Uploaded by karli.sanders

Stem Cell Article

advertisement
Stem Cells
Updated: Sept. 16, 2012
Stem cells are how we all begin: undifferentiated cells that go on to develop into any of
the more than 200 types of cells the adult human body holds. Few quarrel with predictions of the
awesome potential that stem cell research holds. One day, scientists say, stem cells may be used
to replace or repair damaged cells, and have the potential to drastically change the treatment of
conditions like cancer, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease and even paralysis.
But the divisions over how to conduct that research have been deep and bitter, and have
most recently played out in the courts. Most research has been conducted on embryonic stem cell
lines — cultures of cells derived from four- or five-day-old embryos, or fertilized cells.
Opponents of embryonic stem cell research, which often uses embryos discarded by fertility
clinics, want it to be severely restricted or banned outright as inhumane.
The most important legislation relating to stem cell research is known as the DickeyWicker amendment, which first became law in 1996, and has been renewed by Congress every
year since. It specifically bans the use of tax dollars to create human embryos — a practice that
is routine in private fertility clinics — or for research in which embryos are destroyed, discarded
or knowingly subjected to risk of injury. For a time, the ban stood in the way of taxpayerfinanced embryonic stem cell research, because embryos are destroyed when stem cells are
extracted from them. But in August 2001, in a careful compromise, President George W. Bush
opened the door a tiny crack, by ordering that tax dollars could be used for studies on a small
number of lines, or colonies, of stem cells already extracted from embryos — so long as federal
researchers did not do the extraction themselves.
Congress continued to be inundated with calls from people suffering from diseases for
which stem cells research might be the only hope, and from equally vehement opponents. In
2006, the Republican-controlled Congress passed a bill to expand research. In response, Mr.
Bush issued the first veto of his presidency. In 2007, Congress, now in Democratic hands, passed
a similar bill by a larger margin, but still not by enough to override Mr. Bush’s veto. In March
2009, President Obama issued an executive order rescinding the limits set by Mr. Bush and
making clear that the government supported stem-cell research.
In August 2010, Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of Federal District Court blocked Mr.
Obama’s executive order, saying it violated a ban on federal money being used to destroy
embryos. In May 2011, a federal appeals panel voted 2 to 1 to overturn Judge Lambert’s ruling.
The appeals court said that because the law is written in the present tense, “it does not extend to
past actions,” meaning that research on existing lines of stem cells could continue. The ruling,
however is just the latest in what is bound to be a lengthy legal battle.
Follow-Up Questions:
1. What are stem cells?
2. Why is it important for scientists to study stem cells?
3. Why are stem cells so controversial?
4. The above article mentions the Dickey-Wicker Amendment that regulates stem cell
research. Go to this link (https://www.researchamerica.org/advocacy-action/issuesresearchamerica-advocates/stem-cell-research/timeline-major-events-stemcell#:~:text=The%20guidelines%20stipulate%20that%3A,the%20donor's%20clinical%20
need%3B%20and) and type down the guidelines set by the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) for stem cell research. (Hint: This is found under the “2000” section of the link.)
5. Based on what you have read, what do you think? What is your opinion about stem cell
research?
BONUS – What have been some of the latest updates (past 5 years) regarding what is allowed
in stem cell/fetal tissue research? Include your source(s)!
Download