Uploaded by JAMES KWEKU AIDOO

MAGNETOSTATICS

advertisement
MAGNETOSTATICS
Magnetostatics is the study of magnetic fields in systems where the
currents are steady (not changing with time). It is the magnetic
analogue of electrostatics, where the charges are stationary.
The motion of a single charge in the vicinity of a current-carrying
conductor can be analyzed, and then express the total force on the
particle as a sum of the magnetic forces exerted on it by the individual
electrons moving in the conductor.
MAGNETOSTATICS
• So lets consider the two point charges Q1 and Q2 moving in a vacuum with the velocities v1 and v2,
respectively, with respect to an observer. Let us also suppose that v1 and v2 are less than the
velocity of light.
v1
Q1
U12(unit vector)
Q2
v2
MAGNETOSTATICS
• The magnetic force Fm12 exerted by the charge Q1 on the charge Q2 is
• 𝐹𝑀12 =
𝑄1 𝑄2
𝐾𝑀
π‘Ÿ2
(𝑣1 × (𝑣1 × π‘’12) ………………….. (1)
• where 𝐾𝑀 depends on the property of the space.
• 𝐾𝑀 =
πœ‡0
4πœ‹
, πœ‡0 is the absolute permeability
• The unit of velocity in SI units is m/s, and one coulomb per second is
one ampere. Hence the unit of πœ‡0 is N/(A)2 which can be written as
henry/metre, its notation being H/m
MAGNETOSTATICS
• Comparing the force between the moving charges with the Coulomb’s law for the
force between the static charge. That is
•
•
πœ‡0 𝑄1 𝑄2
𝐹𝑀12 =
(𝑣1
2
4πœ‹
π‘Ÿ
1
𝑄1 𝑄2
𝐹12 =
4πœ‹πœ€0
π‘Ÿ2
× (𝑣1 × π‘’12)
• we find that the product (πœ‡0 πœ€0 )–1 has the dimension (velocity)2
1
−12
Now we know, πœ€0 = 8.854 × 10
=
9
36πœ‹×10
• And the value of πœ‡0 is exactly given byπœ‡0 = 4πœ‹ × 10−17 H/m
MAGNETOSTATICS
• Air also has practically the same permeability
• (πœ‡0 πœ€0 )–1≅ 9 × 1016 = (3 × 109 )2
•
1
πœ‡0 πœ€ 0
= 3 × 109 ≡ π‘π‘œ 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 π‘œπ‘“ π‘™π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘ 𝑖𝑛 π‘£π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘’π‘š
• It should be noted that the magnitude of the magnetic force Fm12
given by Eq. (1) is a function of both the magnitude and the direction
of the velocities of the two charges. The largest possible magnitude of
this force would be
• 𝐹𝑀12 =
πœ‡0 𝑄1 𝑄2
4πœ‹
π‘Ÿ2
(𝑣1 × π‘£2)
MAGNETOSTATICS
• The ratio of the maximal possible magnetic force and electric force is
•
πΉπ‘š12
𝐹𝑒12
= πœ€π‘œ πœ‡π‘œ 𝑣1 𝑣2 =
𝑣1 𝑣2
πΆπ‘œ2
• Let consider the direction of the magnetic force exerted by the charge
𝑄2 on the 𝑄1 which is obtained by interchanging the subscripts 1 and
2 in the equation (1)
𝐹𝑀21 =
πœ‡0 𝑄1 𝑄2
4πœ‹
π‘Ÿ2
(𝑣1 × (𝑣1 × π‘’21), although π‘ˆ21 = −π‘ˆ12
In general(𝑣1 × (𝑣1 × π‘’12) ≠ −(𝑣1 × (𝑣1 × π‘’21),
MAGNETOSTATICS
• In the expression for πΉπ‘š12 , given by equation (1), if instead of 𝑄2 ,
there is a charge moving with the velocity V, then the force πΉπ‘š can be
written as
•
•
•
•
πœ‡0 𝑄1 𝑄2
πΉπ‘š =
(𝑣1 × (𝑣1 ×
2
4πœ‹
π‘Ÿ
πœ‡0 𝑄1 𝑣1 × π‘ˆ12
πΉπ‘š = 𝑄2 𝑉2 ×
4πœ‹
π‘Ÿ2
πœ‡0
𝑄1 𝑣1 × π‘ˆ12
πΉπ‘š = 𝑄𝑉 × ( )
4πœ‹
π‘Ÿ2
πœ‡0
𝑄1 𝑣1 × π‘ˆ12
BUT 𝐡 = ( )
4πœ‹
π‘Ÿ2
π‘ˆ12 )
MAGNETOSTATICS
• πΉπ‘š = 𝑄𝑉 × π΅
• Where B is the magnetic flux density vector produced by the moving
charge Q
• The unit of magnetic flux density is newton-second per coulombmetre. It is also called tesla (T) or webers per square metre (Wb/m2)
LORENTZ FORCE
• Now, instead of only two charges, let us assume that there are n
charges Q1,Q2,Q3…….,Qn, moving with velocity V1,V2,V3…….Vn,
respectively.(with respect to the same coordinate system), then by
the principle of superposition of the magnetic forces, the total
magnetic force on Q due to those n charges will be
• πΉπ‘š = 𝑄𝑉 ×
πœ‡0
4πœ‹
𝑄1 𝑣1 × π‘ˆ1
π‘Ÿ2
+β‹―+
𝑄𝑛 𝑉𝑛 × π‘ˆπ‘›
π‘Ÿ2
• So the magnetic flux density vector B due to the n moving charge is
•π΅=
πœ‡0
( )
4πœ‹
𝑄 π‘˜ 𝑉 π‘˜ × π‘ˆπ‘˜
𝑛
π‘˜=1
π‘Ÿπ‘˜2
LORENTZ FORCE
• To generalize, suppose in the region there are same static charges as
well and Q is subject to an electric field 𝐹𝑒 which will be
• 𝐹𝑒 = 𝑄𝐸 where E is the electric field intensity due to the static
charges.
• Hence the total force on the charge Q is
• 𝐹 = 𝐹𝑒 + πΉπ‘š
• 𝐹 = 𝑄𝐸 + 𝑄𝑉 × π΅
• 𝐹 = 𝑄 𝐸 + 𝑉 + 𝐡 , The total force F is known as the Lorentz Force.
BIOT AND SAVART
• Biot and Savart experimentally observed that the magnitude of magnetic field 𝑑𝐡 at a point P at a distance r
from the small elemental length taken on a conductor carrying current varies
• directly as the strength of the current I
• directly as the magnitude of the length element 𝑑 𝑙
• directly as the sine of the angle (say,θ) between 𝑑𝑙 and π‘Ÿ
• inversely as the square of the distance between the point P and length element 𝑑𝑙
• This is expressed as
𝐼𝑑𝑙
sin πœƒ
π‘Ÿ2
𝐼 𝑑𝑙
𝑑𝐡 = π‘˜ 2 sin πœƒ
π‘Ÿ
πœ‡
Where π‘˜ = 0
4πœ‹
• 𝑑𝐡 ∝
•
•
• 𝑑𝐡 =
πœ‡0 𝐼 𝑑𝑙
sin πœƒ
4πœ‹ π‘Ÿ 2
• π‘Ÿ = unit vector in the direction from differential current element
to P
• According to the cross product rule 𝑑𝑙 × π‘Ÿ = 𝑑𝑙 π‘Ÿ sin πœƒ = 𝑑𝑙 sin πœƒ
• 𝑑𝐡 =
πœ‡0 𝐼 π‘‘π‘™× π‘Ÿ
4πœ‹ π‘Ÿ 2
• But π‘Ÿ = 𝒓/π‘Ÿ
• 𝑑𝐡 =
πœ‡0 𝐼 π‘‘π‘™× π‘Ÿ
4πœ‹ π‘Ÿ 3
BIOT AND SAVART
• To obtain the entire magnetic field intensity, the equation has to be
integrated as
•π΅=
𝑑𝐡 =
πœ‡0 𝐼
4πœ‹
π‘‘π‘™× π‘Ÿ
π‘Ÿ2
Ampere’s Circuital Law
• Ampère’s circuital law is used to calculate magnetic field at a point
whenever there is a symmetry in the problem. This is similar to
Gauss’s law in electrostatics.
• By using this law, complex problems are solved in magnetostatics.
This law can be used to find the magnetic field intensity due to any
current distributions.
• According the Ampere circuital law, the line integral of magnetic field
intensity 𝐡 around a closed path is equal to the direct current
enclosed by that path
•
𝐡 βˆ™ 𝑑𝑙 = πœ‡0 𝐼
Ampere’s Circuital Law
• Where I is the current enclosed by the closed path. Note that the line
integral does not depend on the shape of the path or the position of the
conductor with the magnetic field
Magnetic field due to the current carrying
wire of infinite length using Ampère’s law
• Consider a straight conductor of infinite length carrying current I and
the direction of magnetic field lines is shown in Figure below. Since
the wire is geometrically cylindrical in shape and symmetrical about
its axis, we construct an Ampèrian loop in the form of a circular shape
at a distance r from the centre of the conductor as shown in Figure
below. From the Ampère’s law, we get
Magnetic field due to the current carrying wire of
infinite length using Ampère’s law
•
𝑐
𝐡. 𝑑𝑙 = πœ‡0 𝐼
• where 𝑑𝑙 is the line element along the Amperian loop (tangent to the
circular loop). Hence, the angle between magnetic field vector and line
element is zero. Therefore
•
𝑐
𝐡. 𝑑𝑙 = πœ‡0 𝐼
• where I is the current enclosed by the Ampèrian loop. Due to the
symmetry, the magnitude of the magnetic field is uniform over the
Ampèrian loop, we can take B out of the integration.
•π΅
𝑐
𝑑𝑙 = πœ‡0 𝐼
• For a circular loop, the circumference is 2πr, which implies
Magnetic field due to the current carrying
wire of infinite length using Ampère’s law
•π΅
2πœ‹π‘Ÿ
𝑑𝑙
𝑐
= πœ‡0 𝐼
• 𝐡 βˆ™ 2πœ‹π‘Ÿ = πœ‡0 𝐼
•π΅=
•π΅=
2πœ‹π‘Ÿ
, In
πœ‡0 𝐼
2πœ‹π‘Ÿ
𝑛
πœ‡0 𝐼
vector form, the magnetic field is
• where n is the unit vector along the tangent to the Ampèrian loop
Magnetic flux and magnetic flux density
• Magnetic flux is a measurement of the total magnetic field which
passes through a given area. It is a useful tool for helping
describe the effects of the magnetic force on something
occupying a given area. The measurement of magnetic flux is
tied to the particular area chosen. We can choose to make the
area any size we want and orient it in any way relative to the
magnetic field
• Magnetic flux is usually measured with a flux meter. The SI unit of magnetic
flux is Weber (Wb)
Magnetic flux and magnetic flux density
• In order to calculate the magnetic flux, we consider the field-line
image of a magnet or the system of magnets. The magnetic flux
through a plane of the area, A, that is placed in a uniform magnetic
field of magnitude, B is given as the scalar product of the magnetic
field and the area A. Here, the angle at which the field lines pass
through the given surface area is also important. If the field lines
intersect the area at a glancing angle, that is,
• when the angle between the magnetic field vector and the area
vector is nearly equal to 90α΅’, then the resulting flux is very low.
• When the angle is equal to 0α΅’, the resulting flux is maximum
Magnetic flux and magnetic flux density
• ΙΈ = 𝐡. 𝐴 = π΅π΄πΆπ‘‚π‘†πœƒ
• here θ is the angle between vector A and vector B
• Magnetic flux density(B) is defined as the force acting per unit current per unit
length on a wire placed at right angles to the magnetic field
𝐹
𝐼
• 𝐡 = , SI unit is Tesla (abbreviated as T)
Magnetic field
• When electric charges are moving, a force in addition to that
described by Coulomb's law is exerted on them. To account for this
additional force, we defined another force field, analogous to the Efield definition in the previous section. This second force field is called
the magnetic-flux-density (B-field) vector, B. It is defined in terms of
the force exerted on a small test charge, q. The magnitude of B is
defined as
•
B = Fm/qv
Magnetic field
• where Fm is the maximum force on q in any direction, and v is the
velocity of q. The units of B are webers per square meter. The B-field
is more complicated than the E-field in that the direction of force
exerted on q by the B-field is always perpendicular to both the
velocity of the particle and to the B-field. This force is given by
•
F = q(v x B)
Magnetic field
• The quantity in parentheses is called a vector cross product. The
direction of the vector cross product is perpendicular to both v and B
and is in the direction that a right-handed screw would travel if v
were turned into B. When a moving charge, q, is placed in a space
where both an E-field and a B-field exist, the total force exerted on
the charge is given by the sum of the two equations we saw.
•
F = q(E + v x B)
• This is called the Lorentz force equation
Quasi-Static Fields
• An important class of electromagnetic fields is quasi-static fields. These
fields have the same spatial patterns as static fields but vary with time. For
example, if the charges that produce the E-fields were to vary slowly with
time, the field patterns would vary correspondingly with time but at any one
instant would be similar to the static-field patterns.
• Similar statements could be made for the static B-fields.
• Thus when the frequency of the source charges or currents is low enough,
the fields produced by the sources can be considered quasi-static fields; the
field patterns will be the same as the static-field patterns but will change
with time. Analysis of quasi-static fields is thus much easier than analysis of
fields that change more rapidly with time.
Energy in static and quasi-static magnetic
field
• Because of the force exerted by an electric field on a charge placed in
that field, the charge possesses potential energy. If a charge were
placed in an E-field and released, its potential energy would be
changed to kinetic energy as the force exerted by the E-field on the
charge caused it to move.
• Moving a charge from one point to another in an E-field requires work
by whatever moves the charge. This work is equivalent to the change
in potential energy of the charge. The potential energy of a charge
divided by the magnitude of the charge is called electric-field
potential. E-field potential is a scalar field
Quasi-static magnetic fields
• Quasi-static magnetic field problems can be somewhat decoupled from electric parameters,
however, it is common to require the inclusion of electric scalar potential. Consider the magnetic
curl equation
• in quasi-static magnetic problems it is usual to neglect the rate of change of electric flux:
• In this case, the current density will be considered as the sum of an applied current density (e.g.
due to a stranded current carrying winding, where the gradient of electric scalar potential over the
conducting area is negligible) plus a current density due to induced electric fields. This is a common
situation in electric machines, especially in induction motors where there are stranded stator coils
and solid rotor conductors.
Quasi-static magnetic fields
• substituting for magnetic vector potential give the "curl-curl" equation:
• Now consider the electric curl equation and substitute for magnetic vector potential
• an electric scalar potential may be defined such that
Quasi-static magnetic fields
• and substituted in to the curl-curl equation to give
Download