NATIONAL CERTIFICATE: DIAMOND PROCESSING SPECIACIALIZATION AREA A: FACET GIRDLE BY MACHINE Unit Standard: 59851 Name: Learner ID Number Postal Address Work: Contact Details Cell: Email: Name: Facilitator Course Date Name: Venue Agreed Submission Date Actual Submission Date © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 1 What counts as good evidence? Good evidence generally complies with the following criteria: Unit standard requirements Valid: The evidence submitted should relate to the questions included in the assessments. Current: The evidence submitted should not be outdated. Sufficient: Guard against submitting both an insufficient and an excessive amount of evidence; a learner should ensure that they have answered all activities and assignments. Authentic: A learner is required to generate their own evidence from the information as applied to their particular workplace. Using evidence or work produced by other people such as fellow learners or colleagues, in any manner or form, is prohibited and unlawful. (Kindly refer to the declaration of authenticity, in the PoE, that should be completed and signed by the learner.) In South Africa, the body responsible for overseeing the quality of registered qualifications is the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA). One of the mechanisms they use to ensure uniformity when accrediting a qualification is known as a unit standard. A unit standard is a set level of quality used to regulate the content and the assessments of a short course, in alignment with the relevant unit standard. Prominent requirements that feature in a unit standard are: Specific Outcomes: Knowledge, skills and values (demonstrated within a specific context) which support one or more critical outcomes. Assessment Criteria: The standards used to guide learning and the assessment of the achievements and/or to evaluate and certify the competence of a learner. Critical Cross-Field Outcomes (CCFO’s): CCFO’s refer to the generic outcomes that inform all teaching and learning. CCFO’s may include, for example, working effectively with others as a team member and collecting, analysing, organising and evaluating information in a critical manner. Essential Embedded Knowledge: Includes other supplementary assessment information on the unit standard. (Source: Adapted from: http://www.saqa.org.za, 2016) Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) RPL is a process whereby formal, non-formal and informal learning is measured and mediated for recognition across different contexts and certified against the requirements for credit, access, inclusion or advancement in the formal education and training system or workplace. The aim is to make it possible to obtain formal recognition for knowledge gained informally or incidentally throughout life within a workplace or in the context of personal reading or experiences. The RPL process also entails supporting a candidate to ensure that knowledge is gained and reflected in terms of a relevant qualification registered on the National Qualifications Framework (NQF). (Source: National Policy for the Implementation of RPL, SAQA, 2013, par 30) © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 2 2 ASSESSMENT Assessment methods Evaluating Products Products refer to documents such as work-related policies or plans, or finished products such as project plans or extended response (essay) answers, which should be included as evidence in terms of the requirements of the PoE. Questioning Written questions assess the knowledge and understanding of a learner in terms of the related subject matter. Such questions might challenge a learner to: Create posters. Develop mind maps. Provide comments in response to scenarios involving role-play. Perform class activities and assignments during contact sessions. Present evidence in terms of knowledge assignment questions. Present evidence in terms of practical workplace assignment questions. Observation An assessor observes a learner performing the following tasks and/or skills: During role-play sessions. While presenting class activities and assignments. Presenting evidence A learner is required to submit the evidence pertaining to the assessment on the agreed submission date as stipulated on the information page that features at the start of the PoE. Late submissions may be subject to a fee. Before submitting a PoE for assessment, a learner should ensure that they have read all the instructions carefully and that the evidence presented meets all the requirements. Assessment procedures Please take note of the following about the assessment process: A learner will receive a notification via SMS from the Assessment Department acknowledging receipt of the PoE. Additional evidence may be submitted for re-assessment after the initial submission of the PoE. If a learner is dissatisfied with the result of an assessment, an appeal may be lodged in terms of the policy for appeals (please refer to the appeals section in the PoE). If a learner has a special need that might affect the outcome of the assessment(s), such as language being a barrier, a physical or mental disability or a personal matter, they should notify the assessor in advance. Where possible the special needs will be accommodated. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 3 Assessment procedures contd. The course fee includes one assessment and two re-assessments. An additional fee is charged on further re-assessments. The figure below details the assessment process. Learner submits PoE PoE is assessed by a registered assessor FINDING: COMPETENT Yes Internal moderation Learner is informed of COMPETENT result Learner completes and submits their section of the Assessment Feedback Report Certificate of competence is printed and delivered/posted Assessment results are verified and endorsed by the relevant SETA FINDING: NOT YET COMPETENT Is the evidence submitted valid, authentic, current and sufficient to prove competence? No Internal moderation Learner is informed of NOT YET COMPETENT result and receives remedial feedback on questions for which evidence must be re-submitted Learner re-submits evidence required in terms of remedial feedback Re-assessment (only re-submitted evidence is assessed by a registered assessor) Learner is uploaded to the National Learners’ Records Database (NLRD) for the relevant unit standard(s) Statement of Results is provided to the learner Figure 1: Assessment Process © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 4 ASSESSOR FEEDBACK REPORT TO THE LEARNER Course name: Unit Standard(s): Learner Full Name: Learner ID No.: Email Address: Assessor Full Name: Assessment Date: Assessment Result: OVERALL FINDINGS: (Comments from the assessor - for remedial action a separate form will be issued) Assessor Signature: Date: LEARNER FEEDBACK TO THE ASSESSOR: Criteria Yes No 1 The assessment process was followed as agreed. 2 The assessment was conducted in a fair way. 3 My special needs were accommodated during the assessment 4 I was given detailed feedback on my performance. 5 I understood the feedback that was given to me. 6 I accepted the feedback that was given to me. Comments Learner Signature: Date: Please email fully completed and signed form to: assessment@pscollege.co.za © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 5 Assessment management An integrated assessment approach is applied in terms of currently registered SAQA unit standards and qualifications (when applicable), in a manner that is fair, valid, reliable and feasible. Moderation and verification procedures are conducted in terms of the norms, standards and guidelines set by SAQA. Quality assurance of the assessment management process An assessment is conducted according to the following process: Preparing a learner for an assessment. Assessing a PoE upon submission. Providing feedback to a learner after an assessment of a PoE. Reviewing the design of an assessment. The requirements applicable to outcomes-based assessment are adhered to throughout the process. Rights to a fair, valid, transparent and consistent assessment A learner has the right to be informed when and how an assessment is conducted during training interventions. A learner has the right to appeal against the finding of an assessment. Kindly refer to the section that deals with appeals in this document. A learner may request to have an observer present during an assessment. However, the observer may not partake, comment or interrupt the assessment. A learner is entitled to request to view their assessed PoE in the presence of a registered assessor, provided the request is made within normal working hours and the viewing is scheduled during normal working hours. General matters applicable to assessment management Assessment results are made available as soon as possible once the final assessment or moderation has been conducted. Adequate measures are taken to secure the assessment results and ensure the integrity of the assessment process. Facilitators and/or assessors are required to initial each page where a learner has presented evidence. Notes © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 6 3 RE-ASSESSMENT Purpose of reassessment The re-assessment process offers a learner the opportunity to re-submit evidence when the outcome of the assessment of their PoE has been deemed Not Yet Competent (NYC). Overview of the re-assessment process The outcome of an assessment conducted on a PoE is deemed NYC when certain evidence, which is required to prove the competence of a learner, is missing or lacking. A learner, who submitted a PoE which was assessed as being NYC, is required to re-submit certain evidence. The assessor should provide a learner with adequate feedback and appropriate guidelines to ensure that they are properly prepared for re-submitting the evidence that is missing or lacking. The re-submission of the evidence provides a learner with the opportunity to achieve the learning outcomes as specified in the assessment criteria and specific outcomes of the relevant unit standard. Responsibilities and duties of an ASSESSOR in terms of the reassessment process Assessments are conducted by registered assessors who have signed the Assessor Code of Conduct. Assessors must follow the assessment principles of fairness, validity, transparency and consistency when conducting an assessment. It is the duty of an assessor to determine and indicate an outcome of Competency (C) or Not Yet Competent (NYC), based on the evidence submitted by a learner in the PoE. In conjunction with the outcome, an assessor should provide remedial feedback and information on any additional support or action required from a learner. Once an assessor has compiled the aforementioned requirements in writing, they submit it to the Assessment Office. This is to be done timeously and submitted electronically via fax or email. Note: The remedial feedback provided by an assessor should be comprehensive, specific, developmental, remedial and understood. In turn, the Assessment Department will notify a learner of the need for a reassessment. It is their responsibility to explain the process that should subsequently be followed and to ensure that a learner understands it. Notes © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 7 Responsibilities and duties of a LEARNER in terms of the reassessment process The onus is upon a learner to ensure that the remedial feedback received from the Assessment Office, as provided by the Assessor, is comprehensive, specific, developmental, remedial and understood. It is the duty of a learner to contact the assessor if any additional remedial feedback is required. The timeframe for a re-submission intended for a re-assessment is four (4) weeks from receipt of the NYC assessment result and remedial action. Although an assessor may liaise with a learner regarding the evidence to be resubmitted, it is the duty of a learner to submit the required evidence to the Assessment Office. A learner who is dissatisfied with an assessment outcome has recourse by lodging an appeal and following the appeal process. General matters applicable to the reassessment process The re-assessment process follows the assessment principles of fairness, credibility, authenticity, validity, transparency and reliability. The costs of the first two re-submissions are included in the course fee. Additional re-assessments are performed at a cost of R 200.00, which is payable by the learner. The re-assessment policy of the College is learner centred and complies with the policies of the SAQA and ETQA on continuous learning and assessment. This approach ensures that the required skills and competencies have been inculcated (to teach or instill something by frequent repetition) and that the learner demonstrates that these skills and competencies can be applied practically. Notes © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 8 4 APPEALS Introduction A learner may lodge an appeal if he or she is dissatisfied with an assessment outcome or the assessment process that was followed. Appeal procedures A learner who wishes to lodge an appeal should follow the steps set out below: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. General matters applicable to appeals The learner requests the assessor to justify the outcome of the assessment and to reconsider the assessment outcome in accordance with the procedures for appeals at the College. If not resolved, a formal appeal is lodged with the Certification Manager; this is to be done in writing by using the Appeal Form: Assessment Outcome. The assessment will then be moderated by an internal moderator. If the matter remains unresolved, it may be referred to a panel of moderators (internal and/or external) and/or the Academic Board of the College to further determine an appropriate course of action. If the matter remains unresolved, it may be referred to an ETQA body. A learner who lodges an appeal to the level that requires an external moderator, will be liable for the costs incurred for external verification, regardless of the outcome. Notes © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 9 Appeal form Appeal Form: Assessment Outcome Full Name: Learner Name: Organisation (where learner is employed) Course Title Course Date Hereby please receive the appeal against the assessment outcome conducted by: Name: Assessor On (Date) Reason(s) for Appealing Please provide comprehensive motivation. Signature: Learner Date Report: Investigating an Appeal Full Name: Moderator Findings of Moderator Signature: Moderator Date Appeal Status After Internal Moderation Resolved Unresolved Follow-Up Action Required Signature: Certification Manager © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Date 10 5 LEARNER PREPARATION CHECKLIST AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Full Name: Learner Full Name: Assessor Course Title Registration Number: Assessor Assessor Programme Unit Standard Title Conduct outcomes-based assessment Discussion Point NQF Level Credits 115753 05 15 Decision/Action Taken A learner should enter a “checkmark (√)” in the open fields below to indicate your understanding of, and agreement to, the assessment related requirements. 1. The purpose of an assessment is to obtain formal recognition for the unit standard(s) listed above. 2. A learner is assessed in terms of the requirements of the relevant unit standard, which are included in the PoE. These requirements include the following: Specific outcomes, assessment criteria and critical cross-field outcomes. NQF level and credit values. Assessment instruments. Assessment methods (questioning, observation and product evaluation). 3. A learner’s Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) will be assessed until competent. A learner who submits evidence that does not comply with the requirements of the unit standard(s) will be assessed as Not Yet Competent (NYC). A learner will only be re-assessed1 on those questions they were assessed as NYC. 4. Assessment arrangements: You were informed of the agreed and actual submission dates. You were informed that assessments are performed in the most cost-effective manner possible. The College undertakes to maintain confidentiality of learner information. You were informed about the College’s assessment and re-assessment policies and procedures. You were informed about the arrangements for learner assessment feedback. 5. You have the right to lodge an appeal against the finding of an assessor. (Note: appeal procedures and form, are included in the PoE). 1 Unit Standard ID The course fee includes one assessment and two re-assessments. An additional fee is charged on further re-assessments. © Pro-Active Public Services College 11 (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Decision/Action Taken A learner should enter the phrase “None” to indicate no special need or a description of the special need. Note: The facilitator should provide a description on how the special need will be accommodated Discussion Point 6. Describe a special need (e.g. sight impairment) you may (or may not) have that may affect the assessment. Comments of the learner (To be made in the learner’s own handwriting): Declaration by the learner: I, ___________________________________________________________________ , ID Number: _____________________________________ , hereby declare that: I am satisfied with the preparation for assessment process I was afforded an opportunity to provide input. I received a complete PoE as part of my course material and have been informed of the Instructions on Compiling and Submitting a Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) All my questions related to assessment have been fully attended to, as indicated above. I will be ready to be assessed in terms of the unit standard(s) on the agreed submission date indicated on the information page on the front of the PoE. Signed at ____________________________________________________ on the _____ day of _____________________ 20__ Signature: Learner © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Signature: Facilitator Signature: Assessor 12 6 PERSONAL DETAILS Insert copies of the following important personal documents after this page. 1. Identity Document (ID) A recently certified copy of the learner’s ID should be inserted here – not older than 3 (three) months. Note: Results can only be uploaded to the National Learners’ Records Database (NLRD) once the College has received a certified copy of the relevant ID. 2. Curriculum Vitae (CV) A copy of your CV should be inserted here. 3. Qualifications A certified copy of your highest national qualification (e.g. grade 12 or B-degree) and/or any other relevant qualifications should be inserted here. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 13 7 DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY Authentic/authenticity: 1 worthy of belief as conforming to fact or reality; trustworthy 2 not imaginary, false or imitation; genuine 3 not counterfeit or copied (The Penguin English Dictionary 2002:50) I, _____________________________________, hereby declare that this PoE primarily consists of my own work. I confirm that most of the work has been developed personally and compiled in the pursuit of proving my competence. In some instances, partially or entirely, some material may have been generated through group work, in which instance I was a dedicated participant and I am therefore entitled to utilise it as evidence. I hereby affirm that I have, to the best of my understanding, not committed any copyright violations. Where I have used any information or documentation that is not my own, I have acknowledged the use of this information or document in the appropriate manner in the list of references in the table below. I agree that, if it is in any way determined that I have committed any fraudulent activities in connection with the completion and compilation of my PoE, I shall forfeit the assessment result gained. I also declare that the nature of the fraudulent activities referred to were explained to me. I hereby declare that I have used the following information or documentation as evidence for the assignments in my PoE or used this information or documentation to develop evidence: List of References Detail pertaining to information or documentation that has been accessed by a learner to develop the answers in the assignments required for the PoE. Description of the INFORMATION or DOCUMENTATION that was used to develop the evidence for the assignments in the PoE PURPOSE for which the information or documentation was used such as an assignment number or question number Description of the COPYRIGHT HOLDER of the information or documentation that was used Note: Examples of information or documentation that may be used are: relevant Learner Guide, legislation, organisational policies, procedures and reports as well as formal publications on the subject matter that is related to the short course. Signature: Learner © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Date 14 8 BUILDING A PORTFOLIO Instructions on Compiling and Submitting a Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) Submit a complete PoE prior to or on the agreed submission date Ensure that the following documents are completed in full, included, attached in the correct order and submitted as part of the PoE: 1. Cover page 8. Evidence in respect of formative 2. Table of contents assessment activities 3. Signed Learner Preparation and 9. Evidence in respect of the knowledge Assessment Plan questionnaire assignment 4. Certified copy of your Identity Document 10. Evidence in respect of practical workplace (ID) assignments 5. A copy of your Curriculum Vitae (CV) 6. Certified copies of the highest national or other qualifications 7. Signed Declaration of Authenticity Initial each page Deliver a PoE Use only black ink to complete the PoE and initial each page where evidence has been added 609 Justice Mahomed, Muckleneuk, Pretoria, 0002 Retain a copy Mail a PoE Remember to make a duplicate copy of the PoE for personal safe keeping before submitting it Registered mail: Pro-Active College Private Bag x 38 Lynnwood Ridge 0040 PoE completion Additional pages Electronic Font type: Arial Font size: 12 Spacing: Single By hand Write legibly Only black ink No pencil Additional response pages may be included, should the space provided be insufficient Preferred binding Electronic submission of PoE Neat file Slide binders File fasteners Note: Do not staple PoE / no plastic sleeves / flip files No electronic PoE will be accepted Assessor support Request extension Contact the assessor if any support is required Email assessment@pscollege.co.za to request an extension for a PoE submission date Access Learners may, by prior arrangement, view their assessed PoE in the presence of a registered assessor Signature: Learner Date Signature: Facilitator Date © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 15 Electronic copy of Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) Learners may access a copy of the PoE to complete the assessment tasks electronically. How to download the PoE The following steps outline how learners may download the required PoE in an electronic format. Step 1: Visit the following website - www.connect-pscollege.co.za/e-portfolio. Type the URL (Universal Resource Locator) into the address bar of the internet browser (see figure 2). Figure 2: Website page that will be displayed once URL has been entered Steps to download the PoE are continued on the next page Notes © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 16 Electronic copy of Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) contd. Step 2: Type in your ID number in the indicated space (field). Step 3: Type in the PIN number in the indicated space (field). This is the unique eleven (11) digit PIN number that was provided by the facilitator to learners during the contact session. Step 4: Click the ‘Download Portfolio’ button to download the document to your computer or device. Remember to save the document in a location, on your computer or device, from where it may be easily retrieved in the future. Figure 4: The ID and PIN numbers of a learner are required in the data fields depicted above to download an electronic copy of the PoE General matters applicable to the electronic copy of the PoE Learners only have three opportunities to download the required electronic PoE. Learners are only able to download the required electronic PoE until the agreed submission date. Thereafter they may request an electronic copy from portfolio@pscollege.co.za. PIN numbers may not be shared with persons who did not attend the training. No electronic submissions are accepted. Learners who complete a PoE electronically are still required to print a copy and submit the physical document in person or via registered mail. If learners experience problems with downloading the electronic version, they are welcome to contact the help desk at helpdesk@pscollege.co.za for assistance. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 17 Portfolio of Evidence checklist Use the checklist below to ensure that the PoE due for submission is completed in its entirety before submitting it to the College for assessment. Description of PoE evidence 1. All the required information has been completed on the cover page. 2. A table of contents has been included. 3. A completed and signed Leaner Preparation and Assessment Plan has been included. 4. A certified copy of the learner’s ID (Identity Document) has been included. 5. A copy of the learner’s CV (Curriculum Vitae) has been included. 6. Certified copies of the learner’s highest national or other qualification(s) have been included. 7. A completed and signed Declaration of Authenticity has been included. 8. The section titled Instructions on Building a Portfolio has been signed and included. 9. Evidence in respect of the formative assessment activities has been included. Yes/ No Explanation if specific PoE evidence cannot be included 10. Evidence in respect of the knowledge questionnaire assignment has been included. 11 Evidence in respect of the practical workplace assignments has been included. Please note: If a PoE is not fully completed or if there are outstanding documents, the process of receiving assessment results may be delayed until all requirements have been met. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 18 Learner to initial: FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS Contribute to Project Initiation, Scope definition and Scope Change control. Activity 1 Project Initiation 1. What does Project initiation entail? Project initiation entails the following: (i) Defining the project management cycle. (ii) Gathering project information. (iii) Defining project requirements. (iv) Identifying stakeholders and their expectations. (v) Creating the project charter. 2.. List the phases of the project life cycle. (I) (II) (III) (IV) Concept and initiation phase Design and development phase Implementation and construction phase Commissioning/ closing and handover phase 3.State in your own words what activities are involved (at least 3 in each) in the Concept, design and implementation phases of the project life cycle . Concept phase Identification of all stakeholders and their expectations Clarification of stakeholder needs. Finalise project objectives. Define key performance indicators Design phase. Development of the work breakdown structure Determining who will perform the work Determining cost and schedule estimates Closing phase Making transition for the next phase Establishing formal closure of the project. Reviewing project successes and failures. 4. Projects emerge when a perceived need or opportunity results in Organisational sponsorship to take action. Identify three points why the organisation should consider this particular project. (I) To solve a current problem (ii)To respond to a stated request. (iii)To meet or create a market demand (iv)To comply with shifting legal requirements (v)To improve a process © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 19 Learner to initial: (vi) To exploit a technical advance or perform basic research. (vii) To pursue a business strategy. 5. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 20 Learner to initial: Activity 2 Project Stakeholders 1. What is the definition of Project Management as defined by the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)? It is the application of knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to project activities in order to meet stakeholder’s needs and expectations from a project. 2. Who are Project Stakeholders? A stakeholder is anyone who has something to gain or lose as a result of the project. It includes all the people who have something to gain or lose by either the doing of the project or the delivered results delivered by the project. 3. List at least three stake holders relevant to the project. (i) All members of the project team. (ii) Suppliers to the project. (iii) Outside contractors. (iv) The client (v) The project management. 4.Who are the key stakeholders? (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Project manager. The customer or user The sponsor Management of the organization. 5 List four steps to Stakeholder management (i) Identify and gather information about stakeholders (ii) Analyze each stakeholder’ probable behavior and potential impact (iii) Develop stakeholder strategies. (iv) Implement and maintain the strategies. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 21 Learner to initial: Activity 3 Scope definition 1. Name the three project baselines. (i) The scope baseline. (ii) The time/ schedule baseline. (iii) The cost baseline. 2. What are the project baselines used for? The scope baselines are used for project performance and progress measurement. 3.Define scope. It is all the work, and only the required work, that the project must complete In order for the project to be done. This mainly refers to the deliverables the Project team will create. 4. What is scope statement? It is the document that defines the project and is the basis for making decisions about the project. It includes the goal statement, project justification, the products or services the project will produce, deliverables, and the success criteria of the project. It also includes exclusions. It also describes the functional requirements of the project deliverables. 5.Define project deliverables. Project deliverables are customer’s expectations of the product, services and end tangible results the project will create. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 22 Learner to initial: Summative assessments Assignment 1: knowledge questionnaire Instruction to candidates Please read the question carefully. The questions are designed to test your insight and understanding. 1. What is the significance of scope management? The significance of scope management is to ensure. 2. Explain in your own words what is scope creep. Scope creep is the tendency of the project to expand over time resulting in Changing of the requirements, specifications and priorities. 3. What are the consequences of the scope creep? The consequences of scope creep are that costs and schedules estimates may Go out of control thereby rendering the project unachievable. 4.What are project constraints? What is scope management? 5.A well- defined project scope must have a checklist, list 3 items in the checklist. (i) Project objectives. (II) Project deliverables (iii) Milestones (iv) Technical requirements (v) Limits and exclusions (vi) Reviews with customers. 7. List the three steps to develop a work breakdown structure 8. Project deliverables are the tangible results, the products or services of the Project. . © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 23 Learner to initial: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 24 Learner to initial: Scope Change Control Activity 4. 1.What is the work breakdown structure (WBS)? The work breakdown structure is the process of successively subdividing the project Scope into smaller work elements called work packages or tasks. 2. What are the consequences of not using the Work breakdown structure? The consequences are that it is very likely that many tasks of the project will be missed 3.Scope change control is critical process in project management, providing a process to manage the implementation of scope changes. . List 3 three causes of project scope changes Changes in project scope can be caused by the following: changes in government regulations, changes in technology, changes in the market place, badly defined scope of work, suggestions from customers, owners, project managers, team members, bad workmanship, and risk occurrence event. 4.If the project scope needs to change, it is critical to have a sound change control process in place that records the change and keeps log of all the project changes. There are several steps to be followed List only3 steps to be followed to implement changes in an orderly way. (i) Document the proposed change. (ii) Justify the change (iii) Identify the impact of change. (iv)Review, evaluate and approve or disapprove the changes formally. (v)Assign responsibilities for implementing change. (vi)Adjust the master schedule and budget. (vii)Track all changes that are to be implemented. (viii)Communicate changes to all parties affected, 5.There are seven key management principles for effective project scope control, list only three. (I) Plan for change (ii) Set up a change control system (iii) Educate stakeholders. (iv)Use the system (v)Minimize scope changes (vi)Communicate (vii)Be a watchdog. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 25 Learner to initial: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 26 Learner to initial: THE NQF Complete the puzzle below [ Activity 1 13. 5. 1. 10. 8. 3. 12. 15. 6. 7. 9. 14. 11. 2. 4. Across: 1. Acronym for the framework of qualifications that organises and classifies qualifications and competencies in South Africa. 2. One of the main functions of SAQA is to create __________. 3. The National Qualifications Framework has a number of __________ representing a progression of learning and of increasing complexity. 4. __________ assurance refers to the monitoring and auditing of achievements in terms of standards or qualifications registered on the NQF. 5. The SETA of the manufacturing, engineering and related services sector. 6. The ________ is responsible for evaluating and recognising professional bodies. 7. A body that administrates education and training within a particular sector of industry. Down: 1. An electronic information system based at the SAQA head office. Its purpose is to provide information on qualifications, standards, learner achievements and on SAQA itself. 8. The principle of the NAF of having different routes or pathways that leads to the same learning ends. 9. The value of the NQF that refers to human dignity. 10. Credit to be given to learning that has already been acquired, e.g. through life experience or nonformal training courses. 11. Acronym for the main body responsible for the implementation of the NQF. 12. The body responsible for collecting levies from levy-paying organisations. 13. Responsible for generating the skills development legislation and regulations and for the publication of guidelines to help promote the implementation of the Skills Development Act and the Skills Development Levy Act. 14. A body that is responsible for quality assurance and reports to SAQA. 15. The body that oversees the work of the SETAs with regards to skills development. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 27 Learner to initial: Matching exercise The facilitator will provide the matching columns for this activity. You need to match column A with column B : [ Activity 2 A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 28 Learner to initial: THE UNIT STANDARD Study the unit standard 14348 (Process incoming and outgoing telephone calls ) and answer the questions below: Activity 3 1. State the unit standard’s title. 2. What is the unit standard’s purpose? 3. Learners need to be assessed against the specific outcomes and the assessment criteria of the unit standard in order to be declared “competent”. “Competence” is a combination of practical competence (skills), foundational competence (knowledge) and Reflective competence (understanding). Consider each specific outcome and its supporting assessment criteria and fill in the table below to indicate what needs to be assessed. Specific outcome 1: Employing effective telephone etiquette Practical competence © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Foundational competence Reflexive competence 29 Learner to initial: Specific Outcome 2: Answering the telephone according to organisational standards Practical competence Foundational competence Reflexive competence 4. What learning is assumed to be in place when the candidate starts learning towards the unit standard? 5. Define what the term “unit standard range” means and what implication will this have on the assessment of a candidate? © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 30 Learner to initial: 6. What is the essential embedded knowledge for this unit standard? Do you need to assess the essential embedded knowledge? 7. How long will it take the average learner to meet the outcomes defined in this unit standard? What is the implication of this on the assessment that needs to be conducted? 8. What type of unit standard is this? What does this mean? © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 31 Learner to initial: 9. Explain the level of difficulty that is attached to this unit standard and what influence this will have on your assessment. 10. Until what date can learners be trained against this unit standard? Until what date can learners be assessed against this unit standard? Why? © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 32 Learner to initial: PLANNING THE ASSESSMENT [ Activity 4 Refer to the unit standard: Process incoming and outgoing telephone calls (NLRD 14348) and answer the questions below. 1. Fill in the table on the following page to indicate the most appropriate assessment methods and tools for the assessment of this unit standard. Assessment methods are: Observation. Questioning. Product evaluation. Assessment tools are summarised in the table below: INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION Problem solving exercises with guidelines. An assignment sheet and rubric are usually included. Description of a real or simulated situation and written questions. Activity to show manual (product or process checklist) and/or behavioural skills (observation checklist). Consist of a range of questions to be answered, often in a specified time period; questions can be of various types including multiple choice, true/false, short answer, essay, etc. Combines observation and questioning. Structured format. Assignment Case study Checklist Examinations and tests Interview Log books Actual book with instructions for use. Oral exam Portfolio Practical exercises / demonstrations Questionnaire Role play © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Can be useful in assessing the candidates listening and communication abilities; also useful in situations where the candidate may not be able to demonstrate competence in a written format. Written descriptions and rubrics are usually included. A collection of work produced by the candidate; can include work sample. Clear instructions need to be included on what is needed, how the evidence should be collected and the standard that the evidence will be assessed against. List of expected activities and tick list of observations to be made. A structured written interview, consisting of a list of questions. Often used in conjunction with simulation in which the candidate is required to respond by assuming a particular role in the scenario. Clear instructions and outcomes to be achieved need to be included. 33 Learner to initial: INSTRUMENT Reflexive journal © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 DESCRIPTION Gives the candidate the opportunity to critically reflect on his or her knowledge and learning; provides a valuable means for candidate self-assessment. Before deciding upon a specific assessment methods and instruments, you need to be aware of the criteria that these should satisfy. 34 Learner to initial: Specific Outcome 1: Contributing to project initiation , scope definition and scope change control. EVALUATION Assessment methods and instruments Problem Solving Knowledge and Understanding Practical and technical skills Attitudes and Values Assessment methods (E.g., Observation, questioning or product evaluation). Assessment instruments (E.g., Written assessment/tests, questionnaires, observation checklists, role plays, etc.). Specific Outcome 2: Answering telephone according to organisational standards EVALUATION Assessment methods and instruments Problem Solving Knowledge and Understanding Practical and technical skills Assessment methods (E.g., Observation, questioning or product evaluation). Assessment instruments (E.g., Written assessment/tests, questionnaires, observation checklists, role plays, etc.). © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 35 Learner to initial: Attitudes and Values 2. Explain when formative and summative assessments should be conducted? 3. Who are the role players in this assessment? What are they responsible for? Role players © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Responsibilities 36 Learner to initial: 4. What assessment documentation do you require for this assessment and why? Assessment documentation © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Purpose 37 Learner to initial: PREPARE CANDIDATES FOR ASSESSMENT [ In this activity you will prepare a candidate for assessment against Unit Standard 14348: Process incoming and outgoing telephone calls. Activity 5 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 38 Learner to initial: Learner Preparation Checklist and Assessment Plan Full Name: Learner Full Name: Assessor Unit Standard Title Discussion Point Decision/Action Taken A learner should enter a “checkmark (√)” in the open fields below to indicate your understanding of, and agreement to, the assessment related requirements. Unit Standard ID NQF Level Credits Explanation on how the assessor will prepare the learner on the discussion point 1. The purpose of an assessment is to obtain formal recognition for the unit standard(s) listed above. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 39 2. A learner is assessed in terms of the requirements of the relevant unit standard, which are included in the PoE. These requirements include the following: Specific outcomes, assessment criteria and critical cross-field outcomes. NQF level and credit values. Assessment instruments. Assessment methods (questioning, observation and product evaluation). 3. A learner’s Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) will be assessed until competent. A learner who submits evidence that does not comply with the requirements of the unit standard will be assessed as not yet competent (NYC). A learner will only be reassessed2 on those questions they were assessed as NYC. 2 The course fee includes one assessment and two re-assessments. An additional fee is charged on further re-assessments. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 40 4. Assessment arrangements: You were informed of the agreed and actual submission dates. You were informed that assessments are performed in the most cost-effective manner possible. The College undertakes to maintain confidentiality of learner information. You reviewed the College’s assessment and reassessment policies and procedures. You reviewed the arrangements for learner assessment feedback. 5. You have the right to lodge an appeal against the finding of an assessor. (Note: appeal procedures and form, are included in the PoE). 6. Describe a special need (e.g. sight impairment) you may (or may not) have that may affect the assessment © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 41 Comments of the learner (To be made in the learner’s own handwriting): Declaration by the learner: I, ___________________________________________________________________ , ID Number: _____________________________________ , hereby declare that: I am satisfied with the pre-assessment process. I was afforded an opportunity to provide input and influence the manner in which the assessment is conducted. I received a complete PoE. All my questions related to assessment have been fully attended to, as indicated above. I will be ready to be assessed in terms of the unit standard(s) on the agreed submission date indicated on the information page on the front of the PoE. Signed at ____________________________________________________ on the _____ day of _____________________ 20__ Signature: Learner © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Signature: Assessor 42 CONDUCT THE ASSESSMENT AND RECORD THE EVIDENCE This activity requires you to conduct an assessment, using a predesigned instrument to record the evidence. Activity 6 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 OBSERVATION CHECKLIST Specific Outcome 2: Answer telephone according to organisational standards Name of learner: __________________________________________________ Date: __________________________ Name of assessor: _______________________________________________ Criteria 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Comments The telephone was answered within five (5) rings. The telephone was answered according to standard operating procedures: The caller was greeted in one of the following ways: “Good morning”; “Good afternoon”, or “Good evening”. The name of the organisation was stated. The candidate identified himself / herself. The candidate asked how s/he could assist the caller. The candidate smiled while talking on the telephone. The candidate had a pen and message pad handy when s/he answered the telephone. Relevant caller information was acquired, namely: The name of the caller. The caller’s number. The caller’s organisation (if applicable). A detailed message. The date and time on which the call was received. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Assessor Signature: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 44 Learner to initial: PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON ASSESSMENTS [ Activity 7 In the previous activity you were required to conduct an assessment and record the evidence. For this activity you need to give feedback to your candidate. Name of Programme Name of Learner Name of Assessor Date Rating indicate with an X Competent Not yet competent Feedback to learner: Comments from learner: Signature assessor Signature learner Date Date © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 45 Learner to initial: Process of giving feedback Describe step by step how you would give face to face feedback to this learner. DESCRIPTION © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 46 Learner to initial: ASSESSMENT REVIEW [ Use the format on the following pages to review the assessment that you conducted in the previous activities. Activity 8 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 47 Learner to initial: Assessment Review Report Programme/Workshop Title: Unit Standard ID(s): Learner Initials and Surname: Learner ID: Method of Obtaining Credits: Class Attendance and Completion of PoE Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Assessment Outcome: Competent (C) Not Yet Competent (NYC) Evidence Used Assessment Methods Used Direct Observation Indirect (e.g. PoE) Questioning Historical Product Evaluation Comments Was the following criteria sufficiently met? Credibility Good Evidence Comments Fairness: Yes No Valid: Yes No Practicability: Yes No Authentic: Yes No Reliability: Yes No Current: Yes No Validity: Yes No Sufficient: Yes No Description of special need(s): Special Need(s) Support Only complete if special need(s) was communicated by learner. Comments and Recommendations Accommodation measures agreed upon: Was the special need(s) sufficiently addressed? Yes No Assessor’s Self Assessment General Comments Does the assessment relate closely to the relevant unit standard, outcomes and/or assessment criteria? Yes No Were all the principles of assessment applied? Yes No Was the final judgement reliable? Yes No Was the assessment fair towards the learner? Yes No Assessor Initials and Surname: Assessor Signature: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Date: 48 Learner to initial: Matching exercise The facilitator will provide the matching columns for this activity. You need to match column A with column B : [ Activity 9 A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 49 Learner to initial: Matching exercise The facilitator will provide the matching columns for this activity. You need to match column A with column B : [ Activity 10 A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 50 Learner to initial: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 51 Learner to initial: SECTION 2: SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT ASSIGNMENTS © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 52 Learner to initial: KNOWLEDGE ASSIGNMENT Question 1 Explain the difference between traditional assessment and standards-based (outcomes based) assessments. Question 2 2a. Explain RPL in terms of its purpose 2b.Explain the RPL process that should be followed when carrying out an RPL-related assessment © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 53 Learner to initial: Question 3 3a. List and describe the 3 methods of assessment. 3b. Indicate the MOST appropriate assessment method and tool / instrument to gather evidence in the following situations: Assessment of: Assessment method Assessment tool / instrument Problem solving Knowledge and understanding Practical and technical skills Attitudinal skills and values © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 54 Learner to initial: Question 4 List and describe the 4 key assessment principles that you will apply during the entire assessment process © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 55 Learner to initial: Question 5 Describe the feedback procedure that you should follow when giving feedback to the candidate. Question 6 Explain how you would deal with the following potential barriers to gather evidence. Blindness: Deafness: Language: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 56 Learner to initial: Question 7 Explain outcomes-based learning. Question 8 Which categories forms competence? © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 57 Learner to initial: SECTION A AND B Instructions to Candidates Section A and B each consist of 4 Assignments. The assignments for the two sections are exactly the same. You are required to identify one (1) learning programme that you will use to assess both your learners against. This learning programme cannot be the same as the one that was used for the formative section of this portfolio (Unit standard 14348 – Process incoming and outgoing telephone calls). You also need to identify two people who will be your learners; one learner for Section A and one learner for Section B. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 58 Learner to initial: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 59 Learner to initial: SECTION A Candidate assessor and learner 1 in a simulation environment © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 60 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 1 PREPARE FOR ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS: 1. 2. 3. 4. Select an appropriate learning programme to assess your learner against. Prepare all documents necessary for the assessment. Arrange the pre-assessment meeting with the learner. Conduct the pre-assessment meeting with the learner. (Complete all relevant documentation, i.e. the Learner Preparation and Assessment Plan – see template on the next page Insert the following documentation after this page: 1. A copy of the certified identification document of your learner. 2. The relevant unit standard or module documents. These documents must illustrate significant outcome statements with assessment criteria. 3. Assessment policy of your organization. If your organization does not have an assessment policy, please submit a copy of the assessment policy of the relevant ETQA such as the SETAs or QCTO. 4. Evidence of the arrangements with all relevant role players (such as emails or memoranda). 5. The Learner Preparation Checklist and Assessment Plan document completed during the pre-assessment meeting (See template on the next page) © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 61 Learner to initial: 5 LEARNER PREPARATION CHECKLIST AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Full Name: Learner Full Name: Assessor Course Title Unit Standard / Module ID Unit Standard / ModuleTitle Discussion Point Credits Decision/Action Taken A learner should enter a “checkmark (√)” in the open fields below to indicate your understanding of, and agreement to, the assessment related requirements. 1. The purpose of an assessment is to obtain formal recognition for the unit standard(s) listed above. 2. A learner is assessed in terms of the requirements of the relevant unit standard, which are included in the PoE. These requirements include the following: Specific outcomes, assessment criteria and critical cross-field outcomes. NQF level and credit values. Assessment instruments. Assessment methods (questioning, observation and product evaluation). 3. A learner’s Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) will be assessed until competent. A learner who submits evidence that does not comply with the requirements of the unit standard(s) will be assessed as Not Yet Competent (NYC). A learner will only be re-assessed3 on those questions they were assessed as NYC. 4. Assessment arrangements: You were informed of the agreed and actual submission dates. You were informed that assessments are performed in the most cost-effective manner possible. The College undertakes to maintain confidentiality of learner information. You were informed about the College’s assessment and re-assessment policies and procedures. You were informed about the arrangements for learner assessment feedback. 5. You have the right to lodge an appeal against the finding of an assessor. (Note: appeal procedures and form, are included in the PoE). 3 NQF Level The course fee includes one assessment and two re-assessments. An additional fee is charged on further re-assessments. © Pro-Active Public Services College 62 (Pty) Ltd Learner to initial: Version: March 2019 Decision/Action Taken A learner should enter the phrase “None” to indicate no special need or a description of the special need. Note: The facilitator should provide a description on how the special need will be accommodated Discussion Point 6. Describe a special need (e.g. sight impairment) you may (or may not) have that may affect the assessment. Comments of the learner (To be made in the learner’s own handwriting): Declaration by the learner: I, ___________________________________________________________________ , ID Number: _____________________________________ , hereby declare that: I am satisfied with the preparation for assessment process I was afforded an opportunity to provide input. I received a complete PoE as part of my course material and have been informed of the Instructions on Compiling and Submitting a Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) All my questions related to assessment have been fully attended to, as indicated above. I will be ready to be assessed in terms of the unit standard(s) on the agreed submission date indicated on the information page on the front of the PoE. Signed at ____________________________________________________ on the _____ day of _____________________ 20__ Signature: Learner © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Signature: Assessor 63 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 2 CONDUCT ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS 1. Arrange the assessment meeting / session with the learner. 2. On the day of the assessment: The learner has to complete the assessment tools provided by the assessor. The candidate assessor needs to assess the assessment tools completed by the learner and decide on competency. Insert the following documentation after this page: 1. Evidence of the arrangements with all relevant role players (such as emails or memoranda). 2. The assessment instruments completed by the learner and assessed by the candidate assessor. 3. Answering memorandum or assessment guidelines for the assessment instruments that will be used to assess the learner. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 64 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 3 PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS On the day of the assessment: 1. The candidate assessor provides feedback to the learner about the completed assessment – See template on the next page 2. The learner provide feedback to the candidate assessor about the completed assessment – See template on the next page Insert the following documentation after this page: 1. The completed Assessor Feedback to Learner form that was used by the assessor to provide feedback to the learner – See template on next page 2. The completed Learner Feedback to Assessor form that was used by the learner to provide feedback to the assessor – See template on next page © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 65 Learner to initial: ASSESSOR FEEDBACK REPORT TO THE LEARNER Course name: Unit Standard(s) / Module ID: Learner Full Name: Learner ID No.: Assessor Full Name: Assessment Date: Assessment Result: OVERALL FINDINGS: (Comments from the assessor - for remedial action a separate form will be issued) Assessor Signature: Date: LEARNER FEEDBACK TO THE ASSESSOR: Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 Yes No The assessment process was followed as agreed. The assessment was conducted in a fair way. My special needs were accommodated during the assessment I was given detailed feedback on my performance. I understood the feedback that was given to me. I accepted the feedback that was given to me. Comments Learner Signature: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Date: 66 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 4 REVIEW ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS Once the assessment has been completed and feedback was provided to the learner the candidate assessor has to review the assessment process as well as the assessment itself. The following documentation will be completed on the day of assessment and should be inserted after this page: Completed Assessment Review Report – see template on the next page © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 67 Learner to initial: Assessment Review Report Programme/Workshop Title: Unit Standard / Module ID(s): Learner Initials and Surname: Learner ID: Method of Obtaining Credits: Class Attendance and Completion of PoE Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Assessment Outcome: Competent (C) Not Yet Competent (NYC) Evidence Used Assessment Methods Used Direct Observation Indirect (e.g. PoE) Questioning Historical Product Evaluation Comments Was the following criteria sufficiently met? Credibility Good Evidence Comments Fairness: Yes No Valid: Yes No Practicability: Yes No Authentic: Yes No Reliability: Yes No Current: Yes No Validity: Yes No Sufficient: Yes No Description of special need(s): Special Need(s) Support Only complete if special need(s) was communicated by learner. Comments and Recommendations Accommodation measures agreed upon: Was the special need(s) sufficiently addressed? Yes No Assessor’s Self Assessment General Comments Does the assessment relate closely to the relevant unit standard, outcomes and/or assessment criteria? Yes No Were all the principles of assessment applied? Yes No Was the final judgement reliable? Yes No Was the assessment fair towards the learner? Yes No Assessor Initials and Surname: Assessor Reg No: Assessor Signature: Date: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 68 Learner to initial: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 69 Learner to initial: SECTION B Candidate assessor and learner 2 in a real environment © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 70 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 1 PREPARE FOR ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS: 1. 2. 3. 4. Select an appropriate learning programme to assess your learner against. Prepare all documents necessary for the assessment. Arrange the pre-assessment meeting with the learner. Conduct the pre-assessment meeting with the learner. (Complete all relevant documentation, i.e. the Learner Preparation and Assessment Plan – see template on the next page Insert the following documentation after this page: 1. A copy of the certified identification document of your learner. 2. The relevant unit standard or module documents. These documents must illustrate significant outcome statements with assessment criteria. 3. Assessment policy of your organization. If your organization does not have an assessment policy, please submit a copy of the assessment policy of the relevant ETQA such as the SETAs or QCTO. 4. Evidence of the arrangements with all relevant role players (such as emails or memoranda). 5. The Learner Preparation Checklist and Assessment Plan document completed during the pre-assessment meeting (See template on the next page) © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 71 Learner to initial: 5 LEARNER PREPARATION CHECKLIST AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Full Name: Learner Full Name: Assessor Course Title Unit Standard / Module ID Unit Standard / ModuleTitle Discussion Point Credits Decision/Action Taken A learner should enter a “checkmark (√)” in the open fields below to indicate your understanding of, and agreement to, the assessment related requirements. 1. The purpose of an assessment is to obtain formal recognition for the unit standard(s) listed above. 2. A learner is assessed in terms of the requirements of the relevant unit standard, which are included in the PoE. These requirements include the following: Specific outcomes, assessment criteria and critical cross-field outcomes. NQF level and credit values. Assessment instruments. Assessment methods (questioning, observation and product evaluation). 3. A learner’s Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) will be assessed until competent. A learner who submits evidence that does not comply with the requirements of the unit standard(s) will be assessed as Not Yet Competent (NYC). A learner will only be re-assessed4 on those questions they were assessed as NYC. 4. Assessment arrangements: You were informed of the agreed and actual submission dates. You were informed that assessments are performed in the most cost-effective manner possible. The College undertakes to maintain confidentiality of learner information. You were informed about the College’s assessment and re-assessment policies and procedures. You were informed about the arrangements for learner assessment feedback. 5. You have the right to lodge an appeal against the finding of an assessor. (Note: appeal procedures and form, are included in the PoE). 4 NQF Level The course fee includes one assessment and two re-assessments. An additional fee is charged on further re-assessments. © Pro-Active Public Services College 72 (Pty) Ltd Learner to initial: Version: March 2019 Decision/Action Taken A learner should enter the phrase “None” to indicate no special need or a description of the special need. Note: The facilitator should provide a description on how the special need will be accommodated Discussion Point 6. Describe a special need (e.g. sight impairment) you may (or may not) have that may affect the assessment. Comments of the learner (To be made in the learner’s own handwriting): Declaration by the learner: I, ___________________________________________________________________ , ID Number: _____________________________________ , hereby declare that: I am satisfied with the preparation for assessment process I was afforded an opportunity to provide input. I received a complete PoE as part of my course material and have been informed of the Instructions on Compiling and Submitting a Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) All my questions related to assessment have been fully attended to, as indicated above. I will be ready to be assessed in terms of the unit standard(s) on the agreed submission date indicated on the information page on the front of the PoE. Signed at ____________________________________________________ on the _____ day of _____________________ 20__ Signature: Learner © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Signature: Assessor 73 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 2 CONDUCT ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS 1. Arrange the assessment meeting / session with the learner. 2. On the day of the assessment: The learner has to complete the assessment tools provided by the assessor. The candidate assessor needs to assess the assessment tools completed by the learner and decide on competency. Insert the following documentation after this page: 1. Evidence of the arrangements with all relevant role players (such as emails or memoranda). 2. The assessment instruments completed by the learner and assessed by the candidate assessor. 3. Answering memorandum or assessment guidelines for the assessment instruments that will be used to assess the learner. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 74 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 3 PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS On the day of the assessment: 1. The candidate assessor provides feedback to the learner about the completed assessment – See template on the next page 2. The learner provide feedback to the candidate assessor about the completed assessment – See template on the next page Insert the following documentation after this page: 1. The completed Assessor Feedback to Learner form that was used by the assessor to provide feedback to the learner – See template on next page 2. The completed Learner Feedback to Assessor form that was used by the learner to provide feedback to the assessor – See template on next page © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 75 Learner to initial: ASSESSOR FEEDBACK REPORT TO THE LEARNER Course name: Unit Standard(s) / Module ID: Learner Full Name: Learner ID No.: Assessor Full Name: Assessment Date: Assessment Result: OVERALL FINDINGS: (Comments from the assessor - for remedial action a separate form will be issued) Assessor Signature: Date: LEARNER FEEDBACK TO THE ASSESSOR: Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 Yes No The assessment process was followed as agreed. The assessment was conducted in a fair way. My special needs were accommodated during the assessment I was given detailed feedback on my performance. I understood the feedback that was given to me. I accepted the feedback that was given to me. Comments Learner Signature: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Date: 76 Learner to initial: ASSIGNMENT 4 REVIEW ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS Once the assessment has been completed and feedback was provided to the learner the candidate assessor has to review the assessment process as well as the assessment itself. The following documentation will be completed on the day of assessment and should be inserted after this page: Completed Assessment Review Report – see template on the next page © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 77 Learner to initial: Assessment Review Report Programme/Workshop Title: Unit Standard / Module ID(s): Learner Initials and Surname: Learner ID: Method of Obtaining Credits: Class Attendance and Completion of PoE Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Assessment Outcome: Competent (C) Not Yet Competent (NYC) Evidence Used Assessment Methods Used Direct Observation Indirect (e.g. PoE) Questioning Historical Product Evaluation Comments Was the following criteria sufficiently met? Credibility Good Evidence Comments Fairness: Yes No Valid: Yes No Practicability: Yes No Authentic: Yes No Reliability: Yes No Current: Yes No Validity: Yes No Sufficient: Yes No Description of special need(s): Special Need(s) Support Only complete if special need(s) was communicated by learner. Comments and Recommendations Accommodation measures agreed upon: Was the special need(s) sufficiently addressed? Yes No Assessor’s Self Assessment General Comments Does the assessment relate closely to the relevant unit standard, outcomes and/or assessment criteria? Yes No Were all the principles of assessment applied? Yes No Was the final judgement reliable? Yes No Was the assessment fair towards the learner? Yes No Assessor Initials and Surname: Assessor Reg No: Assessor Signature: Date: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 78 Learner to initial: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 79 Learner to initial: Unit standards All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD: Process incoming and outgoing telephone calls SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE Process incoming and outgoing telephone calls ORIGINATOR SGB Administration PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY FIELD SUBFIELD Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies Office Administration ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS Undefined RegularFundamental Level 2 NQF Level 02 3 REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER Reregistered 2018-07-01 2023-06-30 SAQA 06120/18 LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT 2024-06-30 2027-06-30 In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD Learners will be learning towards obtaining a national qualification at level 2 or are working in an administrative environment, including SMME`s (Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises), where the acquisition of competence against this standard will add value to the learner`s job, or chances of finding employment. Learners will be well positioned to extend their learning and practice into other areas in the business environment, or to strive towards professional standards and improved performance. The qualifying learner is capable of: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 80 Learner to initial: ational standards LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING Learners accessing this unit standard will have demonstrated competence in numeracy and literacy at NQF Level 1 or equivalent. UNIT STANDARD RANGE onal standards will include tonality, volume, pronunciation, annunciation, vocabulary, timeous response, choice of greeting and clarity. caller. guidelines, policies, procedures and systems. Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 Employ effective telephone etiquette ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 1. Telephone etiquette and answering procedures are explained. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 2. The factors that hinder communication process are identified and explained. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 3. Calls are handled with discretion and confidentiality. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 4. Caller is put on hold when not conversing directly with the caller. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 5. A caller on hold is frequently consulted to establish whether he or she wishes to remain on hold. SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 Answer telephone according to organisational standards ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 1. Telephone is answered promptly. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 2. Telephone is answered according to standard operating procedures. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 3. Caller is greeted according to organisational requirements. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 81 Learner to initial: 4. Relevant caller information is acquired during initial interaction. SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 Process incoming calls according to organisational standards ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 1. Call is redirected as appropriate. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 2. Multiple lines and holding techniques are handled using correct technique. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 3. Calls are screened as per standard operating procedures. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 4. Message is taken and transmitted if required / requested according to organisational requirements. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 5. Further assistance is obtained from an appropriate source, if required. SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 Process outgoing calls in accordance with organisational requirements ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 1. Information and documentation required for the call are obtained and prepared. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 2. Outgoing call is dialed using the correct number. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 3. Purpose of the call is stated clearly and according to organisational procedures. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 4. Resulting actions from calls are recorded. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 5. Messages are left, if required / requested according to organisational requirements. UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS Accreditation and Moderation: The Services Educational Training Quality Assurance Body (ETQA) will accredit providers offering learning towards this standard and register assessors. UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 82 Learner to initial: ng procedures for handling incoming and outgoing calls. Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING Identify and solve problems which are related to the processing of calls, so that, all calls reach their destination. UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING Work effectively with others within the workplace in order to process incoming and outgoing calls in the most efficient and effective way. UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING Organise oneself and one`s activities responsibly and effectively at all times to ensure no interruptions to switchboard operations occur. UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information during the processing of all incoming and outgoing calls. UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING Communicate effectively with all telephone callers to maintain or enhance company image and provide required information to callers. UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE Use science and technology effectively and critically when processing caller information and incoming and outgoing calls. UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING Understand the world as a set of related systems in that the poor processing of telephone calls has an impact which can affect the company`s image. In order to contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of society at large, it must be the intention underlying any programme of learning to make an individual aware of the importance of: being culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts when handling callers. REREGISTRATION HISTORY As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL Core 23833 National Certificate: Business Administration Services Level 2 NQF Level 02 Core 64652 National Certificate: Hairdressing Level 2 2009NQF Level Passed the End As per Learning 0402 Date Programmes 08 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 STATUS Reregistered PRIMARY OR END DELEGATED QA DATE FUNCTIONARY 202306SERVICES 30 83 Learner to initial: Status was "Reregistered" 80786 National Certificate: Home-Care Practices 65111 National Certificate: Beauty Technology Core Core recorded against this Qual 202306SERVICES 30 Level 2 NQF Level 02 Level 3 NQF Level 03 Passed the End As per Learning 2011Date Programmes 02Status was recorded against 16 "Reregistered" this Qual 93997 National Certificate: Contact Centre and Business Process Outsourcing Support Level 3 NQF Level 03 Reregistered As per Learning 2021Programmes 06recorded against 30 this Qual 48887 National Certificate: Hiring Services and Support Level 3 NQF Level 03 Reregistered 202306SERVICES 30 Core 48513 National Certificate: Public Administration Level 3 NQF Level 03 Core 57804 National Certificate: Public Administration Level 3 NQF Level 03 Level 2 NQF Level 02 Core Core Fundamental 20415 National Certificate: Conservation Resource Guardianship Reregistered Passed the End 2006- Was PSETA until Date 11Last Date for Status was 16 Achievement "Registered" Reregistered 202306PSETA 30 Passed the End 2008- Was CATHSSETA Date 02until Last Date for Status was 06 Achievement "Reregistered" PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. 1. PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN AFRICA PTY LTD All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 84 Learner to initial: All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD: Conduct outcomes-based assessment SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE 115753 Conduct outcomes-based assessment ORIGINATOR SGB Assessor Standards PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY ETDP SETA - Education, Training and Development Practices Sector Education and Training Authority FIELD SUBFIELD Field 05 - Education, Training and Development Higher Education and Training ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL TYPE NQF LEVEL CREDITS Undefined Regular Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 15 Level 5 REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START REGISTRATION END DATE DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER Reregistered 2018-07-01 SAQA 06120/18 LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT 2024-06-30 2027-06-30 2023-06-30 In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. This unit standard replaces: US ID Unit Standard Title Pre-2009 NQF NQF Level Level 7978 Plan and conduct assessment of learning outcomes Level 5 Level 4 9927 Conduct an assessment Credits Replacement Status Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 15 Complete NQF Level 04 12 Complete PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD This generic assessor unit standard is for those who assess people for their achievement of learning outcomes in terms of specified criteria using pre-designed assessment instruments. The outcomes and criteria may be defined in a range of documents including but not limited to unit standards, exit level outcomes, assessment standards, curriculum statements and qualifications. Those who achieve this unit standard will be able to conduct assessments within their fields of expertise. This unit standard will contribute towards the achievement of a variety of qualifications, particularly within the fields of Education Training and Development Practices and Human Resource Development. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 85 Learner to initial: People credited with this unit standard are able to carry out assessments in a fair, valid, reliable and practicable manner that is free of all bias and discrimination, paying particular attention to the three groups targeted for redress: race, gender and disability. In particular, people credited with this unit standard will be able to: Demonstrate understanding of outcomes-based assessment; Prepare for assessments; Conduct assessments; Provide feedback on assessments; and Review assessments. LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING The credit calculation is based on the assumption that those starting to learn towards this unit standard have no previous assessment experience. It is assumed, though, that the candidate-assessors have evaluative expertise within the area of learning in which they intend to assess (see Definition of Terms for a definition of "evaluative expertise"). UNIT STANDARD RANGE 1. This generic assessment unit standard applies to assessment in all fields of learning. However, it is expected that assessments will be contextualised to meet the requirements of different contexts. 2. Assessment of candidate-assessors will only be valid for award of this unit standard if the following requirements are met: Assessments carried out by the candidate-assessor are in relation to significant, meaningful and coherent outcome statements that include criteria for assessment purposes, and allow for judgements of competence in line with SAQA's definition of competence i.e. embrace foundational, practical and reflexive dimensions of competence. Outcomes that are highly task-orientated and do not demand much, if any, in the way of reflexive competence, will not be sufficient for measuring competence as an assessor in terms of this unit standard. It is important that candidate-assessors select outcomes that enable them to meet the requirement laid out here. The candidate-assessor demonstrates repeatability by carrying out at least two assessments : - One of which may be a simulated assessment (in order to cover a range of typical assessment situations), and - At least one of which must involve a real candidate in a real assessment situation, preferably under the guidance of a mentor. The assessments may involve two or more candidates in relation to the same outcome. Candidate-assessors produce evidence that they can conduct assessments in RPL situations and for candidates who may have fairly recently acquired the necessary knowledge and skills through courses or learning programmes. However, candidate assessors do not need to carry out both kinds of assessments in practice for the award of this unit standard. Should candidate-assessors carry out an RPL-related assessment for the purposes of this unit standard, then it is sufficient for them to show how they might have conducted the assessment differently had it been an assessment linked to recent learning, and vice versa. 3. For the purposes of assessment against this unit standard, candidate-assessors should have access to Assessment Guides and will not be expected to design assessments. (See Definition of Terms for a definition of Assessment Guides). Candidate assessors will be expected to interpret the standards at hand in order to ensure their assessment judgements are in accordance with the requirements of the standard. In cases where Assessment Guides are not available, providers should seek ways to make such guides available for the purposes of this assessment. Where candidate-assessor also intend to design assessments, then providers are encouraged to integrate the learning and assessment of the unit standards: Conduct outcomes-based assessments Design and develop outcomes-based assessments 4. Candidate-assessors should have access to organisational assessment policies, procedures and systems (including moderation). It is assumed the organisational policies and procedures are of a quality sufficient for accreditation purposes. Where such policies and procedures are not yet available, the provider may make general policies and procedures available for the purposes of this assessment. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 86 Learner to initial: Further range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 Demonstrate understanding of outcomes-based assessment. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 Comparisons between outcomes-based and another form of assessment of learning highlight key differences in terms of the underlying philosophies and approaches to assessment, including an outline of advantages and disadvantages. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 RPL is explained in terms of its purpose, processes and related benefits and challenges. Explanations highlight the potential impact of RPL on individuals, learning organisations and the workplace. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 A variety of assessment methods are described and compared in terms of how they could be used when conducting assessments in different situations. ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE The description of methods should cover situations for gathering evidence of: Problem solving ability, Knowledge and understanding, Practical and technical skills, Attitudinal skills and values. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 Key principles of assessment are described and illustrated in practical situations. The descriptions highlight the importance of applying the principles in terms of the possible effect on the assessment process and results. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 The approach to giving feedback on assessment results is described in terms of the possible impact on candidates and further learning and assessment. SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 Prepare for assessments. OUTCOME RANGE Preparation for assessments relates to organising and preparing resources, people, schedules, venues, assessment instruments and documentation for a particular assessment and/or related assessments for an individual or a number of assessment candidates/learners. Preparation is to be carried out in situations where the candidate assessor has access to: Relevant organisational assessment and moderation policies and procedures, and Assessment guides and instruments for the assessment at hand, including the relevant outcomes and criteria. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 87 Learner to initial: Preparation of assessment resources, logistics, documentation and environment meets the requirements of the assessment at hand and ensures fairness and safety of assessment. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 Parties involved in the assessment are notified in good time. Checks are carried out to ensure parties involved in the assessment are ready and available to meet required schedules. ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE Parties include assessment candidates and moderators, and may include assessment facilitators and/or assistants, teachers, trainers, invigilators and safety personnel. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 All pre-assessment moderation requirements are carried out in accordance with relevant assessment policies, moderation plans and ETQA requirements. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 Assessment details are explained to candidates clearly and constructively. Opportunities for clarification are provided and responses promote understanding of the requirements. ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE Assessment details cover the specific purpose, process, expectations, roles, responsibilities and appeals procedures related to the assessment at hand, as well as the general context of assessment in terms of the principles and mechanisms of the NQF, as applicable to the situation and assessment context. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 Inputs are sought from candidates regarding special needs and possible sources of evidence that could contribute to valid assessment, including RPL opportunities. Modifications made to the assessment approach on the basis of the inputs do not affect the validity of the assessment. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 Candidate readiness for assessment is confirmed. In cases where candidates are not yet ready, actions taken are in line with assessment policies. SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 Conduct assessments. OUTCOME RANGE The ability to make assessment judgements using diverse sources of evidence must be demonstrated. Assessments to include cases where candidates have special needs and where evidence arises through RPL situations. Should it not be feasible to gather evidence for assessments of special need candidates or in RPL situations, evidence may be produced through scenarios. Candidate-assessors must show they can make judgements in situations where: Candidates meet all criteria for a particular outcome, Candidates clearly do not meet the criteria for a particular outcome, Candidates meet some, but not all criteria, and More evidence is required in order to make a judgement of competence. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 Assessment practices promote effective, manageable, fair and safe assessment. Assessment practices are in line with quality assurance requirements, recognised codes of practice and learning-site or work-site standard operating procedures where applicable. ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 88 Learner to initial: Professional, industry or legislated codes of practice. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 The assessment is carried out according to the assessment design and in line with the assessment plan. Adjustments are justified by the situation, and unforeseen events and special needs of candidates are addressed without compromising the validity or fairness of the assessment. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 Questioning techniques are appropriate and have the potential to successfully elicit appropriate responses. Communication with candidates is non-leading, and is appropriate to the assessment at hand and the language ability of the candidate. ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE "Leading" refers to the practice of inadvertently or deliberately influencing the evidence candidates produce through the style of questioning, instructions or responses to candidates. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 Sufficient evidence is gathered, including evidence generated over time, to enable valid, consistent, reliable and fair assessment judgements to be made. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 Assessment judgements are consistent with judgements made on similar evidence and are justified by the authenticity, validity, sufficiency and currency of the evidence. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 Records of the assessment are in line with the requirements of the organisation's quality assurance system. Records meet requirements for making assessment judgements, giving meaningful feedback, supporting internal and external moderation, and addressing possible appeals. SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 Provide feedback on assessments. OUTCOME RANGE Parties include candidates, educators, trainers, managers and moderators as applicable to the situation. Evidence must be provided of the ability to give written and oral feedback. The ability to give feedback must be demonstrated in situations where: - Candidates meet all criteria in relation to an outcome, - Candidates clearly do not meet the criteria in relation to an outcome, - Candidates meet some, but not all criteria, and - More evidence is required before a judgement is possible. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 Feedback is given to relevant parties in accordance with confidentiality requirements, in an appropriate sequence and within agreed timeframes. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 Feedback is clear and confined to strengths and weaknesses in performance and/or requirements for further evidence in relation to the outcome/s at hand. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 89 Learner to initial: The type and manner of feedback is constructive, culturally sensitive and related to the relevant party's needs. Sufficient information is provided to enable the purpose of the assessment to be met, and to enable parties to make further decisions. ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE Further decisions include awarding of credit, redirecting candidates to further learning or guiding candidates to further application or re-assessment. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 Feedback on the assessment process is obtained from the candidate and opportunities are provided for clarification and explanations concerning the entire assessment. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 Disputes and/or appeals that arise are dealt with according to the assessment policy. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 Agreements reached and key elements of the feedback are recorded in line with the requirements of the organisation's quality assurance system. SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 Review assessments. OUTCOME RANGE The review should address at least the following aspects: The quality of the assessment instruments, including the outcomes against which assessment takes place and Assessment Guides used, The assessment process, and Candidate readiness for assessment. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 The review identifies strengths and weaknesses in the instruments and process, and records these for incorporation in assessment redesign. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 Feedback from relevant parties is analysed and used to influence future assessments positively. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 Weaknesses in the assessment design and process that could have compromised the fairness of assessment are identified and dealt with according to the organisation's assessment policy. ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 Weaknesses in the assessment arising from poorly defined outcomes and criteria are identified, and effective steps are taken to inform relevant bodies. UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS A candidate-assessor wishing to be assessed, against this unit standard may apply to an assessment agency, assessor or provider institution accredited by the relevant ETQA. Anyone assessing a candidate-assessor against this unit standard must meet the assessor requirements of the relevant ETQA. In particular, such assessors of candidate-assessors must demonstrate that they assess in terms of the scope and context defined in all the range statements. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 90 Learner to initial: Any institution offering learning towards this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA. External moderation of assessment will be conducted by the relevant ETQA at its discretion. UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE The following knowledge is embedded within the unit standard, and will be assessed directly or indirectly through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the assessment criteria: Outcomes-based education, training and development Principles of assessment - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'Key principles of assessment are described and illustrated in practical situations. The descriptions highlight the importance of applying the principles in terms of the possible effect on the assessment process and results.', and indirectly assessed via a requirement to apply the principles throughout the standard. Principles and practices of RPL - directly assessed through assessment criteria 'RPL is explained in terms of its purpose, processes and related benefits and challenges. Explanations highlight the potential impact of RPL on individuals, learning organisations and the workplace.', 'Inputs are sought from candidates regarding special needs and possible sources of evidence that could contribute to valid assessment, including RPL opportunities. Modifications made to the assessment approach on the basis of the inputs do not affect the validity of the assessment.' and specific outcome 'Conduct assessments.', as well as through application in the rest of the standard. Methods of assessment - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'A variety of assessment methods are described and compared in terms of how they could be used when conducting assessments in different situations.', and indirectly assessed through application of the methods Potential barriers to assessment - assessed when dealing with special needs. The principles and mechanisms of the NQF - this knowledge underpins the standard Assessment policies and ETQA requirements Moderation requirements UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME N/A UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES N/A Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING Identify and solve problems using critical and creative thinking: preparing for contingencies, candidates with special needs, problems that arise during assessment, suggesting changes to assessment. UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING Work effectively in a team using critical and creative thinking: working with candidates and other relevant parties during assessment, as well as post-assessment. UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING Organize and manage oneself and ones activities: preparing, conducting and recording the assessment. UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 91 Learner to initial: Collect, analyse, organize and critically evaluate information: gather, evaluate and judge evidence and the assessment process. UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING Communicate effectively: prepare candidates for assessment, communicate during assessment, and provide feedback. UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING Demonstrate the world as a set of related systems: understanding the impact of assessment on individuals and organisations. UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING Be culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts: give feedback on assessments in a culturally sensitive manner. UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA N/A REREGISTRATION HISTORY As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. UNIT STANDARD NOTES This unit standard replaces unit standard 9927, "Conduct an assessment", Level 4, 12 credits. This unit standard replaces unit standard 7978, "Plan and conduct assessment of learning outcomes", Level 5, 15 credits. Supplementary information Definition of Terms The following terms are defined as used within this and related unit standards: Assessment: - a process in which evidence is gathered and evaluated against agreed criteria in order to make a judgement of competence for developmental and/or recognition purposes. Assessment activities: - what a candidate does or is involved in as a means of producing evidence e.g. designing things, making things, repairing things, reporting on something, answering questions, solving problems, demonstrating techniques. Assessment criteria: - descriptions of the required type and quality of evidence against which candidates are to be assessed. Assessment design: - the analysis of defined outcomes and criteria to produce a detailed description of how an assessment should take place, including all instructions and information regarding the assessment activities and assessment methods. The product of assessment design could be termed an Assessment Guide (see definition below). Assessment facilitator (or evidence facilitator): - a person who works within particular contexts, under the supervision of registered assessors, to help candidates/learners gather, produce and organise evidence for assessment. Assessment Guide: - this is a complete package based on a thorough analysis of specified outcomes and criteria, assessment requirements and a particular assessment context. Assessment Guides are designed primarily for use by assessors to conduct an assessment (or possibly a series of related assessments) in terms of a significant and coherent outcome of learning e.g. a unit standard. Assessment Guides address the following key aspects in detail: - How will the assessment take place? - What is needed to make the assessment happen? © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 92 Learner to initial: - How will evidence be gathered, recorded and judged? In general, Assessment Guides include descriptions of the approach to the assessment, assessment conditions, assessment activities, instructions to assessors and candidates/learners, assessment methods, assessment instruments (e.g. scenarios, role-plays, questions, tasks), resource requirements, guidance for contextualising assessments, relevant standard operating procedures, administrative procedures, moderation requirements, assessment outcomes and criteria, observations sheets, checklists, possible or required sources of evidence and guidance on expected quality of evidence including exemplars, memoranda or rubrics. Assessment instruments: - those items that an assessor uses or a candidate uses as part of the assessment e.g. scenarios with questions, case studies, description of tasks to be performed, descriptions of role play situations. Assessment method: - for the most part, assessment methods relate to what an assessor does to gather and evaluate evidence. Assessment methods include observing candidates, questioning candidates, interviewing supervisors/colleagues/managers of candidates, listening to candidates, reviewing written material, testing products. Assessment plan: - this is produced at provider level, and gives an overview of the timeframes and responsibilities for assessment and moderation for the agreed delivery period. The plan addresses practical implementation details, including, for example, decisions about the clustering of certain outcomes or unit standards/outcomes for integrated assessment, any planned RPL, and the relation of assessment and moderation to delivery of modules/ programmes in terms of timeframes. Assessment principles: - see more detailed definitions in next section. Candidate/learner: - person whose performance is being assessed by an assessor. Such people include those who may already be competent, but who seek assessment for formal recognition (candidates), as well as those who may have completed or are in the process of completing learning programmes (learners). Candidate-assessor: - the person who is being assessed against this particular unit standard. Evaluative expertise: - the ability to judge the quality of a performance in relation to specified criteria consistently, reliably and with insight. Evaluative expertise implies deep subject matter understanding and knowledge about the outcomes being assessed at a theoretical and practical level, but does not necessarily include practical ability in the outcome. Evidence: - tangible proof produced by or about individuals, that can be perceived with the senses, bearing a direct relationship to defined outcomes and criteria, based on which judgements are made concerning the competence of individuals. Evidence includes plans, products, reports, answers to questions, testimonials, certificates, descriptions of observed performances, peer review reports. Evidence facilitator: - see assessment facilitator Moderation: - a process that supports and evaluates the assessment environment, process and instruments with a view to confirming the reliability and authenticity of assessment results and improving the quality of assessments and assessors. Performance: - includes demonstration of skills, knowledge, understanding and attitudes, and the ability to transfer these to new situations. Portfolio of evidence: - a carefully organised and complete collection of evidence compiled by candidates/learners to prove competence in relation to defined outcomes. RPL - Recognition of Prior Learning means the comparison of the previous learning and experience of a learner against specified learning outcomes required for: - The award of credits for a specified unit standard or qualification, - Access to further learning, - Recognition in terms of meeting minimum requirements for a specific job, - Placement at a particular level in an organisation or institution, or - Advanced standing or status. This means that regardless of where, when or how a person obtained the required skills and knowledge, it could be recognised for credits. In this sense, RPL is an important principle of the NQF. RPL involves an assessment process of preparing for RPL, engaging with RPL candidates, gathering evidence, evaluating and judging evidence in relation to defined criteria, giving feedback and reporting results. Given that the all candidates are assessed against the same criteria, credits awarded through RPL are therefore just as valid as © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 93 Learner to initial: credits awarded through any other assessment process. Outcomes-based assessment: - a planned process for gathering and judging evidence of competence, in relation to pre-determined criteria within an outcomes-based paradigm, for various purposes including further development and recognition of learning achievements. Verifier: - those who operate at systems level to monitor assessment and moderation practices, trends and results. Principles of assessment Methods of Assessment: Appropriate: The method of assessment is suited to the outcome being assessed i.e. is capable of gathering evidence in relation to the intended outcome, and not something else. Fair: The method of assessment does not present any barriers to achievements, which are not related to the achievement of the outcome at hand. Manageable: The methods used make for easily arranged, cost-effective assessments that do not unduly interfere with learning. Integrated into work or learning: Evidence collection is integrated into the work or learning process where this is appropriate and feasible. (Often referred to as naturally occurring evidence). Evidence Valid: The evidence focuses on the requirements laid down in the relevant standard and matches the evidence requirements of the outcome/s at hand under conditions that mirror the conditions of actual performance as closely as possible Current: The evidence is sufficient proof that the candidate is able to perform the assessment outcomes at the time the assessor declares the candidate competent. Authentic: The assessor is satisfied that the evidence is attributable to the person being assessed. Sufficient: The evidence collected establishes that all criteria have been met and that performance to the required standard can be repeated consistently in the future i.e. the performance to standard is not a "onceoff". Overall Assessment Process Systematic: The overall process ensures assessment is fair, effective, repeatable and manageable. Open: The process is transparent i.e. assessment candidates understand the assessment process and the criteria that apply and can contribute to the planning and accumulation of evidence. Reliable/Consistent: The same assessor would make the same judgement again in similar circumstances and judgements match judgements made on similar evidence. QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: PRE2009 NQF LEVEL 65030 National Certificate: Arts and Culture Development Level 5 Management Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered 2023CATHSSETA 06-30 Core 50334 National Certificate: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices Level 5 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 Core 49277 National Diploma: Braille Level 5 Practice NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 Core 49710 National Diploma: Development Practice Level 5 NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 61592 National Diploma: Human Resources Management Level 5 and Practices NQF Level 05 Reregistered As per Learning 2023- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual Core Core © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 NQF LEVEL PRIMARY OR END DELEGATED QA DATE FUNCTIONARY ID QUALIFICATION TITLE STATUS 94 Learner to initial: Core 50333 National Diploma: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices Core 67373 National Diploma: Orientation and Mobility Practice Level 5 NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 Core 61570 National Diploma: Power Plant Process Control Level 5 Operations NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023EWSETA 06-30 63689 Bachelor of Arts: Geographical Information Level 6 Science Level Passed the End TBA: PreDate 20182009 was Status was 06-30 L6 "Reregistered" 50330 Bachelor: Occupationally Directed Education Level 6 Training and Development Practices NQF Level 07 Reregistered As per Learning 2021- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual 50331 National Certificate: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices Level 6 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L6 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 Elective 78529 Further Education and Training Certificate: Chemical Operations Level 4 NQF Level 04 Reregistered As per Learning 2021- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual Elective 61669 Further Education and Training Certificate: Community Water, Health and Sanitation Facilitation Level 4 NQF Level 04 Reregistered 2023EWSETA 06-30 Elective 50480 Further Education and Training Certificate: Firearm Training Level 4 NQF Level 04 Reregistered 2023SAPFTC 06-30 Elective 66489 Further Education and Training Certificate: Foundry Operations Level 4 NQF Level 04 Elective 49092 Further Education and Training Certificate: Furniture Making Level 4 NQF Level 04 Elective 64950 Further Education and Training Certificate: Laboratory Analysis Level 4 NQF Level 04 Elective 58952 Further Education and Training Certificate: Laboratory Analysis Level 4 NQF Level 04 Passed the End As per Learning Date 2008- Programmes Status was 08-05 recorded against "Registered" this Qual Elective 49049 Further Education and Training Certificate: Lump Ore Beneficiation Level 4 NQF Level 04 Passed the End Was MQA until Last Date 2009Date for Status was 02-18 Achievement "Reregistered" Elective 48915 Further Education and Training Certificate: Manufacturing and Assembly Operations Supervision Level 4 NQF Level 04 Reregistered 2023MERSETA 06-30 Elective 50040 Further Education and Training Certificate: Level 4 NQF Level 04 Reregistered 2023MERSETA 06-30 Core Core Core © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Level 5 NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 Passed the End Date 2013MERSETA Status was 11-07 "Reregistered" Reregistered 2023FPMSETA 06-30 Reregistered As per Learning 2021- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual 95 Learner to initial: Optical Manufacturing Processes Passed the End Date 2013CETA Status was 11-07 "Reregistered" Elective 58782 Further Education and Training Certificate: Plumbing Level 4 NQF Level 04 Elective 58779 Further Education and Training Certificate: Production Technology Level 4 NQF Level 04 Elective 61949 Further Education and Training Certificate: Pulp Level 4 and Paper Operations NQF Level 04 Passed the End Date 2015FPMSETA Status was 06-30 "Reregistered" Elective 50560 Further Education and Training Certificate: Small Craft Construction Level 4 NQF Level 04 Passed the End Was MERSETA until Date 2009Last Date for Status was 08-31 Achievement "Registered" Elective 60189 Further Education and Training Certificate: Wastewater and Water Reticulation Services Level 4 NQF Level 04 Elective 64649 Higher Certificate: Early Childhood Development Level 5 NQF Level 05 Elective 58580 National Certificate: Aerodrome Control Level 5 Level Passed the End TBA: PreDate 2016TETA 2009 was Status was 12-31 L5 "Reregistered" Elective 58581 National Certificate: Air Traffic Support Level 5 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered 2023TETA 06-30 Elective 63309 National Certificate: Defensive Mission Control Level 5 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered 2023SAS SETA 06-30 Elective 22901 National Certificate: Environmental Education, Level 5 Training and Development Practice Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 Elective 59201 National Certificate: Generic Management Level 5 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered As per Learning 2023- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual Elective 59429 National Certificate: Inclusive Education Level 5 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered 2023ETDP SETA 06-30 Elective 49743 National Certificate: Manufacturing Management Level 5 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered 2023FOODBEV 06-30 Elective 58625 National Certificate: Occupational Safety Level 5 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L5 Reregistered As per Learning 2021- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual Elective 80047 National Certificate: Road Level 5 Safety Development NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023SAS SETA 06-30 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Reregistered 2023MERSETA 06-30 Reregistered 2023EWSETA 06-30 Reregistered As per Learning 2021- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual 96 Learner to initial: Elective 49852 National Diploma: Applied Military Intelligence Elective 57450 National Diploma: Automotive Diagnostics and Repair Elective 49853 National Diploma: Defensive Mission Control Level 5 NQF Level 05 Level 5 Level Passed the End Was MERSETA until TBA: PreDate 2009Last Date for 2009 was Status was 02-18 Achievement L5 "Registered" Level 5 Level Passed the End Was SAS SETA until TBA: PreDate 2008Last Date for 2009 was Status was 09-17 Achievement L5 "Registered" Elective 64650 National Diploma: Early Childhood Development Level 5 NQF Level 05 Reregistered As per Learning 2021- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual Elective 50500 National Diploma: Electronic Warfare Level 5 NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023SAS SETA 06-30 Elective 63589 National Diploma: Geographical Information Level 5 Science NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023CETA 06-30 Elective 58784 National Diploma: Geospatial Image Analysis Level 5 NQF Level 05 Reregistered As per Learning 2023- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual Elective 49023 National Diploma: Liaison Level 5 Interpreting NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023QCTO 06-30 Elective 49059 National Diploma: Master Craftsmanship Level 5 (Electrical) NQF Level 05 Reregistered 2023EWSETA 06-30 Elective 73529 Advanced Certificate: Education: School Management and Leadership Level 6 NQF Level 06 Reregistered As per Learning 2021- Programmes 06-30 recorded against this Qual Elective 61729 National Diploma: Policing Level 6 NQF Level 06 Reregistered 2023SAS SETA 06-30 Elective 20485 National First Degree: ABET Practice Level 6 Level TBA: Pre2009 was L6 Reregistered 2021ETDP SETA 06-30 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Reregistered 2023SAS SETA 06-30 97 Learner to initial: ASSESSOR DOCUMENTS © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 98 Learner to initial: ASSESSMENT REPORT Name of Skills Programme US No. 59851 Assessor Programme NQF Level 3 Credit Value 72 US Title NQF Level 3 No of Credits 72 Conduct outcomes-based assessment. CCFO Identifying Identify and solve problems by using critical and creative thinking. CCFO Organising Organise and manage oneself and one`s activities. CCFO Collecting Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information. CCFO Communicating Critical Cross-field Outcomes Communicate effectively. CCFO Science Use science and technology effectively and critically. CCFO Working Work effectively with others and in teams. CCFO Demonstrating Understand the world as a set of inter-related parts of a system. The assessment of the Critical Cross - field outcomes is integrated into the assessment of the specific outcomes and assessment criteria. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 99 ASSESSMENT REPORT National Certificate: Diamond Processing: Specialization/Subfield A Specific Outcomes SO1: Knowledge of procedures and steps of preparing the diamond gemstones for processing/polishing Assessment Criteria Assessment Methods Assessment Instruments/tasks Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Achievements AC1: State the procedure and steps of faceting the girdle by machine Questioning Knowledge assignment question 1 Knowledge assignment, activity 1 AC2: State the procedure and steps of opening windows on diamond gemstone Questioning Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment, activity2 Questioning Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment, activity3 AC3: State the procedure and steps of setting bench and levelling a scaif for polishing diamond gemstone © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 100 ASSESSMENT REPORT Specific Outcomes Assessment Criteria AC4: State the procedure and steps of preparing scaif for polishing diamond gemstone AC5: State the procedure and steps of levelling tangs for polishing diamond gemstones © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Assessment Methods Assessment Instruments/tasks Questioning Knowledge assignment Questioning Knowledge assignment Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Achievements Knowledge assignment activity 4 Knowledge assignment, activity 5 101 ASSESSMENT REPORT Questioning Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment activity6 Questioning Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment: question 7 AC6: State the procedure and steps of preparing sawn diamond gemstone for polishing .AC7: State the procedure and steps of preparing makeable diamond gemstones for processing © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 102 ASSESSMENT REPORT Specific Outcomes SO2: General knowledge of the diamond environment workplace . Assessment Criteria Assessment Methods Assessment Instruments/tasks Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Achievements AC1: Knowledge and understanding of the diamond work environment and safety. Questioning Knowledge assignment: Knowledge assignment 1: question 1 AC2: Knowledge and understanding of the diamond work environment and safety. Questioning Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment 1:question 2 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 103 ASSESSMENT REPORT Specific Outcomes Assessment Criteria Assessment Methods Assessment Instruments/tasks Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Achievements AC3: Knowledge and understanding of the diamond work environment and safety. Questioning Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment 1: question 3 AC4: Knowledge and understanding of the diamond work environment and safety. Questioning Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment: 1:question 4 AC5: Knowledge and understanding of the diamond work environment and safety. Questioning Knowledge assignment: Knowledge assignment 1: question 5 © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 104 ASSESSMENT REPORT Assessment Criteria Specific Outcomes SO3: Knowledge and understanding of the formation of diamonds and the shapes and characteristics of diamond gemstones. AC1: Knowledge of the structure and understanding of the diamond properties and diamond gemstones structure. Assessment Methods Questioning Assessment Instruments/tasks Knowledge assignment Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Achievements Knowledge assignment 2 question 1 Knowledge assignment 2: . AC2: Knowledge of the structure and understanding of the diamond properties and diamond gemstones structure. Product evaluation Portfolio, workplace assignment AC3: Knowledge of the structure and understanding of the diamond properties and diamond gemstones structure. Questioning Knowledge assignment C4: Knowledge of the structure and understanding of the diamond properties and diamond gemstones structure. Questioning © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 question 2 Knowledge assignment 3: question 3 Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment 2: question 4 105 ASSESSMENT REPORT . © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 106 ASSESSMENT REPORT Specific Outcomes . Assessment Criteria Assessment Methods Assessment Instruments/tasks AC5: Knowledge of the structure and understanding of the diamond properties and diamond gemstones structure. Questioning Knowledge assignment AC6: Knowledge of the structure and understanding of the diamond properties and diamond gemstones structure. Questioning Knowledge assignment AC7: Knowledge of the structure and understanding of the diamond properties and diamond gemstones structure. Questioning © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Knowledge assignment 2: question 5 Knowledge assignment 2: question 6 Knowledge assignment Knowledge assignment 2: question 7 Achievements 107 ASSESSMENT REPORT Specific Outcomes Assessment Criteria AC4: Feedback on the assessment process is obtained from the candidate and opportunities are provided for clarification and explanations concerning the entire assessment. AC5: Disputes and/or appeals that arise are dealt with according to the assessment policy. SO5 Review assessments. AC6: Agreements reached and key elements of the feedback are recorded in line with the requirements of the organisation`s quality assurance system. AC1: The review identifies strengths and weaknesses in the instruments and process and records these for incorporation in assessment redesign. AC2: Feedback from relevant parties is analysed and used to influence future assessments positively. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Assessment Methods Assessment Instruments/tasks Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Product evaluation Portfolio, workplace assignment Assignment 3 Product evaluation Portfolio, workplace assignment Assignment 3 Product evaluation Portfolio, workplace assignment Assignment 3 Product evaluation Portfolio, workplace assignment Product evaluation Portfolio, workplace assignment Achievements Assignment 4 Assignment 4 108 ASSESSMENT REPORT Specific Outcomes Assessment Criteria AC3: Weaknesses in the assessment design and process that could have compromised the fairness of assessment are identified and dealt with according to the organisation`s assessment policy. AC4: Weaknesses in the assessment arising from poorly defined outcomes and criteria are identified and effective steps are taken to inform relevant bodies. Assessment Methods Product evaluation Assessment Instruments/tasks Portfolio, workplace assignment Evidence checklist Specifics to measure achievement & Nonachievement Achievements Assignment 4 Assignment 4 Product evaluation Portfolio, workplace assignment COMMENTS © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 109 ASSESSMENT REPORT Unit Standard code 115753 Conduct outcomesbased assessment Assessment Activity Assignment 2: Conduct assessment. Assignment 1: Prepare for assessment. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 CCFO to be addressed Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills. Understand the world as a set of inter-related parts of a system. Application of this outcome will be revealed through the quality of the descriptions and explanations of the NQF, which is an inter-related system. Assessment Method Product evaluation Product evaluation 110 ASSESSMENT REPORT Date of assessment Assessor Date of communication Mode of communication (e.g. Phone call or e-mail) Tshidiso Edwin Malebo © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 111 ASSESSOR FEEDBACK REPORT TO THE LEARNER Course name: Unit Standard(s): Learner Full Name: Learner ID No.: Email Address: Assessor Full Name: Assessment Date: Assessment Result: OVERALL FINDINGS: (Comments from the assessor - for remedial action a separate form will be issued) Assessor Signature: Date: LEARNER FEEDBACK TO THE ASSESSOR: Criteria Yes No 1 The assessment process was followed as agreed. 2 The assessment was conducted in a fair way. 3 My special needs were accommodated during the assessment 4 I was given detailed feedback on my performance. 5 I understood the feedback that was given to me. 6 I accepted the feedback that was given to me. Comments Learner Signature: Date: Please email fully completed and signed form to: assessment@pscollege.co.za © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 112 GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSORS: Assessors Name and Registration No. List of Learners assessed C NYC Did you complete the Learner Preparation Form? Did the Learner sign the Declaration of Authenticity Form Did you Complete the Assessor Review Report? Tshidiso Malebo Edwin Ambrose Matlala Tebogo C Yes Yes Yes Tshidiso Malebo Edwin Johannes MMolawa Ntumo C Yes Yes Yes © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 Comments on your meeting with the Moderator 113 Assessors Name and Registration No. © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 List of Learners assessed C NYC Did you complete the Learner Preparation Form? Did the Learner sign the Declaration of Authenticity Form Did you Complete the Assessor Review Report? Comments on your meeting with the Moderator 114 Assessment Review Report Programme/Workshop Title: Unit Standard ID(s): Learner Initials and Surname: Learner ID: Method of Obtaining Credits: Class Attendance and Completion of PoE Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Assessment Outcome: Competent (C) Not Yet Competent (NYC) Evidence Used Assessment Methods Used Direct Observation Indirect (e.g. PoE) Questioning Historical Product Evaluation Comments Was the following criteria sufficiently met? Credibility Good Evidence Comments Fairness: Yes No Valid: Yes No Practicability: Yes No Authentic: Yes No Reliability: Yes No Current: Yes No Validity: Yes No Sufficient: Yes No Special Need(s) Support Only complete if special need(s) was communicated by learner. Comments and Recommendations Description of special need(s): Accommodation measures agreed upon: Was the special need(s) sufficiently addressed? Yes No Assessor’s Self Assessment General Comments Does the assessment relate closely to the relevant unit standard, outcomes and/or assessment criteria? Yes No Were all the principles of assessment applied? Yes No Was the final judgement reliable? Yes No Was the assessment fair towards the learner? Yes No Assessor Initials and Surname: Assessor Reg No: Assessor Signature: Date: Moderator Initials and Surname: Moderator Reg No: Moderator Signature: Date: © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 115 PORTFOLIO OF EVIDENCE: LATE SUBMISSION FEE Please complete, attach proof of payment and fax/email back to the Assessment Department Fax: 086 619 1194 or Email: submit@pscollege.co.za Name Surname ID Number Contact number Email Course name Course date Facilitator Please select one of the following: R250 - Late Submission (after 2 months) R500 - Late Submission (after 6 months) R750 - Late Submission (after 1 year) R 300 - Late Resubmission (after allowed 3 weeks) BANKING DETAILS ACCOUNT NAME: Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd BANK: Nedbank BRANCH: Business Pretoria BRANCH NUMBER: 149 745 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 149 721 7709 Reference: Kindly use your name and surname as reference R400 - 3rd Resubmission Notes: You have 2 months after your course to submit your PoE Fees for late submissions (after 2 months): R 250 per PoE Fees for late submissions (after 6 months): R 500 per PoE Fees for late submissions (after 12 months): R 750 per PoE Please ensure that your Portfolio is fully completed and that all sections and supporting documents are submitted correctly. If you need to re-submit any documents, you have 3 weeks to do so. Re-submission: Submit after 3 weeks: R 300 per PoE 3rd Submission (within a year) R 400 per PoE Request for extension can be done via email: assessment@pscollege.co.za © Pro-Active Public Services College (Pty) Ltd Version: March 2019 116