Academic Group: School of Engineering
FINAL POSTER AND VIVA ASSESSMENT FORM
Student Name:
Anuranjitha Samith Bandara
Student Number:
2023712
Year/Semester/Cohort:
Module Code/Occ./Title:
AME6011/ Major Project
Programme:
Submission Date:
Wijerathna
Project/Poster Title:
NB-IoT Based Status Measurement of 33kV Power Distribution Network
Assessor Name:
P. A. G. M. Amarasinghe
Assessor Role (Circle one):
Assessment Weight: 10%
Marking Criteria: Assign marks in accordance to the full range of each category
Very Poor
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good Excellent Outstanding
0-6
7-9
10-11
12-14
15-16
17-19
20-25
A. POSTER PRESENTATION (5% Weight)
Attracts attention and has aesthetic appeal

The poster stands out from the crowd, perhaps through imaginative and bold use of content, images, titles,
background, colours, or text.
 A creative, well-structured, professionally-executed, layout, using space, form and colour, linking elements,
images and text that to attract, guide and focus attention.
Confident and engaging
 The presentation is delivered in a confident, competent and engaging manner by the student.
Score (Out of 25)
Comments:
20
The poster is clear and delivers the required information to the audience.
Engages its Technical Audience at an Appropriate Level

Technical content and level, whilst accessible, engages, convinces, and informs its engineering audience
Appropriate Scope and Content

Presents a succinct and appropriate summary of project title, aims and objectives, background, approach,
design choices, results, analysis, outcomes and conclusions.
Effective Communication

Organised and presented clearly so as to effectively communicate the essential message through images
and text with good spelling, grammar and typography.
Score (Out of 25)
Comments:
The student was audible, and the presentation consist of all the required information.
Subtotal (Out of 50)
[Marks A]
Additional
Comments:
22
42
B. Viva (5% Weight)
Command and ownership
 Displays a thorough grasp and ownership of project strategy and detail.
Depth of understanding and quality of work

A thorough understanding is portrayed of technical aspects and background.

Evidence of having researched the project area -by literature research, background reading or evaluation and
review of other material.

Alternative methods or solutions should have been examined and critically analysed and discussed.
Score (Out of 25)
22
The student has a good understanding of the project, and it was well executed.
Comments:
Project Demonstration
 Evidence of student achievements in the project. The student should have demonstrated a completed, usable
and working system or prototype produced in relation to the specified project aims and objectives.
Response to Questions
 Able to understand questions and provide competent and convincing responses.
Score (Out of 25)
Comments:
22
The student provided satisfactory answers to the questions. Also, he demonstrated the project
outcome.
Subtotal (Out of 50)
[Marks B]
44
Additional
Comments:
Total Marks (Out of 100)
Marks A + Marks B
Overall Marks Awarded by Assessor
86
To be completed on supervisor’s mark sheet only. Supervisor to complete this section in
discussion and agreement with second assessor.
Second Assessor’s Overall
Awarded Marks:
Supervisor’s signature:
Second Assessor’s signature:
Final Agreed Marks