School of Electrical Electronics and Computer Engineering
Department of Computer Engineering
EEA106L
(Numerical Methods and Analysis Laboratory)
Laboratory Report Rubric
NAME OF STUDENT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
BONUSTRO, LOUIE DOMINE M.
MAY 01, 2021
EXPERIMENT TITLE
EVALUATOR:
ROOTS OF NON – LINEAR FUNCTION: POLYNOMIAL FUNCTION
PROF. NOEL SALALILA
Poor
(1)
Fair
(2)
Good
(3)
Very Good
(4)
Excellent
(5)
The laboratory report
is untidy, did not follow
the given format,
some parts are
missing, most
questions are not
answered.
The laboratory report
is untidy, followed the
given format, some
parts are missing,
most questions are not
answered.
The laboratory report
is neat, followed the
given format, some
parts are missing,
mostly questions are
not answered.
The laboratory report
is neat, followed the
given format, no
missing parts, and
only a few questions
are not answered.
The laboratory report
is very neat, well
presented, followed
the given format,
organized, and the
required content is
complete.
The result, gathered
data, and answers to
questions were all
incorrect. If data
sheets are required in
the experiment, they
are not used.
The result is correct,
however, gathered
data, and answers to
questions were all
incorrect. If data
sheets are required in
the experiment, data
sheets are used but
wrong data are used
in the computation or
tabulated.
The result and
gathered data were
correct, however,
answers to questions
were all incorrect. If
data sheets are
required in the
experiment, data
sheets are consulted
but some of the data
used are wrong.
The result and
gathered data were all
correct, and most of
the answers to
questions are all
correct. If data sheets
are required in the
experiment, data
sheets are consulted
but with few wrong
data used in the
computation or
tabulation.
The result, gathered
data, and answers to
questions are all
correct. If data sheets
are required in the
experiment, data
sheets are fully
consulted and correct
data are used in the
tabulation or
computation.
C. Interpretation of
data and
discussion
The interpretation of
data and discussion
were not based on the
result and data
gathered during the
experiment.
The interpretation of
data and discussion
were based on the
result and data
gathered during the
experiment, but does
not present clarity.
The interpretation of
data and discussion
were based on the
result and data
gathered during the
experiment, and
somehow presents
clarity.
The interpretation of
data and discussion
were based on the
result and data
gathered during the
experiment, and
mostly presents clarity.
The interpretation of
data and discussion
were based on the
result and data
gathered during the
experiment and are
presented very clearly.
D. Conclusion
The conclusion was
not based on the
objectives and all
ideas are not coherent
or clear.
The conclusion was
based on the
objectives but not all
of the ideas are
coherent nor clear.
The conclusion was
based on the
objectives and few of
the ideas are coherent
but not too clear.
The conclusion was
based on the
objectives and most of
the ideas are coherent
and clear.
The conclusion was
based on the
objectives and all of
the ideas are coherent
and presented very
clearly.
E. Use of Language
The words used were
not appropriate, had
poor grammar, had
bad sentence
construction and ideas
were not clearly
expressed.
The words used were
somehow appropriate,
had good grammar,
had good sentence
construction and not
all ideas were clearly
expressed.
The words used were
appropriate, had good
grammar, had good
sentence construction
and few of the ideas
were clearly
expressed.
The words used were
appropriate, had very
good grammar, had
very good sentence
construction and
almost all of the ideas
were clearly
expressed.
The words used were
appropriate, had
excellent grammar,
had excellent
sentence construction
and all of the ideas
were clearly
expressed.
F. Promptness
The laboratory report
was submitted two or
more weeks late.
The laboratory report
was submitted one
week late.
The laboratory report
was submitted three to
six days late
The laboratory report
was submitted one to
two days late.
The laboratory report
was submitted on
time.
Criteria
A. Completeness
and organization
of the Experiment
Laboratory
Report
B. Correctness of
the gathered data
and answers to
questions.
Score
Final Data Sheet
Preliminary Data Sheet
Activity 4 Roots of Non-Linear Functions: Polynomial Functions
Name: Bonustro, Louie Domine M.
Date: May 01, 2021
Crs/Sec: EEA106L/B6
Terminal no:
Given functions:
a. Polynomial Function 1: f(𝑥) = 9.34 − 21.97𝑥 + 16.3𝑥 2 -3.704𝑥 3
b. Polynomial Function 2: 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑥 3 − 0.5𝑥 2 + 4𝑥 − 2
Terminating Condition A: Er = Es < 0.00045%
Terminating Condition B: Er = Es < 0.00045%