Uploaded by Noor Bayan

Lec.5

advertisement
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Microscopic Methods
There is a broad spectrum of microscopic techniques available to observe
polymer blend morphologies over several orders of magnitudes of length
scale.
It starts in the 10 μm range using optical microscopy (OM) and it goes down
to the nm range using the high resolution transmission electron microscopy.
1. Optical Microscopy (OM) or Light Microscopy (LM)
First information on the morphology of polymer blends is simply obtained
by visual inspection.
Blending two transparent, colorless amorphous polymers that have different
refractive indexes usually leads to an opaque material, in which the size of
phases exceeds the wavelength of visible light (>500 nm). It is usually
assumed that to have opacity the difference of the refractive indexes should
be larger than 0.003.
In the case when crystalline polymers are involved, the situation becomes
more complicated. These polymers are frequently opaque because there are
refractive index differences between the amorphous and crystalline regions
and the super molecular structures (spherulites) are also large (>500 nm),
Thus in the case of blends with semicrystalline polymers, the distinction
between homogeneous and heterogeneous structures of the amorphous phase
by visual inspection is limited to studies above the melting point of the
crystalline component.
A more detailed insight into the phase morphology of polymer blends can
be obtained by using optical microscopy (OM). The classical light microscopy
is limited by diffraction to domains not smaller than 500 nm.
In OM, the necessary contrast for detecting different phases might arise from
a number of different sources such as color, opacity, refractive index,
orientation, absorption or dichroic differences.
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
There are numerous imaging methods of OM, e.g., transmission-reflection,
bright field-dark field, phase contrast, interference microscopy, polarized
light, etc.
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is normally used to observe surfaces.
The resolution is not so good as TEM. Usually, SEM micrographs are
obtained by collecting secondary electrons emitted upon bombarding the
samples with high energy electrons. This secondary electron image (SEI)
gives information about the topography of the sample surface.
To obtain an information of morphology in the bulk of the material, it is
necessary to remove the surface layer. Only when adhesion between the
phases is poor, "new surface", that reflects the bulk morphology can be created
by fracturing the sample.
Usually, to prevent plastic deformation, the sample is first annealed in liquid
nitrogen, then fractured.
Another method of removing the surface layer is by etching. This process
may be carried out by:
1- Chemical etching, where one polymer is degraded using a chemical
reaction and the reaction products can be removed from surface.
2- Solvent etching, to selectively dissolve one of the polymers.
3- Ion beam etching, to preferentially degrade one of the polymers.
The low molecular weight by products evaporate under high vacuum.
Samples were coated with gold prior to examination under the electron
beam.
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
There has been a tremendous development in transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) since its discovery by Ruska.
To study the polymer morphology by TEM, a sample must be thin, usually
thinner than about 200 nm. However, using field emission guns (FEG), thicker
specimen (≤ 2μm) can be used.
Since polymers are mainly composed of C, H,N and O atoms, the electron
density difference between polymers is not large enough to achieve sufficient
contrast in heterogeneous materials. Thus staining techniques are usually
necessary.
Table below gives an overview of the most common staining methods for
polymers.
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
For most cases staining with osmium or rhutenium tetroxide (OsO4 or RuO4,
respectively) yields sufficient results.
OsO4 reacts with isolated double bonds (C=O, C=C) such as the double
bonds in polyisoprene and poly butadiene, but it does not react with
conjugated double bonds.
The mechanism of RuO4 staining seems to be different from OsO4. It does
not react directly with chemical species, but rather it forms clusters.
It stains most polymer but to a different degree dependent mostly on the
diffusion rate.
The diffusion of RuO4 into the polymer is most important. For crystalline
polymers, RuO4 diffuses preferably into the amorphous regions and stains
them, whereas the lamellar crystals remain unstained.
The double staining technique facilitates a clear contrast for more complicated
systems
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Figure : TEM micrograph of HIPS/ABS blend, double-stained with
RuO4 and OsO4
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
- X-Ray Diffraction Technique (XRD)
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
The interplanar spacing: The magnitude of the distance between two
adjacent and parallel planes of atoms (i.e., the interplanar spacing dhkl) is a
function of the Miller indices (h, k, and l) as well as the lattice parameter(s).
For example, for crystal structures having cubic symmetry,
d hkl 
a2
h2  k 2  l 2
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
s
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Lec. 5 …………………………………………..……………………………………….Methods of Polymer Morphology
Download