________________________
Learning Area: _________________________
Grade Level:
Name of Writer:
Quarter _ _______________
________________________________
Instruction: Evaluate the WW and PT carefully and for each evaluation criterion consider the extent to which the material meets the criteria.
Rate only the applicable learning area and criterion, write X if not applicable.
Very
Satisfactory
3
I. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
General
Requirement
Nature of Authentic
Assessment
1. Composed of 1 WW and PT with appropriate rubrics per week.
Focus
4. The focus is on MELC and Performance Standards
Language
5. Used everyday language of the learner.
Satisfactory
2
2. Developed with reference to the MELC.
3. Developed with reference to the SLM/LM/LeaP
6. Used appropriate language and vocabulary.
7. The length of the sentences and paragraphs are age- appropriate.
8. Language used : (Put rate only to the applicable Learning
Area):
Kinder to Grade 10
8.1. Filipino, EsP – Filipino
8.2. English, Science and Math – English
8.3. MAPEH , EPP-TLE
8. 3.1. Grades 4 to 5 – Filipino
8. 3.2. Grades 6 to 10 – English
8. 4. Araling Panlipunan
8.4.1 Grades 1 to 10 – Filipino
9. Illustrations adhere to the Social Content Guidelines.
Illustrations (Put rate
only to the applicable
10. Filipino characters (if applicable) are the subject of illustrations.
learning area, write X if
not applicable)
11. People, animals, places, and objects are appropriate to the
age, grade level and context of the learners.
12. Illustrations clarify and/or enhance concepts.
13. Illustrations and visuals are gender and culture sensitive.
Style Guide
15. Follows the technical specification
15.1. Use A4-sized layout with 1in x 1in x 1in x 1in (2.54cm x 2.54cm x
2.54cm x 2.54cm) margin.
15.2. Use Century Gothic as the general font style. Sizes vary
depending on the parts.
15.3 3. All documents should follow the single-spacing format.
Total Points/No. of Indicators
Average Score
*Get the average score. 1.0 – 1.75 -Needs major revision – 1.76- 2.25 – Needs minor revision – 2.26 – 3.0 Approved
Poor
1
Suggestions /Recommendations:
Name of Evaluator:___________________________
Signature Over Printed Name
Date: ____________________