Court Case exposes Facts About IRS!
Please! EVERYONE;YOU MUST READ
THIS:!!!
Check out Title 20 CFR, Chapter 111, Subparagraph B, 422.103(B)(2)(2). I
don't have a link for the info for Title 20 but by searching the above, it
brought me to the link below.... The link below is from 2009 but I believe it is
as relevant then as it is now....
http://www.dailypaul.com/99462/super-hot-court-case-exposes-factsabout-irs-please-everyone-you-must-read-this. This is a powerful site, with
many COURT CASES and explanations about the IRS. The below is an
excerpt from the link just above...
In Current Events
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FACTS.
1. Social Security Numbers can only be issued to federal "employees" for use
only in the performance of their official duties. See 20 CFR §422.104.
2. The Social Security Number is the property of the government and not
you. Therefore, it can't be "yours" unless you are a public officer on official
business. See 20 CFR §422.103[ d].
3. The SSN is issued to the federal "public officer" and not to the man, and
then only while he is an agent of the federal government.
4. Anyone who uses a Social Security Number who is NOT a federal
employee acting on official commercial, government business is guilty of
impersonating a federal "employee", which is a crime. See 18 U.S.C. §912.
5. You can only use it in connection with a "public purpose", and not a
private purpose. It is illegal and a crime to use or abuse the SSN for a
private or personal use. This is called embezzlement or conversion, and it is
a criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. §641 and 18 U.S.C. §654.
6. Everything connected to the SSN becomes "public property" because the
SSN can only be used in connection with a "public office" or federal
employment.
7. The private man was never issued an SSN if he is not acting as a federal
"employee". Therefore, he can honestly answer "NO" in response to the
question of whether he was ever issued an SSN if he is not acting as a federal
"employee" or agent.
Taken from
USC Title 15 Chapter 1 Section 17 clearly states: "The labor of a
Human being is not a commodity or article of commerce."
IRS-ACS Correspondence
PO Box 24017- Stop 76202
Fresno, CA 93776
Attn: Susan Meredith, Operations Manager, Collection
IDENTIFICATION: Bradford Smith, SSN: xxx-xx-xx, non-federally
Connected worker SUBJECT: Internal Revenue Service Notice of Levy
Form 668-W(coffee) PURPOSE: Request for written authority to garnish
Wages, including: 1) Form 668-B Levy 2) Judgment abstract from
A court of competent jurisdiction 3) Form 2159 Payroll Deduction
Agreement 4) Letter 3164 Notice 5) Form 12175
ENCLOSURES:
1. Treasury Financial Manual, Part 3, Chapter 4 of Title 1, 4075Levy for Unpaid Tax Liability, March 2000 edition.
2. Internal Revenue Manual 5.14.10- Administrative garnishment via
Private employers, state government agencies, etc. (IRM 5.14.10.2
Dated 09-30-2004),
http://www.supremelaw.org/irm/part5/ch14s10.htm (This section is
Now conveniently missing in their revised version 5.14.10.1 dated
09-26-2008.)
3. U.S. Representative Raul M. Grijalva September 8, 2003 letter
To an IRS Taxpayer Advocate in Arizona (names & other identifying
Information redacted).
[6:25:38 PM | Edited 6:28:34 PM] Ted Wacholtz:
****Any statute that supposes to effect legislative judgment,
Thereby eliminating judicial due process of law, is a bill
Of attainder, which the U.S. Constitution prohibits both
Congress and state legislatures from enacting. However,
The Internal Revenue Code does not authorize seizures,
Garnishments and the like without judicial due process.****