Dynamics, Structures and Design Group Chebyshev Polynomials Fits for Non-parametric Model of Magneto-rheological Damper Hassan A. Metered1, Dr Philip Bonello2 and Dr S.O. Oyadiji2 1 Ph. D student, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 2Mech., Aero. and Civil Engineering School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Introduction The magneto-rheological (MR) damper is one of the most promising new devices for vehicle vibration reduction. Because of its mechanical simplicity, high dynamic range, low power requirements, large force capacity and robustness, this device offers a compromise solution for the two conflicting requirements of ride comfort and vehicle handling. In the present work a new approach for studying the dynamical behaviour of MR damper is presented. It consists of a procedure for the application of Chebyshev orthogonal polynomial fits for damping force generated by numerically solving the Bouc-Wen model as a function of displacement and velocity at constant voltage. Also, a three dimensional fit is proposed for expressing the damping force as a function of displacement, velocity and input voltage. For all cases, the use of the Chebyshev polynomials fits expression is seen to be very efficient and precise for MR damper. Then, use the function “griddata” available in MATLAB to construct the surface plot as shown in Fig.1 & 2. Finally, substitute in the two equations of Ck,l,z and F respectively. a 1500 Chebyshev Bouc-Wen 1000 Force (N) 500 MR Damper Model 0 -500 Spencer Jr. et al. [1] proposed a modified Bouc-Wen model (see Fig. 1), which avoided -1000 most of the problems observed in the other models. -1500 0 1 2 3 Time (sec) 4 5 6 b In this model, the damping force F 1000 Force (N) Fig. 2 Surface plot according to set 1 produced by the MR device is given by k1 ( x xo ) F c1 y 500 0 -500 -1000 -0.01 where y is governed by the following equations -0.005 0 Displacement (m) c Fig.1 Modified Bouc-Wen model 0.005 0.01 1000 1 [z co x ko ( x y )] co c1 y z z x n 1 y z z x n Force (N) y 0 -500 -1000 y ) A( x -0.1 Fig. 3 Surface plot according to set 2 In the above equations, parameters α, c1 and co are directly related to the voltage u applied to the MR damper in a manner shown below, (u ) a bu, c1 c1 (u ) c1a c1bu, 500 -0.05 0 0.05 Velocity (m/sec) 0.1 0.15 Fig. 4 Comparison between Bouc-Wen model and Chebyshev polynomials fit (30 * 30 terms) according to set 1 and 2 co co (u ) coa cobu where u is given as the output from a first-order filter as follows (u v ) u in which, v is the command voltage signal sent to the current driver. Fig. 5 Some surface plots according to set 3 at different voltages The corresponding parameters of the MR model that used in this research are obtained 4500 The main idea of this section is based on the remark made above. As functions of three variables, the damping force can be approximated as triple series involving variables displacement (x), velocity (x ) , and input voltage (v). ˆ ( x, x , v) F , v) F ( x, x K , L,Z C k ,l , z 0 )Tz (v) Tk ( x)Tl ( x klz where Cklz is Chebyshev coefficients that governed by the following equation [3] C k ,l , z 1500 1500 0 -1500 -3000 -3000 -4500 -4500 0 1 2 3 Time (sec) 4 5 6 Fig. 6 Comparison between Bouc-Wen model and Chebyshev polynomials fit (20 * 20 * 20 terms) according to set 3 0 1 2 3 Time (sec) 4 5 6 F ig. 7 Comparison between Bouc-Wen model and Chebyshev polynomials fit (20 * 20 * 20 terms) according to set 4 Conclusions and Recommendation for Future Work The Chebyshev polynomials fits method for characterizing the non-linear dynamical behaviour of MR damper was presented. Displacement, velocity, and voltage dependency of the MR damper are highlighted by Chebyshev polynomials fit very effectively, and being a fast system identification method. The non-parametric results based on Chebyshev for MR damper are presented for all cases in table 1. These results are compared with those of Bouc-Wen model. An excellent match is observed in the MR damper behavior for all cases. Extended work with Chebyshev polynomials fit to express voltage as a function of displacement, velocity, and damping force. Q Q Results and Discussion Hassan Metered 0 -1500 8 (1 k 0 )(1 l 0 )(1 z 0 )Q Q Q A nonlinear simulation technique using MATLAB 7.1 and SIMULINK is used to solve the Modified Bouc-Wen model and compare it with Chebyshev polynomials fits. In order to validate the non-parametric study that proposed in this study, a series of validation data sets are defined in table 1. Predicted damping forces for the MR fluid damper using the Chebyshev Polynomials Fit model and the Modified Bouc–Wen model with the first 2 sets are shown in Fig. 4, in which the damping force versus time, displacement, and velocity are plotted. To apply the Chebyshev polynomials fit, firstly, a surface plot must be plotted to get the damping force as a function of displacement and velocity (2-dimensional problem) by solving modified Bouc-Wen model. Force (N) 3000 2s 1 2 j 1 ˆ ( , , ) cos 2i 1 * cos * F * cos i 1 j 1 s 1 2Q 2Q 2Q Q Chebyshev Bouc-Wen 3000 Force (N) from ,Wang and Liao 2005, [2]. Chebyshev Polynomials Fits 4500 Chebyshev Bouc-Wen References 1- Spencer, B. F. Jr., Dyke, S. J., Sain, M. K. & Carlson, J. D.,” Phenomenological Model for Magneto-Rheological Dampers” , 1997, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Volume: 123, pp 230–238 2- Wang, D. H., & Liao, W. H.,” Testing and Steady State Modeling of a Linear MR Damper Under Sinusoidal Loading”, 2005, Journal of Smart Materials and Structures, Volume: 9, pp 95-102 3- F. A. Rodrigues, F. Thouverez, C. Gibert, & L. Jezequel,” Chebyshev Polynomials Fits for Efficient Analysis of Finite Length Squeeze Film Damped Rotors”, 2003, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Volume: 125, pp 175-183