I.
1. THE MAN IS FREE AND THE MAN IS RATIONAL
THE MAN IS FREE IN DEFFERENT ASPECTS, THE MAN IS CONDEMNED TO BE FREE, THE MAN I
FREE IN ORDER TO MAKE HIS OWN CHOICES IN LIFE. BUT IT IS CONDEMENED TO BE FREE,
BECAUSE SOME POEPLE TELL, WE DID NOT CREATE OURSELVES. EVEN THOUGH PEOPLE ARE
PUT ON EARTH WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT WE MUST BE ABLE TO CHOOSE AND ACT IN FREELY
WAY FROM EVERY SITUATION WE ARE IN. EVERYTHING THAT WE DO IS A RESULT OF BEING
FREE BECAUSE WE HAVE OUR OWN CHOICE OF LIVING, THE ALSO CONSIDERED RATIONAL THE
WAY IN HIS ACTIONS AND THAT WAS ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SENSIBLE REASONS. THE MAN
WAS CALLED RATIONAL PERSON BECAUSE HE WAS ABLE TO MAKE DECISIONS BASED ON
INTELLIGENT THINKING RATHER THAN ON EMOTION.
2. ETHICS IS NORMATIVE AND PERSPECTIVE
THE ETHICS INVOLVES SYSTEMATIZING, DEFENDING, AND RECOMMENDING SUCH PARTICULAR
CONCEPTS OF RIGHT AND WRONG IN TERMS OF BEHAVIOR. IT ALONG WITH THE CONCERNS
MATTERS OF VALUE, THE ETHICS CALLED NORMATIVE BECAUSE IT HAS A BRANCH OF MORAL
PHILOSOPHY, OR ETHICS, CONERNING AND IT INCLUDES MORAL RULES THAT HAVE DIRECT
IMPLICATIONS FOR WHAT HUMAN ACTIONS, INSTITUTIONSAND WAYS OF LIFE SHOULD BE LIKE.
THE ETHICS IS PERSPECTIVE AND IT PRESENTS THE INDIVIDUAL USES IN ORDER TO VIEW
CERTAIN PROBLEMS. EACH PERSON HAS SUCH AS PERSPECTIVE WHETHER OR NOT THEY
REALIZE IT, IN TERMS OF ETHICS PERSPECTIVE THERE ARE SEVERAL TYPES AND/OR BRANCHES
SUCH AS, UTILITARIAN, DEONTOLOGICAL, AND VIRTUE ETHICS. IT IS CONSIDERED THE FORM OF
FOUNDATION IN ETHICS CONVERSATION, IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT PUBLIC RELATIONS
PROFESSIONALS ALSO UNDERSTAND HOW TO APPLY THESE CONCEPTS TO THE ACTUAL
PRACTICE OF THE PROBLEM.
3. NOT ALL LEGAL IS ETHICAL
WHEN WE DISCUSS THE ETHICAL FORM IN TERMS OF ETHICS, ANYONE WHO TELLS YOU,
SIMPLY IMPLIES, THAT WHATEVER LEGAL IS, IT ALSO ETHICAL IS MOST LIKELY INDULGING IN
SELF-SERVING OF RATIONALIZATIONS. THE FACT THAT SOMETHING IS LEGAL DOESNT MAKE IT
ETHICAL. FOR EXAMPLE, BREAKING PROMISES IS GENERALLY LEGAL,BUT IT IS THOUGHT OF AS
UNETHICAL, CHEATING TO YOUR PARTNER IS LEGAL BUT UNETHICAL THOUGH THE RULE
AGAINST IT IS PERHAPS MORE HONOURED AND SO ON.
4. WHAT IS ETHICALLY RIGHT AND WRONG IS HIGHLY ARBITARY AND CONTEXUAL.
THE TERM ETHICS ARE THE STANDARD OF WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG AND THEY ARE BASED
ON OUR VALUES. BEING ETHICAL REQUIRES TO MAKING A MORAL JUDGEMENT, AND THAT
NOT ALWAYS EASY, PERHAPS ETHICAL BEHAVIOR TAKES COURAGE AND HAS TO BE PRACTICED,
WE MIGHT DISPLAYED AND SHOW OUR ETHICAL CORE IN MANY WAYS, AND IT USUALLY DONT
TALK ABOUT IT. THE MORALLY OBLIGATORY ACTS ARE MORALLY RIGHTS, ACTS ONES OOUGHT
TO DO, ONE IS MORALLY PROHIBITED FROM NOT DOING THEM THEY ARE MORAL DUTIES, THEY
ARE ACTS THAT ARE REQUIRED.
5. ETHICS DEMAND MORE THAN THE LAW DEMANDS
THE LAW IS MORE THAN SIMPLY CODIFYING ETHICAL NORMS. ETHICAL ALSO CONSIDERED
DECISION MAKING REQUIRES THAT A DECISION MAKER BE WILLING AT LEAST. THE LAW SETS
OUT WHAT PEOPLE ARE FREE TO DO, REGARDLESS OF THE EFFECT THAT THOSE ACTIONS HAVE
ON OTHERS. ETHICS DESCRIBES WHAT PEOPLE SHOULD DO, BEING ABLE TO TAKING THEIR
RESPONSIBILITIES AND THE PREDICTABLE CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH ACTIONS INTO CERTAIN
CASES.
6. THE SOCRATIC METHOD
IT IS A METHOD IN WHICH A DEBATE. THE SOCRATIC METHOD WAS DERIVED OF SUCH A
DIALOGUE IN ORDER TO PRESENTS, TELLS AND ASK A PARTICULAR CONTRADICTIONS. THE
SOCRATIC METHOD INVOLVES A SHARED OF DIALOGUE BETWEEN PARTICULAR PERSON. THE
CONSIDERED PERSONS LEADS BY POSING, THOUGHT PROVOKING QUESTIONS. IT ACTIVELY
ENGAGE BY ASKING QUESTIONS OF THEIR OWN. THE MAIN GOAL OF IT WAS, TO SOLIDIFY
THEIR KNOWEDGE OF THE CASE BY THINKING CRITICALLY UNDER PRESSURE. IT ALSO HELPS
THEM THE ART OF SPEAKING IN FRONT OF LARGE GROUPS IN YOUR SURROUNDINGS.
II.
IN THIS CASE, WE WERE ABLE TO PRESENT A PHYSICAL OBJECTS AND ETHICS THAT USES IN THIS
CERTAIN CONTEXT. THERE ARE SUCH DIALOGUE TO CONSIDERED THERE ARE SELECTED PERSON
INVOLVING IN THIS SCENARIO WHICH REPRESENTS THE PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES IN TERMS OF
ETHICAL MATTERS. IT ALSO SHOWN THE CERTAIN BEHAVIOR OF A ONE PERSON THAT
OBVIOUSLY VIOLATING MORAL ETHICS.