CORONA 7.9 CASH RECONCILATION IMPLMENTATION TEST SUMMARY REPORT VERSION 1.0 DOCUMENT APPROVAL HISTORY Prepared By Project quality assurances dept. Reviewed By Project management team Approved By Corona 7.9 cash reconciliation implementation Quality assurances report Type of test ☒ Unit ☒ Integration ☒ System ☒ Performance ☒ Acceptance Summary Date: 05/11/2021 1) Does the project has signed statement of work SUMMARY TEST PERFORMED TEST COMPLETION EVALUATION The QA team Reviewed all the documents and the UAT test case reports The SOW has been prepared with a joint review between the Finastra and the awash bank The final document was signed electronically among with the awash bank and Finastra. The project time line was not meet the agreed plan though different factors for the delay FACTORS THAT BLOCKED PROGRESS TEST DELIVERABLES & REUSABLE ASSETS LESSON LEARNED After collectively meeting with the project manager ,project coordinator ,functional team lead and the technical team lead to prepare The signed statement of work(SOW) This test case is well address but the time line is not meet the agreement To the benefit of the bank this criterion is well done so it highly recommended to go live and enable the system to be used by the business unit to automate their manual reconciliation FINAL RECOMMENDA TION The signed statement of work(SOW) 2) Does the project have formal team assignment? SUMMARY TEST PERFORMED TEST COMPLETION EVALUATION The project team like project manager ,project coordinator ,functional team lead and the technical team lead formation and their task well performed All the team are participated FACTORS THAT BLOCKED PROGRESS TEST MEASURES TEST DELIVERABLES & REUSABLE ASSETS After collectively meeting with the project manager, project coordinator, functional team lead and the technical team lead the project corona 7.9 cash reconciliation implementation LESSON LEARNED FINAL RECOMMENDA TION TEAM FORMATION This test case is well address but the time line is not meet the agreement To the benefit of the bank this criterion is well done so it highly recommended to go live and enable the system to be used by the business unit to automate their manual reconciliation 3) Does the project execute against the project time line SUMMARY TEST PERFORMED TEST COMPLETION EVALUATION Check the project time line The project was executed as per the time line during the first two milestone phases (test and production server instances preparation) Delay was encountered on the data preparation and submission of transactional data in the correct format The system needs standard corona interfaces format Issues on the mantis Data inconsistences of swift statement FACTORS THAT BLOCKED PROGRESS TEST DELIVERABLES & REUSABLE ASSETS The time of the project accomplishment LESSON LEARNED Checking the case why the project is delay FINAL RECOMMENDA TION This test case is well address but the time line is not meet the agreement To the benefit of the bank this criterion is well done so it highly recommended to go live and enable the system to be used by the business unit to automate their manual reconciliation 4) Does the project execute with in the allocated services cost? SUMMARY TEST PERFORMED Check the cost of the project TEST COMPLETION EVALUATION As discussed with the project manager of the bank there was no services cost for the implementation TEST DELIVERABLES & REUSABLE ASSETS The cost to perform the project FINAL RECOMMENDA TION This test case is well address but the time line is not meet the agreement To the benefit of the bank this criterion is well done so it highly recommended to go live and enable the system to be used by the business unit to automate their manual reconciliation 5) Does all the deliverables of the project Submitted? SUMMARY TEST PERFORMED List out the deliverable of the project TEST COMPLETION EVALUATION All the deliverable are submitted FACTORS THAT BLOCKED PROGRESS TEST DELIVERABLES & REUSABLE ASSETS LESSON LEARNED FINAL RECOMMENDA TION 1) Corona system software delivered 2) Project definition document delivered 3) Solution design document delivered 4) Project plan delivered 5) Onsite activity report delivered 6) Standard corona documentation delivered 7) Standard corona training handouts delivered 8) Rad and security functional documents delivered 9) Coding standard documents delivered 10) Threat modeling documents delivered After collectively meeting with the project manager, project coordinator, functional team lead and the technical team lead the project deliverable are submitted to the project manager The deliverable IS well address but the time line is not meet the agreement To the benefit of the bank this criterion is well done so it highly recommended to go live and enable the system to be used by the business unit to automate their manual reconciliation 6) Does all the test case are executed ? SUMMARY TEST PERFORMED Check the number of test case that the project has with in the status like passed ,failed or block TEST COMPLETION EVALUATION TEST MEASURES Report the failed criteria for the development team with mantis and agreed to addressed as exception TEST DELIVERABLES & REUSABLE ASSETS The list of test case with pass status FINAL RECOMMENDA TION The project has 72 executed test case from this 32 are functional and 40 are technical case Out of 32 functional 29(90.6%) are passed Out of 32 functional 3(9.4%) failed and from the technical case 39(97.5%) are passed and 1(2.5%) failed so generally out of 72 test case 68(94.4%) are passed and 4(5.6%) are failed This test case is well address but the time line is not meet the agreement To the benefit of the bank this criterion is well done so it highly recommended to go live and enable the system to be used by the business unit to automate their manual reconciliation APPROVALS NAME/TITLE Role SIGNATURE DATE WOINSHET DENDIR Senior quality assurances <<Signature>> 5/11/2021 YOHANS BEKELE Project manager <<Signature>> 5/11/2021 MESKEREM BELETE Project coordinator <<Signature>> 5/11/2021 <<Signature>> 5/11/2021
