHzto 30 164 kHz f 1 kHz c2 m and Fc2 = 164 kHz, modulating frequency f m = 1 kHz, modulation index M = 0.95, load = 0.95, load resistance RL = 8 Ω, and filter parameters L = 30 μH and C = 1 μF. resistance RL = 8 Ω, and filter parameters L = 30 µH and C = 1 µF. (a) Class‐BD amplifier shown in Figure 1 with conventional NBDD modulator (b) Class‐BD amplifier shown in Figure 4 with extended NBDD PWM modulator Figure 8. Cont. Electronics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 Electronics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 17 12 of12 17 of 17 (c) Class‐BD amplifier shown in Figure 5 with extended PSC PWM modulator Figure 8. Simulated THD + N frequency responses of three tested amplifiers in the band up to 30 kHz. (c) Class‐BD amplifier shown in Figure 5 with extended PSC PWM modulator Figure 9 shows the voltage oscillograms measured atband the outputs of the Figure 8. Simulated THD + N+frequency responses of tested amplifiers up tokHz. 30 kHz. Figure 8. Simulated THD N frequency responses ofthree three tested amplifiers inin thethe band upfollowing to 30 proposed Class‐BD amplifier with the PSC PWM modulator in Figure 5: right half bridge, Figure 9 shows thevoltage voltage oscillograms measured thethe following outputs of the leftFigure half bridge, DMthe output, andoscillograms CM output before andatafter filtration. We obtain quite 9 shows measured at following outputs of the proposed Class-BD amplifier with the PSC PWM modulator in Figure 5: right half bridge, similar oscillograms for the Class BD‐amplifier with the NBDD modulator in Figure 4. A proposed Class‐BD amplifier with the PSC PWM modulator in Figure 5: right half bridge, left half bridge, DM output, and CM output before and after filtration. We obtain quite comparison of the output voltages on the right half bridge, left half bridge and CM output, left similar half bridge, DM output, and CM output before andNBDD after filtration. We obtain4.quite oscillograms for the9,Class BD-amplifier with the modulator in Figure presented in Figures 5 and shows that the real‐time waveforms are distorted by over‐ similar oscillograms foroutput the Class BD‐amplifier with the NBDD modulator inand Figure A comparison of the voltages on the right half bridge, left half bridge CM 4. A lapping spikes on the rising and falling edges of the PWM pulse in each switching period. comparison of the output voltages on the right half bridge, left half bridge and CM output, presented in Figures 5 and 9, shows that the real-time waveforms are distorted output, by The main source of these spikes are timing errors added in each switching period Tc by presented in Figures shows theedges real‐time distorted by over‐ overlapping spikes 5onand the 9, rising andthat falling of thewaveforms PWM pulseare in each switching the gate drivers, such as dead time. The inevitability of timing errors is due to the fact that period. The main source of and thesefalling spikesedges are timing errors added in in each switching period lapping spikes on the rising of the PWM pulse each switching period. the turn‐on delay times of the NMOS and PMOS transistors have to be implemented by Tc by the gate drivers, such as dead time. The inevitability of timing errors is due to the fact The main sourceadjusting of these spikes aretimes timing errors added in each switching perioddriv‐ Tc by independently the of delay ofand the rising and falling edges of implemented the PWM that the turn-on delay times the NMOS PMOS transistors have toisbe theing gate drivers, such as dead time. The inevitability of timing errors due to the fact that Even with equalthe turn‐on times of the and NMOS andedges PMOS, during by signals. independently adjusting delay delay times of the rising falling of the PWMthe thedead turn‐on delay times ofcurrent the NMOS PMOS have to diode. be implemented by time, the inductor in theand output LPFtransistors turns the body During driving signals. Even with equal turn-on delay times of the on NMOS and PMOS, during thethe independently adjusting the delay times of the rising and falling edges of the PWM driv‐ next phase the other side of the output MOSFET at diode. the endDuring of the the dead dead time,when the inductor current in the LPFstarts turnstoonturn the on body ingtime, signals. Even with equal turn‐on delay times of the NMOS and PMOS, during the body diode stays in a conducting state unless the stored minority carrier is fullythe next phase when the other side of the MOSFET starts to turn on at the end of the dead dead time, the inductor current in the output LPF turns on the body diode. During discharged. Thisdiode reverse recovery current tends to have a sharp, spiky shape andisleads time, the body stays in a conducting state unless the stored minority carrier fully tothe next phase when other side ofcurrent thespikes MOSFET starts turnfalling on atshape the end of the unwanted distortion by overlapping onto the rising and edges of leads the PWM discharged. Thisthe reverse recovery tends have a to sharp, spiky and todead unwanted distortion byperiod. overlapping spikes onfiltration the rising and fallingminority edges of carrier the pulse each switching However, the of the appearing spikes atPWM theisCM time, theinbody diode stays in a conducting state unless the stored fully pulse in each switching period. However, the filtration of the appearing spikes at the CM output is very even when the filter tends inductance L isa very small, is shown the to discharged. This easy, reverse recovery current to have sharp, spikyasshape and in leads output isdistortion very easy,by even when the filter inductance L is very as is shown thePWM oscillogram in Figure 9. overlapping unwanted spikes on the rising andsmall, falling edges of in the oscillogram in Figure 9. pulse in each switching period. However, the filtration of the appearing spikes at the CM output is very easy, even when the filter inductance L is very small, as is shown in the oscillogram in Figure 9. (a) Left-half and right-half H-bridge outputs before (left) and after (right) filtration Figure 9. Cont. (a) Left-half and right-half H-bridge outputs before (left) and after (right) filtration Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 13 of 17 Electronics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 17 (b) Differential Mode output (c) Common-Mode output DM VOUT DM VOUT before (left) and after (right) filtration before (left) and after (right) filtration Figure 9. 9. Ocillograms outputsofofthe theClass-BD Class‐BD amplifier in Figure 5: Left-half (a) Left‐half and right‐half Figure Ocillogramsmeasured measuredat at the the following following outputs amplifier in Figure 5: (a) and right-half HH‐bridge outputs, (b) DM output, (c) CM output (in the left column before, in the right column after filtration); bridge outputs, (b) DM output, (c) CM output (in the left column before, in the right column after filtration); Fc2 = 164 kHz, ; vertically: 1 div/5 V;1 horizontally: div/5 Fc f2m= 164 f m 10 kHz 10 kHz kHz;, vertically: 1 div/5 V; horizontally: div/5 µs; V 1= 24 V.μs ; VDD 24 V . DD Figure10 10shows shows the the PCBs PCBs of of the balanced CM Figure the tested testedClass-BD Class‐BDaudio audioamplifiers amplifierswith with balanced CM ® Power MOSFET IRF9389PbF: output, implemented on complementary pairs HEXFET ® output, implemented on complementary pairs HEXFET Power MOSFET IRF9389PbF: (a) (a) shown in Figure 4, using the extended NBDD modulator; andshown (b) shown in shown in Figure 4, using the extended NBDD PWMPWM modulator; and (b) in Figure Figure 5, using the extended PSC PWM modulator. To test a typical Class-BD amplifier 5, using the extended PSC PWM modulator. To test a typical Class‐BD amplifier in a H‐ in a H-bridge configuration with a classic NBDD PWM modulator (as shown in Figure 1 bridge configuration with a classic NBDD PWM modulator (as shown in Figure 1 but with but with complementary MOSFETs), the main H-bridge of the amplifier in Figure 10a was complementary MOSFETs), the main H‐bridge of the amplifier in Figure 10a was used. used. To implement such a configuration, pins: drain-source of M5, M7 transistors should To implement such a configuration, pins: drain‐source of M5, M7 transistors should be be galvanically connected, while M6 and M8 should be permanently open. Electronic galvanically while M6 and M8 should be permanently open. Electronic components connected, on PCBs have the same symbols as in Figures 4 and 5. Load resistances of 4com‐ Ω, ponents on PCBs have the same symbols as in Figures 4 and 5. Load resistances of 4 Ω, 65 65 W or 8 Ω, 35 W are attached to PCBs with short cables from the outside. W or 8The Ω, following 35 W are attached to PCBswas withused short the outside. set of equipment tocables test thefrom amplifiers: The following set of equipment was used to test the amplifiers: − Rigol DG1032Z function generator; − − Rigol RigolDG1032Z DSA832E function spectrumgenerator; analyzer, 9 kHz ~ 3.2 GHz; − − Rigol DSA832E kHz~~2.9 3.2GHz; GHz; Hp 8593 agilentspectrum spectrum analyzer, analyzer, 19kHz − − Hp 8593 agilent spectrum analyzer, 1 kHz ~ 2.9 DSO4254B advanced digital oscilloscope 4× 250 GHz; MHz. − DSO4254B advanced digital oscilloscope 4 × 250 MHz. 2021, 10, 1381 OR PEERElectronics REVIEW 14 of 17 14 of 17 Figure TheThe PCBsPCBs of the of tested amplifiers with balanced CM output, implemented on complementary Figure10.10. theClass-BD tested audio Class‐BD audio amplifiers with balanced CM output, imple‐ ® Power MOSFET IRF9389PbF: (a) shown in Figure 4, using the extended NBDD PWM modulator; (b) shown pairs HEXFET ® mented on complementary pairs HEXFET Power MOSFET IRF9389PbF: (a) shown in Figure 4, us‐ in Figure 5, using the extended PSC PWM modulator. ing the extended NBDD PWM modulator; (b) shown in Figure 5, using the extended PSC PWM modulator. 4. Final Conclusions Two original open-loop Class-BD audio amplifiers with balanced Common-Mode 4. Final Conclusionsoutputs were described and tested. The output stage of each proposed amplifier includes the typical Class‐BD H-bridge with fouramplifiers MOSFETs and four additionalCommon‐Mode MOSFET switches that Two original open‐loop audio with balanced balance and keep the CM output constant. Each of the amplifiers employs the extended outputs were described and tested. The output stage of eachand proposed amplifier NBDD PWM or PSC PWM modulation scheme was implemented onincludes complementary ® the typical H‐bridgepower with four MOSFETs and four additional MOSFET switches that bal‐ MOSFET pairs: HEXFET IRF9389PbF. simulation studies in SPICE and experimental studies have shown that the ance and keep the CM Extensive output constant. Each of the amplifiers employs the extended proposed Class-BD amplifiers have almost the same audio performance on the DM outputs NBDD PWM or PSC PWM modulation scheme and was implemented on complementary as the prototype Class BD amplifier with the optimal NBDD modulation and, at the same power MOSFET pairs: HEXFET® IRF9389PbF. time, have balanced constant voltage CM outputs, thus enabling the implementation of Extensive simulation studies SPICE and experimental studies have shown the the true, filterlessinClass-BD amplifiers. The filtration of unwanted spectralthat components at proposed Class‐BD amplifiers have almost the same audio performance on the DM out‐ puts as the prototype Class BD amplifier with the optimal NBDD modulation and, at the same time, have balanced constant voltage CM outputs, thus enabling the implementation of the true, filterless Class‐BD amplifiers. The filtration of unwanted spectral components Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 15 of 17 the DM output of the tested amplifiers is very easy because the frequency spectrum has no harmonics of the switching frequency, and no IM components around odd multiples of the switching frequency. Since these amplifiers simultaneously have balanced CM outputs, with a constant VDD /2 voltage at this output, the output filter can be dramatically reduced, or rather eliminated, while significantly lowering radiative electromagnetic interference (EMI). The implementation of the amplifier output stage on complementary MOSFET pairs is much easier than only on NMOSFET transistors because the gate drivers of all MOSFETs share a common ground GND1 and are directly driven from the NBDD or PSC PWM modulator outputs, the gate drivers are powered from the same voltage as the output stage, and the complementary MOSFET pairs do not need pairs of complementary control signals. To supply the proposed amplifiers with a voltage of 24 V, i.e., greater than |VGSmax | (according to the datasheet it is 20 V), it was designed and applied a gate drive circuit with a level voltage shifter with Zener diode for the control signals that is suitable for applications with complementary power MOSFETs with the following supply voltage: VDD < |VGS max + VZ | and VDD < |VDSmax |. This gate drive circuit has also the ability to control turn-on and turn-off speeds independently for NMOSFET and PMOSFET. Extensive experimental and simulation studies in SPICE have shown that the proposed class BD amplifiers have almost the same audio performance on the DM outputs as the prototype Class-BD amplifier with the optimal NBDD modulation. The output power and the efficiency versus modulation index M, as well as THD as a function of the signal frequency, have been tested for two proposed Class-BD amplifiers and the prototype Class-BD amplifier with the optimal NBDD modulation (Figure 7) for the two switching frequencies, Fc1 = 328 kHz and Fc2 = 164 kHz, using, with each switching frequency, two different load resistances: RL = 4 Ω and RL = 8 Ω. The audio performance on the DM outputs of the three tested amplifiers, for the following: = 328 kHz, RL = 4 Ω, f m = 1 kHz, M = 0.95; = 328 kHz, RL = 8 Ω, f m = 1 kHz, M = 0.95; = 164 kHz, RL = 4 Ω, f m = 1 kHz, M = 0.95; = 164 kHz, RL = 8 Ω, f m = 1 kHz, M = 0.95; are as follows: 1. Prototype Class-BD amplifier with conventional NBDD modulator: (a) PL = 61.16 W, η = 97.01%, THD = 0.683%; (b) PL = 32.88 W, η = 97.80%, THD = 0.635%; (c) PL = 59.48 W, η = 97.37%, THD = 0.102%; (d) PL = 32.19 W, η = 98.29%, THD = 0.078%. 2. Class-BD amplifier shown in Figure 4 with extended NBDD PWM modulator: (a) PL = 56.71 W, η = 94.62%, THD = 0.784%; (b) PL = 31.01 W, η = 95.02%, THD = 0.742%; (c) PL = 56.93 W, η = 97.37%, THD = 0.085%; (d) PL = 31.35 W, η = 96.72%, THD = 0.065%. 3. Class-BD amplifier shown in Figure 5 with extended PSC PWM modulator: (a) PL = 57.80 W, η = 95.27%, THD = 0.752%; (b) PL = 31.01 W, η = 96.38%, THD = 0.707%; (c) PL = 57.16 W, η = 95.76%, THD = 0.071%; (d) PL = 30.53 W, η = 97.10%, THD = 0.099%. Comparing the above listed audio performance on the DM outputs of the three tested amplifiers, we can see that the proposed Class-BD amplifiers have lower efficiency of about 1 to 2% than the prototype Class-BD amplifier with the conventional NBDD modulation, due to higher conduction losses in a greater number of transistor switches in the output stages. They have also a slightly higher THD of about 0.1% than the prototype amplifier with the conventional NBDD modulation because they are controlled by extended (a) (b) (c) (d) Fc1 Fc1 Fc2 Fc2 Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 16 of 17 modulators, giving more timing errors added by the gate driver in each switching period Tc . THD of all tested amplifiers is higher by about 0.6% for the higher switching frequency Fc1 = 328 kHz than for Fc2 = 164 kHz because relative timing errors are greater for shorter switching period Tc . Class-BDD amplifiers with CM balanced output can successfully use a not very high switching frequency (in our design Fc2 = 164 kHz), resulting in higher efficiency and lower THD, even with a reduced LC output filter. The proposed open-loop Class-BD audio amplifiers with balanced CM outputs are true, filterless Class-D amplifiers with significantly reduced electromagnetic radiation interference (EMI). In practice, due to imperfect waveforms of the voltages controlling the MOSFET transistors, spike pulses are generated at the CM output of the amplifier, which are easy to filter by the reduced LC output filter, even at a very low inductance L. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, W.K., and S.K.; methodology, W.K.; software, W.K. and J.J.; validation, S.K., and W.K.; formal analysis, W.K.; investigation, W.K. and J.J.; resources, W.K.; data curation, W.K.; writing—original draft preparation, W.K. and S.K.; writing—review and editing, W.K. and S.K.; visualization, S.K. and W.K.; supervision, S.K.; project administration, W.K.; funding acquisition, S.K. and W.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding and The APC was funded by the Rector of the University of Applied Sciences in Tarnów, Poland. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Nielsen, K. A Review and Comparison of Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) Methods for Analog and Digital Input Switching Power Amplifiers. In Proceedings of the 102nd AES Convention, Munich, Germany, 22–25 March 1997. Nielsen, K. Parallel Phase Shifted Carrier Pulse Width Modulation (PSCPWM)—A Novel Approach to Switching Power Amplifier Design. In Proceedings of the 102nd AES Convention, Munich, Germany, 22–25 March 1997. Jasielski, J.; Kolodziejski, W.; Kuta, S. Cancellation of common-mode output signal in Class-BD audio amplifiers. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems (ICSES), Kraków, Poland, 5–7 September 2016; pp. 167–172. [CrossRef] Igarashi, T.; Komine, N.; Taihua, L.; Fukai, Y.; Arai, T.; Sano, Y. New method class D amplifier which enables reduction of RF noise and signal distortion. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International NEWCAS Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 17–20 June 2012; pp. 265–268. Cox, S.M.; Yu, J.; Goh, W.L.; Tan, M.T. Intrinsic Distortion of a Fully Differential BD-Modulated Class-D Amplifier with Analog Feedback. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regul. Pap. 2012, 60, 63–73. [CrossRef] Chien, S.-H.; Wu, L.-T.; Chen, S.-Y.; Jan, R.D.; Shih, M.Y.; Lin, C.T.; Kuo, T.H. An Open-Loop Class-D Audio Amplifier with Increased Low-Distortion Output Power and PVT-Insensitive EMI Reduction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, 15–17 September 2014. Siniscalchi, P.; Hester, R.K. A 20 W/Channel Class-D Amplifier with Near-Zero Common-Mode Radiated Emissions. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2009, 44, 3264–3271. [CrossRef] Quek, Y.B. Class-D LC Filter Design, Texas Instruments, Application Report, SLOA119A–April 2006–Revised January 2008. pp. 1–19. Available online: https://www.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/pdf/sloa119 (accessed on 8 June 2021). Guanziroli, F.; Bassoli, R.; Crippa, C.; Devecchi, D.; Nicollini, G. A 1 W 104 dB SNR Filter-Less Fully-Digital Open-Loop Class D Audio Amplifier with EMI Reduction. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2012, 47, 686–698. [CrossRef] Ikriannikov, A.; Wilson, N. New concept for Class D audio amplifiers for lower cost and better performance. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2011, 57, 1218–1226. [CrossRef] Midya, P.; Roeckner, W.J. Filterless Class D Amplifiers: Power-Efficiency and Power Dissipation. IET Circuits Devices Syst. 2010, 4, 48–56. Teplechuk, M.A.; Gribben, A.; Amadi, C. True Filterless Class-D Audio Amplifier. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2011, 46, 2784–2793. [CrossRef] Berkhout, M.; Dooper, L. Class-D Audio Amplifiers in Mobile Applications. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2010, 57, 992–1002. [CrossRef] Hwang, Y.S.; Shen, J.H.; Chen, J.J.; Fan, M.R. Performance comparison of integrated fully-differential filterless Class-D am-plifiers with different feedback techniques. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 2013, 76, 167–177. [CrossRef] Electronics 2021, 10, 1381 15. 16. 17 of 17 Jasielski, J.; Kuta, S. Applied methods of power supply and galvanic isolation of gate drivers of power transistors in bridging end stages of Class D amplifiers and inverters. Sci. Technol. Innov. 2018, 2, 31–41. [CrossRef] Park, S.; Jahns, T. A Self-Boost Charge Pump Topology for a Gate Drive High-Side Power Supply. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2005, 20. [CrossRef]