Euro NCAP: A Safety Evolution Aled Williams 16 – 17 May 2016, Faridabad What is Euro NCAP? A public-private partnership since 1997 Member States / Economic Regions Automobile Clubs Consumer Advocates Insurer Industry 3 Copyright © 2015 Euro NCAP. All rights reserved. 20 years of Euro NCAP 1997 2017 New to Europe Well established Tests addressed fundamental safety issues Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Quick consumer recognition Broad consumer recognition and trust Rejected and dismissed by Industry Fully engaged with Industry 1997: The Problems Safety not a selling point Safety engineers had little influence within vehicle manufacturers No recognition or reward for excellence Consumer choice based on perception only – no independent information Poor vehicle crashworthiness in real-life accidents Frontal Impact Side Impact ECE Regulation 94+ 64km/h, 40% overlap ECE Regulation 95 50km/h 950kg trolley 55km/h (34mph) 50% car to car, 50% MAIS 3+ injuries 1997: Euro NCAP Phase 1 60% % of cars rated / year Milestones 3-stars 50% 4-stars 5-stars 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2001: First 5 star car 2009: Overall Rating Scheme 2016: 1997 2002 2003: Child Occupant Rating Scheme Current Rating 2007 Euro NCAP in 2016 Adapting to emerging advanced technology Outlook 2020 The future rating scheme is laid out in the Roadmap 2020 document Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 • Front occupant protection • Far side occupant protection • SBR update • AEB C2C Phase 2 • AEB Cyclists • LKA • Road departure and evasive steering • SAS • Driver monitoring • Semi-automated driving Ratings – Rewards – Test Campaigns – Consultation 9 Copyright © 2015 Euro NCAP. All rights reserved. 2016 L7 Quadricycle Safety Campaign Limits to mass and power Some capable of 100km/h No legislative crash test requirements Simplified test procedures and rating scheme Frontal: 50km/h full width to deformable barrier Side: 50km/h 950kg trolley 10 Copyright © 2015 Euro NCAP. All rights reserved. 2016 L7 Quadricycle Safety Campaign All quadricycles performed poorly Fundamental safety concerns Some showed poor structural integrity Dummy readings indicated a high risk of fatal or serious injuries (red body region in illustrations) Some issues relatively easily solved Urge quadricycle manufacturers to invest in safety Call for greater safety regulation of quadricycles Euro NCAP to try to engage more closely with manufacturers 11 Copyright © 2015 Euro NCAP. All rights reserved. Working Groups General AOP COP PP SA TWG Front impact Child Safety Pedestrian Safety SAS Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs PNCAP TWG TEFIRE (THOR) Deployable systems AEB C2C Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Inter-lab Side impact AEB VRU Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Comm’s group Whiplash LSS Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Ratings Group IWI Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers VVSMA Euro NCAP, ANCAP, OEMs Automated Driving Euro NCAP 12 Copyright © 2015 Euro NCAP. All rights reserved. Working Groups General AOP COP PP SA TWG Front impact Child Safety Pedestrian Safety SAS Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs PNCAP TWG TEFIRE (THOR) Deployable systems AEB C2C Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Inter-lab Side impact AEB VRU Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Comm’s group Whiplash LSS Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers Ratings Group IWI Euro NCAP Euro NCAP, OEMs, Suppliers VVSMA Euro NCAP, ANCAP, OEMs Automated Driving Euro NCAP 13 Copyright © 2015 Euro NCAP. All rights reserved. Conclusions Euro NCAP at forefront of protocol development Protocols available to other NCAPs Working closely with other programmes Challenging Industry but fully engaged with OEMs 14 Copyright © 2015 Euro NCAP. All rights reserved. Thank you for your attention 15