The Seven Learning Styles – How do you learn? Contrary to the traditional educational framework, there is actually a diverse range of learning styles appropriate for every student. Schools generally use linguistic or logical learning styles, but other styles may be more effective for some learners. When students are not performing as well as they could be, it is likely they just need to be taught in a different way. It is important to remember; diversity is not exclusively about qualities, beliefs and faith, it can also determine how we best learn new skills. Some people learn through movements and hands-on activities, while some need visual information to fully understand a concept. A successful teacher is the one who does not only disseminate knowledge and encourage learning but can also identify the learning styles of students and tend to each one of them. The idea of individualized learning styles started in the 1970s and since then has greatly influenced education. Neil Fleming’s VARK model is one of the common and widely used frameworks today. Fleming’s learning styles are categorised into visual, auditory, reading-writing and kinesthetic. To expand on Fleming’s model, let’s have a look at Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligence theory – the seven learning styles… 1. Visual (Spatial) Do you need to draw things out? Are you constantly doodling? If you find it easier to understand something if it is in a diagram, you are probably a visual learner. Knowledge or concept maps use visual symbols as a way to express knowledge, concepts, thoughts or ideas, and the relationships between them. These are a great tool for visual or spatial learners as you can draw connections or use colour coding to group ideas. By representing information spatially and with images, students are able to focus on meaning, reorganise and group similar ideas easily, and utilise their visual memory to learn. Visual learners often pursue careers such as architecture, engineering, project management, or design. 2. Aural (Auditory-Musical) Do you dislike reading? If you need someone to tell you something out loud to understand it, you are an auditory learner. You depend on hearing the information to fully understand it, rather than just reading it from a book. Group discussions are a great way for auditory learners to grasp new ideas. Auditory learners have the aptitude to notice audible signals like changes in tone, or pitch to name a few. For example, when memorising a phone number, an auditory learner will say it out loud first and take note of how it sounded to remember it. Aural learners often pursue careers such as musician, recording engineer, speech pathologist, or language teacher. 3. Verbal (Linguistic) Do you love words and writing? People who find it easier to express themselves by writing or speaking can be regarded as verbal learners. You love to write and read. You like to play on the meaning or sound of words such as tongue twisters, rhymes and so on. You’re familiar with the definitions of many words and regularly make an effort to learn more meanings of new words. Techniques used by verbal learners involve mnemonics, scripting, roleplaying and anything that involves both speaking and writing. Verbal learners often pursue public speaking, writing, administration, journalism or politics. 4. Physical (Kinesthetic) Are you a hands-on type of person? In this style, learning happens when the learner carries out a physical activity, rather than listening to a lecture or watching a demonstration. Those who have a preference for kinesthetic learning are called ‘do-ers’ and much prefer hands-on learning. Kinesthetic learners make up about five percent of the population. Kinesthetic learners are often interested in careers such as emergency services, safety representative, physical education, or entertainment (such as acting or dance). 5. Logical (Mathematical) Are you great with numbers? When you like using your brain for logical and mathematical reasoning, you’re a logical learner. You easily recognise patterns and can connect seemingly meaningless concepts easily. Logical learners often lean towards classifying and grouping information to help them further understand it. You excel in numbers and are fine with doing complex calculations such as basic trigonometry off the top of your head! Logical learners could pursue careers in fields such as scientific research, accountancy, bookkeeping or computer programming. 6. Social (Interpersonal) Are you a people person? Other learners prefer social or interpersonal learning. If you’re at best in socializing and communicating with people, both verbally and non-verbally, this is what you are; a social learner. People often come to you to listen and ask for advice. They do because of the apparent sensitivity you have to their feelings, moods and even motivations. You listen well and empathize with what others are thinking and going through. Social learners may pursue counselling, teaching, training and coaching, sales, politics, and human resources among others. 7. Solitary (Intrapersonal) Do you prefer working alone? You have a solitary style if you are more private, independent and introspective. Your concentration is at its best when you focus on your thoughts and feelings without the distraction of others. Authors and researchers often have a strong solitary learning style. However, having a good solitary grounding is evident for many top performers in a range of fields. Being able to learn introspectively works well with some of the more dominant learning styles discussed above. Learning styles vs. multiple intelligences: Related, but not the same What are learning styles? Google has a field day when you look up learning styles. As is the case with most complicated terminology, some of the definitions make sense and some don’t. Here are three explanations of learning styles that sit right: 1. Teaching Expertise states that “Learning Styles (LS) can be defined as the way humans prefer to concentrate on, store, and remember new and difficult information.” OK, so far so good. That makes sense. 1. Educational scholar Dorothy MacKeracher (2004, p. 71) describes learning styles as “the characteristic of cognitive, affective, social, and physiological behaviors that serve as relatively stable indicators of how learners perceive, interact with, and respond to the learning environment.” 1. On the other hand, Brown University jumps more to the point and expresses that learning styles are how you process and comprehend information in learning situations. Brown also breaks up learning styles into six categories (which we’ll revisit later): Visual learning Kinesthetic learning Individual learning Tactile learning Auditory learning Group learning In short, learning styles have to do with an individual’s preferred way of learning — or, as Gardner put it, how students approach a task. Who came up with the learning styles? Many scholars point out that learning styles have been around since Carl Jung explored personality types in 1923 and separated them into the following: Extraversion vs. introversion Sensation vs. intuition Thinking vs. feeling Judging vs. perceiving This led to the now-famous Myers Brigg personality test (which yes, could be it’s very own blog post). But it was a New Zealand researcher Neil Flemming who discovered that certain teachers could reach every student if they catered to students’ learning styles. He came up with VARK in 1987, which stands for the four basic modalities of learning techniques: visual, aural, auditory, read/write, and kinesthetic. Yes, it’s slightly different from Brown’s interpretation above, but the general idea holds true that there are categorized, preferred ways to learn. VARK states that learning is not so black and white and reminds us to “[r]emember [that] life (and work) are multimodal, so there are no hard and fast boundaries.” On the other hand, Gardner’s 1983 Multiple Intelligence Theory aimed to breakdown learning abilities based on learning styles. According to Gardner, the notion of multiple intelligences “is a theoretical framework for defining/understanding/assessing/developing people’s different intelligence factors.” One could argue that multiple intelligence theory focuses more on evaluating and understanding an individual’s intelligence than learning styles do. Gardner also emphasized that individuals possess each of these bits of intelligence, but it’s the degree to which each one exhibits that’s important to recognize. *Note that critics of multiple intelligence theory point out that “intelligence” is not a clearly defined term. Instead, they base learning styles on biological and conditioned factors. After sifting through various comparisons of these two terms, we found another description from the Teaching for Multiple Intelligences that stuck with us: “[L]earning styles emphasize the different ways people think and feel as they solve problems, create products, and interact. The theory of multiple intelligences is an effort to understand how cultures and disciplines shape human potential.” You’re not alone if you’re still finding the concept tricky to grasp, so let’s go a step further and breakdown each category. But before we dig in, note that the notion of “learning” itself is not clear-cut, and we all possess aspects of all these styles and intelligences. The 6 learning styles Here’s a breakdown of learning styles: 1. Visual learning Using one’s sense of sight to gather information. Visual learning activities: Following maps Sketching diagrams Watching videos 2. Group learning Learning well in social settings, with a focus on collaboration and team-building skills. Group learning activities: Team building activities like those on a ropes course, human alphabet, and group sit Group projects such as literature posters or presentations Group discussions, formally or informally 3. Kinesthetic learning Learning takes place physically with movement, expressions, and one’s sense of touch. Kinesthetic learning activities: Simulation games like Predator Prey Field trips or other outdoor activities Board games and other manipulatives 4. Individual learning Learning alone as opposed to in a group, with greater focus on self-study. This learning style connects with intrapersonal multiple intelligence. Individual learning activities: Independent reading Solo study sessions Individualized online projects 5. Tactile learning Hands-on learning. This relates to kinesthetic intelligence and even nature intelligence. Tactile learning activities: Building 3D models Attending and/or presenting at a science fair Measuring items in the classroom 6. Auditory learning Learning through hearing. Related to linguistic intelligence and musical intelligence. Auditory learning activities: Listening to nursery rhymes Writing song lyrics, or even singing Creating or listening to podcasts The 9 intelligence categories Now that you’re more familiar with learning styles, let’s offer some explanations for multiple intelligences. Most scholars break up the multiple intelligences into nine categories (because they added the existentialist one recently). Although related to learning styles, multiple intelligences focus more on intellectual abilities. On the other hand, learning styles emphasize preferences or how a person likes to approach their learning. As you read the descriptions below, you should sense the overlap. 1. Spatial-visual intelligence Students with this trait have an uncanny ability to visualize things. Whether it be manipulating 3D objects or finding the quickest route on a roadmap, this intelligence goes hand in hand with the visual learning style. It’s how you store visually learned information in your memory. 2. Verbal-linguistic intelligence Do you know those students who get excited about writing stories and public speaking? They favor verbal-linguistic learning. They probably love words, spoken and written. And they relish word sounds, meanings, etc. These students also tend to listen attentively. 3. Musical intelligence People who exhibit musical intelligence learn in an auditory way and have an ear for rhythm. Instead of favoring words or images, musical learners prefer sounds. 4. Bodily-Kinesthetic intelligence How you obtain information through moving as well as how you control your body/fine motor skills. In short, bodily-kinesthetic intelligence involves learning through movement. 5. Naturalist intelligence Learning best outdoors. People who are curious about their natural world, animals, and plants exhibit naturalist intelligence. 6. Interpersonal intelligence People in this category are social and empathetic, which allows them to intuitively sense others’ needs. They can read the moods of others and relate to their peers. They’re also often strong communicators. 7. Intrapersonal intelligence On the other end, intrapersonal intelligence focuses more inwardly than out. These learners ten to be highly reflective and thoughtful within their own minds. They also may be highly in tune with their own strengths and weaknesses. 8. Logical-mathematical intelligence People who love analyzing problems and reaching a logical solution fall in this category. They have strong reasoning skills, typically excel at standardized tests, and are keen on identifying patterns. 9. Existential intelligence What’s the meaning of life? What is beauty? How do you define art? These are all big questions that characterize existentialist intelligence. These deep thinkers with philosophic minds are always trying to understand the world around them. The take-away Familiarity with multiple avenues of learning will benefit you and your students. Stacking your teacher arsenal with knowledge on learning styles and multiple intelligence theory will help you reach all your students and not just a select few. Remember that all learners have unique strengths and weaknesses, and a one-size-fitsall approach to teaching doesn’t cater to a student’s individualism. By familiarizing yourself with multiple intelligence theory and the different learning styles, you’ll be able to tap into all your students’ strengths. One final thought How do you learn? Visually? Linguistically? Spatially? In addition to implementing these sweet teaching techniques into your curriculum, when you reflect on your own learning styles and multiple intelligences, you’ll be one step closer to understanding those around you! Photo: Google Edu Multiple Intelligences are not the same as learning styles Learning styles are how we approach different tasks, whereas Multiple Intelligences are a representation of different intellectual abilities. We process information in a variety of different ways – visual (see), auditory (hear) and kinaesthetic (touch) and reflective (think), etc. However, learning experiences do not have to relate directly to your strongest area of intelligence. e.g. someone with a more linguistic leaning does not have to learn primarily through lectures. Often the easiest path to understanding is through multiple avenues. Limiting learning to a single avenue can be counter-productive. Our brains are complex, we learn different skills in different ways. Sometimes it is easier to fully understand a concept by using multiple avenues. e.g. Seeing, hearing and interacting with a concept to embed understanding. Think playing monopoly to help understand the intricacies of finances. Emotional Intelligence is essentially an extension of the theory of multiple intelligences proposed in 1983 by Dr. Howard Gardner, professor of education at Harvard University. He suggests that the traditional idea of IQ was too limited. Instead Gardner proposed his theory to account for a broader range of human potential in children and adults. These include: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Linguistic/verbal (“word smart”) Logical-mathematical (“number/reasoning smart”) Musical (“music smart”) Spatial (“picture smart”) Body-Kinesthetic (“body smart”) Interpersonal (“people smart”) 7. Intrapersonal (“self smart”) 8. Naturalist (“nature smart”) 9. Spiritual/Existential (“religion and ‘ultimate issues”) ntegrating Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences In integrating these major theories of knowledge, we moved through three steps. First, we attempted to describe, for each of Gardner's intelligences, a set of four learning processes or abilities, one for each of the four learning styles. For linguistic intelligence, for example, the Mastery style represents the ability to use language to describe events and sequence activities; the Interpersonal style, the ability to use language to build trust and rapport; the Understanding style, the ability to develop logical arguments and use rhetoric; and the Self-expressive style, the ability to use metaphoric and expressive language. Figure 1. Sample "Kinesthetic" Vocations by Style Integrating Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences-table "Mastery The ability to use the body and tools to take effective action or to construct or repair. Mechanic, Trainer, Contractor, Craftsperson, Tool and Dye Maker" "Interpersonal The ability to use the body to build rapport, to console or persuade, and to support others. Coach, Counselor, Salesperson, Trainer" Kinesthetic "Understanding The ability to plan strategically or to critique the actions of the body. Physical Educator, Sports Analyst, Professional Athlete, Dance Critic" "Self-Expressive The ability to appreciate the aesthetics of the body and to use those values to create new forms of expression. Sculptor, Choreographer, Actor, Dancer, Mime, Puppeteer" Next, we listed samples of vocations that people are likely to choose, given particular intelligence and learning-style profiles. Working in this way, we devised a model that linked the process-centered approach of learning styles and the content and productdriven multiple intelligence theory. Figure 2 shows how you might construct a classroom display of information about intelligences, styles, and possible vocations. Consider kinesthetic intelligence and the difference between a Tiger Woods and a Gene Kelly: People who excel in this intelligence, with an Understanding style, might be professional athletes (like Tiger Woods), dance critics, or sports analysts; people with a Self-expressive style might be sculptors, choreographers, dancers (like Gene Kelly), actors, mimes, or puppeteers. Figure 2. Student Choice: Assessment Products by Intelligence and Style LINGUISTIC Mastery Write an article Put together a magazine Develop a plan Develop a newscast Describe a complex procedure/object Interpersonal Write a letter Make a pitch Conduct an interview Counsel a fictional character or a friend Understanding Make a case Make/defend a decision Advance a theory Interpret a text Explain an artifact Self-Expressive Write a play Develop a plan to direct Spin a tale Develop an advertising campaign Mastery: The ability to use language to describe events and sequence activities (journalist, technical writer, administrator, contractor) Interpersonal: The ability to use language to build trust and rapport (salesperson, counselor, clergyperson, therapist) Understanding: The ability to develop logical arguments and use rhetoric (lawyer, professor, orator, philosopher) Self-expressive: The ability to use metaphoric and expressive language (playwright, poet, advertising copywriter, novelist) Mastery: The ability to use numbers to compute, describe, and document (accountant, bookkeeper, statistician) Interpersonal: The ability to apply mathematics in personal and daily life (tradesperson, homemaker) Understanding: The ability to use mathematical concepts to make conjectures, establish proofs, and apply mathematics and data to construct arguments (logician, computer programmer, scientist, quantitative problem solver) Self-expressive: The ability to be sensitive to the patterns, symmetry, logic, and aesthetics of mathematics and to solve problems in design and modeling (composer, engineer, inventor, designer, qualitative problem solver) Mastery: The ability to perceive and represent the visual-spatial world accurately (illustrator, artist, guide, photographer) Interpersonal: The ability to arrange color, line, shape, form, and space to meet the needs of others (interior decorator, painter, clothing designer, weaver, builder) Understanding: The ability to interpret and graphically represent visual or spatial ideas (architect, iconographer, computer graphics designer, art critic) Self-expressive: The ability to transform visual or spatial ideas into imaginative and expressive creations (artist, inventor, model builder, cinematographer) Mastery: The ability to use the body and tools to take effective action or to construct or repair (mechanic, trainer, contractor, craftsperson, tool and dye maker) Interpersonal: The ability to use the body to build rapport, to console and persuade, and to support others (coach, counselor, salesperson, trainer) Understanding: The ability to plan strategically or to critique the actions of the body (physical educator, sports analyst, professional athlete, dance critic) Self-expressive: The ability to appreciate the aesthetics of the body and to use those values to create new forms of expression (sculptor, choreographer, actor, dancer, mime, puppeteer) Mastery: The ability to understand and develop musical technique (technician, music teacher, instrument maker) Interpersonal: The ability to respond emotionally to music and to work together to use music to meet the needs of others (choral, band, and orchestral performer or conductor; public relations director in music) Understanding: The ability to interpret musical forms and ideas (music critic, aficionado, music collector) Self-expressive: The ability to create imaginative and expressive performances and compositions (composer, conductor, individual/small-group performer) Mastery: The ability to organize people and to communicate clearly what needs to be done (administrator, manager, politician) Interpersonal: The ability to use empathy to help others and to solve problems (social worker, doctor, nurse, therapist, teacher) Understanding: The ability to discriminate and interpret among different kinds of interpersonal clues (sociologist, psychologist, psychotherapist, professor of psychology or sociology) Self-expressive: The ability to influence and inspire others to work toward a common goal (consultant, charismatic leader, politician, evangelist) Mastery: The ability to assess one's own strengths, weaknesses, talents, and interests and use them to set goals (planner, small business owner) Interpersonal: The ability to use understanding of oneself to be of service to others (counselor, social worker) Understanding: The ability to form and develop concepts and theories based on an examination of oneself (psychologist) Self-expressive: The ability to reflect on one's inner moods, intuitions, and temperament and to use them to create or express a personal vision (artist, religious leader, writer) As the final step in constructing the intelligence-learning style menus, we collected descriptions of products that a person with strengths in each intelligence and style might create. For example, in the linguistic intelligence domain, a person with the Mastery style might write an article, put a magazine together, develop a newscast, or describe a complex procedure. By contrast, a person with a Selfexpressive style might write a play, spin a tale, or develop an advertising campaign (see fig. 2). In the kinesthetic intelligence domain, a person with an Understanding style might choreograph a concept or teach a physical education concept; a person with a Self-expressive style might create a diorama or act out emotional states or concepts. A class display of such lists might accompany charts like the sample shown in Figure 2. How to Use the Integrated Intelligence Menus Several years ago, Grant Wiggins reminded us that we can't teach everything. It is also quite obvious that we can't use every teaching method nor every form of assessment. Here are some ways to use the Integrated Intelligence Menus— particularly for performance assessment—without trying to do everything at once. 1. Use the menus as a compass. Keep a running record of the styles and intelligences you use regularly and of those you avoid. When a particular form of assessment doesn't work, offer the student another choice from another part of the menu. 2. Focus on one intelligence at a time. Offer your students a choice in one of the four styles, or urge them to do two assessments: one from a style they like and one from a style they would normally avoid. 3. Build on student interest. When students conduct research, either individually or in groups, show them the menus and allow them to choose the product or approach that appeals to them. They should choose the best product for communicating their understanding of the topic or text. Students thus discover not only the meaning of quality, but also something about the nature of their own interests, concerns, styles, and intelligences. Does it help us develop every student's capacity to learn what we believe all students need to know? Does it help each student discover and develop his or her unique abilities and interests? In conjunction, both multiple intelligences and learning styles can work together to form a powerful and integrated model of human intelligence and learning—a model that respects and celebrates diversity and provides us with the tools to meet high standards. Summary of the Eight IntelligencesIntelligence AreaStrengthsPreferencesLearns best throughNeedsVerbal / LinguisticWriting, reading, memorizing dates, thinking in words, telling storiesWrite, read, tell stories, talk, memorize, work at solving puzzlesHearing and seeing words, speaking, reading, writing, discussing and debatingBooks, tapes, paper diaries, writing tools, dialogue, discussion, debated, stories, etc.Mathematical/ LogicalMath, logic, problem-solving, reasoning, patternsQuestion, work with numbers, experiment, solve problemsWorking with relationships and patterns, classifying, categorizing, working with the abstractThings to think about and explore, science materials, manipulative, trips to the planetarium and science museum, etc.Visual / SpatialMaps, reading charts, drawing, mazes, puzzles, imagining things, visualizationDraw, build, design, create, daydream, look at picturesWorking with pictures and colors, visualizing, using the mind’s eye, drawingLEGOs, video, movies, slides, art, imagination games, mazes, puzzles, illustrated book, trips to art museums, etc.Bodily / KinestheticAthletics, dancing, crafts, using tools, actingMove around, touch and talk, body languageTouching, moving, knowledge through bodily sensations, processingRole-play, drama, things to build, movement, sports and physical games, tactile experiences, hands-on learning, etc.MusicalPicking up sounds, remembering melodies, rhythms, singingSing, play an instrument, listen to music, humRhythm, singing, melody, listening to music and melodiesSing-along time, trips to concerts, music playing at home and school, musical instruments, etc.InterpersonalLeading, organizing, understanding people, communicating, resolving conflicts, sellingTalk to people, have friends, join groupsComparing, relating, sharing, interviewing, cooperatingFriends, group games, social gatherings, community events, clubs, mentors/ apprenticeships, etc.IntrapersonalRecognizing strengths and weaknesses, setting goals, understanding selfWork alone, reflect pursue interestsWorking alone, having space, reflecting, doing selfpaced projectsSecret places, time alone, self-paced projects, choices, etc.NaturalisticUnderstanding nature, making distinctions, identifying flora and faunaBe involved with nature, make distinctionsWorking in nature, exploring living things, learning about plants and natural eventsOrder, same/different, connections to real life and science issues, patterns Multiple Intelligences: Classroom Application (Table added by Brandy Bellamy and Camille Baker, 2005) Teacher Centered Student Centered Verbal/Linguistic Student Presents Material Students read content and prepare a presentation for his/her classmates Students debate over an issue Students categorize information in logical sequences for organization. Make logical connections between the subject matter and authentic situations to answer the question “why?” Students create graphs or charts to explain written info. Present content verbally Ask questions aloud and look for student feedback Interviews Provide brain teasers or challenging questions to begin lessons. Logical/Mathematical Use props during lecture Provide tangible items pertaining to content for students to examine Review using sports related examples (throw a ball to someone to answer a question) Bodily/Kinesthetic Students use computers to research subject matter. Students create props of their own explaining subject matter (shadow boxes, mobiles, etc…) Students create review games. Have students work individually or in groups to create visuals pertaining to the information: When presenting the information, use visuals to explain content:</br>PowerPoint Slides, Charts, Graphs, cartoons, videos, overheads, smartboards Visual/Spatial Play music in the classroom during reflection periods Show examples or create musical rhythms for students to remember things Students participate in webquests associated with the content Posters; timelines; models; powerpoint slides; maps; illustrations, charts; concept mapping Create a song or melody with the content embedded for memory Use well known songs to memorize formulas, skills, or test content Encourage collaboration among peers Musical Interpersonal Be aware of body language and facial expressions Offer assistance whenever needed Encourage classroom discussion Group work strengthens interpersonal connections Peer feedback and peer tutoring Students present to the class Encourage group editing Intrapersonal Naturalistic Encourage journaling as a positive outlet for expression Journaling Introduce web logging (blogs) Individual research on content Make individual questions welcome Create a positive environment. Students create personal portfolios of work Take students outside to enjoy nature while in learning process (lecture) Students organize thoughts using natural cycles Compare authentic subject matter to natural occurrences. Relate subject matter to stages that occur in nature (plants, weather, etc) Students make relationships among content and the natural environment (how has nature had an impact?) Students perform community service