1/27/2022 Review of the Finite Element Method βͺ Discretization: create a finite element mesh ME274 Introduction βͺ Apply boundary conditions βͺ Element level calculations: ππ π π = ππ (variety of element types: springs, trusses, beams, 2d and 3d solids) βͺ Assembly and global solution: π² π = π βͺ Postprocessing, e.g. stress recovery E. Chan – SJSU ME274 1 4 4 Administrative Information ME 160 or ME 273 Limitations βͺ Dr. Eduardo Chan, Eduardo.Chan@sjsu.edu βͺ Linearity βͺ Office Hours: Tuesday/Thursday 8:45-9:15pm βͺ Isotropic Elasticity βͺ Lectures on Tuesdays & Labs on Thursdays βͺ Static analyses βͺ Grading: βͺ Single parts (mainly) • • • • Homework - 25%: homeworks + lab assignments Tests - 25% Project – 20% Final exam – 30% E. Chan – SJSU ME274 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 2 2 5 5 Today’s Agenda What You Should Know… βͺ Review Basic FEA knowledge: discretization, assembly, solution, accuracy βͺ Good working knowledge of Ansys βͺ Limitations of basic FEA: linear, elasticity, isotropic, static, single part βͺ 2D & 3D modeling – 2D: plane stress, plane strain and axisymmetry – 3D: solids, shells, mixed modeling, and beams βͺ Advanced FEA topics: – – – – – shell modeling and composites assemblies heat transfer transient problems: structural dynamics, transient thermal nonlinear problems, introduction to types of nonlinearities βͺ mesh controls – different mesh controls to refine meshes (max element size, edge curvature ratio etc) – isolation for exclusion to handle singularities βͺ Convergence of results – convergence using different measures (not using auto convergence) E. Chan – SJSU ME274 3 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 3 6 6 1 1/27/2022 FEA Software Capabilities Other physics: Heat Transfer βͺ Some of the Ansys analysis capabilities βͺ Example: Steady-State Heat Transfer π β −πΏππ» = πΈ – – – – – – – linear statics and thermal analyses shells and composites assembly modeling structural dynamics via modal analysis transient thermal analysis nonlinear static: contact and large displacement (proportional load) material nonlinearity - hyperelasticity & plasticity – convective boundary conditions = Newton's Law of cooling: q = h(T - Tο΅) – nonlinear: h = h(T), radiation (not covered in this course) π=πΎ ππ ππ T E. Chan – SJSU ME274 7 7 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 10 10 Introduction to Advanced Topics Transient Analysis βͺ Shells “2½ D” elements: βͺ Structural Dynamics π² π (π) + πͺ w, ο±z Local Normal To surface π π (π) ππ π (π) + π΄ = π(π) ππ πππ – modal superposition - time analysis, frequency analysis, random analysis – based on modal analyses v, ο±y u, ο±x βͺ Transient thermal (direct time solution) βͺ Composite and “laminate shell theory” π πππ» + π β −πΏππ» = πΈ ππ Layer 1: orientation +450 – direct time solution Layer 2: orientation -450 Layer 1: orientation +450 Layer 2: orientation -450 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 8 8 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 11 11 Assembly Analysis Prestressed Analyses βͺ Multiple parts with interfaces βͺ Prestressed Analysis: – effect of superimposing a second loading condition on a body that’s already under stress – “stress stiffness” – cheap alternative to nonlinear analysis βͺ Types of Interfaces: – “welded" or "glued", compatible mesh (default) – free – contact (nonlinear) βͺ Buckling π π²π + π² π =π βͺ Prestressed Static π²π + π² π = π βͺ Prestressed Modal −ππ π΄ + π²π + π² E. Chan – SJSU ME274 9 9 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 π =π 12 12 2 1/27/2022 Nonlinear Analysis Nonlinear Analysis βͺ Assumptions of linearity: – small displacement - negligible difference between initial and deformed positions – small strain – linear stress-strain relation N f βͺ Consequences of linear assumptions: sliding contact bearing contact – solution proportional to load – superposition, e.g. load set summing, modal analysis/superposition •f < ο N •f >= οN Pressure p1 p2 p1 p2 time (non-proportional loading) time E. Chan – SJSU ME274 13 13 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 16 16 Nonlinear Analysis Numerical Consequences βͺ Governing D.E.: βͺ Governing equation: ππππ(π ) = ππππ(π ) ππππ(π ) = ππππ(π ) conservative (e.g. nonlinear elasticity) βͺ Requires nonlinear solution, e.g. Newton-Raphson method. βͺ Types of nonlinearities: βͺ In addition to accuracy concerns of linear solution (e.g. discretization error), there are concerns of convergence of the nonlinear solution. βͺ Material: – π ≠ π¬πΊ – hyperelasticity (nonlinear elasticity) – plasticity nonconservative (hysteritic) (e.g. plasticity ) βͺ Re-meshing may be required as mesh becomes distorted during solution. βͺ Geometric: – large displacements – large strains: πΊ ≠ ππ ππ – engineering vs true strains – π= π· π¨ ? conservative loads or follower loads initial or final A ? E. Chan – SJSU ME274 14 14 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 17 Nonlinear Analysis Numerical Consequences (cont) βͺ Nonlinear Stress: βͺ Mesh that is accurate for linear solution may need to be refined for nonlinear solution (plasticity, contact regions, boundary layers in fluid dynamics etc.) E. Chan – SJSU ME274 15 17 15 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 18 18 3 1/27/2022 Nonlinear Example - Contact Nonlinear Analysis βͺ Stress comparison: linear vs nonlinear linear E. Chan – SJSU ME274 19 19 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 Nonlinear Analysis βͺ Example – Thin part with large rotation βͺ Thin part with large rotation: – – – – E. Chan – SJSU ME274 20 20 shape of deformed model not captured by linear analysis linear analysis cannot predict self-contact clearance linear stresses are off by about 11% need to use nonlinear or large deformation analysis !!! E. Chan – SJSU ME274 23 23 Nonlinear Analysis Nonlinear Analysis βͺ Displacement comparison: linear vs nonlinear βͺ Example - Thin plate with “geometric stiffness” linear 21 22 22 Nonlinear Analysis E. Chan – SJSU ME274 nonlinear nonlinear 21 E. Chan – SJSU ME274 24 24 4 1/27/2022 Nonlinear Analysis βͺ Results comparison: linear vs nonlinear linear nonlinear E. Chan – SJSU ME274 25 25 Nonlinear Analysis βͺ Displacement vs Load Graph E. Chan – SJSU ME274 26 26 Nonlinear Analysis βͺ Thin plate with “geometric stiffness” – linear analysis predicts maximum displacement 6 times larger than nonlinear results – linear analysis predicts stresses more than twice as high as nonlinear results – need to use nonlinear / large deformation analysis!!! E. Chan – SJSU ME274 27 27 5