Pleading the Complaint Motions Against the Complaint The Complaint Three Essential Elements of the Complaint- FRCP 8(a) (a)(1)-Jurisdiction- plaintiff must allege case is within SMJ (some states require PJ & Venue) (a)(2)-Statement of the claim- short and plain statement showing the pleader is entitled to relief- plaintiff needs to only state facts, not legal theory relied upon. (a)(3)-Relief- demand for specific relief (i.e. money damages, injunction, etc.) Special (Heightened) Pleading Rules 9(b)- must plead fraud with particularity 9(g)- must plead any special damages Other claims do not demand a specific pleading- Leatherman Pleading in the Alternative- 8(e)(2)A party may set forth two or more Defenses against the validity of the complaint Defenses- 12(b)- defenses against the validity of the complaint Motion for More Definite Statement- 12(e)- if complaint is so ?vague and ambiguous that defendant cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading?- Matos v. Nextran Motion to Strike- 12(f)- if plaintiff has included ?redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous? material in complaint, defendant may move to have material stricken from pleading. -Matos v. Nextran Consolidation- defendant is limited to one pre-answer motion Waiver- 12(h)- Certain defenses that can be raised by 12(b) motion will be waived if they are not included in the 12(b) motion. PJ, Venue, Insufficient service of process; but SMJ can never be waived. Motions Delay Defendant?s Obligation to Answer 12(a)(1)- states that a defendant must file answer within 20 days of complaint12(a)(4)- filing motions alters time allowed because defendant is then not required to answer until 10 days after court answers motion. Evolution of Pleadings The Answer 3 Possible Responses to each allegation: Admit, Deny, Lack of Sufficient Information Affirmative Defenses Defenses that must be explicitly pleaded in the answer if defendant is to raise in trial 8(c)- non-exclusive list of affirmative defenses (including contributory negligence, fraud, res judicata, SOL, illegality) Counterclaim- Claim against the plaintiff offering reason why the plaintiff is liable to the defendant Rule 12(h) Waiver of Defenses (1) Waiver - the below defenses are WAIVED if (A) omitted from a joined motion per 12(g)(2); OR (B) failing to either: (i) make it by motion under this rule; OR (ii) include it in a responsive pleading. . . Waived defenses - 12(b)... (2) lack of PJ (3) imporper venue (4) insufficient process (5) insufficient service of process. (2) Raising certain claims For failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, to join a person req. by 19(b), or to state: a legal defense may be raised: (A) in a 7(a) pleading; (B) by 12(c) motion; OR (C) at trial. (3) Lack of Subject matter jurisdiction may be raised by the court itself as grounds for dismissal AT ANY TIME. The Reply The plaintiff?s response to counterclaim (plaintiff does not respond to affirmative defenses) 1. Does the service meet Constitutional standards? - Must be "reasonably calculated" to appraise a party of the action. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust - If ? learns that actions taken are unreasonable, he must make additional efforts. Formal Service to Individual -Rule 4(e) 2. Does the method of service satisfy Rule 4(e)? (a)(2) - Delivering copy of summons to individual personally (b)(2) - leaving copy of summons @ indvl's dwlling with a person of suitable age. (c)(2) - delivery by law enforcement agent (1) - Following state procedures for service where claim is brought (1) - If serving ? outside forum state, ? may serve per ? 's state rules. Rule 4(c)(1)- Serive must include both complaint AND summons Rule 4(a)(1)- what all has to be included Rule (4)(b)- get the summons from the clerk's office Conley Standard- “a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” BROAD. Conley v. Gibson Twombly Standard (Speculation)- overruled Conley standard. holding that factual allegations of parallel conduct alone did not state a claim for relief under § 1 of the Sherman Act. In response to the plaintiffs’ argument that under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) only a “short and plain statement of the claim” was required, Justice Souter noted that the Rule “requires a ‘showing,’ rather than a blanket assertion of entitlement to relief ” that relied merely on labels and conclusion. To meet this standard, a §1 claim must be pled “with enough factual matter (taken as true) to suggest that an agreement was made,” or at least “to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of illegal agreement. Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly Iqbal Standard (Plausibility)- The court went further in judging what the actual factual allegations would satisfy. The Court, in a decision written by Justice Kennedy, held that whether a complaint is "plausible," as that term is used by Twombly, turns not on whether the alleged conduct is unlikely, but on whether the complaint contains sufficient non conclusory factual allegations to support a reasonable inference that the conduct occurred. Ashcroft v. Iqbal. Twombly-Iqbal Standard- The Twombly/Iqbal pleading standards not only specify that a complaint must be plausible on its face, but it must bring forth sufficient factual allegations that nudge a claim across the line from conceivable to plausible. Additionally, the claim must raise some legal theory that is cognizable as a matter of law Court must accept all allegations as true EXCEPT "'legal conclusions'. Only a plausible claim for relief survives. Concievable does not mean plausible. Inference of mere possibility of misconduct is insufficient to show entitlement to relief. Service of Process Is service waived or formal? Formal Service to Corp. or Entity-Rule 4(j) If served within United States - Rule 4(h)(1) (A) - Pursuant to 4(e)(1) for serving individual; or (B) - By delievering a copy of summpons & complaint to an officer, managing or general agent, or any Waiver of Process-Rule 4(d) (1) - ? has duty to avoid "unnecessary expenses" (2)(B) - If ? refuses to waive w/o good cause, he will bear expenses of service (3) - Gives 60 days to respond to complaint if waived. Std. srvc gives 20 days instead. You got served. Rule 4(m) - Was service filed within 120 days of complaint? -If not, did ? have good cause not to? -If no to both, suit must be dismsissed. Challenging Service of Process - Rule 12(b)(5) Per Rule 12(h)(1), failure to challenge sufficient service in the initial pleadings WAIVES ? 's right to do so in the future. Special Rules Boles Mentioned Rule 4(f)- individual defendant in foreign country Rule 4(g)- minor or incompetant person Rule 4(i)- U.S. Government as defendant