See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261097811 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY CASE STUDY Article · March 2014 CITATIONS READS 0 126,879 1 author: Dr. Osako Marie Ngoie (Djemo) Argosy University, Chicago, United States 9 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Dr. Osako Marie Ngoie (Djemo) on 26 March 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Running head: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY General Electric Company Case Study Osako Marie Ngoie (Djemo) Argosy University – Chicago DBA Program GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 2 Table of Contents Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………………4 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Background of GE Company ………………………………………………………………….. 6 Literature Review…………..………………………………………………………………. … 7 The Characteristics of Innovation and Change in GE Organization ………………………….. 8 GE Challenges and Commitments ……………………………………………………………. 9 SWOT Analysis of GE …………………………………………………………………….......10 Analysis and Evaluation ………………………………………………………… 11 Structure Idea Management (SIM) and the System of GE Company ……………………….. 12 The diffusion innovation theory ……………………………………………………………... 13 The diffusion innovation process ………………………………………………… 14 Inter and Intra-Networking Effects on organizations ………………………………………… 15 GE core aspect of leadership …………………………………………………………………. 16 Executive Leaders ………………………………………………………………… 16 Board of Directors…………………………………………………………………...16 Effects of Leadership Ethics ………………………………………………………………….. 17 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 3 Corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate Process ……………………………………………………. .18 The Stages of the process……………………………………………………... 19 The Gates of the process………………….……………………………….…...19 Leadership ….…………………………………………………………..…….. 20 The individuals…………………………………………………………………20 The inter-organizational network…...………………………………………… 21 Research Summary ……………………………………………………………………………. 22 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………..….23 References …………………………………………………………………………………….24 Graphics The Structured Idea Management Process……………………………………………………..12 The graphical presentation of the process……………………………………………………. 14 Logistic function innovation process, “S curve”……………………………………………….15 Corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate Process model……………………………………………..16 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 4 Abstract This paper discusses different characteristics of innovation and change within General Electric (GE) Company. Corporations are highly challenged in the business environment by the competitors and the customer’s satisfaction. The advanced pace in technology and the globalization aspect have allowed many corporations as well as individuals to use their creativity abilities and leadership skills to innovate new products and services, also new ways of perceiving and presenting things. The change in people’s needs and socio-environmental expectations has led GE Company to work through imagination by turning challenges into opportunities and weaknesses into strengths. Innovation is the game to play in order to remain successful and sustainable in the current global marketplace for all industries. Keywords: Leading Innovation, Change, and General Electric Company, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 5 Introduction The globalization and the competition on the marketplace have led many organizations to improve their products and services through innovation. Creativity plays a leadership role for a successful innovation. However, does every new or creative idea lead to innovation? Should the company credit the success of innovation to individuals (personnel) with new ideas working toward innovating new products and services? Or should the company credit the leadership momentum of innovative skill? Why some of the companies are successfully innovative while others fail to implement their new ideas in order to produce innovative results? Do the diffusion of innovations and innovation process play a grand role for the organizations success? In this paper, General Electric (GE) Company is considered to be a case study to answer these questions. GE is one of the highly innovative companies in the world. GE works on toughest challenges to transform imagination trough creativity into innovations. They find solutions for energy, health and home, transportation and finance. This company differentiates itself by building, powering, moving and curing the world. GE ensures that they invest in their leadership, personnel, and work environment to support the creativity and innovation. The organization of this paper includes the Background of GE company, Literature review, The characteristics of innovation and change in GE organization, The GE Challenges and Solution Commitments, The SWOT Analysis of GE, SIM and the System of GE, The diffusion innovation theory, Corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate Innovation Process, Application of the Innovation Process, Inter and Intra-networking effects on organizations, The role of Leadership, Role of Ethics and Responsibility, Principles and practices for implementing innovation at GE, Research Summary, and Conclusion. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Background of GE Company From the earliest days, GE Company has used the tools of research, combined with a little inspiration, to create the world of tomorrow. The legacy of GE’s originality offers a rich history based on the following question: “Why predict the future when you can create it?” For over 130 years, GE has continued to innovate what has yet to be imagined. Thomas Alva Edison opened a laboratory in Menlo Park, New Jersey in 1876 where he was able to explore the possibilities of generator and other electrical devices that he had seen in the Exposition. From that laboratory, Edison came up with the greatest invention of the age - a successful radiant electric lamp. Edison brought his various businesses together in 1890 and established the Edison General Electric Company. Awkwardly, The Thomson-Houston Company emerged during that same period as a dominant electrical innovation company led by Charles A. Coffin and became the Edison General Electric Company’s competitor. Coffin is a former shoe manufacturer from Lynn, Massachusetts. Both business expanded and realized that either company could not produce complete electrical installations relying solely on their own patents and technologies. Therefore, the two companies decided to combine their business in 1892. They called the new organization General Electric (GE) Company. Many of the Edison's early business contributions are still part of GE today. Some of these contributions include lighting, transportation, industrial products, power transmission, and medical equipment. Earlier of 1890s, GE produced its first appliances electric fans at the Ft. Wayne electric works while a full line of heating and cooking devices were settled in 1907. The U.S. government started to search for a company that could develop the first airplane engine "booster" for the inexperienced U.S. aviation industry in 1976 and identified GE Aircraft 6 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 7 Engines that was established since 1987. Edison's experiments with plastic threads for light bulbs in 1893 led to the first GE Plastics department, created in 1930. Literature Review Some people may argue that individuals with creativity ideas are more important for an innovative company, but others will argue that the leadership plays a very important role for an innovative company. Both views may be considered true at certain extends. However, the perspective of supporting the leaders seems to be more relevant as the organizations have to invest in their leaders to ensure that they do develop their own innovative thinking capabilities and also have the ability to develop their employees’ and teams’ innovative-creativity skills. Rowe and Nejad (2009) stipulate that most of the leaders’ strategies consider human capital as an important factor in innovation and the creation of core competencies, and they expend considerable effort sustaining the health of this resource (human capital). Therefore, the core aspects of leadership are important to leading innovation and change within an organization. Hobcraft and Phillips (2012) provide the abilities of leaders to support their importance in leading innovation and changes within an organization. Leaders are able to link innovation to strategies; they create focus, engagement and passion for innovation; they direct funds and resources to good innovation programs; they speed good ideas to market as new business models, products and services; and they ensure defined innovation processes in order to produce sustainable innovations. Leaders play a vital role in the success or failure of innovation. Innovation can be misunderstood and not explicit enough. Therefore, leaders have the duty to clarify the role of each participant for accountability purposes. Also, leaders have to make sure that the company has built an accurate innovative culture through organizational culture. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 8 GE is one of the world’s largest innovative Companies. GE believes that imagination equals innovation. The company is determined to solve the world’s biggest problems by putting their collective imagination to work for a better future. The chairman and CEO of GE, Jeff Immelt, agree that building strong leaders is a strategic imperative. When times are easy, leadership can be taken for granted but when the world is turbulent, great leaders are appreciated. GE culture is among its innovations. GE leaders have built the company’s innovative culture by providing a place for creating and bringing big ideas to life. GE culture is the unifying force for its many business units around the world. The Characteristics of Innovation and Change in GE Organization In today world of competition, companies are forced to meet the dynamic change of the economy, customers’ satisfaction, socio-environmental requirements, etc. Companies have to adjust to new competitions and new ways of doing business. Therefore, innovation is a must in order to sustain and remain successful. Having a change management control process in place ahead of time may reduce the cost of hindrances to leading innovation and changes. The growth of a company is a process. GE Company needed to get out of the basement in order to grow and be innovation driven. This describes a necessary practice for implementing innovative processes for GE Company. GE is a great company, very innovative with big vision. Despite all the threats and weaknesses that can slow the company’s performance and efficiency, the strengths and opportunities build the company and allow it to survive through tough moment in business. The “GE advantage” policy allows the company to achieve the competition advantage and enhance the customer values. GE understands the importance of the employees’ system of innovation while ensuring a great leadership in order to be and remain successful and competitive in the current marketplace. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY GE Challenges and Solution Commitments The world is faced with big challenges that constitute GE challenges, such as reserves of oil and gas are being depleted, global recognition of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, lack of clean water, new demands on natural resources, infrastructure, and access to energy. GE tackles these challenges by helping the environment and customers while rewarding shareowners. This action is fulfilled by applying the following commitments. GE Company has two commitments: Healthymagination and Ecomagination. Healthymagination is GE commitment to making sustainable health a reality through innovative technology and services focused on addressing three critical needs: lowering costs, touching more lives and improving quality. Ecomagination puts into practice GE's belief that financial and environmental performance can work together to drive company growth while taking on some of the world's toughest challenges. GE Company has a strong set of global businesses in infrastructure and finance aligned to meet current’s needs, such as (1) the demand for global infrastructure; (2) growing and changing demographics that need access to healthcare, (3) finance and information; and (4) environmental technologies. 9 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 10 The SWOT Analysis of GE Strengths Weaknesses Global recognition Under-performing energy sector Global strength and competitiveness Bets on financial markets have proven Diversified business portfolio and line unsuccessful with economic turmoil of operation Weak revenue growth of industrial Strong research & development segment (R&D) Underperforming in Asian markets Order backlog guarantees business Leveraged flow in the future Generates more than half of its profits Excellent management & Strong from GE capital services, hard hit by culture in terms of people, systems, the economic downturn of 2008. technology and measures Threat to flexibility Environmental initiatives Economic Leader Opportunities Development of infrastructure Aviation industry growth Increasing global exploration and production Servicing and regeneration of commercial airplanes around the world customer services initiative Treats Rise of competition Information security Senior management - weak performance by GE has put doubts on Jeff Immelt's ability to be the next Jack Welch GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 11 Mergers and acquisitions Rising commodity prices Research and development Exposure to financial markets and crisis World economic slowdown in the US and Eurozone, two of the most important markets for GE Media depictions Analysis and Evaluation The number of strengths in the above table indicates that GE Company is growing and enhancing its profitability. Its global recognition, strengths strategies and competitiveness allow GE to be in a favorable position as compared to its competitors, in the same sector. The use of business units for management presents an effective way to manage the sprawling company. This situation not only reduces the possibility of overpowering senior management with work but likewise promotes productivity based on accountability expected from the business unit managers. The company undertakes multi-activities which highly contribute to effectiveness. This is enhanced by the mergers and acquisitions that have diversified the company's product range and in turn leading to improvement on profits incurred. GE strengths and opportunities have a lot of constraints. Countless threats and weaknesses have creep up the performance of the company at some extend by presenting restrictions on the company's management. Some of the threat elements to the company’s survival include high levels of competition, financial crises and risk of information loss. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 12 Weaknesses within the company including the poor productivity of the energy sector and flexibility threat could impact negatively on the company. In order to reduce the impact of threats and weaknesses, the company could use the strengths and opportunities to alleviate them. The efficient management can also be used to prevent loss of data through implementing proper control measures and to avoid losses which could exemplify the situation caused by the financial crisis. And now, GE has a new theory that is changing the way of doing their business called “GE Advantage” where GE is pride on driving consistency, operational excellence, and enhanced customer value. For this reason, the company is placing some big bets on 40 high impact projects that will help increase its speed to market, improve the quality of its products and services, significantly reduce costs, and drive competitive advantage for its customers and the company. Structure Idea Management (SIM) and the System of GE Company Structured Idea Management (SIM) can be defined as a structured process of effectively collecting, evaluating and managing ideas from employees and any other stakeholder in order to turn best ideas into innovation. In other words, SIM is a process where creativity and structure are pooled to find efficiently optimal innovative solutions. SIM empowers companies to continuously innovate, grow and remain competitive. The Structured Idea Management Process GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 13 Source: Rowbotham and Bohlin (2003) The former legendary CEO of GE (Kotelnikov, n.d.), Jack Welch, trained the company by saying "Use the brains of every worker", "Make sure that it is the person with the best idea who wins”. GE Company uses the employees’ system of innovation because of the established idea of “may the person with the best ideas win”. GE Company knows how to use its employees’ sense of creativity; Welch advised the rewards and celebration of new ideas do encourage others to want contribute as well. The company must reward those who live the company's values, show "guts". According to Kotelnikov, the advises of Welch has led GE to become one of the most innovative, profitable, and admired companies on earth. At its core, SIM is a very simple concept based on the premise that those closest to the work know its best. When the ideas of those people, irrespective of their functions and job titles, are solicited and turned immediately into action, an unstoppable wave of creativity, energy, and productivity is unleashed throughout the organization. SIM is intergrated in GE as a work out "Town Meetings" that give the corporation access to an unlimited resource of imagination and energy of its talented employees. SIM can be used to resolve resistance to change in case the company is losing market share or can no longer afford to compete. The company may be very slow, and even resistant, to the adoption of new ideas. But, change takes place in a social system and requires acts of communication and management. The diffusion innovation theory The diffusion innovation is a theory that tries to explain how, why, and at what rate new ideas and technology spread through cultures. This theory has been promoted in 1962 by a GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 14 professor of rural sociology, Everett Rogers, in his book “Diffusion of innovations”. According to professor Rogers, the diffusion is the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain frequencies over time among the members of a social system. The diffusion innovation process It appears that many organizations are predominantly interested in the diffusion process. This is explained by the fact that the diffusion innovation theory defines the success and failure of any new products introduced in the market. The diffusion innovation process is related to the decision making process. Therefore, it’s absolutely rational for an organization to understand the theory of diffusion innovation and its process in order to be able to manage and extend the range of the new products or services. The process of diffusion innovation goes through five stages (Rogers, 1962): awareness, interest, evaluation, trial, and adoption. Rogers mentioned that the diffusion process was first identified by Ryan and Gross in 1943. In the later editions, Rogers changed the terminology of the five stages of diffusion process into: knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation. Nonetheless, the descriptions of stages remained similar trough editions. The graphical presentation of the process 1. Five Stage innovation process Source: Rogers (1962) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 15 2. Logistic function innovation process, “S curve” Source: Rogers (1962) Comment: This graphic demonstrates consecutive groups of consumers adopting the new technology (blue curve) and its market share (yellow curve) which will ultimately reach the satiety level. In mathematics the “S curve” is known as the logistic function. Corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate Innovation Process Marketplace competition and customer’s satisfaction have challenged organizations to emphasize on products innovation. The Corning’s five-stage stage-gate process provides a way of developing profitable new products. With this process, the project management teams are able to move through the production system more proficiently. The Five-Stage Stage-Gate process was created by Dr. Robert G. Cooper and Dr. Scott J. Edgett. The development of Corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate process is accepted and adopted as a project management technique for managing innovation and developing new products. This adoption has been endorsed after a careful study of how successful project teams work toward developing winning new products. The model of stage-gate optimizes the efficiency of a new product development process and allows the management to detect and kill poor projects at a GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 16 very early stage. Therefore, the management of the model is focused on potentially winning projects. Corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate Process model Source: Dr. Robert Cooper and Dr. Scott Edgett According to Cooper and Scott (1996), the corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate System is defined as a conceptual and operational road map for moving a new-product project from idea to launch. This process allows management and verification of the products’ development from one stage to the other. The Stage-Gate Product Innovation system has been referred to as the single most important discovery in product innovation The Stages of the process Each stage in the process is a decision point that leads to a Go/kill or prioritization decision point. The structure of each stage is similar to the chart below: Source: Dr. Robert Cooper and Dr. Scott Edgett GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 17 The Gates of the process The Gates in the process are decision points where non well-performed projects are discarded and resources are allocated to the best projects. The Gates systems deal with three quality issues: quality of execution; business rationale; and the quality of the action plan. The structure of each gate process is similar to the Chart below: Source: Dr. Robert Cooper and Dr. Scott Edgett Cooper and Scott (1996) established some benefits of using the Stage-Gate system: Accelerates speed-to-market Increases likelihood of product success Introduces discipline into an ordinarily chaotic process Reduces re-work and other forms of waste Improves focus via gates where poor projects are killed Achieves efficient and effective allocation of scarce resources Ensures a complete process – no critical steps are omitted Application of the Innovation process Leadership Leadership innovative skill is very important to any stage-gate process. There are multiple levels of approval in a stage-gate process to keep a new product in development. This allows for GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 18 multiple stages in which a project can be evaluated for potential and either killed or given the resources it needs to go forward. The success or the failure of the stage gate process is attributed to the leaders’ decision. Leaders have to be involved and together with the management decision makers, they have to establish successful criteria for each project to achieve the goal of having fewer, but better, new-product projects. The individuals The leaders put in place a creative and innovative environment, and work with individuals with new ideas or innovative thinking in the change process to solve the organization’s challenges. The individuals involved in the process of new products using the Corning’s Five-Stage StageGate process are accountable for any success or failure of the innovation result. These individuals have to understand that the company’s reputation and sustainability rely on the outcome of their efficiency and productivity. Therefore, they have to make sure that they understand and make right decisions for every stage and gate of the corning’s Five-stage system. The inter-organizational network The implementation of a product innovation strategy requires that people at all level within the organization work in collaboration in order to achieve full success of the innovation result. Every individual or group of individuals has a role to play to solve the challenges of the organization. The inter-organizational network is very important as this will determine the result of the corning’s Five-Stage stage gate process. A poor inter-organizational network will produce less effective innovative result compare to the strong inter-organizational network. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 19 The organizational learning processes The corning’s Five-Stage stage gate process is a well-established process system that has been adopted by many innovative industries to develop and produce new products. However, every organization can adapt this process to meet its mission and its goals. The review process after every set of results should empower the organization by working toward correcting their mistakes and improve the future outcome process. This review phase can be identified as a learning process. The more the organization reviews the processed innovation results the more it improves its future outcome. Inter and Intra-Networking Effects on Organizations The need for innovation is often refer to as a foremost reason for the development of network forms of organizations. Obviously, Networks work to the advantage of the innovation spread. According to Robertson, Scarborough, and Swan (2002), Innovation is considered to be an iterative, recursive and episodic process surrounding the design and development, diffusion and implementation of new ideas for the adopting organization. The inter-networking diffusion can be understood as the spread of a new idea or any innovation from one person or organization to the other until it reaches a critical mass within the network, a point at which the diffusion is self-sustaining and speedily disperses throughout. While the intra-networking diffusion understanding relies on how an innovation or a new idea diffuses within an organization of adoption. The intra-networking diffusion tries to establish the understanding of how the innovation, once adopted, is integrated into the network of the adopted organization through innovation use. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 20 Considering the above understanding, both inter and intra-networking effects of diffusion innovation on organization are critical for the diffusion process. These inter and intranetworking diffusion innovation complements each other and completes the diffusion of innovative process. Role of Leadership at GE GE's Chairman and CEO, Jeff Immelt, has worked very hard since he started his tenure in 2001 to transform GE into a leader in essential themes tied to world development, such as emerging markets, environmental solutions, demographics and digital connections. Mr. Immelt also laid the vision for GE's ambitious “ecomagination” initiative and has been named one of the "World's Best CEOs" three times by Barron's. Executive Leaders The men and women who are driving GE's many businesses are highly considered as the top leaders in their industries. They are the new generation of leaders and each is leading their respective organizations to become closer to their customers, while finding new operational efficiencies and ways to work toward a distinguished future. Board of Directors GE's Board of Directors provide comprehensive oversight of the major strategic issues of the company while ensuring that the company serves the interests of shareowners and other key stakeholders with the highest standards of integrity and compliance. However, critics and wise counselors are among some social issues that are raised most of the time to ensure that the company is serving equally. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 21 Role of Ethics and Responsibility Leaders are called to set an example for its followers. They play a responsible role within the organization. Leaders are considered to be role model for the employees, or their team members; therefore they can have tremendous impact on their life, behavior, moral, productivity, efficiency, etc. Leaders demonstrate ethical behaviors when they are doing what is morally right, just, and good, and when they help to elevate followers’ moral awareness and moral self-actualization. According to Zhu (Spring 2008), ethical leadership encompasses more than the fostering of ethical behaviors. Ethical leadership can have positive or negative effects on organizational performance. Innovative organizational processes are supported and enhanced by leadership ethics and values because it fosters the development of one of the most crucial success elements; trust. An innovative organization engages everyone throughout the organization in the task of developing and implementing new ways to reach the organization's goals. The leadership can affect ethically or unethically the organizational innovation and change. For instance, corruption among leaders within the organization of innovation and change must not be tolerated as it will spoil the workplace and diminish their responsibilities. This behavior will spread in the organization and affect the trust and collaboration. Meanwhile, the leadership awareness is a positive attitude that will encourage every worker and stimulate everyone to do they share of work. The leader’s awareness will affect positively the performance of the organization innovation and change. Ethics and responsible behaviors are required for qualified leaders and personnel. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 22 Principles and practices for implementing innovation at GE In order to implement innovation at GE, some principles and practices have been put in place: Aligning recruiting efforts with the strategy of holding on the best people; Ensure the company’s talent management practices is suitable with each worker; Implant corporate culture into talent management processes such as hiring methods and leadership development; The CEO as well as all managers have to get involved at all levels in the company; Establish the best balance of the company’s global and local needs; and Discovering new ways to distinguish the company from all competitors. GE’s growth strategy is grounded on five mainstays: technological leadership, services acceleration, enduring customer relationships, resource allocation and globalization. According to CEO Jeffrey Immelt, the GE’s talent management system is its most powerful implementation tool.” GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 23 Research Summary GE is a great company, very innovative with big vision. GE works on things that matter with a philosophy of “May the person with the best idea wins”. GE Company understands the importance of using the brain of the workers. GE knows how to reward and celebrate people who live at the “value” and standard of the company.The company takes on the toughest challenges to build better people and better technologies. The company wants to make sure that they find solutions in energy, health and home, transportation and finance. GE is building, powering, and moving the world. This company does not just imagine these things but works to make it happen. Despite all the treats and weaknesses that can slow the company’s performance and efficiency, the strengths and opportunities build the company and allow it to survive through tough moment in business. The “GE advantage” policy allows the company to achieve the competition advantage and enhance the customer values. GE understands the importance of the employees’ system of innovation while ensuring a great leadership in order to be and remain successful and competitive in the current marketplace. GE also understands that for its employees to flourish their performance, they have to be placed in a sound work environment. That is why GE is committed to strengthens and use any opportunity their get to support its leadership culture through systems and policies that foster open communication, maintain employee and partner privacy. The company fights hard to reduce its weaknesses and threats while assuring employee health and safety, and reduce the cost of products to meet customer’s satisfaction. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 24 Conclusion In this paper, GE company was used as a case study on organizational Innovation and change. Different characteristics of innovation and change have been discussed within GE Company. The competition on the actual marketplace in the world has challenged GE company to come up with new ideas and innovative ways of developing and producing its products and services. Dr. Cooper and Edgett have solved the competition argument by producing an innovative system called corning’s five-stage stage-gate process. This innovative process has allowed companies, such as GE, to reinvent their ideas and launch new products and services. It is more effective, efficient, faster process that improves the product innovation results. Leaders and individuals within organization have to work in network collaborations in order to meet the goals of their organizations, stand out the competition with innovative products and solve any financial or sustainability challenges that the organization comes across. The inter and intranetworking effects are critical for GE diffusion innovation process. That’s why the SIM has been very well integrated in GE Company, this has allowed the company to become one of the most innovative, profitable, and admired companies on earth. The SIM can also be used to resolve resistance to change by communication and management. Thus, while the current discussion addresses key features of organizational innovation and change that determine the success and sustainability of GE, more research is necessary to understand and help GE Company remain competitive in this hungry world of creativity and innovation. Innovation is the game to play in order to remain successful and sustainable in the current global marketplace for all industries. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 25 References Baumgartner, J. (2008). An Introduction To Idea Management. Retrieved from http://www.jpb.com/creative/ideaManagementIntro.pdf Carter, P. (2009). Corning’s Five-Stage Stage-Gate process. Retrieved from http://www.drpatrickcarter.com/blog/2009/08/corning%E2%80%99s-five-stage-stagegate-process/ Conglomerates/ General Electric SWOT Analysis. (n.d). Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.wikiswot.com/SWOT/12_Conglomerates/General_Electric.html Cooper, R. (2009). How Companies are reinventing their Idea-to-Launch Methodologies. Technology Management, 52(2), 47-57. Cooper, R. and Edgett, S. (1996). Stage-Gate - Your Roadmap for New Product Development. Retrieved from http://www.prod-dev.com/stage-gate.php Hobcraft, P. and Phillips, J. (2012). The Critical Role That Senior Leaders Must Fill for Innovation Success. Retrieved from http://www.innovationexcellence.com/blog/ 2012/09/10/the-critical-role-that-senior-leaders-must-fill-for-innovation-success Karlsson, M. (2011, September 26). Innovation Management: How to Successfully Implement Collaborative Idea Management. Retrieved from http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2011/09/26/how-to-successfully-implementcollaborative-idea-management-2/ GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 26 Kafelnikov, V. (n.d.). Creating Corporate Environment Where the Best Idea Does Win: Case in Point of GE. Retrieved from http://www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/crosscuttings/change_enviro_best-idea-wins.html Prokesch, S. (2009). How GE teaches Teams to Lead Change. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://www.ge.com/pdf/innovation/leadership/hbr_crotonville.pdf Richet. (n.d). Hubbpages. SWOT Analysis of General Electric Company. Retrieved from http://richet.hubpages.com/hub/SWOT-Analysis-of-General-Electric-Company Rowbotham, L. and Bohlin, N. (2003). Structured Idea Management as a Value-Adding Process. Retrieved from http://www.adl.com/uploads/tx_extprism/1996_q2_31-36.pdf Rowe, G. and Nejad, M.H. (2009). Strategic Leadership: Short-Term Stability and Long-Term Viability. Ivey Business Journal. Retrieved from http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com Shrivathsan, M. (2012, April 2). Practical Innovation Management: What is Idea Management? And what are its benefits? Retrieved from http://www.ideaglow.com/innovationmanagement-blog/2012/04/idea-management-definition-benefits/ www.ge.com Zhu, W. (Spring 2008). The Effect of Leadership on Follower Moral Identity: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Leadership Review, 8, 62-73. View publication stats