Верстов Дмитрий и Хромов Иван legal memorandum Судебная записка heading заголовок assignment назначение statement of facts изложение фактов pertinent уместный analysis анализ citations цитаты recommendation рекомендация Come on, guys, the memo came down from our beloved Deputy of Operations. He spread a sheet of paper on the table and wrote a heading. But the moonlight has already received a new assignment. What I want is a disinterested statement of facts for the mind to work on, and that's what I seem to find in the book I've drawn. Although I'm not sure this article is pertinent at the moment. I was expecting an idea from you, not a political analysis. To that I can also reply with a citation from your own writings. You're gonna need my recommendation. Unit 3 Unit 7 liability ответственность «reasonable person» standard duty of care Стандарт «разумного человека» обязанность соблюдать осторожность, груз ответственности предусмотрительность prudence We think we've dealt with all the liability issues. He fits the "reasonable person" standard . I have a duty of care. I must remind you that it is not your own prudence or judgment that has actual cause фактическая причина harm вред, ущерб proximate cause непосредственная причина компенсация, возмещение compensation duty breach of duty обязанность, долг, обязательство нарушение служебных обязанностей enabled you to keep your place in the trade. I read recently it is considered now to be a myth, although the actual cause is still unknown. However, I don't think there was any harm done. He's manufacturing proximate cause. He did not know why he should think of it as compensation, but he did and it was comforting. It was the call to duty, and reality. It's breach of duty at best.