DPCH V Vs CPICH Nokia T-Mobile T Mobile FSC UMTS Performance Team Power Control Related Parameter Setting-Nokia Test case PtxPrimary CPICH PtxDPCHmax Ptx_AMR limit1 CPICHtoRefRAB offset Ptx AMR limit2 Ptx AMR limit =PAPtxDPCHmax dBm dB dBm dB dBm dBm Reference Drive 35 -3 43 2 33 33 Test 1 35 -3 43 10 25 25 Test 2 35 0 46 2 33 33 T t3 Test 35 -3 3 43 -10 10 45 45 Test 4 35 0 46 -10 45 45 39 1 47 -6 45 45 32 -3 3 43 1 31 31 Test 5 Test6 DL power setting: Parameters Setting-Nokia Total PA power – 40W (No related Nokia Parameter) CPICH power (PtxPrimaryCPICH)=35dBm DL Maximum Tx power per traffic channel (PtxDPCHmax) = -3dB DL Minimum Mi i Tx T power per traffic t ffi channel h l (Pt (PtxDPCHmin) DPCH i ) = -28dB 28dB DL maximum Tx power per radio link (PtxDLabsMax) =37dBm BLER target (DLreferenceTargetBLER) =-2.2 =10^(-2.2)=0.63% (defined in WCEL parameter) =10^(-2)=1% (viewed from field measurement) Downlink bit rate of the reference service (DLreferenceBitRate)=12.2 (kbps, AMR voice) DL maximum power of reference service (CPICHtoRefRABoffset) =2dB (= PtxPrimaryCPICH-2=33dBm) ((The parameter p CPICHToRefRABOffset defines the maximum link transmission power for a selected reference radio access bearer, for example, 12.2-kbps speech service, The maximum link powers of other services are obtained by scaling the reference maximum power with the ratio of bit rates, R/Rref, and the ratio of DL Eb/N0 requirements, /ref, between the reference and a particular service: CPICH RSCP vs. CPICH Ec/No RSCP Ec/No Below -110.00 >= -110.00 to < -90.00 Above -90.00 11/08/06 Serving cell Below -15.0 >= -15.0 to < -12.0 Above -12.0 4 BLER and UE Transmit Power BLER UE Transmit Power 11/08/06 >= 0.00 to < 1.00 >= 1.00 to < 2.00 >= 2.00 to < 5.00 >= 5.00 to < 101.00 Below 10.0 >= 10.0 to < 15.0 Above 15.0 5 Effect of CPICHtoRefRABoffset on coverage and BLER Test case PtxPrimary CPICH PtxDPCHmax Ptx_AMR limit1 CPICHtoRefRAB offset Ptx AMR limit2 Ptx AMR limit =PAPtxDPCHmax 11/08/06 dBm dB dBm dB dBm dBm Test 2 35 0 46 2 33 33 Test 4 35 0 46 -10 45 45 6 Effect of CPICHtoRefRABoffset on coverage and BLER Test-Case-2 vs. Test Case-4 • 11/08/06 As can be seen, seen increasing the max DL transmission power of reference service (AMR Speech) increases the coverage along with a reduction in the BLER even with the same CPICH value. 7 Test 2 Effect of CPICHtoRefRABoffset on g and BLER coverage • When the max DL transmission power of reference service (AMR speech) increases, the cell coverage g extended even though the CPICH is the same 11/08/06 Test 4 8 Test 2 Effect of CPICHtoRefRABoffset on g and BLER coverage • When more power is available, more power will be consumed Test 4 11/08/06 9 Effect of CPICHtoRefRABoffset on coverage and BLER Test case PtxPrimary CPICH PtxDPCHmax Ptx_AMR limit1 CPICHtoRefRAB offset Ptx AMR limit2 Ptx AMR limit =PAPtxDPCHmax dBm dB dBm dB dBm dBm Reference Drive 35 -3 43 2 33 33 Test 1 35 -3 43 10 25 25 11/08/06 10 Effect of CPICHtoRefRABoffset on coverage and BLER 11/08/06 11 Reference Effect of CPICHtoRefRABoffset on coverage and BLER • In line with our previous slide the coverage co e age dec decreases eases with t a decrease in the max DL Tx power (AMR Speech) for the same value of CPICH. 11/08/06 Test 1 12 Impact p of decreasing g the CPICH Test case PtxPrimary CPICH PtxDPCHmax Ptx_AMR limit1 CPICHtoRefRAB offset Ptx AMR limit2 Ptx AMR limit =PAPtxDPCHmax dBm dB dBm dB dBm dBm Reference Drive 35 -3 43 2 33 33 Test6 32 -3 43 1 31 31 11/08/06 13 Reference Impact of decreasing the CPICH Test6 shows lower measured Ec/Io with 3dB lower on CPICH power. 11/08/06 Test6 14 Impact of decreasing the CPICH The cell coverage breaks at similar range regardless the difference of CPICH power 11/08/06 15 Impact of decreasing the CPICH DCH power limit plays significant role in defining cell coverage 11/08/06 16 Impact p of increasing g CPICH on coverage g and BLER Test case PtxPrimary CPICH PtxDPCHmax Ptx_AMR limit1 CPICHtoRefRAB offset Ptx AMR limit2 Ptx AMR limit =PAPtxDPCHmax Test 4 Test 5 11/08/06 dBm dB dBm dB dBm dBm 35 0 46 -10 45 45 39 1 47 -6 45 45 17 Impact of increasing CPICH on coverage and BLER 11/08/06 18 Impact of increasing CPICH on coverage and BLER • 3-4dB improvements are measured at cell edge for test5 11/08/06 19 Impact of increasing CPICH on coverage and BLER • With 4dB higher CPICH power of test5, no significant improvement on cell coverage is measured 11/08/06 20 Observation from the DT data • Increasing the DL DCH value keeping the CPICH power constant will improve cell coverage • Decreasing in CPICH with lowered DL DCH power, cell coverage change is minim m minimum. • DCH power plays more important role in defining cell coverage than CPICH power 11/08/06 21