Uploaded by dpetegorsky

DAF Numbers Obscure Who’s Giving and How Much

advertisement
DAF Numbers Obscure Who’s Giving and How Much — Inside Philant...
1 of 8
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2021/3/3/daf-numbers-obscu...
DAF Numbers Obscure
Who’s Giving and How
Much
Dan Petegorsky, Guest Contributor
COSMA/SHUTTERSTOCK
Want to get inside funders'
heads? Sign up for our
email updates.
One of the more disingenuous arguments that
3/3/2021, 11:58 AM
DAF Numbers Obscure Who’s Giving and How Much — Inside Philant...
2 of 8
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2021/3/3/daf-numbers-obscu...
supporters of donor-advised funds (DAFs)
increasingly make is that DAFs help to “democratize
philanthropy” by serving as vehicles for smaller
donors. As evidence, they say that the size of the
SIGN UP
average DAF continues to trend down—to $162,556
in the latest report from the National Philanthropic
Trust (NPT).
Featured Jobs
Leaving aside the bizarre notion that someone with
over $160,000 to give away in charitable donations
Donor Relations Manager
is in any way a small donor, the figures are
Remote, - National Service Office for
misleading. And they point to the lack of
Nurse-Family Partnership and Child First
transparency in the kind of aggregate figures the
industry reports provide (or, indeed, in the 990s on
which they are largely based). As critics frequently
point out, whether describing account sizes or
Major Gifts Officer
NEW YORK CITY, NY - Natural Resources
Defense Council
payout rates, the sweeping averages that industry
Major Gifts Officer
leaders cite fail to provide a clear picture of how
San Francisco, CA - Natural Resources
these giving mechanisms are truly functioning.
Defense Council
Regarding the question of donor size, it’s like the
inverse of the old “Bill Gates walks into a bar” adage.
Music Education Grants Program Officer
Washington, DC - Chorus America
Vice President for Advancement
An updated version of that old saw might go, Elon
Musk walks into a bar and all the patrons suddenly
become billionaires (on average). The case of the
DAF reports is the opposite: By crowding the bar
Olivet, MI - Olivet College
Post a Job
More jobs
Powered by
with masses of small donors, they want us to believe
Musk isn’t nearly as wealthy as he actually is,
“because averages.” If you brought 350,000 people
into Elon’s place and averaged their wealth, Musk’s
worth would drop to a mere fraction of his $182
billion.
3/3/2021, 11:58 AM
DAF Numbers Obscure Who’s Giving and How Much — Inside Philant...
3 of 8
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2021/3/3/daf-numbers-obscu...
Similarly, in its recent annual donor-advised fund
reports, NPT has been adding in literally hundreds
of thousands of workplace giving accounts that are
administered as donor-advised funds by American
Online Giving Foundation (AOGF). Throw these into
the mix and, poof, the size of your average DAF
account shrinks dramatically.
These accounts are great vehicles for spurring and
managing automatic payroll deduction contributions
and employer-matching donations through
workplace giving programs. And they are an entirely
different animal than the mini-foundations that
most DAFs have become. Participating employees do
not stash hundreds of thousands or millions of
dollars into charitable accounts to maximize their
tax deductions: Virtually all of the money that comes
into the accounts goes out to working charities in the
same year.
In its most recent publicly available filing (fiscal year
ending March 31, 2018), AOGF reported that its
352,552 funds received $598 million in
contributions and granted $589 million to charities,
or 99% of those contributions. At the end of its prior
fiscal year, AOGF reported the total assets in its DAF
accounts as only $983,686. Using the payout rate
formula preferred by NPT and other DAF managers
(current year grants divided by prior end-of-year
assets), AOGF’s rate would be 59,995%.
Using a more rational formula suggested by Ray
Madoff and James Andreoni, the rate would be a far
more intelligible 98%. As Madoff and Andreoni point
3/3/2021, 11:58 AM
DAF Numbers Obscure Who’s Giving and How Much — Inside Philant...
4 of 8
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2021/3/3/daf-numbers-obscu...
out in their working paper on the topic, the
commonly used payout formula itself is another
source of problematic data on DAF activity. But for
our purposes, the point is that AOGF is clearly
operating differently than most DAFs—it’s not
warehousing wealth in any way, shape or form.
Workers donate money from their paychecks to their
preferred charities. By contrast, the rest of the DAF
world’s average payout rate would be a mere 16%
that year: In other words, 84% of available assets
remain in the DAFs rather than being distributed to
working charities. You can see how averaging these
types of funds together presents a skewed picture of
donors and their giving habits.
Lumping these hundreds of thousands of modest
givers in with the overall DAF statistics allows NPT
to vastly understate the average size of DAF
accounts. This is especially true within the “national
charity” category where NPT includes these
workplace giving accounts. NPT claims that the
average size of a DAF account for these sponsors in
2018 was just over $122,000. But if you take out
those 352,552 AOGF accounts from the calculation,
the size soars to just under $300,000.
And what about those crowds who flooded the bar?
Using NPT’s formula, the average size of an AOGF
account would be $26. Again, workplace giving
accounts are not there to warehouse charitable
assets, and should be counted in a category of their
own. That would both give them their due and also
highlight the ever-increasing accumulation of assets
in the other DAF categories.
3/3/2021, 11:58 AM
DAF Numbers Obscure Who’s Giving and How Much — Inside Philant...
5 of 8
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2021/3/3/daf-numbers-obscu...
In contrast to the workplace giving accounts, the
data for the other categories reveal a fundamental
design flaw in DAFs: they have no mandated payout
requirement. Donors get a tax deduction when they
place funds in a DAF but have no incentive to move
funds to an active charity.
Policymakers are considering new proposals to spur
charitable giving—among them, a push to require
DAFs to have minimum payouts to discourage the
warehousing of wealth. This debate is clouded,
however, by misleading and confusing data on what
current DAF payouts actually are and who, exactly, is
benefiting from the advantages these giving
mechanisms offer.
The confusion is only compounded when all the
public has to go on are reports based on overly broad
averages instead of disaggregated data that would
provide us with a more accurate picture of this form
of charitable giving. The NPT’s reports, and others
like it, give us a snapshot of the industry, but a very,
very blurry one. We can and must do better.
Dan Petegorsky is coordinator of the Charity
Reform Initiative at the Institute for Policy Studies.
—
Editor’s Note: IP reached out to the National
Philanthropic Trust for a response to Dan
Petegorsky’s criticisms. Below is the Trust’s
statement:
“Emerging donor-advised fund (DAF) models, like
3/3/2021, 11:58 AM
DAF Numbers Obscure Who’s Giving and How Much — Inside Philant...
6 of 8
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2021/3/3/daf-numbers-obscu...
workplace giving, attract and encourage people to
engage actively in philanthropy. That means more
dollars go to important causes. DAFs are remarkably
flexible giving vehicles and we celebrate and
promote the many different and innovative ways that
DAFs can be used to advance philanthropy.
“We are always evaluating ways to evolve and
improve the Donor-Advised Fund Report—including
how to categorize each DAF sponsor. The DAF
Report first noted workplace giving models in 2018
and has reported on their continued rise in
popularity in the years since. We recognize this trend
has a significant impact on the DAF sector and has
implications for our peers in the nonprofit world. We
welcome all suggestions, including reconsidering
criteria for the DAF sponsor categories in future
reports. We take seriously our responsibility to
accurately report the data and make meaningful
observations in the DAF Report.”
Featured
DAF
Numbers
Obscure
Who’s Giving
and How
Much
Five Major
Takeaways
from Fidelity
Charitable's
Latest Giving
Report
March 03, 2021
“Not Going
Away.”
California
DAF Reform
Bills Die, But
the Debate
Will Persist
DAFs Are a
Monument of
Wealth and
Power That
Must Come
Down
0 Likes
Share
3/3/2021, 11:58 AM
Download