STRATEGIC COST MANAGEMENT LESSON 1: PROCESS COSTING It is a system of accumulating cost of product by departments or cost center. Commonly used by companies where a large number of product are being continuously process until completed and transferred to finished goods. OBJECTIVES: 1. To determine the manufacturing costs allocated in every department to calculate the unit per cost of the product for profit determination and inventory costing procedures. 2. To determine the total cost of the units still in process and the costs of the units completed. TAKE NOTE: Process Cost system is used when products are manufactured by mass production while Job-Order Cost system is most suitable when single product or batch of product is manufactured according to customer’s preference. The following similarities between process costing and job-order cost system: Manufacturing cost element – both track and record the three elements: Direct Materials, Direct Labor, and Manufacturing Overhead Accumulation costs: a) All raw materials purchased – Debited to Material Account b) All direct labor – Debited to Factory Payroll Account c) All actual manufacturing overhead costs – Debited to Manufacturing Overhead Control Account Flow of costs – the accumulated manufacturing costs are assigned to the same account in both costing system: Work in process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold. Differences: Number in Work in Process accounts Process Costing Multiple work in process accounts are used for each used production department Point at which total costs id At the end of the each month while determined the units are being processed The unit cost is equal to the total manufacturing costs for the Unit cost computation period divided by the units produced during the period Job-Order Cost System One work in process account is used Total costs are computed when the job is completed The unit cost is determined by dividing the total cost per job by the units produced. ACCUMULATION OF COSTS BY DEPARTMENT Units in completed in one department are transferred to the next department accompanied by their corresponding costs. Completed unit of the one department becomes the raw materials of the one department until the units are converted into finished products. The output of Department 1 becomes the input of Department 2, which receives the units produced as well as its production costs. Upon the completion of the process in Department 2, the cost of units completed consists of the cost received from Department 1 and cost incurred in Department 2. The cost of unit increases as it progresses from one department to the next. ASSIGNEMENT OF MANUFACTURING COSTS Normal Costing - direct materials and direct labor are applied at actual cost while manufacturing overhead is applied at predetermined rate. Standard Costing – direct materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead are applied at standard cost or estimated cost. TYPES OF PROCESSES Sequential processing – (series of producing department) it requires that units pass through process before one process they can be worked on in the next process in the sequence. Parallel processing – (two sub-components) that requires two or more sequential processes to produce a finished goods. PROCESS COSTING SYSTEM Direct Materials – usually direct materials are added to the first department, but they may also be added in the subsequent departments. Work in process, Depatment xxx 1 xxx Work in process, Department xxx 2 Work in process, Department 3 Materials xx x Direct Labor – the distributions of direct labor to the departments are: Work in process, Depatment 1 xxx Work in process, Department 2 xxx Work in process, Department 3 xxx Factory Payroll xxx Manufacturing Overhead – are applied using a predetermined application rate. Work in process, Depatment 1 xxx Work in process, Department 2 xxx Work in process, Department 3 xxx xxx Applied Manufacturing Overhead Transfer to Next Department Work in process, Department 2 Work in Process, Department 1 xxx xxx Transfer to Finished Goods - the units completed in the last department and transferred to stockroom awaiting sale: Finished Goods xxx Work in process, Department xxx 3 Transferred-in costs – are costs transferred from a prior process department to a subsequent process department. For subsequent process department, transferred-in costs are a type of raw material costs. ACCUMULATING COSTS IN PRODUCTION REPORT Production Report The document that summarizes the manufacturing activity that takes place in a prior process department for a given period of time. It is prepared by the cost accountant for each department at the end of the month. It provides information about the physical units produced in a department and their associated manufacturing costs. It is the document used by the management to understand and evaluate the operations of a department because it shows the flow of units as well as the flow of costs related to the department. It is divided into the following sections and subdivisions: Unit information section a) Units to account for = Units in BWIP + Units started during the period b) Units accounted to = Units started and transferred out + Units in EWIP Cost information section a) Costs to account for = Goods transferred out + Goods in EWIP b) Cost accounted for = BWIP + Incurred during the month EQUIVALENT UNITS IN PRODUCTION It is the measure of work done during the month, express in fully completed units. The stage of completion at the end of the month is based on past experiences. Normally, not all units are completed during the period. There are still in process at different stages of completion at the end of the month. All these units must be converted to equivalent unit of production by multiplying the number of units in process the percentage of completion. This procedure is necessary for the purpose of computing the unit cost. METHODS: WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD Total Manufacturing Cost = BWIP costs + costs incurred during the period Equivalents units = Units completed + units in EWIP Unit Cost = Total Manufacturing Costs / Equivalents units during the period Evaluation of Weighted Average Method By treating units in BWIP as belonging to the current period, all equivalent units belong to the same category when it comes to calculating unit cost. Unit cost computation are simplified If the unit cost in a process is relatively stable from one period to the next, the weighted average method is reasonably accurate. If the price of manufacturing inputs increases significantly from one period to the next, the unit cost of current output is understated, and the unit cost of BWIP units is overstated. STEPS: 1. Physical Flow Analysis Schedule Units to account for: Units in BWIP Units started during the period Units accounted to: Units started and transferred out: Started and completed From beginning work in process xxx xxx Units in EWIP xx x xx x xx x xx x xx x xx x 2. Prepare a schedule for equivalents units Equivalent Units Materials xxx xxx Labor xxx xxx Overhead xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx Materi als Labor Overhead Total xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx Units Completed Add: Units in EWIP x percentage Total Equivalent Units 3. Compute the cost per equivalents Cost to account for: BWIP EWIP Total Cost to account xxx for Cost per equivalent unit = Total Cost to account xxx for / Total Equivalent Units xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 4. Compute the cost of goods transferred out and the cost of EWIP Cost of Goods Transferred out = Units completed (see step 2) x Total Cost per Equivalent Cost of EWIP = Units in EWIP (see step 2) multiply by the corresponding cost per equivalent unit in step 3 5. Prepare the Cost Reconciliation Cost to account for = BWIP costs + Incurred during the period Cost accounted for = Cost of units transferred out (see step 4) + Cost of EWIP (see step 4) FIFO METHOD The equivalent units of work in BWIP from the prior period are not counted in calculating this period’s equivalent units. Thus, it is excluded in calculating the unit cost. Unit cost = cost of the period / output of the period The cost of units transferred out is the sum of three different items: o Costs incurred in the prior period found in BWIP o Cost of completing the BWIP incurred this period o Cost of the units started and completed this period Cost of EWIP = unit cost x equivalents in EWIP STEPS: 1) Physical Flow Analysis (see step 1 under Weighted Average) 2) Prepare a schedule of equivalent units Materials Labor Units started xxx xxx Add: Units in BWIP x % (yung xxx xxx kailangan pa para ma-complete si 100%) Add: Units in EWIP x % (yung na xxx xxx completed na) Total Equivalent Units of xxx xxx Output 3) Compute the cost per equivalent unit Materials Labor Overhead Cost incurred during the xxx xxx xxx period Divide by: Total xxx xxx xxx equivalent units of output Cost per equivalent unit xxx xxx xxx Overhead xxx xxx xxx xxx Total xxx xxx xxx 4) Compute the cost of goods transferred out and cost of EWIP Cost of Goods Transferred Out: Units started and Completed = units started (see step 2) x total cost per equivalent unit (see step 3) Add: Units in BWIP (see step 2) multiply by the corresponding cost per equivalent unit (see step 3) Add: BWIP costs Cost of EWIP Units in EWIP (see step 2) multiply by the corresponding cost per equivalent unit (see step 3) 5) Prepare the cost reconciliation Cost to account for BWIP costs Cost incurred during the period Cost accounted for Units in BWIP (see step 4) Units started and completed (see step 4) Units in EWIP (see step 4) LESSON 2: ALLOCATION FOR JOINT AND BY-PRODUCTS Joint Products - are individual products, each with significant sales values, which are produced simultaneously from the same raw materials and/or manufacturing process. • Manufacturing of joint products has a split-off point (point of separation) in which separate products emerge, which can be sold as is or processed further. Cost incurred after split-off point do not cause allocation problems since they can be identified with the specific products • None of the joint products is significantly greater in value than other joint products. This characteristic distinguishes joint products from byproducts. • Joint products require simultaneous common processing. Processing of one of the joint products results in the processing of all the other joint products at the same time. Joint cost – common cost consist of direct materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead incurred from the start of the process up to the point of separation (split off point). These costs are indivisible, because they cannot be identified to any of the products being simultaneously produced. Additional processing costs – are cost incurred by each product, after emerged from the same raw material. Additional processing costs consist also of additional materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead incurred after the split off point. METHODS: Physical measure method, such as weight or volume • The physical measure in unit (the gallon) is easy because the products are measured in gallons • The joint costs is easily allocated between two products • Unit costs of all the products are the same, because they were computed by dividing the total cost by the total units • No consideration is given to relative sales value, special processing or handling required, the content of the product, or other special characteristics • Not all costs are directly related to physical units Product 1 Product 2 Physical Measures Productio Total Production n Ratio Production / Total Production 100% Total Allocated Joint Total Manufacturing Costs x Ratio Manufacturing Cost Cost Joint cost per Allocated Joint Cost / Production piece Income Statement – Physical Measures Method Product Product 2 1 Revenues Sales x selling price Total Revenues Cost of Goods Allocated Joint Cost LESS cost of ending Total Cost of Goods Sold inventory* Sold *ending inventory x joint cost per piece Gross Profit Gross Profit Rate Revenues – Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit / Revenues Total Revenues – Total Cost of Goods Sold Total Gross Profit / Total Revenues Sales value at split-off point method (relative sales value), set to yield a uniform rate of gross profit. • This method allocates joint costs to joint products on the basis of their relative sales value at the split-off point. This method uses the sales value of the entire production of the accounting period because joint costs are incurred on all units produced, not just on those sold in the current period. • x Joint cost = Allocated Joint Costs Costs are allocated to products in proportion to their expected revenues. The cost-allocation base (total sales value at split-off point) is expressed in terms of a common denominator (the amount of revenues) that is systematically recorded in the accounting system. • This method needs the market selling prices for all products at the split-off point. • This method always yield the same rate of gross profit for the products when there are no beginning inventories and all products are sold at split-off point. • This method is straightforward. Product Product 2 1 Sales Value at Tota Sales Value Production x selling price Split-off l at Point Split-off Point Ratio Sales Value at Split-off point / Total 100 Sales Value at % Split-off point Allocated Joint Tota Manufacturin Total Manufacturing Costs x Ratio Cost l g Cost Joint cost per piece Allocated Joint Cost / production • Income Statement – Sales Value at Split-off Point Method Product Product 2 1 Revenues Sales x selling price Total Revenues Cost of Goods Sold Allocated Joint Cost less cost of ending Total Cost of Goods inventory* Sold *ending inventory x joint cost per piece Gross Profit Revenues – Cost of Goods Sold Total Gross Profit Total Gross Profit / Gross Profit Rate Gross Profit / Revenues Total Revenues Adjusted sales value method (net realizable value), considering additional processing costs. • If the joint products must be processed further before sale, the sales value at split-off point method of allocation does not measure the true value of the production at the point of separation. • The additional processing costs must be deducted from the sales value before the cost allocation is made. • • • • • • x Joint Costs = Allocated Joint Cost This method is usually used only when sales value at split-off point of one or more products is not known The allocations are very similar to those made when the sales value at split-off point is used. The procedures involved are simple and relatively easy to apply. The costs usually present the true picture of the values at the point of separation of the products. The cost allocations are still derived from the selling or market price, which may have a little or no relationship to the actual cost. NEW PRODUCT 1 NEW PRODUCT 2 Product 1 – was Product 2 – was further further processed to processed to Adjusted Sales Value at split-off Point Ratio Allocated Joint Cost Joint Cost per piece produce produce another product another product Sales before cost LESS separable allocation cost or incremental cost Total Adjusted sales Value at Split-off Point Adjusted Sales Value at Split-off Point / 100% Total Adjusted Sales Value at Split-off Point Total Total Manufacturing Cost x Ratio Manufacturing Cost Allocated Joint Cost PLUS separable cost or incremental cost DIVIDE BY pieces produced Income Statement – Adjusted Sales Value Method NEW PRODUCT 1 NEW PRODUCT 2 Product 1 – was Product 2 – was further further processed to processed to produce produce another product another product Revenues Sales x selling price Allocated Joint Cost Cost of Goods Sold Add: Separable Cost or Incremental Cost Cost of Goods Available for Sale Less: Ending Inventory* *ending inventory x joint cost per piece Gross Profit Revenues – Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Rate Gross Profit / Revenues Total Revenues Total Cost of Goods Sold Total Gross Profit Total Gross Profit / Total Revenues Which method of allocating joint costs should be used? • Used sales value method at split-off method when selling price is available (even if further processing is done.) Reason for using sales value at split-off point methods are: • It measures the value of the joint product immediately at the end of the joint process • It does not require information on the process steps after split-off point, if there is further processing • It serves as a meaningful basis to allocate joint costs to products, which are revenues • It is simple to apply By-products • By-products are those products of limited sales value produced simultaneously with products of greater sales value, known as the main or principal products. Main products are usually produced in much greater quantity than by-products. • By-products, like joint or main products are produced from the same raw materials and or common manufacturing process • By-products are generally secondary importance in production cost allocation methods differ from those used for joint products METHODS: 1) Method A – this method is used when by-products are considered of minor importance and does not require additional processing costs. Net revenue (sales value less selling costs) may be treated as: • Addition to revenue from the sale of the main product or as other income, and all manufacturing costs are applied to the main product • Reduction from the cost of the main product. By-products recognized when sold Net Revenue treated as Additional Revenue or Other Income • This method makes no journal entries until sale of the by-product occurs. • Revenue (proceeds) of the by-product are reported in the income statement either as revenues group with other sales or as other income. From data given, the journal entry to record the sale of the by-product is as follows: Accounts Receivable/Cash xxx Sales xxx • • • No cost is assigned or allocated to the by-product. The sale of the by-product has no effect on the cost of the main product. The procedure is simple and practical and requires no computations of the cost of the by-product. Net Revenue Treated as Cost Reduction If the net revenue from the sale of the by-product is treated as a reduction from the cost of the main product, the following entry to record the sale of by-product would made: Accounts Receivable/Cash xx x Work in process xxx Income Statement under Method A As Addition to Revenue from Sales of Main Product Main Product: Sales x selling price Revenues: PLUS By-product: Sales x selling price (net of selling costs) Total Manufacturing Costs – Main Cost of Goods Product ending Sold inventory* Gross Profit Gross Profit Rates Cost of Main Product ending inventory = Net Manufacturing Costs/Production x Ending Inventory Revenues – Cost Goods Sold Gross Profit/Revenues As Cost Reduction from Cost of Main Product Main Product: Sales x selling price Total Manufacturing Costs – Byproduct revenues – Main Product ending inventory* Cost of Main Product ending inventory = Net Manufacturing Costs/Production x Ending Inventory Revenues – Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit/Revenues 2) Method B – By-products are recognized when produced. • This method is used when by-products are considered important and therefore require additional processing costs. • Two basic accounting methods can be used when by-products are recognized when production is completed: By-product is Recorded at its Net Realizable Value (NRV) : The net realizable value of the completed by-product (estimated sales value less estimated additional costs and selling costs) is charged to By-product inventory and deducted from the total manufacturing costs. No part of joint costs is allocated to the by-product. The method recognizes by-products in the financial statements at the time production is completed, Inventory – By-product (production x xxx selling price) Work in process – Main Product xxx Income Statement under Method B – Net Realizable Value Main Product Revenues Sales x selling price Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Gross Profit Rate Total Manufacturing Costs Less: Net Realizable Value of By-product Net manufacturing Costs Less: Main Product Inventory (ending inventory x unit cost*) Unit Cost = Net Manufacturing Costs / Production Revenues – Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit / Revenues Joint cost allocated to by-product inventory (reversal cost method) Part of the joint costs is allocated to the by-product using the Normal Net Profit or Reversal Cost Method. By-products are also with any additional processing costs after separation. Under this method, the cost to be allocated to the by-product is computed so that the by-product will yield the normal percentage of profit on sales that the company makes, on the average. The estimated cost of the by-product is computed by working back from the estimated sales value, as shown in the following computation: Estimated Sales Price of Completed By-product (production x selling price) Less: Estimated Selling Expense (production x selling expense per pack) Estimated Normal Net Profit (estimated sales price of completed by product x percentage of normal net profit) Total Estimated Manufacturing Costs Less: Estimated Additional Processing Costs Estimated Manufacturing Cost before Separation Once the cost of the by-product is determined, journal entries relating to by-product are recorded as follows: Charged cost before separation applicable to by-product: Work in process, By-product xx x Work in process xxx When additional processing costs are incurred: Work in process, By-product Materials Conversion Costs When by-product is completed: Inventory, By-product Work in process, Byproduct Income Statement under Method B – Reversal Cost Method Main Product Revenues Sales x selling price Joint Cost before separation (is considered as Total Manufacturing Cost because additional Cost of Goods processing Sold cost after separation is only applicable to by-product) ending inventory* *Total Manufacturing Costs / Gross Profit Gross Profit Rate Production x ending inventory Revenues – Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit / Revenues xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx By-Product Sales x selling Price Joint Cost before separation Add: Additional processing cost after separation Total Manufacturing Cost Less: Ending inventory* *Total Manufacturing Cost / Production x ending inventory Revenues – Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit / Revenues Analysis of Joint cost allocated to by-product inventory (reversal cost method) • • • This method assigned both the joint costs and costs incurred after separation to the by-product. The transfer of the joint costs reduces the cost of the main product. This method is complicated and often difficult to apply, because all costs to sell the by-products should be used in the computation and it is impossible to determine the normal selling costs that are applicable. Thus, the incremental selling costs related specifically to the by-product are usually used. The computations are made from estimates that the results may not be sufficiently reliable. Therefore, if the amount of the by-product is minimal, it may not be necessary to use this method because of the time and effort required compared to the benefits received.