Analytic Rubric
Excellent (4)
Presents
Content
Managment information on
the topic
agenda with full
understanding.
Descriptors
Quality of
the
Information
Use of
Resources
and format
Use of
Grammar
and
Mechanics
Points
Criteria
The topic and
artist are clearly
mentioned. It
provides more
than 5
supporting
details and
examples.
Makes an online
slide
presentation (57 slides)
accurately in the
desired slide
format.
No
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation
errors.
Good (3)
Fair (2)
Poor (1)
Presents
information on
the topic
agenda with
good
understanding.
The topic and
artist are clearly
mentioned. It
provides 3 to 5
supporting
details and
examples.
Presents
information on
the topic
agenda with a
fair
understanding.
The topic and
artist are clearly
mentioned. No
supporting
details or
examples are
given.
Presents
information
on the topic
agenda with
limitations.
Makes an online
slide
presentation
(less than 5
slides)
accurately in the
desired slide
format.
Almost no
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation
errors.
Makes an online
slide
presentation
(less than 5
slides) but many
are not in the
desired slide
format.
A few
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation
errors.
Makes an
online slide
presentation
(less than 5
slides) but
they are not
in the desired
slide format.
Many
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation
errors.
The
information
about the
artist has little
or nothing to
do with the
topic.
Grade