IoT Congestion is Challenging Engineers to a ‘Dual’ The Importance of Dual-Band Wi-Fi for the Next Wave of IoT Growth Dan Kephart, Sr. Product Manager of Laird Connectivity Engineers working on IoT design and deployment are being challenged to a “dual,” but this has little to do with battles of honor like the one that involved Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. This challenge may not be worthy of a Broadway musical, but the stakes are high for people designing IoT devices and building out IoT networks that rely on Wi-Fi connectivity. Because IoT networks in a range of industries rely so heavily on WiFi networks, the resulting network congestion and RF complexity too often lead to degraded performance and reliability. The dueling demands of so many Wi-Fi-based IoT devices push Wi-Fi-based networks to their limits. As a solution, engineers can resolve all of these demands with the adoption of dual-band Wi-Fi. This provides dramatically higher performance and more reliable connections, even in highly-congested IoT environments such as industrial settings, hospitals, and manufacturing plants. This white paper provides an overview of the role that dual-band Wi-Fi can play in IoT deployments. It also provides a number of practical design considerations that engineers can use as they begin integrating dual-band Wi-Fi into their product development pipeline and IoT deployment plans. Before discussing dual-band Wi-Fi in depth, however, I should mention that this is the newest in an ongoing series of Laird Connectivity white papers and other resources for engineers designing with Wi-Fi. The following prior materials provide practical information and best practices: • Testing Wi-Fi Functionality in Medical Devices: This white paper maps out a proven strategy for successfully testing and optimizing Wi-Fi-based IoT devices in hospital settings – a complex wireless environment where Wi-Fi has proven to be an effective wireless platform for connected medical devices. • 802.11n and Medical Devices: This white paper discusses why WiFi performs well in hospital and medical settings and provides design considerations for futureproofing Wi-Fi devices for these environments. • Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Coexistence: This white paper provides technical guidance to engineers who are designing and deploying Bluetooth and Wi-Fi devices alongside one another. This ensures that reliability is maximized in an environment populated by numerous devices utilizing each of the wireless technologies. • FCC Opens 6 GHz Frequency, Opening the Future of Wi-Fi: This blog post provides a look ahead to the future of Wi-Fi technologies, with a focus on key features and attributes that engineers should begin planning for in their development roadmaps. For other resources about IoT design, please visit: https://www. lairdconnect.com/resources. p. 2 Why Dual-Band Wi-Fi Makes Sense for IoT For examples of the benefits of dual-band Wi-Fi for increasing performance and reliability, you don’t have to look far. The nearest family room will do. The use of dual-band WiFi is extensive in residential settings, with adoption that has been far faster by consumers than in the enterprise, industrial, and medical fields. The devices being used may be different, but many of the drivers and benefits are similar to IoT deployments. At one point in time, single-band WiFi on the 2.4 GHz frequency was more than adequate for a household, but as the number of Wi-Fi enabled devices increased and as the demands of those devices intensified, families experienced the limits of how much traffic a single band of Wi-Fi could support. A smart tv playing Netflix shows, gaming systems running Gears of War, and tablets playing YouTube videos would often lead to arguments about which member of the family was hogging the Wi-Fi due to the performance issues. These challenges are even more acute in the era of COVID-19, with online learning, at-home work, Zoom calls, and other applications demanding even more of the Wi-Fi network. Dual-band residential routers have helped alleviate that network congestion, particularly when certain devices are dedicated to each band. For example, gaming and Netflix that are sensitive to latency might be dedicated to the 5 GHz signal, while other devices use the 2.4 GHz signal. Yes, IoT networks in settings like hospitals are very different than the nearest family room, but the same principles for use of dual-band WiFi apply. One of the ways that dualband allows organizations to relieve congestion and dramatically improve performance is by adding another signal for devices to connect with. But dual band also gives organizations the ability to manage traffic and performance by assigning specific devices to specific bands and prioritizing which of these devices get different levels of connectivity. Design Considerations and Success Factors for Dual-Band Wi-Fi IoT Below is an outline of key principles that should steer how you integrate dual-band Wi-Fi into your IoT strategy. Also included is a number of best practices and caveats based on the extensive work that the Laird Connectivity team has done with customers on these projects. • Design Dual-Band Flexibility into Your IoT Devices – IoT networks are not static. Over time your organization may want flexibility in how wireless devices are utilized and how connectivity is shared by those devices. For example, a device that you initially plan to solely use the 2.4 GHz spectrum may later need to be reassigned to the higher band or vice versa. As network traffic evolves over time, your organization might need to shift some devices to the higher or lower band in order to optimize performance and manage traffic. For that reason, it is best to design devices with both versions of Wi-Fi in order to have future flexibility. Using dual-band modules and antennas ensures flexibility without impacting the complexity and cost-structure of a device in a substantive way. • Assign Bands Based on Criticality of the Devices – One of the most important principles to follow in deploying dual-band Wi-Fi devices is to utilize one band as mission critical and the other band as less critical. In the same way that the hypothetical family in the previous section reserved the 5 GHz band for “performance apps” like gaming, organizations like hospitals typically opt to reserve the higher band for critical devices such as medical devices that track patient vitals or are directly related to patient care. In that scenario, the 2.4 GHz band becomes the home for lessvital devices including the personal smart devices of patients and their families. This same assigning of bands to critical/non-critical devices is a general guideline to consider in other industries where the stakes may not be life and death but where some devices are more important than others. This guideline can also allow engineering teams to begin modeling what level of demand each Wi-Fi band will experience, enabling them to anticipate how to optimize deployments before the switch is flipped on for an IoT network. p. 3 • Take Advantage of Lesser Traffic and Interference with 5 GHz – As a postscript to the section above, I should note that the 2.4 GHz band is less ideal for mission critical devices not only because of the demands already on that band but also because of its susceptibility to interference. In a complex RF environment, the 2.4 GHz band can experience interference from a number of sources including the proliferation of devices tuned to that frequency, the number of nearby gateways broadcasting on that band, and even nearby devices like microwave ovens. The 5 GHz band is far less susceptible to any of those challenges, underscoring how it is ideal for supporting critical devices. • Also Take Advantage of Channels to Further Improve Performance and Reliability – For engineers who have not worked with dual-band Wi-Fi in the past, one of the key capabilities to be aware of is the number of channels that the 5 GHz band offers. Engineering teams can tune the performance of their devices and networks by assigning 5 GHz devices to specific channels within the band that enable even more precise control of performance, traffic control, and latency. For this reason, I recommend that engineering teams not only create a strategy for how to segment devices between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, but also strategize how to segment devices across the channels on the higher band. • You Get What You Pay for with Modules – As with so much other technology in the wireless world, things that are inexpensive upfront often cost much more in the long run than if you had chosen something of higher quality. This general principle holds true when it comes to dualband Wi-Fi modules. Choosing a low-quality module can lead to a much higher TCO in a number of ways. It can lead to higher costs in terms of supplemental engineering that needs to be done to shore up missing elements where corners were cut. It can lead to higher costs in terms of certifications that were not completed by the manufacturer. Not to mention the opportunity costs caused by delays when modules do not work as advertised, require augmentation, or cause teams to go back to the drawing board on module selection. In our experience, a quality dual-band module always has a lower TCO and is a faster path to completing projects. Excellent documentation, readily-available technical support, guidance about module mounting, and comprehensive pre-certifications are all key selection criteria for a high-quality module. • Focus on Future-Proofing Your Module Choice – One of the most important design considerations for these projects is to anticipate how long a device may be in the field and factor that device lifespan into the radio and module. Some devices have a relatively short lifespan given the pace of turnover with which devices are replaced. But for use cases that have devices in the field for three years, five years, or more, the  engineering team should ensure that the radio and module they have selected will likely still be viable throughout that life cycle based on information available from industry groups and manufacturers. With that said, I believe it is too early for most engineering teams to be factoring 6 GHz Wi-Fi into their product roadmap. For most IoT applications, it will likely be several years before that newest release of the Wi-Fi protocol becomes widely adopted. • Antenna Selection and Placement Can Make or Break Your Project – One of the biggest pitfalls for dual-band Wi-Fi design projects is related to antenna selection. Antenna selection is fraught with difficulty no matter what technologies are involved, due to the number of antennas on the market, the confusion created by their marketing-driven data sheets, and the often dramatic difference between reported performance and actual performance. Dual-band WiFi devices require antennas that are well-designed, have successfully optimized performance of both bands, and avoid the detuning that is possible with 5 GHz signal. Engineering teams should not rely on data sheets and RF modeling for antenna selection. That is also true for antenna placement of both internal and external antennas. Testing is critical to ensure that your team selected the right antenna and installed it in a manner that optimizes performance. Extensive testing is a wise time investment up front in the process that saves time and prevents design headaches later on. This is particularly true for IoT deployments in complex RF environments such as those in healthcare, industrial, and manufacturing settings. It is also important to note that working with an antenna provider that is committed to being a partner in the process provides the engineering team with invaluable guidance and technical support which lowers the risks involved in this critical decision. p. 4 Laird Connectivity’s Sterling-LWB5+ 802.11ac and 60 Series of Wi-Fi + Bluetooth 5 modules answer the call for next-gen wireless IoT. Powered by Infineon Technologies’ CYW4373E silicon, the SterlingLWB5+ is purpose-built for industrial IoT connectivity where performance, cost, size, and ruggedness are required to deliver reliable wireless connectivity. The Sterling-LWB5+ offers significant value to developers by providing an unmatched breadth of options including SMT and M.2 module form factors, certifications, optional antenna diversity, Linux backport packages, and personal support and design services, which altogether provide greater flexibility to meet the challenging requirements of many wireless designs. The 60 Series 60-2230, powered by the powerful NXP 88W8997, achieves the best possible connectivity and performance in any RF environment. With industry-leading software, broad OS support, and M.2 form factor, the 60 Series 60-2230 offers flexibility to meet your needs. The 60 Series introduces 802.11ac, 2x2 MU-MIMO, and Bluetooth 5.1 on one low-power module, delivering future-ready cutting edge technology for your product. Pairing embedded modules with a pre-certified RF antenna saves both certification time and costs. New, exclusive, flexible antenna solutions from Laird Connectivity, the antenna authority, provide unmatched flexibility to help you solve your real-world design challenges. For more information about Laird Connectivity’s Wi-Fi solutions, visit: https://www. lairdconnect.com/wirelessmodules/wifi-modules-bluetooth Learn more about Laird Connectivity antennas at: www.lairdconnect.com/rfantennas p. 5 About the Author: Dan Kephart, Senior Product Manager, IoT Platforms, Laird Connectivity Dan manages the Wi-Fi, SOM, and gateway product lines to enable customers to create IoT solutions that are reliable, secure, and use industry leading connectivity. Dan has over 15 years of industry experience including 12 years in wireless focused products. About Laird Connectivity: Laird Connectivity simplifies the enablement of wireless technologies with market-leading wireless modules and antennas, integrated sensor and gateway platforms, and customer-specific wireless solutions. Our best-inclass support and comprehensive engineering services help reduce risk and improve time-to-market. When you need unmatched wireless performance to connect electronics with security and confidence, Laird Connectivity delivers — no matter what. Learn more at www.lairdconnect.com. For the latest news or more information, visit: Lairdconnect.com twitter.com/lairdconnect facebook.com/ lairdconnectivity linkedin.com/company/ lairdconnectivity p. 6