Political Science 139D Urban and Sub-National Politics in Low and Middle-Income Countries Spring 2020, Tuesdays and Thursdays, 3:30pm – 5:00pm Online via Zoom Instructor: Alison Post Associate Professor Travers Department of Political Science and Global Metropolitan Studies 724 Barrows Hall aepost@berkeley.edu Office hours via zoom: Fridays 3:30 – 5:00pm (and by appointment) Sign-ups here: https://www.wejoinin.com/sheets/gdevw Graduate Student Instructor: Adan Martínez adansteve1394@berkeley.edu Office hours via zoom: Tuesdays 1:30-3:00 p.m. (and by appointment) Sign-up here: Appointments Introduction: Over half of the world’s population is now urban. As urban populations swell, metropolitan areas in both the around the world struggle to provide basic services and address the negative externalities associated with rapid growth. Sanitation, transportation services, pollution, energy services, and public safety typically fall to sub-national governments. Yet local sub-national institutions face difficulties as they tackle these challenges because development tends to spill over political boundaries and resources are limited. Such difficulties are particularly acute in the low and middle-income countries due to tighter resource constraints, weak institutions, and the comparative severity of the underlying problems. Moreover, democratization and decentralization suggest that urban governance and service delivery may have become more democratic, but present challenges with respect to priority setting, coordination, and corruption. This course will examine politics in cities and in other subnational governments, such as states and provinces. It will examine the financial and institutional vehicles used to provide services of different types, and the role of political parties and other forms of political organization in the development and allocation of services. Topics will include urban and sub-national institutions and political regime types, decentralization and multi-level governance, the rule of law and urban violence, civil society and popular mobilization, political party organization and mobilization strategies, public policy formulation, urban bureaucracies, corruption, the politics of urbanization, and the metropolitan political economy. Readings will be drawn primarily from Political Science, Sociology, Geography, and Economics. 1 Assignments: The assignments for this course are designed to achieve a number of objectives, including: Mastery of key concepts crucial for understanding subnational politics in low and middleincome countries Honing student skills in the critical reading of different types of data (quantitative and qualitative, including material from the media) Developing students’ ability to analyze and present data in an effective manner Help students understand alternative approaches to research design in the social sciences, identify strengths and weaknesses in particular studies, and consider the circumstances under which particular approaches are likely to be most appropriate Improving students’ ability to evaluate alternative policy approaches to tackling urban problems in low- and middle-income countries (and more broadly) Written assignments will take the form of short essays, as well as weekly comprehension quizzes administered through bcourses. Essays for the course: a. Quantitative Data Memo: Due September 17th at 3:30pm. (3-4 pages) b. News source memo: Due October 22nd at 3:30pm. (3-4 pages) c. Policy analysis paper: Due November 19th at 3:30pm. (5-7 pages) d. Research Design paper: Due December 16th at 5pm. (7-10 pages) Grading: Class participation will count 20% towards final grades. (Class attendance counts heavily towards participation grades. Students should inform their GSI in advance if they cannot attend section, and only one section absence during the term is acceptable. We also expect regular attendance at and participation in lecture discussions if your time zone allows for such participation; if it does not, let us know and we will provide alternative means of achieving an excellent participation grade. The remaining 70% of the grade will reflect performance on the four main writing assignments outlined above: a) a news source evaluation memo (15%); b) quantitative data memo (15%); c) policy analysis paper (20%) and effective participation in the associated policy debate simulation exercise; d) research design paper (20%). Grades for late papers will be downgraded one full letter grade per day late. 2 Academic Honesty Policy: In fairness to students who put in an honest effort, cheaters will be harshly treated. Any evidence of cheating will result in a score of zero (0) on that assignment or examination. Cheating on the final exam results in an "F" for the course. Cheating includes but is not limited to bringing notes or written or electronic materials into an exam or quiz, using notes or written or electronic materials during an exam or quiz, copying off another person's exam or quiz, allowing someone to copy off of your exam or quiz, and having someone take an exam or quiz for you. Incidences of cheating will be reported to Student Judicial Affairs, which may administer additional punishment. Plagiarism in written assignments is also unacceptable, and will trigger similar consequences. Norms for Online Sessions and Technology Use Class lectures and discussion sections will be delivered via Zoom. We expect students to attend lectures and sections in real time unless they live in time zones that make this infeasible (between 9:00 p.m-6:00 a.m. local time). We expect that attending classes in real time will increase your level of interest in and engagement with the course, and provide helpful deadlines for working through the assigned readings. A google sheet with all relevant zoom links can be found here. Lecture sessions will be recorded so as to facilitate access for students in other time zones. This presents some challenges for instructors and students. Note that this means that breakout rooms visited by the instructors during lecture may be included in lecture recordings. Students may not distribute copies of lecture recordings. We ask that students, whenever possible, keep their videos on, as this allows instructors to assess whether or not students understand material as it is discussed and assess levels of engagement. As a courtesy to other students and the instructors, students should indicate their desire to speak via the Chat function in zoom, or simply make comments via the Chat function. We have distributed a survey to all students to assess technology access and relevant times zones. Responses will help us understand the constraints faced by students enrolled in the class. If you enroll in the class subsequent to the emission of this survey, please contact the instructors so we can ask you the same questions. For information regarding campus resources intended to help students cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, please see this google drive folder. Introductory Office Hours: The instructors will be posting introductory 15-minute office hour slots during the first few weeks of class. We expect every student to sign up for a slot (shared with one other student) so that we can learn about you and how the course may complement your course of study and help you explore your intellectual and professional interests. We encourage you to sign up for office hours throughout the semester as taking classes online can be isolating and many concepts and questions are explored very effectively in one-on-one discussions. 3 Course Materials: Access to the vast majority of course materials is provided through bcourses modules. There you will find links to all the books assigned in the course (see below), articles available through the university libraries, chapters from edited volumes, and policy reports. Bates, Robert (1981). States and Markets in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. University of California Press. [available as e-book through university library] Auyero, Javier and Débora Alejandra Swistun (2009). Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press. [available as e-book through university library] Gay, Robert (2005). Lucia: Testimonies of a Brazilian Drug Dealer’s Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. [available as ebook through the university library] Two additional texts can be downloaded from the World Bank website: World Bank Group (2009). Reshaping Economic Geography. World Development Report. 2009. [http://bit.ly/1dM1t6t] World Bank and United Cities and Local Governments (2008). Decentralization and Local Democracy in the World: First global report by United Cities and Local Government. Washington, DC: World Bank. [http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2609] Week 1: Thursday, August 26th: Urbanization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Montgomery, Mark (2008). “The Urban Transformation of the Developing World.” Science. 319(5864): 761-764 (February 8, 2008). Week 2: Tuesday September 1st and Thursday September 3rd Understanding Urbanization: Local Economic Growth and Migration World Bank Group (2009) Reshaping Economic Geography. World Development Report. 2009. [Chapters 4]. Hessler, Peter. (2011). Country Driving: A Chinese Road Trip. New York: Harper Perennial. pp. 281-325. Harris, J. (2014). The messy reality of agglomeration economies in urban informality: evidence from Nairobi’s handicraft industry. World Development, 61, 102-113. 4 Additional resource: Short interview (7 minutes) with Peter Hessler, author of Country Driving. Week 3: Tuesday, September 8th and Thursday, September 10th: Understanding Urbanization II: Migration and the “Urban Bias” Bates, Robert (1981). States and Markets in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. University of California Press. Pp. 11-105. [entire book]. [Available as e-book through university library] SCREENING IN CLASS ON THURSDAY, September 10th: LAST TRAIN HOME Week 4: Tuesday, September 15th and Thursday, September 17th: Urban Settlement and Migrant Political Incorporation Caldeira, Teresa (1996). “Building Up Walls: The New Pattern of Spatial Segregation in São Paulo.” International Social Science Journal. 48(147): 55-66 (March 1996). Tugal, Cihan (2008). “The Greening of Istanbul.” New Left Review. 51: 64-80. Hsing, You-Tien (2006). “Land and Territorial Politics in Urban China.” The China Quarterly. 187: 575-591. [DATA MEMO DUE Thursday, September 17th at 3:30pm] Week 5: Tuesday, September 22nd and Thursday, September 24th: Local Regime Type I: Democratization, Subnational Authoritarianism, and Hybrid Regimes Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way (2002). “Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy. 13(2): 51-65. Gibson, Edward L. (2005). “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics. 58(1): 101-132. Reuter, Ora John, Noah Buckley, Alexandra Shubenkova, and Guzel Garifullina. 2016. “Local Elections in Authoritarian Regimes: An Elite-Based Theory with Evidence from Russian Mayoral Elections.” Comparative Political Studies. 49(5): 662-697. Additional resource: McMann, Kelly. 2014. “Look Beyond the Capital: The Geography of Political Openings in Eurasia.’ PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 335. Week 6: Tuesday, September 29th and Thursday, October 1st: Regime Type II: Political Parties and Urban Clientelism 5 Auyero, Javier (2000). Poor People's Politics. Durham: Duke University Press. [Chapter 3]. Stokes, Susan (2005). “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 315-325. Auerbach, Adam, and Tariq Thachil. 2018. “How Clients Select Brokers: Competition and Choice in India’s Slums. American Political Science Review. 112(4): 775-791. Optional background: Harrington, Joseph E. (2008). Games, Strategies, and Decision Making. New York City: Worth Publishers. pp. 93-94. [“Prisoner’s Dilemma”]. (posted in bcourses) Week 7: Tuesday, October 6th and Thursday, October 8th: Regime Type III: Federal and Unitary States Gibson, Edward L., Ernesto Calvo, and Tulia G. Falleti (2004). “Reallocative Federalism: Legislative Overrepresentation and Public Spending in the Western Hemisphere.” From Gibson, Edward, ed. (2004). Federalism and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 173-196. [Chapter 5]. Gibson, Edward L. and Ernesto Calvo (2000). “Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina.” Studies in Comparative International Development. 35(3): 32-55. Suberu, Rotimi (2009). “Federalism in Africa: The Nigerian Experience in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnopolitics. 8(1): 67-86. Week 8: Tuesday, October 13th and Thursday October 15th TUES., October 13th: CRITICAL READING OF THE NEWS THURS. Decentralization I: Why decentralize? World Bank and United Cities and Local Governments (2008). Decentralization and Local Democracy in the World: First Global Report by United Cities and Local Government. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Provides an up-to-date survey of decentralization trends, local political institutions, responsibilities of local governments across countries, etc. Reference for both weeks. Read the conclusion and pay special attention to the various geographic trends.] Falleti, Tulia (2005). “A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review. 99(3): 327-346 (August 2005). Eaton, Kent (2001). "Political Obstacles to Decentralization: Evidence from Argentina and the Philippines." Development and Change. 32(1): 101-127 (January 2001). 6 Week 9: Tuesday, October 20th and Thursday, October 22nd: Decentralization II: Consequences of decentralization Montinola, G., Y.Y. Qian, and B. R. Weingast (1995). “Federalism, Chinese Style—The Political Basis for Economic Success in China.” World Politics. 48: 50-81 (October 1995). Cai, Hongbin and Daniel Treisman (2006). "Did Government Decentralization Cause China's Economic Miracle?" World Politics. 58(4): 505-535. View excerpts from the documentary “Chinese Mayor.” 2015. [View the following excerpts: 0-10:06, 31:20-36:10, 41:10-57:25, 1:08:50-1:23] [NEWS MEMO DUE Thurs. Oct. 22nd at 3:30pm] Week 10: Tuesday, October 27th and Thursday, October 29th: Urban Social Movements and Civil Society Auyero, Javier (2005). “Protest and Politics in Contemporary Argentina.” From Levitsky, Steven and Maria Victoria Murillo, ed. (2006). Argentine Democracy: the Politics of Institutional Weakness. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. [Chapter 11]. Read, Benjamin (2008). “Assessing Variation in Civil Society Organizations: China's Homeowner Associations in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies. 41(9): 1240-1265. Gay, Robert (2005). Lucia: Testimonies of a Brazilian Drug Dealer’s Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. [Introduction and Chapter 7, including “Religion”]. AlSayyad, N., & Guvenc, M. (2013). Virtual Uprisings: On the Interaction of New Social Media, Traditional Media Coverage and Urban Space during the ‘Arab Spring’. Urban Studies. Week 11: Tuesday, November 3rd and Thursday, November 5th: Urban Labor Market Transformations and Their Political Implications Tripp, Aili Mari (1997). Changing the Rules: The Politics of Liberalization and the Urban Informal Economy in Tanzania. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Chapters 1, 6]. Gay, Robert (2005). Lucia: Testimonies of a Brazilian Drug Dealer’s Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. [Chapter 6, including “Economy”] Agarwala, Rina (2008). “Reshaping the Social Contract: Emerging Relations between the State and Informal Labor in India.” Theory and Society. 37: 375 - 408. 7 Week 12: Tuesday, November 10th and Thursday, November 12th Urban Land Markets, Property Rights, and Environmental Justice Auyero, Javier and Débora Alejandra Swistun (2009). Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press. [Entire book; available as e-book through the library]. THURSDAY Nov. 12th: SECTION DURING CLASS/ SIMULATION DURING SECTIONS ON MONDAY Week 13: Tuesday, November 17th and Thursday, November 19th: Local State Capacity and Service Delivery: General Debates Piracha, Mujtaba & Mick Moore. 2016. “Revenue-Maximizing or Revenue-Sacrificing Government? Property Tax in Pakistan.” Journal of Development Studies. 52(12): 17761790. Habyarimana, James, Macartan Humphreys, Daniel Posner, and Jeremy Weinstein (2007). “Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?” American Political Science Review. 101(4): 709-725. Berenshot, Ward."Everyday Mediation: The Politics of Public Service Delivery in Gujarat, India." 2010. Development and Change. 41(5): 883-905. [POLICY PAPER DUE Thurs. November 19th at 3:30pm] Week 14: Tuesday, November 24th: Local State Capacity and Service Delivery II: Utilities and Infrastructure Herrera, Veronica & Post, Alison. E. (2014). Can developing countries both decentralize and depoliticize urban water services? Evaluating the legacy of the 1990s reform wave. World Development, 64, 621-641. Anand, Nikhil. 2012. “Pressure: The Polytechnics of Water Supply in Mumbai.” Cultural Anthropology 26(4) 542-563. Optional background: Estache, Antonio, Andrés Gómez-Lobo, and Danny Leipziger (2001). “Utilities Privatization and the Poor: Lessons and Evidence from Latin America.” World Development. 29(7): 1179-1198. 8 [THURSDAY: THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY] Week 15: Tuesday, December 1st and Thursday, December 3rd Public Security Flom, Hernán and Alison E. Post. 2016. “Blame Avoidance and Policy Stability: Security Policy in Buenos Aires.” Comparative Politics. 49(1): 23-46. Gay, Robert (2005). Lucia: Testimonies of a Brazilian Drug Dealer’s Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press [pp. 23-27; Chapter 2 and pgs. 171-174]. Tellez, Juan Fernando, Erik Wibbels, and Anirudh Krishna. 2020. “Local Order, Policing, and Bribes.” World Politics. 72(3): 377-410. [RESEARCH DESIGN PAPER due Wednesday, December 16th at 3:30pm via bcourses] 9