Criteria
Part A (40%)
Zero
Not attempted/ entirely or significantly plagiarized from
other sources.
Ethical Dilemmas – Issues and Solutions
Part B (20%)
Not attempted/ entirely or significantly plagiarized from
other sources.
Sustainability – Challenges and Solutions
Evaluation (15%)
Not attempted/ entirely or significantly plagiarized from
other sources.
Evaluation of Issues
References (10%)
Not attempted no proper referencing & citation style
followed
Overall (15%)
Grammar/ Mechanics/ Sentences and
Expression
Not attempted/ entirely or significantly plagiarized from
other sources.
Fail (30)
Confused and not relevant. No issues and problems
clearly highlighted. Problems/issues not related to the
topic.
Confused and not relevant. No issues and problems
clearly highlighted. Problems/issues not related to the
topic.
Does not clearly evaluate the impact of the issues
highlighted in the essay (both positive and negative). No
discussion on the lessons learned from the issues, and
the steps to be taken to avoid similar issues as faced by
organisations. Some are weak.
3 or less references provided. No proper referencing &
citation style followed.
Numerous grammatical, punctuation, spelling, or
capitalization errors which impede meaning. Expression is
not concise or professional.
Pass (55)
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified.
Issues/problems clearly articulated and adequate. At
least response to 1 issue are articulated briefly.
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified.
Issues/problems clearly articulated and adequate. At
least response to 1 issue are articulated briefly.
Clearly evaluate the impact of the issues highlighted in
the essay (both positive and negative). Provide
discussion on the lessons learned from the issues and
the steps to be taken to avoid similar issues as faced by
organisations. Most key points are not convincing.
4 references provided. Proper referencing & citation style
followed.
Some grammatical, punctuation, spelling, or
capitalization errors which occasionally impede meaning.
Expression is generally concise and professional, but
additional editing is warranted.
Credit (74)
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified. Provide clear
and actionable response which is articulated adequately.
Responses to 1 issues is articulated comprehensively and 2
issues briefly.
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified. Provide clear
and actionable response which is articulated adequately.
Response to 1 issue is articulated comprehensively.
Clearly evaluate the impact of the issues highlighted in the
essay (both positive and negative). Provide discussion on the
lessons learned from the issues and the steps to be taken to
avoid similar issues as faced by organisations. A few key points
are convincing.
6 references provided. Proper referencing & citation style
followed.
A few grammatical, punctuation, spelling, or capitalization
errors but generally don’t impede meaning. Expression is
generally concise and professional, but some additional editing
is warranted.
Distinction (80)
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified. Provide clear and
actionable response which is articulated adequately. Responses to 2
issues are articulated comprehensively and 1 issue articulated
briefly.
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified. Provide clear and
actionable response which is articulated adequately. Responses to 1
issue is articulated comprehensively and 1 issue briefly .
Very clearly evaluate the impact of the issues highlighted in the
essay (both positive and negative). Provide discussion on the
lessons learned from the issues and the steps to be taken to avoid
similar issues as faced by organisations. Most key points
convincing.
8 references provided. Proper referencing & citation style followed.
Occasionally has grammatical, punctuation, spelling, or capitalization
errors and don’t impede meaning. Expression is concise and
professional. Both sentences and style are good.
High Distinction (100)
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified. Provide
clear and actionable response which is articulated
adequately. Responses to 2 issues are articulated
comprehensibly.
Distinguishes between problems/issues identified. Provide
clear and actionable response which is articulated
adequately. Responses to 2 issues are articulated
comprehensibly.
Very thoroughly evaluate the impact of the issues
highlighted in the essay (both positive and negative).
Provide discussion on the lessons learned from the issues
and the steps to be taken to avoid similar issues as faced
by organisations. All key points are convincing.
10 references provided. Proper referencing & citation style
followed.
No grammatical, punctuation, spelling, or capitalization
errors. Expression is concise and professional. The report
has clearly been edited and proofread numerous times.