Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach Name : Putra Mahendra Kusuma Aji Class : Civil Engineering KKI 2020 NPM : 2006517695 PROBLEM 1: A 4.8m long 0.4m PC square pile (Class C) is to resist a lateral load in a free-head condition; the lateral load is to be applied at ground surface level. The soil is sand layer with = 35 and unsat = 17 kN/m3, and the groundwater table was not observed during the soil investigation. Determine the ultimate lateral capacity HU. Kp (passive lateral pressure coefficient) = (1+sin (’))/(1-sin(’)) = (1+(sin(35))/(1-(sin(35))= 3,69 L/d = Length/Diameter = 4.8/0.4 = 12 Hu = (75) ∗ (3.69) ∗ (0.4) ∗ (17) = 291.1 kN HU / Kpd3’ (Ultimate lateral resitance)= 75 f = 0.82 (Hu / ’dKp)0.5 = 0.82 (291,07/(17*0.4*3.69))0.5 = 2.8 m Mmax = Hu (e + 2/3 f) = 291,07 (e + 2/3* 2.8) = 542.0 kNm Check whether Mmax less than Multimate : is Mmax < Multimate : 542.0 > 215.8 Yield Moment = Myield / Kp’d4 = Multimate / Kp’d4 = 215.8/(3.69*17*.4^3) = 134.4 Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach HU / Kpd3’ = 50 kN Hu = (HU / Kpd3’)*Kp*^3 * Yunsat = 55 ∗ (3,69) ∗ (0,4)^3 ∗ (17) = 200,8 𝑘𝑁 Class C Therefore, using Broom’s approach, we were able to find the ultimate lateral capacity would be Hu which is 200.8 kN. Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach PROBLEM 2: A 4.8m long 0.4m PC square pile (Class C) is to resist a lateral load in a free-head condition; the lateral load is to be applied at ground surface level. The soil is sand layer with = 35 and sat = 18 kN/m3, and the groundwater table was observed at the ground surface. Determine the ultimate lateral capacity HU. DIFFERENCE IN GROUND WATER TABLE Kp (passive lateral pressure coefficient) = (1+sin (’))/(1-sin(’)) = (1+(sin(35))/(1-(sin(35))= 3,69 L/d = Length/Diameter = 4.8/0.4 = 12 Hu = (75) ∗ (3.69) ∗ (0.4) ∗ (18 − 9,81) = 140,23 𝑘𝑁 HU / Kpd3’ (Ultimate lateral resitance)= 75 kN f = 0.82 (Hu / ’dKp)0.5 = 0.82 (291,07/(17*0.4*3.69))0.5 = 2.8 m Mmax = Hu (e + 2/3 f) = 291,07 (e + 2/3* 2.8) = 542.0 kNm Check whether Mmax less than Multimate : is Mmax < Multimate : 542 > 215,8 Yield Moment = Myield / Kp’d4 = Multimate / Kp’d4 = 215.8/(3.69*(18.9,81)*.4^3) = 278.9 Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach HU / Kpd3’ = 65 kN Hu = (HU / Kpd3’)*Kp*^3 * Yunsat = 65 ∗ (3,69) ∗ (0,4)^3 ∗ (18-9,81) = 125.7 𝑘𝑁 Class C Therefore, using Broom’s approach, we were able to find the ultimate lateral capacity would be Hu which is 125.7 kN, compared ot number 1’s 200,8 𝑘𝑁 (control). The impact of grondwater on the pile lateral capacity causes the decrease of ultimate lateral capacity. This is because as the water increases, the depth of the undrained soil decreases in height. Compare and discuss the effect of groundwater on pile lateral capacity HU as suggested by Problem 1 and Problem 2. Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach PROBLEM 3: A 4.8m long 0.4m PC square pile (Class C) is to resist a lateral load in a free-head condition; the lateral load is to be applied 1.0 m above ground surface level. The soil is sand layer with = 35 and unsat = 17 kN/m3, and the groundwater table was not observed during the soil investigation. Determine the ultimate lateral capacity HU. DIFFERENCE IN ECCENTRICITY Kp (passive lateral pressure coefficient) = (1+sin (’))/(1-sin(’)) = (1+(sin(35))/(1-(sin(35))= 3,69 L/d = Length/Diameter = 4.8/0.4 = 12 Hu = 72,5 ∗ (3,69) ∗ (0,4)^3∗ (18 − 9,81) = 140,23 𝑘𝑁 HU / Kpd3’ (Ultimate lateral resitance)= 75 kN f = 0.82 (Hu / ’dKp)0.5 = 0.82 (291,07/(17*0.4*3.69))0.5 = 2.8 m Mmax = Hu (e + 2/3 f) = 291,07 (e + 2/3* 2.8) = 542.0 kNm Check whether Mmax less than Multimate : is Mmax < Multimate : 542 > 215,8 Yield Moment = Myield / Kp’d4 = Multimate / Kp’d4 = 215.8/(3.69*17*.4^3) = 134.4 Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach HU / Kpd3’ = 40 kN Hu = (HU / Kpd3’)*Kp*^3 * Yunsat = 40 ∗ (3,69) ∗ (0,4)^3 ∗ (17) = 160.588 kN Class C Therefore, using Broom’s approach, we were able to find the ultimate lateral capacity would be Hu which is 160.6 kN, compared to number 1’s controlled variable at 200,8 𝑘𝑁. The impact of eccentricity causes the ultimate lateral resistance to be lower in value, causing the Hu to be lower than expected, this is because the excentricity of the line would skew towards the free headed. Therefore, increasing the eccentricity, according the Broom’s approach, would reduce the amount of ultimate lateral capacity of the pile. Compare and discuss the effect of load eccentricity above ground surface on ultimate lateral capacity HU as suggested by Problem 1 and Problem 3. Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach PROBLEM 4: A 15m long, 0.4m PC square pile (Class A2) is to resist a lateral load; the pile top is in a fixed-head condition. The soil is clay with cU = 50 kPa. Determine the ultimate lateral capacity HU. DIFFERENT IN CLASS Data cU = 50 kPa l = 15 m d = 0.4 m class A2 MU / cud3 = (8.25*8.80665)/(50*(0.4)^3) = 41.37 HU / cud2 (ultimate lateral resistance) = 30 HU = (HU / cud2) * (cud2) = (30)*(50*(0.4)^2) = 240 kN Laterally Loaded Pile – Brom’s Approach PROBLEM 5: A 15m long, 0.4m PC square pile (Class B) is to resist a lateral load; the pile top is in a fixed-head condition. The soil is clay with cU = 50 kPa. Determine the ultimate lateral capacity HU. DIFFERENT IN CLASS Data cU = 50 kPa l = 15 m d = 0.4 m Class B MU / cud3 = (13.5*9.80665) / (50*(0.4)^3) = 25.28 HU / cud2 = 18 HU = 18 * 50 * 0.4^2 = 144 kN Compare and discuss the pile ultimate strength on pile lateral capacity HU as suggested by Problem 4 and Problem 5. The Hu problem 4 (Class A2) = 240 kN and problem 5 (Class B) = 144 kN, this would mean that the same pile with the lower grade class would have lower ultimate strength capacity. For structures that needs to give higher strength, capacity, it would need a higher grade of pile.