Critical Analytical Essay #1 Strategies for Developing the Topic, the Text, and Your Ideas 1. Work the topic: Circle key words; then, make a list of synonyms or related ideas Turn the statement into a question (include text and author) 2. Brainstorm & Generate Ideas: Make some questions that probe the key aspects of the topic in general and in relation to the text; use openended questions and create possible answers, eg. Discuss the ideas developed by the text creator about the ways in which individuals attempt to reconcile the desire to act independently with the need for security. Ask questions about the topic: What experiences sway individuals into having a desire for independence? Is it an inherent desire that all people experience? What role do parents and parental expectation play in feeding the desire for independence or the need for security? Does security mean financial security? Emotional security? Belonging to a group? Is it true that independence is a desire and security is a need (as the topic suggests)? Next, use questions to develop your interpretation of the topic in relation to the text. How is independence portrayed in the text? How is security portrayed in the text? How might one address the conflict between the two, “the attempt to reconcile”? What is required of the character to feel independent? What is required of the character to feel secure? Does the character’s desire for independence change throughout the short story? How does it change? Does the need for security change throughout the short story? How does it change? When making jot notes in relation to the topic and your questions, consider the following: a. Context: What is the context of the text? b. Character: Which character best relates to the topic? Why? What are the character’s thoughts, actions? Fears? Beliefs? Do the character’s beliefs change? How? Is there a catalyst that causes the character to act in a certain way? How do minor characters affect the protagonist? c. Conflicts: What are the internal and external forces: moral, ethical, emotional, physical and contextual? What is the outcome/resolution to these conflicts or forces? d. Literary Device: are there any dominant literary devices that help us to understand the character, i.e., what is the function of the device? eg. Symbolism (an outward sign of an interior condition), motif (purposeful recurrent pattern of some element). e. Specific Details/Significant Scenes: Which specific details/significant scenes from the text BEST support an answer to the topic? What can be paraphrased and what MUST be in the form of quotations? f. Big Picture: What are you saying about the topic? What is the author saying about the topic? Your essay must weave the two together. Patterns, Connections & Ideas: Look for patterns in the answers to the open-ended questions and jot notes See if there are patterns/connections/ideas that can lead to a debatable claim. Is there a possible motif or hook that you can establish that can be a part of a unifying affect based on the patterns/connections/Ideas? Potential Outline: Decide upon which details you are going to use and in what order they would be most effective (a loose outline) Create a Working Thesis Statement: Create a working thesis statement that may be supported by the details you are considering and the patterns/connections you have discovered. Ensure that it can pass the “So What” test. Significant Passages: Record specific passages that will support the topic and your thesis. English Language Arts 10-1/20-1/30-1 THOUGHT AND UNDERSTANDING (X1.5) Critical/Analytical Response to Literary Texts SUPPORTING EVIDENCE (X1.5) FORM AND STRUCTURE (X1) Scoring Categories and Criteria MATTERS OF CHOICE (X1) Address the whole prompt carefully You don’t have to use quotations, but if Create a title for your essay; don’t After you have used the author’s full TUTORIAL you do, keep them short and embedded just use the topic or the literature. name once, you may refer to him/her SUGGESTIONS Think deeply and bring something new to the discussion. with your idea- sentence. Begin your body paragraphs with a by last name, never first. Use specific ideas. Be specific – everything isn’t important topic sentence to give individual Avoid judgmental statements. Start your essay with a strong to your argument. purpose to each paragraph. Don’t use slang or conversational idea so you have a lot to talk You do have to use exact moments Stay consistent with the idea language. This is a mature essay. about. from the text, significant moments of presented in your introduction. Avoid using I/you. Lift your ideas to a change or realization. Don’t wait until the conclusion to tie universal commentary on human Emphasize author’s purpose and Craft bridges between your ideas and everything together. Do this nature by using people. author’s choices. your evidence. Tell your reader what throughout. Use varied sentence openings. Give your ideas enough time on your evidence is proving. Use transitions. Use varied sentence structure. stage – two-thirds of your Add more/more significant supporting Make connections between your Use varied diction. paragraphs should be discussion. materials in order to be more thoughts. Use present, active tense (e.g., Romeo Ask yourself “so what” after persuasive. End all paragraphs by summing up loves Juliet, not Romeo loved Juliet). each use of evidence. Lead: Context precedes proof/evidence. and linking explicitly to your thesis. Avoid unnecessary words; use direct Avoid Plot Summary! S=set the scene / E=evidence / Consider using a motif to unify ideas. verbs (is impacting = impacts) Use words from the topic throughout. A=analysis Strengthen the conclusion Add passion to your voice. Excellent E/5 Proficient PF/4 Satisfactory S/3 Limited L/2 Poor P/1 Insufficient INS point context + proof discussion MATTERS OF CORRECTNESS (X1) This category carries a “degree of difficulty” clause. It is essential that you spell names, titles, and topic words correctly. Don’t misspell a word given to you in the topic. Leave yourself enough time to proofread, edit, & run spell- check. Watch for comma-splices, run-on sentences, or sentence fragments. Apostrophes are for possession or contractions; never for plurals. Write in plural for easy gender agreement (e.g., the author tells his or her story the authors tell their stories). Maintain consistent verb tenses. Ideas are insightful and carefully considered, demonstrating a comprehension of subtle distinctions in the literary text(s) and the topic. Literary interpretations are perceptive and illuminating. Support is precise and astutely chosen to reinforce the student’s ideas in a convincing way. A valid connection to the student’s ideas is efficiently maintained. A judicious arrangement of ideas and details contributes to a fluent discussion that is developed skillfully. The unifying effect or controlling idea is effectively sustained and integrated. Diction is precise. Syntactic structures are effective and sometimes polished. Stylistic choices contribute to the creation of a skillful composition with a convincing voice. This writing demonstrates confidence in control of correct sentence construction, usage, grammar, and mechanics. The relative absence of error is impressive considering the complexity of the response and the circumstances. Ideas are thoughtful and considered, demonstrating a competent comprehension of the literary text(s) and the topic. Literary interpretations are revealing and sensible. Support is specific and well-chosen to reinforce the student’s ideas in a persuasive way. A sound connection to the student’s ideas is capably maintained. A purposeful arrangement of ideas and details contributes to a controlled discussion that is developed capably. The unifying effect or controlling idea is coherently sustained and presented. Diction is specific. Syntactic structures are generally effective. Stylistic choices contribute to the creation of a considered composition with a capable voice. This writing demonstrates competence in control of correct sentence construction, usage, grammar, and mechanics. Minor errors in complex language structures are understandable considering the circumstances. Ideas are relevant and straightforward, demonstrating a generalized comprehension of the literary text(s) and the topic. Literary interpretations are general but plausible. Support is general, adequate, and appropriately chosen to reinforce the student’s ideas in an acceptable way, but occasionally may lack persuasiveness. A reasonable connection to the student’s ideas is suitably maintained. A straightforward arrangement of ideas and details provides direction for the discussion that is developed appropriately. The unifying effect or controlling idea is presented and maintained generally; however, coherence may falter. Diction is adequate. Syntactic structures are straightforward, but attempts at complex structures may be awkward. Stylistic choices contribute to the creation of a conventional composition with an appropriate voice. This writing demonstrates control of the basics of correct sentence construction, usage, grammar, and mechanics. There may be occasional lapses in control and minor errors. However, the communication remains clear. Ideas are superficial or oversimplified, demonstrating a weak comprehension of the literary text(s) and the topic. Literary interpretations are incomplete and/or literal. Support is inadequate, inaccurate, largely a restatement of what was read, and/or inappropriately chosen to reinforce the student’s ideas and thus lacks persuasiveness. A weak connection to the student’s ideas is maintained. A discernible but ineffectual arrangement of ideas and details provides some direction for the discussion that is underdeveloped. A unifying effect or controlling idea is inconsistently maintained. Diction is imprecise and/or inappropriate. Syntactic structures are frequently awkward and/or ambiguous. Inadequate language choices contribute to the creation of a vague composition with an undiscerning voice. This writing demonstrates faltering control of correct sentence construction, usage, grammar, and mechanics. The range of errors blurs the clarity of communication. Ideas are largely absent or irrelevant and/or do not develop the topic. Little comprehension of the literary text(s) is demonstrated Support is irrelevant, overgeneralized, lacks validity, and/or is absent. Little or no connection to the student’s ideas is evident. A haphazard arrangement of ideas and details provides little or no direction for the discussion, and development is lacking or obscure. A unifying effect or controlling idea is absent. Diction is overgeneralized and/or inaccurate. Syntactic structures are uncontrolled and/or unintelligible. A lack of language choices contributes to the creation of a confused composition with an ineffective voice. This writing demonstrates lack of control of correct sentence construction, usage, grammar, and mechanics. Jarring errors impair communication. • the student has written so little that it is not possible to assess Thought and Understanding and/or Supporting Evidence OR • no reference has been made to literature studied OR • the only literary reference present is to the texts on the examination OR • the marker can discern no evidence of an attempt to address the t ask presented in the assignment /30 Topic One for Cellist of Sarajevo Discuss the idea(s) developed by text creator in your chosen text about an individual’s capacity for selfsacrifice in the face of compelling circumstances. Brainstorm Symbols Working Thesis Statement: Imagery Possible Hook Significant Passages, Brief Explanations, & Page Numbers (for reference): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Topic #2 for Cellist of Sarajevo Discuss the idea(s) developed by the text creator in your chosen text about how acts of courage develop and nurture personal integrity. Brainstorm Symbols Working Thesis Statement: Imagery Possible Hook Significant Passages, Brief Explanations, & Page Numbers (for reference): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.