Uploaded by KD Hurd

The difference between facts and evidence

advertisement
fi
fi
fi
fi
Facts in Evidence
Facts vs. Evidence:
Fact is a truth that can be proven. On the other
hand, Evidence is testimony the is declared by a material witness.
Evidence
can be Documental Evidence or factual evidence. You need to have Factual Evidence to prove that Documental Evidence is not true. For example, in the OJ
Simpson Case the murder weapon was not found and the glove did not t.
Material Misrepresentations:
Parties that are basing their allegations
on Material Misrepresentations and Inconsistent Declarations are engaged in
Negligence. If there is Intent then the Negligence becomes Fraud.
Statute of
Frauds
In order to get around the Fraud, Pro Se Litigants need to bring the evidence into the case as a material fact through a Motion for Summary Judgment or
a Motion to Strike on the Pleading.
Typically, Pro Se Litigants will need to
identify the Gravamen of the Complaint and prepare discovery related to the
matter that will bring that speci c issue that the opposition is attempting to hide
and conceal from the court.
Inconsistent Declarations: Parties attempting to hide a critical omission
will create a series of Inconsistent Declarations that attempt to divert attention
away from the issues at hand. This party will refuse to answer discovery and
object on the basis that the evidence is somehow not related to the case or will
not lead to admissible evidence.
Motion for Summary Judgement on the Gravamen of the Complaint:
PBL
believes that most if not all cases can either be resolved through the Meet and
Confer Letters. However, when the opposition is engaged in Fraud, Material
Misrepresentations and Inconsistent Declarations in an attempt to hide critical
Omissions. Pro Se Litigants can identify the Gravamen of the Complaint that
directly relates to that Omission and addresses said Omission in a Motion for
Summary Judgment.
If the matter cannot be resolved through Demand Letters
and Meet and Confer Letters, then the next level of defense is to subject the
Gravamen of the Complaint to a Motion for Summary Judgement that will expose
the omissions and admit material evidence into the case.
Propounding Discovery:
In accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedures, both parties have the right to Propound Discovery during Law and Motion
phase. Pro Se Litigants can propound discovery:
(A) Demand for Document
Production
(B) Interrogatories
(C) Request for Admissions
(D) Form
Interrogatories
Motion to Compel:
Once the discovery is propounded, the answering party will have 30 days to respond. In the response, they can object on a number of
causes. They can also state that the facts are not known to them. In any matter,
if the Critical Omission is avoided, Pro Se Litigants can le a Motion to Compel
the critical information after a series of Meet and Confer Letters establishing the
issue that needs to be addressed. After the Motion to Compel, Pro Se Litigants
can le a Motion for Summary Judgement on the Critical Omission and expose
the true nature of the Fraud.
Download