Uploaded by kirstenvanderwijk

SQ Week 2

advertisement
Seminar questions week 2
Bouwens & Kroos (2019)
1. What is the decision that is focal in this study and how is the delegation of decision rights
organized in this setting?
2. What kind of customers are served in this bank and why is this relevant?
3. What is the key problem that emerges when decision rights are organized as they are while
serving the kind of customers that they do?
4. What are the two components of the riskiness of a loan? In addition, how do loan rates
move (increase or decrease) when the credit risk and total outstanding debt increase? Does
this make sense to you?
5. What is the main takeaway from Table 5? Is this consistent with the key problem that you
discussed at point 3.
6. What is the main takeaway from Table 6? Is this consistent with the key problem that you
discussed at point 3.
Wallace (1997)
1. What do we mean with the statement that ‘the use of traditional earnings in incentive
compensation contracts may lead to overinvestment?’
2. Why would residual income (as performance measure in their incentive compensation
contract) reduce these overinvestment problems?
3. What is the main takeaway from Table 3? Explain these findings.
4. What is the main takeaway from Table 4? Explain these findings?
5. What is the main takeaway from Table 5 if you solely focus on asset turnover as the
dependent variable? Explain these findings?
6. We also discussed underinvestment problems. What do we mean with underinvestment
problems? Can residual income also be used to address underinvestment problems?
Vyaderm business case
1. Describe the old incentive and control system? What are the main problems that emerge
from this according to Maurice Vedrine?
2. What do we mean with Economic Value Added (EVA)? What are the main modifications that
are made relative to traditional (GAAP) earnings measures? What does Maurice Vedrine
expects to achieve with the introduction of the EVA measure?
3. With regard to the implementation, Vedrine initially decides to adopt one corporate EVA
center and after criticism shifts toward the adoption of 15 EVA centers. This plan is also
aborted and it is ultimately decided to adopt 4 EVA centers. What was the main problem of
one EVA center and the main problem of 15 EVA centers?
4. Does it make sense for a pharmaceutical company to consider the adoption of EVA?
5. What is the EVA for Dermatology for 2017?
6. Competitor PJL had to close down due to no longer being FDA compliant. What would you
recommend Maurice Vedrine with respect to the unusual high EVA performance for
Dermatology in 2017?
Download