PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD)
Version 03 - in effect as of: 22 December 2006
CONTENTS
A.
General description of the small scale project activity
B.
Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology
C.
Duration of the project activity / crediting period
D.
Environmental impacts
E.
Stakeholders’ comments
Annexes
Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the proposed small scale project activity
Annex 2: Information regarding public funding
Annex 3: Baseline information
Annex 4: Monitoring Information
Annex 5: Local Stakeholder Consultations
1
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Revision history of this document
Version
Number
01
02
Date
Description and reason of revision
21 January
2003
8 July 2005
Initial adoption
•
•
03
22 December
2006
•
The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect
guidance and clarifications provided by the Board since
version 01 of this document.
As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC
PDD have been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest
version can be found at
<http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>.
The Board agreed to revise the CDM project design
document for small-scale activities (CDM-SSC-PDD), taking
into account CDM-PDD and CDM-NM.
2
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
SECTION A. General description of small-scale project activity
A.1
Title of the small-scale project activity:
>>
Recycling of VDU overhead gas to reduce stripping steam consumption
Version: 1
Dated: 12.05.2008
A.2.
Description of the small-scale project activity:
>>
The objective of IOCL Haldia unit in the project activity is to utilize the thermal energy content of the
overhead vapour of the VDU II unit for its reuse as low pressure stripping steam in VDU II fractionating
column to reduce consumption of stripping steam. In the project activity, part of the overhead vapour
from the VDU-II main fractionator column will be re-circulated via a booster ejector for its reuse as
stripping steam in the fractionator column. This booster ejector is operated by high pressure motive
steam. There is a three stage ejector system with three ejectors in one stage provided to maintain the
vacuum in the fractionator column by passing high pressure motive steam through it. In the project
activity one of these ejectors will be stopped and the booster ejector will be installed. The motive steam
consumption of the booster ejector is less than the motive steam consumption of the ejector that will be
replaced. So in addition to reduction in stripping steam consumption there will also be reduction in
motive steam consumption in the project scenario. Hence, the project activity will lead to reduction in
consumption of fuel oil in the Thermal Power House where the stripping steam and motive steam are
generated and in turn reduce the emission of greenhouse gases (GhG) in tonnes of CO2 equivalent.
In absence of project activity, this hot vapour of VDU II overhead, which is a mix of water and
hydrocarbon gets collected in the hot well after getting cooled in after-condensers with cooling water.
Hence the thermal energy content of the overhead vapour remains unutilized and gets wasted with
cooling water in the after-condensers.
The contribution of this project activity towards sustainable development is provided below:
Socio-economic well being:
• The project activity contributes towards local socio-economic development around its area of operation
through provision of employment opportunities (indirect) for local population.
Environmental well being:
• Overall GHG emissions will be reduced.
• Sustenance and improvement in regional air quality by avoiding consumption of commonly used fossil
fuels like fuel oil in the boilers of the thermal power house by reducing consumption of stripping
steam. It thereby results in maintenance of the ecosystem and human health by reducing GHG
emissions.
• Non-renewable fuel resources will be preserved and be available for use for other purposes
Technological well being:
• This project will motivate others to deploy this technology (where ever applicable) and thus helping in
overall GHG reduction
3
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
A.3.
Project participants:
>>
Name of Party involved
((host) indicates a host Party)
Government of India (Host)
Private and/or public entity(ies)
project participants
(as applicable)
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
(IOCL),Haldia Refinery
Kind indicate if the Party
involved wishes to be
considered as project
participant (Yes/No)
No
The contact details of IOCL have been provided in Annex 1 of this PDD.
A.4.
Technical description of the small-scale project activity:
A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity:
>>
A.4.1.1.
Host Party (ies):
>>
India
A.4.1.2.
>>
Region: Eastern region
State: West Bengal
A.4.1.3.
>>
Town: Haldia
Region/State/Province etc.:
City/Town/Community etc:
A.4.1.4. Details of physical location, including information allowing the unique
identification of this small-scale project activity:
>>
This project will be implemented in the VDU II unit of Haldia refinery unit of Indian Oil Corporation
Ltd. (IOCL). The unit is located in Haldia, an industrial area under Haldia Development Authority in the
East Midnapore District of West Bengal in India. The latitude and longitude of the place is 22 degree 2
minutes N and 88 degree 6 minutes E respectively. The plant is 1.2 km away from the Nearest Railway
Station (Haldia Railway Station) and 5 km away from the Nearest Port (Haldia port under Calcutta Port
Trust) on river Hoogly. Nearest Airport (Dumdum airport) is 150 km away from the plant.
A.4.2. Type and category (ies) and technology/measure of the small-scale project activity:
>>
According to the categorization of Appendix B to the simplified modalities and procedures for small
scale CDM project activities, the proposed project activity can be categorised as Type AMS-II D /
Version 11, Sectoral Scope: 04, EB 35, “Energy Efficiency and Fuel Switching Measures for
Industrial Facilities”.
Reference: Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project
activities,
http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/SSCmethodologies/approved.html
4
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
The technology used in the project activity:
In the project activity the overhead vapour of the fractionator column of the VDU II unit will be recycled
to reuse it as stripping steam in the fractionator column through a booster ejector forming a ‘T’ joint with
the main fractionator column. The process flow for the proposed project activity will be:
O/H Vapour
Stage 1
Ejectors
To Stage 2
Ejectors
Conde
nser
Hot Well
Ejector proposed
Motive steam
Fractionating
Column
Stripping Steam
The lines in black represent the existing system whereas the lines in red represent the proposed system
under the project activity. One ejector out of three ejectors in the first stage will be stopped.
A.4.3
Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:
>>
Years
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Annual estimation of emission reduction
in tonnes of CO2e
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
5
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Year 9
Year 10
Total estimated reductions (tonnes
of CO2)
Total number of crediting years
Annual average over the crediting
period of estimated reductions
(tonnes of CO2)
38005
38005
380050
10
38005
A.4.4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity:
>>
No public funding has been sought for the project activity. The project proponent will identify potential
participants if additional funds are required in the future.
A.4.5. Confirmation that the small-scale project activity is not a debundled component of a
large scale project activity:
As mentioned under Appendix C of the Simplified Modalities and Procedures for Small-Scale CDM
project Activities, the following results in debundling of a large CDM project:
“A proposed small-scale project activity shall be deemed to be a debundled component of a large project
activity if there is a registered small-scale CDM project activity or an application to register another
small-scale CDM project activity:
- With the same project participants;
- In the same project category and technology/measure; and
- Registered within the previous 2 years; and
- Whose project boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the proposed small-scale
activity at the closest point”
The identified CDM project is being promoted by IOCL Haldia Unit. The project proponent further
confirms that it has not registered any small scale CDM activity or applied for registration of any other
small scale CDM project activity in the same project category and technology/measure within 1km of the
chosen project boundary of the proposed project activity. Hence the above criteria of debundling cases
are not applicable for this CDM project.
6
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
SECTIN B.
Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology
B.1.
Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the
small-scale project activity:
>>
According to the categorization of Appendix B to the simplified modalities and procedures for small
scale CDM project activities, the proposed project activity can be categorised as Type AMS-II D /
Version 11, Sectoral Scope: 04, EB 35, “Energy Efficiency and Fuel Switching Measures for
Industrial Facilities”.
Reference: Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project
activities,
http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/SSCmethodologies/approved.html
B.2
Justification of the choice of the project category:
>>
Requirement
Justification
This category comprises any As energy efficiency measure the heat content of the overhead
energy efficiency and fuel vapour of the VDU II will be utilized as stripping steam in the
switching
measure fractionator column to reduce striping steam consumption
implemented at a single
industrial or mining and
mineral production facility.
The measures may replace, In the project activity the overhead vapour of the existing VDU II
modify or retrofit existing unit will be reused as stripping steam. The overhead vapour will be
facilities or be installed in a re circulated to the main stripping steam head by installing new
new facility
steam line and booster ejector in the system and stopping one of the
three first stage ejectors.
The aggregate energy savings
of a single project may not Project has lead to reduction of stripping steam and motive steam
exceed the equivalent of 60 consumption in the VDU II unit .The overall energy savings in
GWhe per year. A total saving terms of fuel energy input is equivalent of 136.4 GWHth. This is the
of 60 GWhe per year is maximum amount of energy savings the project can achieve with its
equivalent to a maximal saving full capacity utilization.
of 180 GWhth per year in fuel
input.
This category is applicable to The system for monitoring of stripping steam consumption, motive
project activities where it is steam consumption, pressure and temperature parameters of
possible to directly measure stripping and motive steam, boiler efficiency etc, is available in
and record the energy use baseline as well as in project scenario.
within the project boundary
(e.g. electricity and/or fossil
fuel consumption).
This category is applicable to The project activity has brought in energy savings by recovering the
project activities where the energy potential in the overhead vapour by using it as stripping
impact of the measures
steam in the fractionator column of the VDU II unit and by reducing
7
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Requirement
Justification
implemented (improvements in overall motive steam consumption in the project boundary.
energy efficiency) by the Variables such as type of raw material input, process throughput
project activity can be clearly will remain constant and will have no effect on the energy savings.
distinguished
from changes in energy use due
to
other
variables
not
influenced by the project
activity (signal to
noise ratio)
B.3.
Description of the project boundary:
>>
According to the applied methodology:
The project boundary is the physical, geographical site of the industrial or mining and mineral production
facility, processes or equipments that are affected by the project activity
In the project activity the project boundary includes the following equipments in VDU II:
1. The boiler in the TPH -the source of stripping steam
2. The fractionator column -the source of overhead vapor and where the consumption of stripping steam
is getting reduced
3. The ejector through which overhead vapor is mixing with the main striping steam
4. The three stage ejectors required to maintain the vacuum
4. The main stripping steam column
3 stage ejectors
Overhead vapour
Motive Steam
Ejector Unit
Vacuum
Distillation
Unit
Stripping Steam
Boiler
8
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
B.4.
Description of baseline and its development:
>>
The baseline scenario is identified as the most plausible baseline scenario among all realistic and credible
alternative(s).
For the use of the overhead vapour, the realistic and credible alternative for the project activity is:
The potential thermal energy content in the overhead vapour is not utilized: This option is in compliance
with the regulatory requirements. In the absence of the project activity, hydrocarbons in the vapour are
pumped out to the oil pool & water in the vapour is drained into the oily water sewage for treatment in
wastewater treatment plant. Alternatively, it can be routed to sour water stripper for stripping of the
hydrocarbons.
Proposed project activity not undertaken as a CDM project activity:
This alternative is in compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. However, it faces
investment and technological barriers. (Please refer to section B.5 below for detailed analysis on these barriers)
Hence this option is not a part of the baseline scenario.
Continuation of the existing operation
In absence of the project activity there will be no recovery of the overhead vapor of the fractionator column of
the VDU II unit and the whole amount of stripping steam will be generated from burning fuel oil in the boiler
of the thermal power house as in case of the existing practice. All the existing ejectors will continue to operate
without any reduction in motive steam consumption. This practice will meet the requirement of the unit
without any hindrance in the production. For this there is no need of any extra investment due to installation of
steam line and booster ejector as well as no legal or regulatory barrier. Considering all these facts the
continuation of the existing practice has been considered as a likely baseline scenario.
B.5.
Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below
those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered small-scale CDM project activity:
In accordance with paragraph 28 of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM
project activities that says “A simplified baseline and monitoring methodology listed in appendix B may
be used for a small scale CDM project activity if the project participants are able to demonstrate to a
designated operational entity that the project activity would otherwise not be implemented due to the
existence of one or more of the barriers listed in attachment A to appendix B” the proposed project
activity requires to overcome the following barriers for its implementation:
Financial Barriers:
As per “appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small scale CDM Project activities”
financial barrier for the project is demonstrated when “a financially more viable alternative to the
project activity would have led to higher emissions”
This project activity has substantially high capital investment considering re-designing cost plus material
& execution cost. Whereas continuing with the existing practice will have no extra investment but it will
lead to higher emissions as there will be no reduction in stripping steam consumption in the VDU II unit.
With such huge investment the project proponent cannot implement the project activity without CDM
revenue.
Technological barriers:
9
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
New stripping media would be introduced matching the column pressure & temperature profile as well as
vapour-liquid equilibrium inside the column. It requires elaborate changes in process & mechanical
design. Mass & Energy balance of the fractionator would undergo changes, which is required to be
established theoretically by professional designer. All these measures require substantial expenses.
Again, revision of present operating parameters and re-establishment of new parameters would require
considerable loss of time in stabilization leading to loss of throughput & downstream processing loss,
affecting profitability of the refinery.
In case of failure of the new technology, quality of the column streams would change & would lead to
upset in downstream processing units and their product qualities. This would also adversely affect
refinery profitability.
As the technology is new and critical monitoring is different from the existing operation, additional cost
would be incurred for training of operating personnel on new methodologies of operation, switching
methodology from the existing to the new technology, re-establishing new process etc.
Considering the above difficulties this project activity is a big risk and technological challenge to the
company while the technology is not common in the oil sector.
Barriers due to prevailing practice:
The project is first of its kind in the country. As this is a new technology so manpower with experience
or expertise in trouble-shooting is unavailable. So, in case of upsets, delay in re-establishment would lead
to loss of time vis-à-vis level of processing and profitability of the refinery. Thus IOCL Haldia is taking
a great risk in implementing this project while they had the other option of not going for this option.
B.6.
Emission reductions:
B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices:
>>
The procedure followed to calculate the emission reduction is as follows:
Baseline energy:
1) Stripping Steam Energy
E BSS = QBSS * ETPYBSS
(1)
Where
E BSS = Baseline Stripping steam energy consumption per hour (Kcal/hr)
QBSS = Baseline Stripping steam consumption per hour (kg/hr)
ETPYBSS = Baseline Enthalpy of stripping steam being supplied (kCal/kg).
2) Motive Steam Energy
E BMS = QBMS * ETPYBMS
(2)
Where
E BMS = Baseline Motive steam energy consumption per hour (kCal/hr)
QBMS = Baseline Motive steam consumption per hour (kg/hr)
10
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
ETPYBMS = Baseline Enthalpy of motive steam being supplied (kCal/kg).
3) Total energy of Project Boundary in the baseline in Kcal/hr
(3)
E Bτ = E BSS + E BMS
Project Energy:
1) Stripping Steam Energy
(4)
E PSS = QPSS * ETPYPSS
E PSS = Project Stripping steam energy consumption per hour (kCal/hr)
QPSS = Project Stripping steam consumption per hour (kg/hr)
ETPYPSS = Project Enthalpy of stripping steam being supplied (kCal/kg).
2) Motive Steam Energy
(5)
E PMS = QPMS * ETPYPMS
E PMS = Project Motive steam energy consumption per day (kCal/hr)
QPMS = Project Motive steam consumption per hour (kg/hr)
ETPYPMS = Project Enthalpy of motive steam being supplied (kCal/kg).
3) Total energy of Project Boundary in the project activity
(6)
E Pτ = E PSS + E PMS
E Pτ = Total project steam energy consumption per hour (kCal/hr)
Net Reduction in Steam Energy requirement
Ered = E Bτ − E Pτ
Ered = Net reduction in steam energy consumption per hr (kCal/hr)
Net reduction in energy in TJ in a year y:
Ered , y
=
Ered *
N OPS * 4.187 * 10^-9
Where:
N OPS = Number of Operating hours in a year
Reduction in Input energy to the boiler
11
(7)
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Einp = Ered , y / η b
Einp = Energy input in Boiler in TJ
η b = Efficiency of boiler in %
Estimated CO2 emission reductions C ER in the boiler per year
C ER = Einp * CEFFO
CEFFO = CO emission Factor of FO in tCO2/TJ
2
C ER = CO emission reductions in the boiler per year
2
To calculate leakage:
According to the applied methodology, if the energy efficiency technology is equipment transferred from
another activity or if the existing equipment is transferred to another activity, leakage is to be considered.
In this project activity, energy efficiency measure has been taken through recovery of the overhead
vapour in the existing VDU II unit. So no leakage has been considered.
So the total emission reduction from the project activity can be calculated as:
C ER = Einp * CEFFO
Values taken for estimation of emission reduction:
Quantity
tonne/hr
Enthalpy
kcal/kg
Pressure
kg/cm2 abs
Baseline
Motive Steam
Stripping Steam
43.87
14
713.55
722.45
10
4
270
280
Project
Motive Steam
Stripping Steam
40.57
0
713.55
722.45
10
4
270
280
Item
Boiler Efficiency
Emission Factor of Fuel Oil
Temperature
deg C
Unit
%
tCO2/TJ
Value
85
77.4
B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:
The following data and parameter will not be monitored during project scenario throughout the crediting
period but those are determined only once and thus remain fixed throughout the crediting period AND
are available when validation is undertaken.
12
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Data / Parameter:
QBSS
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
Kg/hr
Quantity of stripping steam consumed per day in Kg
Plant Records
14000
Consumption of stripping is measured by the steam flow meter in the VDU II
unit. Monthly data of one year before the implementation of the project was
considered for baseline calculation.
Data / Parameter:
QBMS
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
Kg/hr
Quantity of motive steam consumed per day in kg
Plant Records
43870
Consumption of motive steam is measured by the steam flow meter in the VDU
II unit. The data of one year before the implementation of the project was
considered for baseline calculation.
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
PrBSS
Kg/sq.cm (g)
Pressure at which stripping steam is supplied in the baseline
Plant Records
4
Pressure of stripping steam is monitored by the pressure gauges installed in the
VDU II unit.
TBSS
Degree Centigrade
Temperature at which stripping steam is supplied in the baseline
Plant Records
13
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Value applied:
280
Justification of the
Temperature of stripping steam is monitored by the temperature gauges installed
in the VDU II unit.
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
PrBMS
Kg/sq.cm (g)
Pressure at which motive steam is supplied in the baseline
Plant Records
10
Pressure of motive steam is monitored by the pressure gauges installed in the
VDU II unit.
TBMS
Degree Centigrade
Temperature at which motive steam is supplied in the baseline
Plant Records
270
Temperature of motive steam is monitored by the temperature gauges installed
in the VDU II unit.
B.6.3 Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:
>>
Detail of the formulae used, default value used, assumptions made has been delineated under section
B.6.1 above. The estimated emission reduction is given below:
Item
Emission reductions in a year
Unit
tCO2
14
Value
38005
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
B.6.4
>>
Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions:
Estimation of
project activity
emissions
(tCO2e)
Year
Year 1
88233
Year 2
88233
Year 3
88233
Year 4
88233
Year 5
88233
Year 6
88233
Year 7
88233
Year 8
88233
Year 9
88233
Year 10
88233
Total (tonnes of
CO2e)
882330
B.7
Estimation of
baseline
emissions
(tCO2e)
Estimation of
leakage
(tCO2e)
Estimation of
overall emission
reductions
(tCO2e)
126238
126238
126238
126238
126238
126238
126238
126238
126238
126238
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
38005
1262380
0
380050
Application of a monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:
B.7.1
Data and parameters monitored:
Monitoring Methodology:
For monitoring of reduction in stripping steam consumption according to the applied methodology AMS
IID direct measurements of the following parameters are to be performed:
1. Quantity of stripping steam consumption in the project boundary in the baseline and in the project
ativity
2. Quantity of motive steam consumption in the project boundary in the baseline and in the project
activity
3. Pressure of stripping steam and motive steam in the baseline and in the project activity
4. Temperature of stripping steam and motive steam in the baseline and the project activity
5. Quantity of fuel oil consumed to generate steam in the thermal power house
6. Net Calorific Value of fuel oil consumed in the thermal power house
7. Quantity of steam generated in the boilers in the thermal power house
8. Temperature and pressure of steam generated in the boilers in the thermal power house
9. Temperature of feed water of the boilers in the thermal power house
10. Efficiency of boilers in the Thermal Power House
15
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Data / Parameter:
QPSS
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Kg/hr
Quantity of stripping steam consumed per hr
Plant Records
Data / Parameter:
QPMS
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Kg/hr
Quantity of motive steam consumed per hr
Plant Records
Data / Parameter:
ηb
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
%
Efficiency of Boiler supplying motive and stripping steam
Plant Records
0
Consumption of stripping steam is measured by the steam flow meter in the VDU
II unit in the project activity
Calibration of steam flow measuring equipment is carried out on a periodic basis
as per the quality management system in the plant
0
Consumption of motive steam is measured by the steam flow meter in the VDU II
unit in the project activity
Calibration of steam flow measuring equipment is carried out on a periodic basis
as per the quality management system in the plant
85
16
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Description of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Data / Parameter:
Average of the efficiencies of all the boilers in the thermal power house
Calibration of efficiency measuring equipment is carried out on a periodic basis
as per the quality management system in the plant
PrPSS
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating
expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description
of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Any comment:
Kg/sq.cm (g)
Pressure at which stripping steam is supplied in the project activity
Plant Records
Data / Parameter:
PrPMS
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating
expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description
of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Any comment:
Kg/sq.cm (g)
Pressure at which motive steam is supplied in the project activity
Plant Records
4
Pressure of stripping steam is monitored by the pressure gauges installed in the
VDU II unit.
The measurement methods will be subjected to the QA/QC procedures as per ISO
9001:2000 based Quality Management System.
10
Pressure of motive steam is monitored by the pressure gauges installed in the
VDU II unit.
The measurement methods will be subjected to the QA/QC procedures as per ISO
9001:2000 based Quality Management System.
17
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
TPMS
Degree Centigrade
Temperature at which motive steam is supplied in the project
Plant Records
270
Temperature of motive steam is monitored by the temperature gauges installed
in the VDU II unit.
TPSS
Degree Centigrade
Temperature at which stripping steam is supplied in the project
Plant Records
280
Temperature of stripping steam is monitored by the temperature gauges installed
in the VDU II unit.
18
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
B.7.2
Description of the monitoring plan:
>>
>> The project activity will be operated and managed by the project proponent. All data pertaining to GHG
emission reduction calculations will be monitored and recorded through trained personnel as per ISO 9001
management system. The operational and management structure for the related activities follows the ISO 9001
based structure.
B.8
Date of completion of the application of the baseline and monitoring methodology and the
name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies)
>>
Date of completing the final draft of this baseline section (DD/MM/YYYY): 12.05.08
SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period
C.1
Duration of the project activity:
C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity:
>>
The Project activity is scheduled to start on 01/02/2009
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:
>>
More than 20 years
C.2
Choice of the crediting period and related information:
C.2.1. Renewable crediting period
C.2.1.1.
Starting date of the first crediting period:
C.2.1.2.
Length of the first crediting period:
>>
NA
>>
NA
C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:
C.2.2.1.
Starting date:
>>
The starting date of this fixed crediting period project will be the latter date among the two alternatives;
the date of registration of the CDM project or the project operational date. The tentative starting date is
01/02/2009.
19
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
C.2.2.2.
Length:
>>
10 yrs. From the starting date of crediting period
SECTION D. Environmental impacts
>>
D.1.
If required by the host Party, documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts
of the project activity:
>>
Total flue gas from the stack remains unchanged after the project activity, so there is no requirement for
EIA for the project. However, what ever necessary consent to establish and consent to operate required
for the refinery under the host country Acts and rules with respect to Environment pollution and control
has been obtained from the concerned authority. The Refinery has the valid consent to operate and all the
necessary consent conditions are complied with at present.
Since this project will neither generate any additional air and water pollution with respect the present
scenario hence no separate consent to establish and consent to operate is need for this project.
D.2.
If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host
Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental
impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party:
>>
There will be no significant adverse environmental impact due to this project activity
SECTION E. Stakeholders’ comments
>>
E.1.
Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:
>>
The following categories of Stakeholders have been identified by Tata Chemicals Limited:
- Haldia Refinery Employee’s Union
- Indian Oil Officers’ Association,Haldia Refinery
- Local Students’ Health Home
- Representatives from other local community forum
E.2.
Summary of the comments received:
>>
IOCL Haldia has received positive comments from the local stakeholders. The comments received from
the local stakeholders’ have been annexed as Annexure 5. Specific concerns and questions obtained from
the stakeholders are delineated as below:
1. Local stakeholders have appreciated the movement taken by IOCL
2. Mr. Subrata Banerjee, the secretary of Students’ Health Home has identified the activity as a
positive step towards reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
Mr. T Chatterjee, General Secretary of Indian Oil Officers’ Association feels convinced about the
environmental aspects of the project activity
20
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
E.3.
Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
>>
All specific queries have been answered as detailed in Annexure 5. Please note that there are no negative
comments received that require the project proponent to take any corrective action.
21
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Annex 1
CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
Organization:
Street/P.O.Box:
Building:
City:
State/Region:
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Telephone:
FAX:
E-Mail:
URL:
Represented by:
Title:
Salutation:
Last Name:
Middle Name:
First Name:
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct tel:
Personal E-Mail:
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Haldia Oil refinery
Haldia
West Bengal, Dist. East Midnapore
721606
India
Chief Technical Services Manager
Mr.
Dasgupta
Sujit
Technical Services
+919434724240
+91 3224 252141
+91 3224 253964
Dasguptas1@iocl.co.in
22
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
Annex 2
INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING
As per Section A.4.4
Annex 3
BASELINE INFORMATION
As in Section B 6.3
Annex 4
MONITORING INFORMATION
As per Section B 7.1
Annex 5
LOCAL STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS
23
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
24
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
25
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
26
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM – Executive Board
27