Uploaded by Irsyam Icam

law-answer-technique

advertisement
lOMoARcPSD|7083277
Law answer technique
Business Law (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
StuDocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Muhammad Akmal Hairi Mahdzir (akmalhairi2001@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|7083277
HOW TO ANSWER PROBLEMATIC QUESTIONS
I – Issues
L – Law
A – Application
C – Conclusion
First identify the legal issues. These should be stated briefly in one sentence. There is no
need to enlarge on the issues, as this will be done in the application section.
Secondly, take each issue in turn and set out the relevant law relating to that issue. All
relevant cases and statutory provisions should be mentioned. It is not necessary to give the
facts of every case. The most important thing to set out is the legal principle decided in that
case.
Next, the law should be applied to the facts of the problem question. This may be done
immediately after you have set out the relevant law on each issue, or you may wait until you
have set out the law on all the issues, as has been done below. There is no need to repeat
the legal principles set out in the relevant law section.
Finally, state your conclusions. Again, there is no need to repeat what you have already set
out in the previous sections. The conclusion should be brief. If there is more than one
possible conclusion, set them all out.
1
Downloaded by Muhammad Akmal Hairi Mahdzir (akmalhairi2001@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|7083277
SAMPLE QUESTION:
Mastura had a window shopping in an antique shop. She was then attracted to a vase at the
price of RM150. She wished to buy the vase and brought it to the cashier for payment.
Unfortunately, by the time she was about to pay, she found out that her wallet
was not in her handbag. Mastura tried to cancel her purchase but the cashier alleged
that Mastura was already bound to the contract with them and was therefore
liable to pay for it.
Advise Mastura.
SAMPLE ANSWER:
ISSUE :


Permasalahan yg timbul dalam soalan. Atau juga isu apa yg
daripada permasalahan Mastura
Setiap issue mesti dimulakan dengan perkataan “WHETHER”.
kita
nak
tau
Contoh issue dalam kes Mastura (mempunyai 2 pilihan untuk menulis issue):
1. Whether display of goods in self service shop is considered as ITT or offer?
2. Whether there is an offer in this case?
LAW:



Law adalah penerangan topik yang timbul dari issue.
Dalam law, jangan masukkan nama Mastura dan jangan sesekali memberi komen
tentang Mastura.
Law ini adalah semua yang ada dalam buku yang relevan dengan tajuk perlu ditulis,
termasuk kes dan seksyen.
Contoh Law dalam kes Mastura
Offer is one of the elements of contract. Offer generally means an agreement made by
offeror to the offeree with intention to create a legal relation. Sect 2(a) of Contract Act 1950
(CA 1950) define offer as ……..
 Intro - definition of offer in general and under CA 1950
Invitation to treat (ITT) is differ with offer. ITT means preliminary communication
that may lead to an offer. It is made before the offer take place. ITT is not an offer and it is
just an invitation to make an offer. It such of an attraction to induce public to make an offer
and thus enter a contract with him and by then legal relationship will exist.
2
Downloaded by Muhammad Akmal Hairi Mahdzir (akmalhairi2001@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|7083277
 Intro –definition of ITT
ITT is not an offer. The difference is at the situation when the actual offer take place. In
actual offer, the offer is take place when someone communicate his willingness to do
something or to perform something with the intention that the offeree will accept his offer.
The offer will happen once the offeree has knowledge that the offeror is making the offer. In
ITT, the offer take place as to respond the ITT. It commence when the advertiser make an
invitation to public by inviting public to make an offer to him. Once public see the
advertisement, he may make an offer and here the offer happen. The advertiser then may
respond the offer by making an acceptance.
 Differences between ITT and offer – concept of ITT.
There 5 examples of ITT namely advertisement, display of goods in self-service shop,
quotation, tender and auction. Advertisement means invitation to attract people’s
interest to make an offer. Advertisement can be made either in radio, newspaper, television,
internet and so forth. ITT is happen when the advertiser make an advertisement in
the newspaper. Anyone who reads, saw and notice the advertisement may make an offer
and the advertiser may respond by making an acceptance of that offer.
 Example of ITT – advertisement (definition & concept of ITT
Second example of ITT is quotation. Quotation means early information which gives
opportunity to the buyer to choose the best price according to the list. ITT is happen when
the seller create the list of prices. Anyone who reads, saw and notice the list has opportunity
to select the most suitable price. By selecting the suitable list, he is said to make an offer.
The seller then may respond the customer by making an acceptance of that offer.
 Example of ITT – quotation (definition & concept of ITT)
Tender is also a kind of ITT. The situation of ITT is happen when the government advertises
the tender. If the contractors respond the notice, he is said to make an offer. The
government is said to make an acceptance by choosing the best contractor.
 Example of ITT – tender (definition & concept of ITT)
The other example of ITT is auction. The situation of ITT is happen when the auctioneer
requests bids and inviting the assembly of bidders to make an offer. The bidders who bid the
price is considered as making an offer and the auctioneer is said to make an acceptance by
choosing the best bidder and knock down hammer as a sign of acceptance.
 Example of ITT – auction (definition & concept of ITT)
The last example of ITT is display of goods in self-service shop. The goods must have the
price tags. The act of seller by putting the goods in self-service shop is considered as ITT.
When the customer picks up the goods and brings the goods to the counter and makes
payment, he is said to make an offer. Once the cashier/seller accepts the
payment, the acceptance is considered happen. There are 2 authorities from case telling
about this principle. The first case is Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain vs Boots
Cash Chemist Ltd. In this case, the court held that display of goods was only an ITT. An offer
is made when the customer placed the articles into the basket and bring them to
the counter for payment.
3
Downloaded by Muhammad Akmal Hairi Mahdzir (akmalhairi2001@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|7083277
Acceptance would only be made by the customer. So long as the cashier did not accept the
payment, there is no contract yet. The second case was decided in the case of Fisher vs
Bell. In this case, the court held that display of several kinds of flick knives in a glassshop
window is not an offer but only an invitation to the customers to make an offer to buy.
Whether the offer is to be accepted or not, it depends on the discretion of the shop owner.
APPLICATION :









Application adalah cadangan untuk menyelesaikan masalah Mastura. Ini bermakna,
application adalah solution. Kita perlu beritahu mastura apa yang dia perlu buat.
Secara tak langsung, ianya menjawab ISSUE yang dah tanya atas tadi. Contohnya,
dalam kes Mastura ni, kita akan beritahu Mastura sama ada dah ada kontrak ke
belum dalam kes dia ni, dah ada offer tak, ke cuma baru ada ITT je, mestikah
Mastura membayar harga barang tersebut, boleh ke Mastura saman kedai tu. Kita
akan beritahu jawapannya, dengan merujuk kepada penghujahan dalam LAW yang
kita dah tulis diatas tadi.
Dalam pada kita memberi solution kepada Mastura, kita tak bolehlah bagitau begitu
sahaja. Kita kan belajar law (kena act macam lawyer). Kita kena support jawapan
kita tadi dengan authority, iaitu kes dan seksyen yang support statement kita tadi.
Kes dan seksyen yang dirujuk, mesti lah yang kita dah cerita detail pada LAW tadi.
Contohnya kes Mastura ni pasal display of goods, jadiknya, kita kenalah tulis
kes atau seksyen yang berkenaan dengan tajuk display yang kita dah cerita
panjang lebar dalam LAW tadi.
Untuk seksyen, takde masalah, tulis macam biasa, seksyen berapa dan
akta apa.
Untuk kes, kita hanya dihendaki tulis nama kes dan penghakiman (court
held) dia sahaja. Faktanya tak payah tulis sebab, fakta nya kita dah cerita panjang
lebar dalam LAW tadi.
Lepas kita tulis seksyen dan kes, kita apply lah kisah Mastura tadi dalam
penghakiman kes tadi. Lihat ‘contoh application dalam kes Mastura’.
Dalam erti kata lain, kita kena sama kan apa yang hakim cakap dalam kes yang
kita tulis dalam LAW tu dengan peristiwa Mastura ni. Kita bagitau Mastura
apa nak buat dengan merujuk kepada kes dan seksyen dalam LAW tadi.
Jadi secara ringkasnya, application mesti ada 2 benda, iaitu solution
kepada Mastura dan authority.
Application dalam kes Mastura
As we refer to the case of Mastura, we may say that there was no contract yet between the
seller and her. Mastura also neither bound to enter into the contract nor pay for the goods.
It is because there was no offer in her situation. The only matter that happen is only
invitation of treat done by the seller.
4
Downloaded by Muhammad Akmal Hairi Mahdzir (akmalhairi2001@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|7083277
We can apply the decision of court in the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain vs
Boots Cash Chemist Ltd whereby the court held that display of goods is only ITT and not an
offer. The offer is only happen when the customer picks the goods, bring to the counter and
making the payment. Once the seller accept the payment, he is said to make
an acceptance.
The court also decided the same judgment in second case, namely in the case of Fisher vs
Bell by uphold the principle that display of flick knives in glass window is only ITT. By these
two authority, again, we may say that there was no contract between Mastura and the seller.
CONCLUSION :

Beri conclusion pasal kisah si Mastura
contoh conclusion dalam kes Mastura
As to conclude this case, we can say that Mastura need not to pay the price of the goods
since the contract is yet to happen. The only matter that happen is only invitation of
treat done by the seller. Mastura also neither bound to enter into the contract nor pay
for the goods. It is because there was no offer in her situation.
5
Downloaded by Muhammad Akmal Hairi Mahdzir (akmalhairi2001@gmail.com)
Download