Верстов Дмитрий и Хромов Иван
legal memorandum
Судебная записка
heading
заголовок
assignment
назначение
statement of facts
изложение фактов
pertinent
уместный
analysis
анализ
citations
цитаты
recommendation
рекомендация
Come on, guys, the
memo came down from
our beloved Deputy of
Operations.
He spread a sheet of
paper on the table and
wrote a heading.
But the moonlight has
already received a new
assignment.
What I want is a
disinterested statement of
facts for the mind to
work on, and that's what I
seem to find in the book
I've drawn.
Although I'm not sure
this article is pertinent at
the moment.
I was expecting an idea
from you, not a political
analysis.
To that I can also reply
with a citation from your
own writings.
You're gonna need my
recommendation.
Unit 3
Unit 7
liability
ответственность
«reasonable person»
standard
duty of care
Стандарт «разумного
человека»
обязанность соблюдать
осторожность, груз
ответственности
предусмотрительность
prudence
We think we've dealt
with all the liability
issues.
He fits the "reasonable
person" standard .
I have a duty of care.
I must remind you that it
is not your own prudence
or judgment that has
actual cause
фактическая причина
harm
вред, ущерб
proximate cause
непосредственная
причина
компенсация,
возмещение
compensation
duty
breach of duty
обязанность, долг,
обязательство
нарушение служебных
обязанностей
enabled you to keep your
place in the trade.
I read recently it is
considered now to be a
myth, although the actual
cause is still unknown.
However, I don't think
there was any harm done.
He's manufacturing
proximate cause.
He did not know why he
should think of it as
compensation, but he did
and it was comforting.
It was the call to duty,
and reality.
It's breach of duty at best.