Uploaded by Kaiming Cai

ME274-01 - Introduction

advertisement
1/27/2022
Review of the Finite Element Method
β–ͺ Discretization: create a finite element mesh
ME274 Introduction
β–ͺ Apply boundary conditions
β–ͺ Element level calculations: π’Œπ’† 𝒅𝒆 = 𝒇𝒆
(variety of element types: springs, trusses, beams, 2d and 3d solids)
β–ͺ Assembly and global solution: 𝑲 𝒅 = 𝒇
β–ͺ Postprocessing, e.g. stress recovery
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
1
4
4
Administrative Information
ME 160 or ME 273 Limitations
β–ͺ Dr. Eduardo Chan, Eduardo.Chan@sjsu.edu
β–ͺ Linearity
β–ͺ Office Hours: Tuesday/Thursday 8:45-9:15pm
β–ͺ Isotropic Elasticity
β–ͺ Lectures on Tuesdays & Labs on Thursdays
β–ͺ Static analyses
β–ͺ Grading:
β–ͺ Single parts (mainly)
•
•
•
•
Homework - 25%: homeworks + lab assignments
Tests - 25%
Project – 20%
Final exam – 30%
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
2
2
5
5
Today’s Agenda
What You Should Know…
β–ͺ Review Basic FEA knowledge: discretization, assembly, solution, accuracy
β–ͺ Good working knowledge of Ansys
β–ͺ Limitations of basic FEA: linear, elasticity, isotropic, static, single part
β–ͺ 2D & 3D modeling
– 2D: plane stress, plane strain and axisymmetry
– 3D: solids, shells, mixed modeling, and beams
β–ͺ Advanced FEA topics:
–
–
–
–
–
shell modeling and composites
assemblies
heat transfer
transient problems: structural dynamics, transient thermal
nonlinear problems, introduction to types of nonlinearities
β–ͺ mesh controls
– different mesh controls to refine meshes (max element size, edge curvature ratio etc)
– isolation for exclusion to handle singularities
β–ͺ Convergence of results
– convergence using different measures (not using auto convergence)
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
3
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
3
6
6
1
1/27/2022
FEA Software Capabilities
Other physics: Heat Transfer
β–ͺ Some of the Ansys analysis capabilities
β–ͺ Example: Steady-State Heat Transfer
𝛁 βˆ™ −πœΏπ›π‘» = 𝑸
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
linear statics and thermal analyses
shells and composites
assembly modeling
structural dynamics via modal analysis
transient thermal analysis
nonlinear static: contact and large displacement (proportional load)
material nonlinearity - hyperelasticity & plasticity
– convective boundary conditions = Newton's Law of cooling: q = h(T - Tο‚΅)
– nonlinear: h = h(T), radiation (not covered in this course)
π‘ž=𝐾
πœ•π‘‡
πœ•π‘›
T
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
7
7
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
10
10
Introduction to Advanced Topics
Transient Analysis
β–ͺ Shells “2½ D” elements:
β–ͺ Structural Dynamics
𝑲 𝒅(𝒕) + π‘ͺ
w, z
Local
Normal
To surface
𝝏 𝒅(𝒕)
𝝏𝟐 𝒅(𝒕)
+ 𝑴
= 𝒇(𝒕)
𝝏𝒕
ππ’•πŸ
– modal superposition - time analysis, frequency analysis, random analysis
– based on modal analyses
v, y
u, x
β–ͺ Transient thermal (direct time solution)
β–ͺ Composite and “laminate shell theory”
𝝏
𝝆𝒄𝑻 + 𝛁 βˆ™ −πœΏπ›π‘» = 𝑸
𝝏𝒕
Layer 1: orientation +450
– direct time solution
Layer 2: orientation -450
Layer 1: orientation +450
Layer 2: orientation -450
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
8
8
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
11
11
Assembly Analysis
Prestressed Analyses
β–ͺ Multiple parts with interfaces
β–ͺ Prestressed Analysis:
– effect of superimposing a second loading condition on a body that’s already under stress
– “stress stiffness”
– cheap alternative to nonlinear analysis
β–ͺ Types of Interfaces:
– “welded" or "glued", compatible mesh (default)
– free
– contact (nonlinear)
β–ͺ Buckling
𝝀 π‘²πˆ + 𝑲
𝒅 =𝟎
β–ͺ Prestressed Static
π‘²πˆ + 𝑲
𝒅 = 𝒇
β–ͺ Prestressed Modal
−𝝎𝟐 𝑴 + π‘²πˆ + 𝑲
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
9
9
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
𝒅 =𝟎
12
12
2
1/27/2022
Nonlinear Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
β–ͺ Assumptions of linearity:
– small displacement - negligible difference between initial and deformed positions
– small strain
– linear stress-strain relation
N
f
β–ͺ Consequences of linear assumptions:
sliding contact
bearing contact
– solution proportional to load
– superposition, e.g. load set summing, modal analysis/superposition
•f <  N
•f >= N
Pressure
p1
p2
p1
p2
time
(non-proportional loading)
time
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
13
13
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
16
16
Nonlinear Analysis
Numerical Consequences
β–ͺ Governing D.E.:
β–ͺ Governing equation:
π’‡π’Šπ’π’•(𝒅) = 𝒇𝒆𝒙𝒕(𝒅)
π’‡π’Šπ’π’•(𝒅) = 𝒇𝒆𝒙𝒕(𝒅)
conservative
(e.g. nonlinear elasticity)
β–ͺ Requires nonlinear solution, e.g. Newton-Raphson method.
β–ͺ Types of nonlinearities:
β–ͺ In addition to accuracy concerns of linear solution (e.g. discretization error), there are
concerns of convergence of the nonlinear solution.
β–ͺ Material:
– 𝝈 ≠ π‘¬πœΊ
– hyperelasticity (nonlinear elasticity)
– plasticity
nonconservative (hysteritic)
(e.g. plasticity )
β–ͺ Re-meshing may be required as mesh becomes distorted during solution.
β–ͺ Geometric:
– large displacements
– large strains: 𝜺 ≠
𝝏𝒖
𝝏𝒙
– engineering vs true strains
– 𝝈=
𝑷
𝑨
?
conservative loads or follower loads
initial or final A ?
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
14
14
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
17
Nonlinear Analysis
Numerical Consequences (cont)
β–ͺ Nonlinear Stress:
β–ͺ Mesh that is accurate for linear solution may need to be refined for nonlinear solution
(plasticity, contact regions, boundary layers in fluid dynamics etc.)
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
15
17
15
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
18
18
3
1/27/2022
Nonlinear Example - Contact
Nonlinear Analysis
β–ͺ Stress comparison: linear vs nonlinear
linear
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
19
19
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
Nonlinear Analysis
β–ͺ Example – Thin part with large rotation
β–ͺ Thin part with large rotation:
–
–
–
–
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
20
20
shape of deformed model not captured by linear analysis
linear analysis cannot predict self-contact clearance
linear stresses are off by about 11%
need to use nonlinear or large deformation analysis !!!
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
23
23
Nonlinear Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
β–ͺ Displacement comparison: linear vs nonlinear
β–ͺ Example - Thin plate with “geometric stiffness”
linear
21
22
22
Nonlinear Analysis
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
nonlinear
nonlinear
21
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
24
24
4
1/27/2022
Nonlinear Analysis
β–ͺ Results comparison: linear vs nonlinear
linear
nonlinear
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
25
25
Nonlinear Analysis
β–ͺ Displacement vs Load Graph
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
26
26
Nonlinear Analysis
β–ͺ Thin plate with “geometric stiffness”
– linear analysis predicts maximum displacement 6 times larger than nonlinear results
– linear analysis predicts stresses more than twice as high as nonlinear results
– need to use nonlinear / large deformation analysis!!!
E. Chan – SJSU ME274
27
27
5
Download