Lecture 1 Concept of Rural Development: Theories and Approaches Dr. Pankaj Kumar Introduction Globally, poverty still has a rural face. Three quarters of the world’s two billion poor live in rural regions, where poverty manifests itself in factors other than simply low incomes. The poor lack access to clean water, educational opportunities, health services and support from the government. Poverty also has a negative impact on social relations and it puts human lives at risk through environmental hazards. • In an agrarian country, rural development is of prime importance. There is no national development without rural development. • Dudley Seer says that the questions to ask about a country‟s development are: What has been happening to poverty? What has been happening to unemployment? What has been happening to inequality? If all three of these have declined from high levels, then beyond doubt this has been a period of development for the country concerned. Rational of Rural Development Rational for rural development appears to have emerged out of the non-applicability of the percolation theory of economic development, urban bias of development and consequent spectre of poverty and unemployment in rural areas. The World Development Report 1990 rightly observes, “Poverty as measured by low income tends to be at its worst in rural areas, even allowing for the often substantial differences in cost of living between town and countryside. The problems of malnutrition, lack of education, low life expectancy, and substandard housing are also, as a rule, more severe in rural areas. The importance of rural poverty is not always understood partly because the urban poor are more visible and more vocal than their rural counterparts. The International Labour Organisation and Asian Development Bank Studies and World Development Reports highlighted the problems of rural unemployment and related poverty problems. Despite substantial and impressive increases in food and overall agricultural outputs in some regions of a number of developing countries, the plight of landless labourers and small farmers has not improved significantly. Chinese success in eliminating destitute and unemployment through a system of communes attracted the attention of policy-makers around world. Government and international agencies started a search for alternatives to collectivist models; this led to many ‘reformist’ experiments in rural development. Most social and economic indicators such as mortality, life expectancy, primary enrollment rate, income, physical infrastructure, social services and literacy consistently show that rural areas compare unfavourably with urban areas. The question of rural development in the developing countries has assumed importance and attracted a lot of attention of researchers and policy-makers not only on account of economic and demographic consideration like vast population but also on account of political importance of rural electorate in a democratic setting. Rural + Development • The rural is the place where the ongoing encounter, interaction and mutual transformation (in short: the co-production) of man and living nature is located. This encounter occurs through a wide range of different practices, which are spatially and temporally bounded. These include, agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, rural tourism, rural sports and living in the countryside (Van der Ploeg,1997). • Development is not purely an economic phenomena but rather a multi –dimensional process involving reorganisation and re-orientation of entire economic and social system. Development is process of improving the quality of all human lives with three equally important objectives: • raising peoples living levels •increasing peoples freedom to choose •creating condition conducive to the growth of people’s self –esteem Todaro… Concept of Rural Development Rural development is a concept, a phenomenon, a strategy and a discipline. As a concept, it connotes overall development of rural areas with a view to improving the quality of life of rural people. In this sense, it is a comprehensive and multidimensional concept and encompasses the development of agriculture and allied activities --village and cottage industries and crafts, socioeconomic infrastructure, community services and facilities, and above all, human resources in rural areas. As a phenomenon, it is the result of interactions between various physical, technological, economic, socio-cultural, and institutional factors. As a strategy, it is designed to improve the economic and social well-being of a specific group of people --- the rural poor. As a discipline, it is multidisciplinary in nature representing an intersection of agricultural, social, behavioural, engineering, and management sciences. Definition of Rural Development “ Rural Development is a strategy to enable a specific group of people, poor rural women and men, to gain for themselves and their children more of what they want and need. The group includes small scale farmers, tenants, and the landless.” Chambers (1983). “A process leading to sustainable improvement in the quality of life of rural people, especially the poor”. Singh (1999). According the World Bank (1997) “Sustainable Rural Development can make a powerful contribution to four critical goals of poverty reduction, wider shared growth, household, national, and global food security and sustainable natural resource management.” (World Bank, 1997). “The process of rural development may be compared with a trend in which each coach pushes the one ahead of it and is in turn pushed by the one behind, but it takes a powerful engine o make the whole train move. The secret of success in development lies in identifying and, if needed, developing a suitable engine to attach to the train. There are no universally valid guidelines to identify appropriate engines of growth, if at all they exist. It is a choice which is influenced by time, space and culture.” Evolution of Economic Development Theories • • • • • • • Pre-classical (16th to Late 18th Century) Classical Economics (1776s-1870s) Neo-Classical Economics (1870s-1930s) Keynesian Economics (1930s-1970s) Marxian Economics (1950s-1970) Development Economics (1940s-1990s) Neo-Lliberalism (1990s onwards) Kindly note that the timeline does not necessarily imply loss of significance of a particular theory. Meaning of Development over Time Period Perspectives Meaning of Development 1800 Classical Political Economy Remedy for progress, catching up 1870 Latecomers Industrialisation, catching up 1850 Colonial economics Resource management, trusteeship 1940 Development economics Economic growth-industrialisation 1950 Modernization Theory Growth, political and social modernisation 1960 Dependency Theory Accumulation-national, autocentric 1970 Alternative Development Human flourishing 1980 Human Development Capacitation, enlargement of peopl’s choices 1980 Neoliberalism Economic growth, structural reform, deregulation, liberalisation, privatisation 1990 Post development Authoritarian, Disaster management 2000 Millenium Development Goals Structural Reform Approaches to rural development Rural development is characterised by a mix of theory and practice: “that is both ideas about how „development‟ should or might occur, and real world efforts to put various aspects of development into practice.” (Potter, 2002: 61). Histories of thinking about rural development often attempt to periodise different approaches and key ideas by decades. In part these reflect the preoccupations of the four UN development decades which commenced in the 1960s. Hence it is often said that the: 1960‟s are associated with modernisation approaches emphasising technology transfer. 1970‟s are associated with large scale state development interventions and integrated rural development programmes. 1980‟s are associated with market liberalisation and attempts to roll back the state. 1990‟s are characterised as being strongly process focused with an emphasis on participation and empowerment within a context of diversifying rural livelihood opportunities. By end of 1990s a more balanced approach had started to emerge but there remains no agreement worldwide on how to get the right mix. 2000‟s have a focus on poverty eradication, reinvigoration of small holder agriculture, sustainable farming systems and the location of producers within global value chains. However Ellis and Biggs caution that rural policies have not evolved in such a neat, linear and schematic manner and that “there are leads and lags in the transmission of new ideas across space and time.” (Ellis & Biggs, 2001) The table below (adapted from a Ellis and Biggs) provides an chronology of the changing thinking and approaches internationally to rural development. 1950s Approaches to rural development Commentary Modernisation Modernisation theory held that the small scale subsistence sector had little potential for improved productivity or growth. The development of agriculture could only be stimulated by investment in large scale mono crop estates and plantations. Large farms were perceived to be more efficient than small farms as a consequence of economies of scale. Dual economy Dual economy models posited the parallel operations of a relatively advanced sector and a relatively backward sector alternatively characterised as capitalist and subsistence, formal and informal, modern and traditional. (Fields, 2007) Community development Community development approaches were dominant in this decade. These aimed to mobilise rural communities for development. However at the time this approach was primarily fuelled by US foreign policy priorities and became regarded as an intervention to counter the spread of communism (Holdcroft, 1976). 1960s Approaches to rural development Commentary ‘Green Revolution” Technology transfer Technology transfer focused on large scale, input intensive agriculture based on packages of higher yielding hybrid seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, mechanisation and post harvest technologies which came to be known as the Green Revolution. Agricultural extension, The origins of agricultural extension were based in methods to try to get rural farmers to adopt new technologies and farming practices. In this period extension largely ignored local and indigenous knowledge, farming systems and tenure arrangements. It also targeted men overlooking that much agricultural work was done by women The changing perception of rural people as rational managers of risk and change Research into farming systems changed the perception of rural people who had been characterised as ‘incurably lazy’ and resistant to change. Small farmers were now seen to be behaving in an economically rational way when they rejected improvements which they perceived to be too risky. 1970s Approaches to rural development Commentary Redistribution with growth, A joint IDS/World Bank study in 1972 entitled Redistribution with Growth conceded that,“It is now clear that more than a decade of rapid growth in underdeveloped countries has been of little or no benefit to perhaps a third of their population.” It examined ways in which resources could be transferred from wealthy groups to poorer groups in society by means of: •direct transfer of income from richer to poorer groups •targeted investments in agriculture, education and health which would increase the productive capacity, production and incomes of the poorer groups •redistributing land or other assets in favour of poorer groups. (Jolly, 2006) Promotion of a basic needs approach, A shift of emphasis towards social services and transfer payments, designed to help the poor, and an extension of "new style" projects in nutrition, health and education. 1970s contd… Approaches to rural development Commentary Large scale integrated rural development programmes, The 1970’s was also characterised by large scale, complex, state led, top down, blueprint approaches to rural development. integrated rural development projects were often too complex and overwhelmed the management capacity of state institutions. Many became technocratic and remote from local people’s needs. Limits to growth – World Conservation Strategy The limits to growth debate began in the 1970’s. This assumed that there were direct linkages between population growth, poverty and environmental degradation. The debate promoted ‘disaster narratives’ which cast the poor as destroying the environment while ignoring the disproportionately large, wasteful and unsustainable use of resources by industrialised countries. 1980s Approaches to rural development Commentary The advent of World Bank led economic “structural Adjustment” and market liberalisation. The emergence of neo liberal economic policies and created the impetus for the emergence of structural adjustment programmes (SAP). “As of the late 1970s, the WB began to lend money preconditional upon economic reforms referred to as the Washington Consensus, and other donors followed its lead soon after”. (Aubut, 2004) These reforms based on deregulation, liberalization and fiscal discipline, were designed to engineer a policy environment which would be conducive to market liberalisation, economic growth and development. The shrinking state and the rise of international development NGOs. At the United Nations, from 41 NGOs granted consultative status by the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) in 1948, and 377 in 1968, the number of NGOs in consultative status has now expanded to over 1,550. The significant rise of nonstate actors in development has its roots here and in the process of ‘neoliberal destatisation’ and accelerated globalisation associated with the rise of neoliberalism in subsequent decades (McArthur, 2008) 1980s contd… Approaches to rural development Initial emphasis on participatory research methods in the form of Rapid Rural Appraisal. Commentary During the late 1970’s and 1980’s there was an increasing focus on approaches and methods to enable outside professionals to better understand rural realities. This saw a shift to qualitative and participatory research methods and an increasing awareness of the value of indigenous technical knowledge. Focus on understanding Interventions to promote Environment and the functioning of existing drought mitigation and sustainability farming systems. household food security. 1990s Approaches to rural development Commentary Structural adjustment The 1990’s saw the peaking of SAPs with a particular focus on former communist bloc countries in ‘transition’. These programmes were increasingly associated with high social and environmental costs and have been criticised for turning “developing countries into amenable players in the globalising system of free trade and investment.”(Carley & Christie, 2000: 107) Good governance In combination with the post-Washington Consensus and the focus on institutions and public sector management in the 1990s, a new policy agenda was formulated focusing on a more selective allocation of aid based on the quality of governance. The WB characterised good governance as: “the manner in which power is exercised in the management of a country’s economic and social resources for development.” OECD countries prioritised four elements: the rule of law, public sector management, control of corruption, and reduction of military spending. 1990s contd… Approaches to rural development Poverty reduction Participatory rural appraisal Commentary Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) were introduced in 1999 by the World Bank and the IMF as a new framework (the successor to SAPs) to enhance domestic accountability for poverty reduction reform efforts; a means to enhance the coordination of development assistance between governments and development partners; and a precondition or access to debt relief and concessional financing from both institutions’ (World Bank) Participatory approaches placed new emphasis on how rural people compare options, minimise risk, adapt practices and seek information (Garforth & Harford, 1997). There was increasing recognition of local knowledge and agency through processes of participatory research and planning (Robert Chambers, 1997) 1990s contd… Approaches to rural development Commentary Actor oriented rural development There was a shift in emphasis to an ‘endogenous development paradigm’ which was premised on development originating from within a social system as opposed to modernisation with its emphasis on imported models and expertise. Actor oriented approaches emphasised the importance of participation, the empowerment of local actors and unlocking of local resources.(Nemes, 2005) Environment and sustainability There was increasing recognition of the contribution that environmental goods and services make to livelihoods of poor rural households and the rise of triple bottom line environmental accounting. Emphasis shifted to improved management of the ecosystems that produce these goods and services to increase household incomes of the poor. Community based natural resource management and comanagement of environmental resources gained ascendance. 2000s The current decade has been characterised by flux and fragmentation in development thinking and rural development policy despite the overarching focus of attaining the Millennium Development Goals. Approaches to rural development Commentary Sustainable livelihoods The SL approach recognises the different livelihood sources of the poor, highlights shocks and stresses which impact on these and the enabling factors which enhance them. It does not automatically cast rural people in the role of farmers. “Diversity is the watchword, and livelihoods approaches have challenged fundamentally single-sector approaches to solving complex rural development problems. The appeal is simple: look at the real world, and try and understand things from local perspectives”. (Scoones, 2009) Millennium Development Goals, country ownership and good governance The Millennium Declaration in 2000 set 2015 as the target date for achieving most of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which aim to halve extreme poverty in all its forms. 2000s contd… Approaches to rural development Commentary Decentralisation Linked with the good governance agenda has been the concept of democratic decentralisation. This involves the restructuring of authority so that there is a system of coresponsibility between institutions of governance at the central, regional and local levels according to the principle of subsidiarity (UNDP) . Democratic decentralization is premised on new local institutions being representative and accountable to local populations and having a secure and autonomous domain of powers to make and implement meaningful decisions. Sector wide development approaches The appearance of sector wide approaches is closely linked with recent shifts in donor thinking emphasising the importance of ‘country ownership of donor’ programmes. It also marks a shift from project funding to the development of sectoral policy and strategy. 2000s contd… Approaches to rural development Commentary Social protection The focus on Social Protection (SP) and direct cash transfers is about putting money directly in the pockets of the poor to invest and use at their discretion. This helps people to manage risk and vulnerability and “enables the very poor to share in the benefits of economic growth since many will not be reached by “trickle-down”.” Direct cash transfers are starting to replace traditional food aid and famine relief measures (Peppiatt, Mitchell, & Holzmann, 2001) Poverty eradication Progress in addressing poverty has been slow, resulted in the 24th special session of the General Assembly setting targets to halve the number of people living in extreme poverty by one half by 2015. This target has been endorsed by the Millennium Summit as Millennium Development Goal 1. These goals are receiving international attention as part of the Second United Nations Decade for the Eradication of Poverty (2008-2017), 2000s contd… Approaches to rural development Commentary ICTs for development Reviews of ICT projects in rural areas indicate measurable impacts from ICT projects focusing on price information and market access. (IICD, 2006) However they also caution that technological solutions in isolation are doomed to failure in the same way that mechanisation and large scale infrastructure development schemes are associated with failure in development practice.(Ibid) Climate change During this decade there has been a mounting awareness of the challenges posed by climate change and its impacts poor and vulnerable households. Fair trade The increasing dominance of global supermarket chains over the world food economy has been highlighted as one the main consequences of a globalising agriculture. These initiatives aim to ensure a fair return to the producers. Fairtrade really took off in the late 1980’s with the launch of the first Fairtrade label in Holland marketing coffee from small growers in Mexico. The chronology above highlights the breadth and diversity of elements associated with the rural development agenda. The chronology excludes changing approaches to rural service provision, primary health care, HIV/AIDs and malaria mitigation, education and transport – all key components of rural development initiatives. Theories of Rural Development in India • An analysis of the rural development programmes so far implemented in India reveal that there are at least four sets of theories implicit in them • • • • First on the basis of the coverage of the programme Second on the basis of the content Third on the basis of administrative content Fourth on the basis of spread of effects of development 1.Balanced and unbalanced theories Sectors of economy are interdependent and complementary to each other . Their simultaneous development supports each others development . • Community Development programme (1952) • Total development of material and human resources of rural areas. Covered all aspect of village life including agriculture, health, education, rural industries, transport and communication, social welfare and children Immediate objective was raising agri production Integrated Rural Development Programme The theory of unbalanced, presupposes that resources in an economy are always limited. So for proper and effective utilisation of limited resources, deliberate imbalances are created initially which ultimately lead to balanced development through a process of complementarity. • Grow More Food Compaign(1943) indended to increase food production through development of minor irrigation, land reclamation, etc.. • Intensive Agriculture District Programme (1960) known as Package programme Ford Foundation Expert Team recommendation initial concentration of development in a particular district/area benefits would spread to neighboring area/district Touched only ‘a fringe of the total population’ (Thakurdas committee) 2.Structural and Technological theories Structural Socio-economic system and institutions like caste-structure, custom and practices along with tenurial rights, credits, marketing institutions explain the extent of exploitation. During the first two five year plans, greater emphasis was placed on the structural factor to bring about rural/agricultural development. Greater emphasis was placed on establishing an egalitarian society free from exploitation. From mid-sixties upto the end of seventies, structural theory become less important and emphasis was placed more on technological theories. The most important component of the structural theory were land reforms of the credit and marketing structure. • Adversely affected the interest of richer section • So law framed defectively, executed defectively and interpreted defectively Technological Suitable technology could not be developed to bring about desirable development. • • • • • largely confined to mechanical technology was not very much suitable to Indian situation after mid sixties it was largely biological technology solved the problem of food shortage increased inter-regional and intra-regional variation 3.Centralised and Decentralized theories Centralized Decision making, formulation and administration of programmes are done by central board or organisation. There is very little scope for the people to participate in the decision making process. There is very little assessment of local resources and local needs and aspirations. In Communist countries local level development programmes are formulated and implemented in a centralized way. Decentralized In a democratic society, people’s participation in the decision making process, formulation and implimentaion is encouraged. Proper assessment of local resources and needs is made. Suitable institutions and conventions are built up through which people give vent to their feelings, opinions and participate in decision making process. 4.Percolation and Polarization theories Percolation theory presumes that the benefits of rural development do not remain concentrated in one place. The benefits ‘trickle down’ or percolate to neighbouring areas. This theory may be treated as corollary of the theory of balanced development. Polarisation theory, on the other hand, presumes that the benefits of rural development remain concentrated in the points, where they originate. These growth-points, rather, suck resources from the periphery and accentuate the regional imbalances in economic development. Percolation and polarisation theories of rural development are very much akin to Myrdal’s spread-effect and backwash effects. Thank You