Abstract:
Inflation is a key macroeconomic indicator that measures changes in prices over time. According
to my research, the consumer price index overstated inflation for three reasons: it omitted
consumer substitution, failed to properly account for quality changes, and didn't accurately
reflect new goods entered the market.
Introduction:
Inflation is the gradual reduction of a currency's buying value over time. The increase in the
average price level of a basket of selected goods and services in an economy over time can be
used to calculate a quantitative estimate of the rate at which buying power declines. A rise in the
general level of prices, which is frequently stated as a percentage, signifies that a unit of currency
currently buys less than it previously did.
Inflation is distinguished from deflation, which happens when money's purchasing power rises
but prices fall.it was concluded that consumer price index inflation was overstated by 1.1
percentage points a year as a result of several upward biases, an inability to adequately account
for consumers switching expenditure between different categories, referred to as higher-level
substitution bias.
Background:
Inflation is a common occurrence. Inflation is a macroeconomic measure that has become a hot
topic among economists. In general, there has been a steady increase in the average price (parkin,
1993). Inflation, on the other hand, is a state in which there is an excess demand for goods and
services in general (lerner in gunawan, 1995). Understanding what is going on in the economy
requires accurate inflation measurement. It's much more important for someone whose tax or
pension is based on an inflation index. It should come as no surprise, then, that the accuracy of
official inflation statistics is frequently contested. In light of the influence of modern
technologies, we looked at one of the most influential, the us consumer price index (cpi)1. We
came to the conclusion that it has routinely inflated price increases, which might have farreaching consequences. It's possible that hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary social
security and pension payments were made, while real GDP was continually overstated. The
distortions caused by inaccurately recorded inflation are less clear-cut when it comes to markets
and monetary policy.
pg. 1
People overestimate the inflation rate. Why?
Some of the solid reasons why people overestimate the inflation are explained below:
The effect of substitution: Inflation of 3% indicates that prices have increased by 3% on
average. However, some prices will have climbed by a greater amount, while others will have
increased by a lesser amount (or even decreased). People modify their behavior in reaction to
these changes by buying more of the things that haven't increased in price by much and less of
the goods that have grown in price by a lot: this is known as the substitution effect. As
individuals migrate to relatively cheaper commodities, inflation overestimates the underlying
increase in the cost of living.
Unobservable quality improvements: as we discussed in the "adjusting for quality and
size" section previously, inflation must be calculated like-for-like. Although statisticians try to
account for quality improvements, it is impossible to do so completely. As a result, some
unnoticed quality improvements go unaccounted for. This indicates that inflation exaggerates the
genuine cost of living increase.
Example: This may be shown using the following example: assume you had $100,000 to
spend on either the 2015 amazon website or the bargain-basement 1963 sears catalog your
grandmother told you about. Which one would you pick? Prices were substantially lower in
pg. 2
1963, so you could purchase a lot more items, but it would be low-quality junk that you didn't
desire. So, while the 2015 option is significantly more expensive, the improved quality offsets
some of the cost.
New products and services: As time passes, new things and services emerge that did not
exist previously. When this occurs, customers benefit because they now have a new way to
spend their money. Even though these additional commodities may eventually be included in the
"basket of goods," the value of the new alternative is not taken into account in inflation data.
This means that inflation exaggerates the realistic cost of living raise since it ignores the fact that
consumers are better off as a result of the introduction of new items.
Quality adjustment bias: government statisticians frequently struggle to measure changes in
product quality.
Example: if the design of an air conditioner has improved to the point that it can give out 10%
more cold air without using 10% more power, then a 10% increase in the price of an air
conditioner should not be considered inflation.
Conclusion
As the digital era progresses, the quality of goods and services appears to be increasing, but
consumer purchasing habits are changing at a faster pace. In light of this, without any
methodological modifications, the consumer price index is expected to continue upwardly
skewed. This bias is presently estimated to be in the range of 0.5–1.0 percentage points every
year, according to the consensus. The ensuing underestimation of real GDP might explain why
productivity hasn't increased since the financial crisis of 2009. However, it means that pension
amounts and tax brackets may have been continually set excessively high, increasing
governmental debt to unsustainable levels. The consequences for bond markets and monetary
policy are less obvious.it appears that market actors and policymakers have already addressed
some of the shortcomings of inflation metrics. That raises the question of whether they are
getting a better estimate and, if not, how they may get one. Finding the solutions is likely to
continue to be a challenge for economists for many years to come.
pg. 3