3. Concrete Dam • • • • • • Forces Acting on gravity dam Load Combination for design Design Method of gravity dam Loads on arch dams Method of design Buttress dam Gravity Dam Loads on concrete dams Loads can be classified in terms of applicability/relative importance as primary loads, secondary loads, and exceptional loads. • Primary Loads: are identified as those of major importance to all dams, irrespective of type, e.g. water and related seepage loads, and self-weight loads. Contd • Secondary Loads: are universally applicable although of lesser magnitude (e.g. sediment load) or, – alternatively, are of major importance only to certain types of dams (e.g. thermal effects within concrete dams). • Exceptional Loads: are so designed on the basis of limited general applicability or having a low probability of occurrence (e.g. tectonic effects, or the inertia loads associated with seismic activity). Contd • loading diagram on gravity dams Contd Primary Loads I. Water Load Hydrostatic distribution of pressure with horizontal resultant force P1 Vertical component of load will also exist in the case of an upstream face batter Contd Contd II. Seepage loads/uplift The uplift is supposed to act on the whole width of the foundation Contd Contd Uplift pressure distribution for perfectly tight cutoff walls γωh2 γωh2 γωh1 When flow from u/s to d/s face is allowed γωh1 With u/s effective cutoff γωh2 With d/s effective cutoff γωh2 γωh1 With an intermediate cutoff Contd Value of area reduction factor Suggested by 0.25 to 0.40 Henry 1.00 Maurice Levy 0.95 to 1.00 Terzaghi the value C = 1.00 is recommended Contd Contd . III. Self weight load For a gravity dam the weight of the structure is the main stabilizing force, and hence the construction material should be as heavy as possible Structure self weight is accounted for in terms of the resultant, W, which acts through the centroid (center of gravity) of the cross-sectional area W = γc * A Where: γc is the unit weight of concrete A is the cross-sectional area of the structure The unit weight of concrete may be assumed to be 24 kN/m3 in the absence specific data from laboratory test trials Contd Secondary loads I. Sediment Load The gradual accumulation of significant deposits of fine sediment, notably silt, against the face of the dam generates a resultant horizontal force, Ps. Contd II. Hydrodynamic wave The upper portions of dams are subject to the impact of waves, Pwave. The dimensions and force of waves depend on the extent of water surface, the velocity of wind, and other factors Wave run-up Contd Fetch length (fetch – continuous area of water over which the wind blows in a constant direction) Contd As a basis for wave height computation, Hs (crest to trough), the Stevenson equation can be used. Contd III. Wind Load When the dam is full, wind acts only on the downstream side thus contribute to stability Where: H = Head water depth FWA FV H’ = Tail Water depth FWA = Wave pressure force FW FWA FH = Horizontal hydrostatic force W FH FS = Silt/sediment pressure force F'V FEQ = Earthquake/Seismic force Fs F'H FOD Heel Toe FU It may be taken as 100 to 150 kg/m² for the area exposed to the wind pressure (Varshney, 1986). FW = Wind pressure force FH’ = Tail water hydrostatic force W = Weight of dam FOD = Internal pore water pressure FU = Uplift pressure force [base of dam] FV = Weight of water above dam [u/s] FV’ = Weight of water above dam [d/s] Contd IV. Ice Load An acceptable initial provision for ice load, where considered necessary, is given by Pice = 145 KN/m² for ice thickness greater than 0.6m, otherwise neglected (USBR). Not a problem in Ethiopia Contd I. Exceptional Loads Seismic Load Reservoire full Reservoir empty Earthquake Direction Direction of vibraion Under reservoir full conditions, the most adverse seismic loading will then occur when a ground shock is associated with: – Horizontal foundation acceleration operating upstream, an – Vertical foundation acceleration operating downwards. Contd The acceleration intensities are expressed by acceleration coefficients αh (Horizontal) and αv(vertical) each representing the ratio of peak ground acceleration Horizontal and vertical accelerations are not equal, the former being of greater intensity (αh = (1.5 – 2.0αv). Inertia forces Horizontal Feqh = ±αhW Vertical Feqv = ±αvW Contd Water body • As analyzed by Westerguard(1993) Py = k ' 'α hγ w H . y 2 Fewy = α hγ w y H . y k ' ' 3 where k” = earthquake factor for the water body k" = 0.816 H 1 − 7.75 1000T 2 Where: T = period of earthquake γw = in tone/m3 H, y in meters The force acts at 0.4y from the dam joint being considered. Contd • For inclined upstream face of dam Py = k ' 'α hγ w H . y cos φ • where φ is the angle the face makes with the vertical. • The resultant vertical hydrodynamic load, Fewv, effective above an upstream face batter or flare may be accounted for by application of the appropriate seismic coefficient to vertical water load. It is considered to act through the centroid of the area. Fewv = ±αv Fv Contd • Load Combinations – A concrete dam should be designed with regard to the most rigorous adverse groupings or combinations of loads, which have a reasonable probability of simultaneous occurrence. – Three nominated load combinations are sufficient for almost all circumstances. – In ascending order of severity they may be designated as normal, unusual, and extreme load combinations, denoted as NLC, ULC and ELC, respectively Contd • Load Combinations • Load combination A (construction condition or empty reservoir condition): Dam completed but no water in the reservoir and no tail water. • Load combination B (Normal operating condition): Full reservoir elevation (or top of gates at crest), normal dry weather tail water, normal uplift, ice and uplift (if applicable) • Load combination C (Flood Discharge condition): Reservoir at maximum flood pool elevation, all gates open, tail water at flood elevation, normal uplift, and silt (if applicable) Contd • Load combination D - Combination A, with earthquake. • Load combination E - Combination A, with earthquake but no ice • Load Combination F - Combination C, but with extreme uplift (drain inoperative) • Load Combination G - Combination E, but with extreme uplift (drain inoperative) Contd Contd GRAVITY DAM DESIGN AND ANALYSIS The essential conditions to structural equilibrium and basic stability requirements for a gravity dam for all conditions of loading are Safe against overturning at any horizontal plane within the structure, at the base, or at a plane below the base. Safe against sliding on any horizontal or near-horizontal planes within the structure, at the base, or on any rock seam in the foundation. The allowable stresses in both the concrete or in the foundation material shall not be exceeded. Contd Contd The essential conditions to structural equilibrium and so to stability can be summarized as: ∑H = ∑V = 0 ∑M = 0 Assumptions inherent in preliminary analyses using gravity method (USBR) are as follows: The concrete (or masonry) is homogeneous, isotropic and uniformly eastic. All loads are carried by gravity action of vertical parallel-sided cantilevers with no mutual support between adjacent cantilevers (monoliths). No differential movements affecting the dam or foundation occur as a result of the water load from the reservoir. Contd Contd Overturning Stability Factor of safety against overturning, F0, in terms of moments about the downstream toe of the dam: F0 M ∑ = ∑M + ve − ve It may be noted that M-ve is inclusive of the moments generated by uplift load F0 > 1.25 may be acceptable, but F0 ≥ 1.5 is desirable Contd Overturning stability is considered satisfactory if the resultant intersects the base within the kern, and allowable stresses are not exceeded For earthquake loads, the resultant may fall anywhere within the base, but the allowable concrete or foundation pressure must not be exceeded The resultant location along the base is computed from Re sul tan t M ∑ Location = ∑V Contd Sliding Stability Resistance to sliding any plane above the base of a dam is a function of the shearing strength of concrete, or of the construction lift joint The sliding stability is based on a factor of safety, Fs , as a measure of determining the resistance of the structure against sliding Estimated using one or other of three definitions: •Sliding factor, Fss, •Shear friction factor, FSF, •Limit equilibrium factor, FLF. Contd Sliding Stability Contd The resistance to sliding or shearing, which can be mobilized across a plane, is expressed through the parameters cohesion, c, and frictional resistance, tan Φ. Sliding Factor, FSS FSS is expressed as a function of the resistance to simple sliding over the plane considered FSS H ∑ = ∑V Contd If the plane is inclined at a small angle α, the foregoing expression is modified to FSS (∑ H ∑ V ) − tan α = 1 + (∑ H ∑ V ) tan α •Angle α is defined as positive if sliding operates in an uphill sense. •∑V is determined allowing for the effect of uplift. •FSS on a horizontal plane should not be permitted to exceed 0.75 for a specified NLC; it may be permitted to rise to 0.9 under ELC. Contd Shear-friction factor, FSF •FSF is the ratio of the total resistance to shear and sliding which can be mobilized on a plane to the total horizontal load. S FSF = ∑H • S is the maximum shear resistance, which can be mobilized. cA h S= + ∑ V tan (φ + α ) cos α(1 − tan φ tan α ) where Ah is the area of plane of contact or sliding Contd For the case of a horizontal plane (α =0), the above equation is simplified to S = cA h + ∑ V tan φ And hence FSF = cA h + ∑ V tan φ ∑H Sliding and shearing resistance: shear-friction factor Contd In some circumstances it may be appropriate to include downstream passive wedge resistance, Pp, as a further component of the total resistance to sliding which can be mobilized Sliding: weak seams and passive wedge resistance Contd . This is effected by modifying the equations accordingly as, FSF = (S + Pp ) Where ∑H c A AB Pp = + Ww tan (φ + α ) cos α(1 − tan φ tan α ) Ww is the weight of the wedge In the presence of a horizon with low shear resistance, e.g. a thin clay horizon or clay infill in the discontinuity, it may be advisable to make the assumption S =0, in the above equation Contd . USBR recommended values of FSF summarized Contd Limit equilibrium factor, FLE . This approach follows the conventional soil mechanics logic in defining the limit equilibrium factor, FLE, as the ratio of shear strength to mean applied shear stress across the plane FLE τf = τ Contd . For a single plane sliding mode, the above equation will be Note that for α =0 (horizontal sliding plane) the above expression simplifies to FLE = FSF Contd . The recommended minima for FLE (limit equilibrium factor of safety) against sliding are • FLE = 2.0 in normal operation, i.e. with static load maxima applied, and •FLE = 1.3 under transient load conditions embracing seismic activity. Stress Analysis-Gravity Dams • The basis of the gravity method of stress analysis is the assumption that the vertical stresses on any horizontal plane vary uniformly as a straight line, giving a trapezoidal distribution. This is often referred to as “trapezoidal law.” • Its validity is questionable near the base of the dam where stress concentrations arise at the heel and toe due to reentrant corners formed by the dam faces and the foundation surface. Contd • The primary stresses determined in a comprehensive analysis by the gravity method are: Contd Contd Vertical Normal Stress With the trapezoidal law, the vertical stress, σz, may be found by the following equation, which is the familiar equation for beams with combined bending and axial load: σz = ∑V Ah ± * M ∑ y′ I where ∑V = resultant vertical load above the plane considered, exclusive of uplift, ∑M* = summation of moments determined with respect to the centroid of the plane, y’ = distance from the neutral axis of the plane to the point where σz is being determined , and I = the second moment of area of the plane with respect to its centroid. Contd •For a regular two-dimensional plane section of unit width parallel to the dam axis, and with thickness T normal to the axis, σz . V 12∑ V e y ′ ∑ = ± T T3 Contd where e is the eccentricity of the resultant load R, which must intersect the plane downstream of its centroid for the reservoir full condition. (The signs are interchanged for reservoir empty condition of loading). . Contd For e > T/6, upstream face stress will be negative, i.e. tensile. . Requirements for stability Concrete dam must be free from tensile stress e ≤ B/6 (law of the middle third) Contd For e > T/6, upstream face stress will be negative, i.e. tensile. . Requirements for stability Concrete dam must be free from tensile stress e ≤ B/6 (law of the middle third) Contd For e > T/6, upstream face stress will be negative, i.e. tensile. . Requirements for stability Concrete dam must be free from tensile stress e ≤ B/6 (law of the middle third) Contd . Vertical Stress on the base of a gravity dam Contd • Horizontal shear stresses Numerically equal and complementary horizontal (τzy) and (τyz) shear stresses are generated at any point as a result of the variation in vertical normal stress over a horizontal plane. If the angles between the face slopes and the vertical are respectively Φu upstream and Φd downstream, and if an external hydrostatic pressure, pw, is assumed to operate at the upstream face, then Upstream horizontal shear stress τ u = (p w − σ zu ) tan φ u Downstream horizontal shear stress τ d = σ zd tan φ d Contd . Contd . Contd • Horizontal normal stresses The differences in shear forces are balanced by the normal stresses on the vertical planes The boundary values for σy at either face are given by the following: – for the upstream face, σ yu = p w + (σ zu − p w ) tan 2 φ u – for the downstream face, σ yd = σ zd tan 2 φ d Contd • Principal stresses The principal stresses are the maximum and minimum normal stresses at a point Principal stresses σ1 and σ3 may be determined from knowledge of σz and σy σz + σy – For major principal stress σ = +τ 1 – For minor principal stress, σ3 = τ max = σz − σy 2 + τ2 max 2 σz + σy 2 − τ max Contd σ1 = σ3 = σz + σy 2 σz + σy τ max = 2 + τ max − τ max σz − σy 2 + τ2 Contd As there is no shear stress at and parallel to the face, that is one of the planes of principal stress, the boundary values of σ1 and σ3 are then determined as follows: -For upstream face ( ) σ1u = σ zu 1 + tan 2 φ u − p w tan 2 φ u σ 3u = p w -For downstream ace , assuming no tail water ( σ1d = σ zd 1 + tan 2 φ d σ 3d = 0 ) Contd • Permissible stresses and cracking The compressive stresses generated in a gravity dam by primary loads are very low A factor of safety, Fc, with respect to the specified minimum compressive strength for the concrete,σ c is nevertheless prescribed; Fc ≥ 3 is a common but seldom critical criterion. Table: Permissible compressive stresses (after USBR, 1976) Contd Horizontal cracking is sometimes assumed to occur at the up stream face if σ zu (computed without uplift) falls below a predetermined minimum value: σ zu min K d γ w Z − σ 't = ' Ft ' Contd • Cracked Base Analysis For a horizontal crack a direct solution may be obtained by the following equation: Where: B = total base width b = base width in compression Mo = sum of moments at the toe excluding uplift V = sum of vertical forces excluding uplift p = unit uplift pressure at heel Contd A resulting negative value for b indicates an overturning condition with the resultant falling downstream of the toe After the width b is found, the maximum base pressure can be determined, and then the overturning and sliding stabilities can be evaluated. Contd • Uplift Pressure Distribution Case-1: Uplift distribution with drainage gallery Contd Case-2: Uplift distribution with foundation drains near upstream face Contd • Case-3: Uplift distribution cracked base with drainage, zero compression zone not extending beyond drains Contd • Case-4: Uplift distribution cracked base with drainage, zero compression zone extending beyond drains Buttress Dam • Buttress dams consists of principal structural elements: A sloping upstream deck that supports the water The buttress or vertical walls that support the deck and transmit the load • According to the structure of the dam deck, buttress dams classified as: Buttress dams with a massive head Buttress dams with a flat slab deck Buttress dams with thin curved multiple arch deck Contd Buttress dams with a massive head – Round head buttress dam – Diamond head buttress dams – T-head buttress dams Contd • Buttress dams with a flat slab deck – Simple or Amburson slab buttress – Fixed or continuous deck slab buttress Cantilever deck slab buttress dam: Contd • Longitudinal beams are used for stiffing and bracing the buttresses • Foundation slab below the entire dam, provided with drainage openings for eliminating the uplift pressure • The stability against sliding is ensured with the weight of water on the inclined deck and on the amount of the decrease in the uplift pressure Contd Contd Contd • The distance l between the buttresses and the angle of inclination of the dam barrier α can be determined from the condition for sliding stability of dam W1 = (G K + G P + W2 − U ) f Ks + c.d .b Contd • Example #The profile of the major monolith of a buttress dam is illustrated in the figure. The stability of the dam is to be reviewed in relation to: Normal Load Condition (NLC): Water load(to design flood level + self weight + uplift(no pressure relief drain) Static stability : Overturning, Fo>1.5; sliding (shear friction factor),FSF >2.4. Concrete characteristics: Unit weight γ C 23KN/m3 , Unit shear resistance , C = 500KN/m2 , angle of shearing resistance (internal friction) φC = 350 Contd 1. Analyze the static stability of the buttress unit with respect to plane X–X under NLC and in relation to the defined criteria for Fo and FSF. 2. Concern is felt with regard to stability under possible seismic loading. Dynamic stability criteria are specified as Fo = 2.0; FSF =3.2, and will be met by prestressing as shown. Determine the prestress load required in each inclined tendon. Contd • Solution 1. – All calculations relating to stability refer to the monolith as a complete unit. – Uplift is considered to act only under the buttress head, and – The profile is subdivided into the elements A, B and C, identified in figure for convenience Contd The load–moment table (all moments are relative to toe) is as follows: Contd 2. The load–moment table (all moments are relative to toe) is as follows: Arch Dam • An arch dam is a curved dam that carries a major part of its water load horizontally to the abutments by arch action • Arch (or arch unit) refers to a portion of the dam bounded by two horizontal planes, 1 foot (1 meter) apart. • Cantilever (or cantilever unit) is a portion of the dam contained between two vertical radial planes, 1 foot (or 1 m) apart. • Extrados and Intrados: Extrados is the upstream face of arches and intrados is the downstream face of the arches. Contd Contd Valley suited for arch dam • Narrow gorges provide the most natural solution for an arch dam construction, the usually recommended ratio of crest length to dam height being 5 or less. • The overall shape of the site is classified as a narrow-V, wide-V, narrow-U, or wide-U as shown in Figure Contd • Sarkaria proposed a canyon shape factor (C.S.F.), which would indicate the suitability of a site for arch dam as follows B + H (secψ 1 + secψ 2 ) CSF = H •The usual values of C.S.F. are 2 to 5; lower value giving thinner sections Contd Classification of valley shapes based on CSF value Valley type U shaped Narrow V shaped Wide V-shaped Composite U-V shaped Wide and flat shapes Unclassified Bottom width B <H 0 0 < 2H ψ1 ψ2 CSF < 150 < 350 > 350 > 150 < 150 < 350 > 350 > 150 < 3.1 < 2.4 > 2.4 > 2H ψ1 ψ2 Highly irregular valley shape ≅ 4.1 > 4.1 Contd • Arch dams may be grouped into two main divisions: – Massive arch dam:- the whole span of the dam is covered by a single curved wall usually vertical or nearly so. – Multiple arch dam:- series of arches cover the whole span of the dam, usually inclined and supported on piers or buttresses. • Massive arch dams are divided into the following types: – – – – – Constant radius arch dams Constant angle arch dams Variable radius arch dams Double curvature or Cupola arch dams Arch gravity dams Contd • Arch geometry and profile The horizontal component of arch thrust must be transferred into the abutment at a safe angle, β, (i.e. one that will not promote abutment yielding or instability) At any elevation the arch thrust may be considered to enter the abutment as shown in Figure In general an abutment entry angle, β, of between 45 and 70° is suggested Angle between arch thrust and rock contours Contd Arch and cupola profiles are based on a number of geometrical forms, the more important of which are: Constant-radius profile Constant-angle profile Constant radius profile Has the simplest geometry, combining a vertical U/S face of constant radius with a uniform radial D/S slope The downstream face radius varies with elevation and the central angle, 2θ, reaches a maximum at crest level. The profile is suited to relatively symmetrical U-shaped valleys. Contd Constant Radius profile Contd Constant-angle profile Also known as variable-radius arch dam; usually have extrados and intrados curves of gradually decreasing radii as the depth below the crest increases This is to keep the central angle as large and as nearly constant as possible, so as to secure maximum arch efficiency at all elevations. They are often of double curvature. Frequently adapted to narrow steep-sided V-shaped valleys It is economical type of profile using about 70% concrete as compared to a constant radius arch dam Contd Constant Angle profile Contd Cupola profile: Has a particularly complex geometry and profile, with constantly varying horizontal and vertical radii to either face. Contd • Crown Cantilever: The crown cantilever is defined as the maximum height vertical cantilever and is usually located in the streambed • Single Curvature : Single-curvature arch dams are curved in plan only. Vertical sections, or cantilevers, have vertical or straight sloped faces. • Double Curvature : Double-curvature arch dams means the dam is curved in plan and elevation This type of dam utilizes the concrete weight to greater advantage than single-curvature arch dams Contd Contd Loads on arch dam • The forces acting on arch dam are the same as that of gravity dams – Uplift forces are less important (not significant) – Internal stresses caused by temperature changes and yielding of abutments are very important – The principal dead load is the concrete weight – The principal live load is the reservoir water pressure – An arch dam transfers loads to the abutments and foundations both by cantilever action and through horizontal arches Contd Loads on arch dam • The forces acting on arch dam are the same as that of gravity dams – Uplift forces are less important (not significant) – Internal stresses caused by temperature changes and yielding of abutments are very important – The principal dead load is the concrete weight – The principal live load is the reservoir water pressure – An arch dam transfers loads to the abutments and foundations both by cantilever action and through horizontal arches Contd • Methods of design of massive arch dams a. b. c. d. Thin cylinder theory Thick cylinder theory The elastic theory Other advanced methods such as trial load analysis and finite element methods. Contd a. Thin Cylinder (Ring) Theory The weight of concrete and water in the dam is carried directly to the foundation The horizontal water load is carried entirely by arch action In thin cylinder theory, the stresses in the arch are assumed to be nearly the same as in a thin cylinder of equal outside radius Contd Contd If R is the abutment reaction its component in the upstream direction which resist the pressure force P is equal to R sin θ 2 The hydrostatic pressure acting in the radial) direction P = γ w h Total hydrostatic force = hydrostatic pressure x projected area P = γ w h × 2re sin θ 2 Summing forces parallel to the stream axis 2 R sin θ / 2 = 2γ w hre sin θ / 2 R = γ w hre Contd If the thickness (t) of the arch ring is small compared with re it may be assumed that uniform compressive stress is developed in the arch ring The transverse unit stress For a given stress, thickness t γ w hre R σ = = t *1 t γ w hre t= σ all Note: the hydrostatic pressure γwh may be increased by earth quake and other pressure forces where applicable: Contd γ w hre t= σ all • This equation indicates that the thickness t of the arch ring increases linearly with depth below the water surface and for a given pressure the required thickness is proportional to its radius. • Thickness relation in terms of intrados, ri and mean radius rc , can be derived as follows since re = rc + 0.5t and re = ri + t t= γ w hrc σ all − 0.5γ w h OR γ w hri t= σ all − γ w h Contd • Best Central Angle The concrete volume of any given arch is proportional to the product of the arch thickness and the length of the centerline arc The volume of unit height of arch V = (t * 1)rθ γ w hr t= = kr σ B 2 V = kr θ = kθ 2 sin θ / 2 2 Differentiating V with respect to θ and setting to zero, θ = 133.5o which is the most economical angle for arch with minimum volume For θ = 133.50 ,r = 0.544B Contd b. Thick Cylinder (Ring) Theory Improvement in thin cylinder theory was made by the considering the arch as thick cylinder. The compressive horizontal ring stress, σ, for radius r is given by 2 re 2 × ri 2 Pw re + r σ= 2 2 re − ri MN ( m 2 ) Contd Stress is maximum at the downstream face , Thickness assumed uniform at any elevation h, t = re − ri With P = γ w h σ max 2rw hre 2 = t (r + r ) e i for r = ri Contd • Example: # Given a canyon with the following dimensions, compute and draw the layout of arch dams of constant radius and constant angle profiles. Data - Maximum height = 100m -Top width of the valley = 500m -Bottom width of valley =200m -Allowable stress in concrete, σ all = 5MPa Contd • Solution-Using thin cylinder method 1. Constant radius Let the central angle be 150o Assume top width , 1.5m or assume 0 re = 500 B = = 258.82m 2 sin θ 2 2 sin 75 γ w hre 9.81× 258.82h = = 0.508h t= 5000 σ all Contd Depth Valley (m) width(m) t=0.508h ri = re - t B/2re 0 500 0 258.82 0.9659 10 470 5.08 253.74 0.9080 20 440 10.16 248.66 0.8500 30 410 15.24 243.58 0.7921 40 380 20.32 238.5 0.7341 50 350 25.4 233.42 0.6761 60 320 30.48 228.34 0.6182 70 290 35.56 223.26 0.5602 80 260 40.64 218.18 0.5023 90 230 45.72 213.1 0.4443 100 200 50.8 208.02 0.3864 θ = 2 sin − ( B 2 re ) Contd Contd 2. Constant Angle The best central angle θ = 133.5 0 Contd