Uploaded by TK TRADERS

Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation 04

advertisement
CE 333
Geotechnical Engineering II
Sultan Mohammad Farooq
Sheikh Sharif Ahmed
Department of Civil Engineering
Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
 Consider a situation in which a foundation is
subjected to a vertical ultimate load 𝑸𝒖𝒍𝒕 and a
moment M, as shown in Figures 14a and b.
 For this case, the components of the moment M
about the x-axes and y-axes can be determined as
𝑴𝒙 and π‘΄π’š , respectively (See Figure 14c).
 This condition is equivalent to a load 𝑸𝒖𝒍𝒕 placed
eccentrically on the foundation with 𝒙 = 𝒆𝑩 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π’š =
𝒆𝑳 (Figure 14d). Note that
π‘΄π’š
𝒆𝑩 =
𝑸𝒖𝒍𝒕
and
𝑴𝒙
𝒆𝑳 =
𝑸𝒖𝒍𝒕
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 14
Two-Way Eccentricity
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
 If 𝑸𝒖𝒍𝒕 is needed, it can be obtained from
Where,
𝑸𝒖𝒍𝒕 = 𝒒𝒖 𝑨′
𝟏
𝒒𝒖 = 𝒄𝑡𝒄 𝑭𝒄𝒔 𝑭𝒄𝒅 π‘­π’„π’Š + 𝒒𝑡𝒒 𝑭𝒒𝒔 𝑭𝒒𝒅 π‘­π’’π’Š + πœΈπ‘©′π‘΅πœΈ π‘­πœΈπ’” π‘­πœΈπ’… π‘­πœΈπ’Š
𝟐
′
𝑨 = π’†π’‡π’‡π’†π’„π’•π’Šπ’—π’† 𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒂 = 𝑩′𝑳′
 As before, to evaluate 𝑭𝒄𝒔 , 𝑭𝒒𝒔 , and π‘­πœΈπ’” (Table 03),
we use the effective length 𝑳′ and effective width 𝑩′
instead of L and B, respectively.
 To calculate 𝑭𝒄𝒅 , 𝑭𝒒𝒅 , and π‘­πœΈπ’… we do not replace B
with 𝑩′ .
 In determining the effective area 𝑨′ , effective width
𝑩′ and effective length 𝑳′ , five possible cases may
arise (Highter and Anders, 1985).
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
∅
Nc
Nq
π‘΅πœΈ (M)
π‘΅πœΈ (V)
π‘΅πœΈ (H)
∅
Nc
Nq
π‘΅πœΈ (M)
π‘΅πœΈ (V)
π‘΅πœΈ (H)
0°
1°
2°
3°
4°
5°
6°
7°
8°
9°
10°
11°
12°
13°
14°
15°
16°
17°
18°
19°
20°
21°
22°
23°
24°
5.10
5.38
5.63
5.90
6.19
6.49
6.81
7.16
7.53
7.92
8.34
8.80
9.28
9.81
10.37
10.98
11.63
12.34
13.10
13.93
14.83
15.81
16.88
18.05
19.32
1.00
1.09
1.20
1.31
1.43
1.57
1.72
1.88
2.06
2.25
2.47
2.71
2.97
3.26
3.59
3.94
4.34
4.77
5.26
5.80
6.40
7.07
7.82
8.66
9.60
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.11
0.15
0.21
0.28
0.37
0.47
0.60
0.74
0.92
1.13
1.37
1.66
2.00
2.40
2.87
3.42
4.07
4.82
5.72
0.00
0.07
0.15
0.24
0.34
0.45
0.57
0.71
0.86
1.03
1.22
1.44
1.69
1.97
2.29
2.65
3.06
3.53
4.07
4.68
5.39
6.20
7.13
8.20
9.44
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.11
0.16
0.22
0.30
0.39
0.50
0.63
0.78
0.97
1.18
1.43
1.73
2.08
2.48
2.95
3.50
4.13
4.88
5.75
25°
26°
27°
28°
29°
30°
31°
32°
33°
34°
35°
36°
37°
38°
39°
40°
41°
42°
43°
44°
45°
46°
47°
48°
49°
20.72
22.25
23.94
25.80
27.86
30.14
32.67
35.49
38.64
42.16
46.12
50.59
55.63
61.35
67.87
75.31
83.86
93.71
105.11
118.37
133.87
152.10
173.64
199.26
229.93
10.66
11.85
13.20
14.72
16.44
18.40
20.63
23.18
26.09
29.44
33.30
37.75
42.92
48.93
55.96
64.20
73.90
85.37
99.01
115.31
134.87
158.50
187.21
222.30
265.50
6.77
8.00
9.46
11.19
13.24
15.67
18.56
22.02
26.17
31.15
37.15
44.43
53.27
64.07
77.33
93.69
113.99
139.32
171.14
211.41
262.74
328.73
414.33
526.46
674.92
10.88
12.54
14.47
16.72
19.34
22.40
25.99
30.21
35.19
41.06
48.03
56.31
66.19
78.02
92.25
109.41
130.21
155.54
186.53
224.64
271.75
330.34
403.66
496.00
613.15
6.76
7.94
9.32
10.94
12.84
15.07
17.69
20.79
24.44
28.77
33.92
40.05
47.38
56.17
66.76
79.54
95.05
113.96
137.10
165.58
200.81
244.65
299.52
368.67
456.41
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Author
Factor
Condition
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ = 0°
Relationship
𝐹𝑐𝑠 = 1 + 0.2
πΉπ‘žπ‘  = 𝐹𝛾𝑠 = 1.0
Shape
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ ≥ 10°
𝐹𝑐𝑠 = 1 + 0.2
𝐡
𝐿
Meyerhof
πΉπ‘žπ‘  = 𝐹𝛾𝑠 = 1 + 0.1
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ = 0°
π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›2 45 +
𝐡
𝐿
∅
2
π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›2 45 +
𝐹𝑐𝑑 = 1 + 0.2
∅
2
𝐷𝑓
𝐡
πΉπ‘žπ‘‘ = 𝐹𝛾𝑑 = 1.0
Depth
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ ≥ 10°
𝐹𝑐𝑑 = 1 + 0.2
𝐷𝑓
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘¦ ∅
π‘‘π‘Žπ‘› 45 +
𝐡
πΉπ‘žπ‘‘ = 𝐹𝛾𝑑 = 1 + 0.1
Inclination
𝐡
𝐿
𝐷𝑓
𝐡
𝐹𝑐𝑖 = πΉπ‘žπ‘– = 1 −
π‘‘π‘Žπ‘› 45 +
𝛼° 2
90°
𝛼° 2
∅°
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ > 0°
𝐹𝛾𝑖 = 1 −
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ = 0°
𝐹𝛾𝑖 = 0
∅
2
∅
2
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Author
Factor
Condition
Relationship
𝐹𝑐𝑠 = 1 +
Shape
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘™π‘™ ∅
π‘π‘ž
𝐡
𝐿
𝑁𝑐
𝐡
πΉπ‘žπ‘  = 1 + tan ∅
𝐿 𝐡
𝐹𝛾𝑠 = 1 − 0.4
𝐿
Hansen & Vesic
𝐷𝑓
𝐷𝑓
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ
≤ 1.0
𝐡
𝐹𝑐𝑑 = 1 + 0.4
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ = 0°
𝐡
1 − πΉπ‘žπ‘‘
𝐹𝑐𝑑 = πΉπ‘žπ‘‘ −
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ > 0°
π‘π‘ž tan ∅
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘™π‘™ ∅
𝐷𝑓
πΉπ‘žπ‘‘ = 1 + 2 tan ∅ 1 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛∅ 2
𝐡
𝐹𝛾𝑑 = 1.0
Depth
𝐷𝑓
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ
> 1.0
𝐡
&
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘™π‘™ ∅
𝐹𝑐𝑑 = 1 + 0.4 π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›−1
πΉπ‘žπ‘‘ = 1 + 2 tan ∅ 1 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛∅
2
𝐷𝑓
𝐡
π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›
−1
𝐹𝛾𝑑 = 1.0
Note: 𝒕𝒂𝒏−𝟏
𝑫𝒇
𝑩
is in radians
𝐷𝑓
𝐡
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Hansen
Author
Factor
Condition
Relationship
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ > 0°
1 − πΉπ‘žπ‘–
𝐹𝑐𝑖 = πΉπ‘žπ‘– −
π‘π‘ž − 1
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ = 0°
Inclination
𝑄𝐻
𝐹𝑐𝑖 = 0.5 1 −
𝐴𝑓 π‘π‘Ž
πΉπ‘žπ‘– = 1 −
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘¦ ∅
0.5
0.5𝑄𝐻
𝑄𝑉 +𝐴𝑓 π‘π‘Ž cot ∅
5
0.7𝑄𝐻
𝐹𝛾𝑖 = 1 −
𝑄𝑉 + 𝐴𝑓 π‘π‘Ž cot ∅
5
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Author
Factor
Condition
Vesic
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ > 0°
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ ∅ = 0°
Inclination
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘¦ ∅
Relationship
𝐹𝑐𝑖 = πΉπ‘žπ‘– −
1 − πΉπ‘žπ‘–
π‘π‘ž − 1
π‘šπ‘„π»
𝐹𝑐𝑖 = 1 −
𝐴𝑓 π‘π‘Ž 𝑁𝑐
0.5
𝑄𝐻
πΉπ‘žπ‘– = 1 −
𝑄𝑉 + 𝐴𝑓 π‘π‘Ž cot ∅
𝑄𝐻
𝐹𝛾𝑖 = 1 −
𝑄𝑉 + 𝐴𝑓 π‘π‘Ž cot ∅
π‘š
π‘š+1
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
CASE I
𝒆𝑳 𝟏
𝒆𝑩 𝟏
≥ 𝒂𝒏𝒅
≥
𝑳
πŸ”
𝑩
πŸ”
The effective area for this condition is shown in Figure
15, or
𝑨′
Where,
And
𝟏
= π‘©πŸ 𝑳 𝟏
𝟐
πŸ‘π’†π‘©
π‘©πŸ = 𝑩 𝟏. πŸ“ −
𝑩
πŸ‘π’†π‘³
π‘³πŸ = 𝑳 𝟏. πŸ“ −
𝑳
The effective length is the larger of the two dimensions
π‘©πŸ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘³πŸ . So the effective width is
𝑩′
𝑨′
=
𝑳′
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 15
Effective Area (Case I)
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
CASE II
𝒆𝑳
𝒆𝑩 𝟏
< 𝟎. πŸ“ 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝟎 <
<
𝑳
𝑩
πŸ”
 The effective area for this case, shown in Figure 16, is
𝑨′
𝟏
= π‘³πŸ + π‘³πŸ 𝑩
𝟐
 The magnitudes of π‘³πŸ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘³πŸ can be determined
from Figure 17.
 The effective length is
𝑳′ = π‘³πŸ 𝒐𝒓 π‘³πŸ (whichever is larger)
 The effective width is
𝑩′ =
𝑨′
𝑳′
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 16
Effective Area (Case II)
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 17
Chart for Obtaining
π‘³πŸ 𝑳 𝒂𝒏𝒅 π‘³πŸ 𝑳
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
CASE III
𝒆𝑳 𝟏
𝒆𝑩
< 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝟎 <
< 𝟎. πŸ“
𝑳
πŸ”
𝑩
 The effective area, shown in Figure 18, is
𝑨′
𝟏
= π‘©πŸ + π‘©πŸ 𝑳
𝟐
 The effective width is
 The effective length is
′
𝑨
𝑩′ =
𝑳
𝑳′ = 𝑳
 The magnitudes of π‘©πŸ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘©πŸ can be determined
from Figure 19.
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 18
Effective Area (Case III)
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 19
Chart for Obtaining
π‘©πŸ 𝑩 𝒂𝒏𝒅 π‘©πŸ 𝑩
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
CASE IV
𝒆𝑳 𝟏
𝒆𝑩 𝟏
< 𝒂𝒏𝒅
<
𝑳
πŸ”
𝑩
πŸ”
 Figure 20 shows the effective area for this case.
 The ratio π‘©πŸ 𝑩 and thus π‘©πŸ , can be determined by
using the 𝒆𝑳 𝑳 curves (Figure 21) that slope
upward.
 Similarly, the ratio π‘³πŸ 𝑳 and thus π‘³πŸ , can be
determined by using the 𝒆𝑳 𝑳 curves (Figure 21)
that slope downward. The effective area is then𝑨′
𝟏
= 𝑳 𝟐 𝑩 + 𝑩 + π‘©πŸ 𝑳 − 𝑳 𝟐
𝟐
𝑩′
𝑨′
𝑳
The effective width is
=
The effective length is 𝑳′ = 𝑳
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 20
Effective Area (Case IV)
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 21
Chart for Obtaining
π‘©πŸ 𝑩 𝒂𝒏𝒅 π‘³πŸ 𝑳
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
CASE V
Circular Foundation
 In the case of circular foundations under eccentric
loading (Figure 22), the eccentricity is always one
way.
 The effective area 𝑨′ and the effective width 𝑩′ for a
circular foundation are given in a non-dimensional
form in Table 05 and in Figure 23.
 Once 𝑨′ and 𝑩′ are determined, the effective length
can be obtained as𝑳′
𝑨′
=
𝑩′
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 22
Effective Area (Case V)
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Figure 23
Variation of 𝑨′ π‘ΉπŸ 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑩′ 𝑹
with 𝒆𝑹 𝑹 for Circular
Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Table 05
Variation of 𝑨′ π‘ΉπŸ and 𝑩′ 𝑹 with 𝒆𝑹 𝑹 for
Circular Foundation
𝒆𝑹 𝑹
𝑨′ π‘ΉπŸ
𝑩′ 𝑹
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.80
2.40
2.00
1.61
1.23
0.93
0.62
0.35
0.12
0.00
1.85
1.32
1.20
0.80
0.67
0.50
0.37
0.23
0.12
0.00
Download