Uploaded by Maria Jenneth Sayse

ISP FEBRUARY 2019

advertisement
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-B MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF ORIENTAL MINDORO
VICTORIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT OF ROXAS
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISORY PLAN
For the month of February
NAME OF SCHOOL HEAD: ARISTEDES M. VALDEZ
POSITION TITLE: Principal I
NAME OF
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
Specific
Planned
TEACHER
(refer to Performance
Area/Category/Perfo Number of
Standard Tool)
rmance Indicator for Observatio
Coaching
ns
MARY GRACE
Diversity of Learners
Kinder-Period 1 & 2
1
D. CEZAR
Expectations
ANALYN F. DE
TORRES
Curriculum Content &
Pedagogy.
ESP 1
1
BABYLYN M.
ALBAY
Planning Assessment &
Reporting
MTB 1
1
MATH 2
1
AP 3
1
SCIENCE 4
1
MATH 5
1
ENGLISH 6
1
SCIENCE 6
1
EPP 5
1
LOVE JOY F.
CAYETANO
Diversity of Learners
Expectations
Planning,Assessment and
Reporting
LOURDES F.
RIVERA
Planning Assessment &
Reporting
RODOLFO M.
MONTESA
Planning Assessment &
Reporting
Diversity of Learners
Expectations
NANIE F.
MANIMTIM
BENJIE S.
GAVINO
MARIA
CRISTINA L.
SABAR
DIVINE
GRACE F.
FERRANCOL
.Planning Assessment &
Reporting
Diversity of Learners
Expectations
Curriculum Content &
Pedagogy.
Diversity of Learners
Expectations
Curriculum Content &
Pedagogy.
Remarks
Prepared and Submitted by:
ARISTEDES M. VALDEZ
Principal 1
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-B MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF ORIENTAL MINDORO
VICTORIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT OF ROXAS
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ON INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
NAME OF TEACHER: ____________________________ POSITION TITLE:___________________
SCHOOL: _______________________________DATE OF OBSERVATION:__________________
LEARNING AREA:__________________________________ TIME:_________________________
INSTRUCTIONS:
Rate the teacher along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies
to him/her in every item during supervisory visit. Use a rating scale of 0 to 4.
Legend: NO – Not Observed ; BB – Below Basic; B – Based on Standards ; Basic ; P – Proficient ;
HP – Highly Proficient.
For guidance of the observers, the rating scale is described as follows.
4 – HIGHLY PROFICIENT (HP). Teacher behavior consistently exceeds expectations. Displays
consistently at all times, high level of the performance in skills, abilities, attributes and productivity. Self-direction of
teacher is evident.
3. PROFICIENT (P). Teacher behavior often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency
related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the job areas.
2. BASIC (B) . Teacher behavior on the job meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic
level of work performance outputs as required outcomes.
1. BELOW BASIC (BB). Teacher behavior on the job and outputs frequently fall below standards.
Performance and work outputs consistently low, fails to meet required outcomes hence needs repetition of action or by
completion of others. The teacher may need immediate directive instructional support.
0. NOT OBSERVED (NO) Indicator is required of the job, but not observed.
A. DIVERSITY OF LEARNER EXPECTATIONS.
WITHIN THE APPRAISAL PERIOD, SHE/HE………..
NO
1.set the objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners
2.utilized varied designs ,techniques and activities suited of the different kinds
of learners
3.paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners
4.provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks.
5.recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning
opportunities.
6.adopted strategies to address needs of differently-abled learners.
7.showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socioeconomic background.
RATING
B
BB P
HP
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
TOTAL SCORE: ________________ AVERAGE:__________ DESCRIPTION:_________________
NARRATIVE OBSERVATION:________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________.
B. CURRICULUM CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY
WITHIN THE APPRAISAL PERIOD, SHE/HE………..
RATING
NO B
BB P HP
1.delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate
methodologies, approaches and strategies.
2.used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in
teaching.
3.explained learning goals, instructional procedures & content clearly and
accurately to learners.
4.linked the current content with past and future lessons.
5.aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and
instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.
6.created situations that encourage learners to use Higher Order Thinking
Skills
(HOTS) through the use of local language among others if needed.
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
4
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
0
1
2
3
4
7.engaged and sustained learner’s interest in the subject by making content
meaningful and relevant to them.
8.integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson.
9.established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time.
10.selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional
materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives.
11.provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support
development of good study habits.
12.used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching –
learning activities.
0
1
2
3
4
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
4
TOTAL SCORE: ________________ AVERAGE:__________ DESCRIPTION:_________________
NARRATIVE OBSERVATION:________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________.
C. PLANNING, ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING
WITHIN THE APPRAISAL PERIOD, SHE/HE………..
NO
1.constructed valid and reliable formative and summative test.
2.used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques i.e portfolio,
journals, rubrics, etc.
3. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning.
4.identified teaching-learning difficulties and possible causes.
5.managed remediation activities.
6.used tools for assessing authentic learning.
7.provided timely and accurate feedback learner to encourage them to reflect
on and monitor their own learning growth .
8.kept accurate record of grade performance levels of learners.
RATING
B
BB P
HP
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
0
1
2
3
4
TOTAL SCORE: ________________ AVERAGE:__________ DESCRIPTION:_________________
NARRATIVE OBSERVATION:________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________.
ARISTEDES M. VALDEZ
Signature over printed name of observer
Conforme:
Download