Sample Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition (CAME) according to
advertisement
Sample Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition (CAME) according to Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part-M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and EC No.1056/2008 and ED Decisions No. 2003/19/RM of 28/11/2003 No. 2008/013/R of 12/12/2008 No. 2009/006/R of 24/03/2009 Issue 1 / Revision A DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Date: 28.10.2009 28.10.2009 Page 1 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Introduction Diese Sample CAME ist in englischer Sprache verfasst, um die Verbindung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2042/2003 DER KOMMISSION vom 20. November 2003 und den nur in englischer Sprache verfügbaren AMC Material herzustellen. Das AMC Material ist in Bezug auf den Umfang wesentlich bedeutender als das Gesetz. Die Erstellung einer CAME in deutscher Sprache ist dann zweckmäßig, wenn der Großteil der Kunden aus österreichischem Hoheitsgebiet bzw. deutschsprachigem Raum zu erwarten sind. Diese CAME ist als Beispiel für so genannte freie CAMOs erstellt worden. Das sind für die Führung der Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit anerkannte Unternehmen mit dem Recht zur Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit von Luftfahrzeugen in der nicht gewerbsmäßigen Beförderung, bzw. Ballone im Betrieb der gewerblichen Beförderung (Luftbeförderungsunternehmen). Das heißt also nicht verwendbar in Zusammenhang mit einem AOC. Ledigliches Kopieren der Inhalte dient nicht der Erstellung einer CAME, da die Inhalte sehr breit beschrieben sind. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 2 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn CAME – Cover sheet Company name Address Telephone number Fax number E-mail address Approval number Issue/Revision number of the exposition Issue date of the exposition DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 3 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Table of contents Introduction...............................................................................................................................2 Table of contents......................................................................................................................4 List of effective pages...............................................................................................................7 Revision list ..............................................................................................................................8 Distribution list ..........................................................................................................................9 Abbreviation list ......................................................................................................................10 Part 0 General organisation ...................................................................................................19 0.1 Corporate commitment by the accountable manager....................................................19 0.2 General Information.......................................................................................................20 a) Brief description of the organisation .............................................................................20 b) Scope ...........................................................................................................................20 c) Relationship with other organisations ...........................................................................21 d) Aircraft managed ..........................................................................................................22 e) Type of business ..........................................................................................................22 0.3 Management personnel.................................................................................................23 a) Accountable manager...................................................................................................23 b) Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness PCA (person responsible for continuing airworthiness) ..................................................................................................23 c) Continuing airworthiness coordination..........................................................................25 d) PCA Deputy..................................................................................................................25 e) Quality manager ...........................................................................................................25 0.4 Management organisation chart ....................................................................................27 a) General organisation chart ...........................................................................................27 b) Personal data ...............................................................................................................28 c) Manpower resources and training policy ......................................................................30 0.5 Notification procedure to the competent authority regarding changes to the organisation's activities / approval / location / personnel ..................................................32 a) General.........................................................................................................................32 b) Procedure .....................................................................................................................32 0.6 Exposition amendment procedure.................................................................................34 a) General.........................................................................................................................34 b) Procedure .....................................................................................................................34 Part 1 Continuing airworthiness management procedures ....................................................36 1.1 Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system utilisation ............................................36 a) Bordbuch and/or continuing airworthiness record system ............................................36 b) M.E.L. application .........................................................................................................37 1.2 Owner/Operator aircraft maintenance programmes - development & amendment .......38 a) General.........................................................................................................................38 b) Generic/Baseline Maintenance Programme .................................................................38 c) Content of the AMP ......................................................................................................39 d) Development ................................................................................................................39 1.3 Time and continuing airworthiness records, responsibilities, retention, access ............41 a) Hours and cycles recording ..........................................................................................41 b) Records ........................................................................................................................41 c) Preservation of records.................................................................................................44 d) Transfer of continuing airworthiness records................................................................44 1.4 Accomplishment and control of Airworthiness Directives ..............................................45 a) Airworthiness directive information...............................................................................45 b) Airworthiness directive decision ...................................................................................45 DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 4 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn c) Airworthiness directive control ......................................................................................45 1.5 Analysis of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme ..........................47 1.6 Non-mandatory modification embodiment policy...........................................................48 a) General.........................................................................................................................48 b) Service Bulletins ...........................................................................................................48 c) Modifications.................................................................................................................48 d) Minor Modifications.......................................................................................................48 e) Recording of Modifications ...........................................................................................48 1.7 Major modification / repair standards ............................................................................49 a) General.........................................................................................................................49 b) Development and approval of major modification and major repairs ...........................49 1.8 Defect reports ................................................................................................................50 a) Analysis ........................................................................................................................50 b) Liaison with manufacturers and regulatory authorities .................................................51 c) Deferred defect policy...................................................................................................51 d) Non Deferrable Defects policy......................................................................................51 e) Repetitive Defects ........................................................................................................51 f) Mandatory Occurrence Reporting .................................................................................51 g) Occurrence Review Meetings.......................................................................................51 1.9 Engineering activity .......................................................................................................53 1.10 Reliability programmes ................................................................................................53 1.11 Pre-flight inspections ...................................................................................................54 1.12 Aircraft weighing ..........................................................................................................54 1.13 Check flight procedures...............................................................................................55 a) General.........................................................................................................................55 b) Procedures and standards ...........................................................................................55 Part 2 Quality system .............................................................................................................56 2.1 Continuing airworthiness quality policy, plan and audits procedure ..............................56 a) Continuing airworthiness quality policy.........................................................................56 b) Quality plan...................................................................................................................57 c) Quality audit procedure.................................................................................................57 d) Quality audit remedial action procedure .......................................................................58 2.2 Monitoring of continuing airworthiness management activities .....................................59 2.3 Monitoring of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme(s)...................59 2.4 Monitoring that all maintenance is carried out by an appropriate maintenance organisation ......................................................................................................................59 2.5 Monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the contract, including sub-contractors used by the maintenance contractor.........................59 2.6 Quality audit personnel..................................................................................................60 Part 3 Contracted Maintenance..............................................................................................61 3.1 Maintenance contractor selection procedure.................................................................61 3.2 Quality audit of aircraft...................................................................................................61 Part 4 Airworthiness Review Procedures ...............................................................................63 4.1 Airworthiness review staff..............................................................................................65 4.1.1 Experience, qualification, training and procedure ....................................................65 4.1.2 Authorisations ..........................................................................................................67 4.1.3 Records ...................................................................................................................68 4.2 Review of aircraft records..............................................................................................69 4.3 Physical survey..............................................................................................................69 4.3.1 Physical survey on the aircraft.................................................................................70 4.4 Additional procedures for recommendations to competent authorities for the import of aircraft...............................................................................................................................72 a) Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU ...............................................................72 DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 5 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn b) Airworthiness review of used aircraft imported into the EU ..........................................72 c) New aircraft from EU or imported from a third country .................................................75 4.5 Recommendations to competent authorities for the issuance of airworthiness review certificates.........................................................................................................................76 4.5.1 Findings ...................................................................................................................77 4.6 Issuance of airworthiness review certificates ................................................................78 4.6.1 Invalidity of the airworthiness review certificate.......................................................79 4.7 Airworthiness review records, responsibilities, retention and access............................79 Part 5 Appendices ..................................................................................................................80 5.1 Sample documents........................................................................................................80 a) Bordbuch ......................................................................................................................80 b) Accident / Incident Report ............................................................................................80 c) Quality plan...................................................................................................................80 d) Extension form..............................................................................................................80 e) CAME Recognition Certificate ......................................................................................80 f) Document review checklist (example) ...........................................................................81 g) Physical review checklist ..............................................................................................84 h) Recommendation form for issuance of airworthiness review certificates .....................87 i) Annual Review Checklist OMP –Small AC ....................................................................87 5.2 List of airworthiness review staff....................................................................................90 5.2.1 Airworthiness review staff authorisation .....................................................................90 5.3 List of approved maintenance organisations contracted ...............................................91 5.4 List of contracts with owners/operators and their aircraft ..............................................91 5.5 Holders of AMP’s...........................................................................................................91 5.6 List of sub-contractors ...................................................................................................91 5.7 Copy of contracts with approved maintenance organisations .......................................91 5.8 Copy of contracts for sub-contracted work ....................................................................91 5.9 Copy of contracts for the provision of maintenance data by the owner or operator ......91 DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 6 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn List of effective pages Page Revision Introduction Date Part 0 General organisation Part 1 Continuing airworthiness management procedures Part 2 Quality system Part 3 Contracted Maintenance Part 4 Airworthiness review procedures Part 5 Appendices Approved by Austro Control GmbH ………………………… File number …………………………………… Signature and Stamp DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 ………………………… Date 28.10.2009 Page 7 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Revision list1 Issue and Revision Revision number 1A 1 Date 28.10.2009 Revision incorporated Brief description Date Name/Signature administrative corrections; incorporation of M.A.901(e), M.A.902(a), (b) & M.A.904(a) Revision of Part 4 This section includes all revisions of this manual by date of revision and the effectiveness of the revision/approval by Austro Control GmbH. Each revision has to be entered and noted on the revision list by the holder of the CAME, showing the date of revision and the signature. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 8 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Distribution list This Continued Airworthiness Management Exposition and any subsequent revision are distributed according to part 0.5 to the following recipients. Copy number 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Receiver Publication form2 Austro Control GmbH Accountable Manager Quality Manager Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness Each holder of a CAME is personally responsible for the insertion of all revisions. All responsible persons shall have a thorough knowledge with the organisation’s CAME. A CAME Recognition Certificate (5.1 e) shall signed by these persons as confirmation that they have received the document. All persons concerned by the CAME have to have access. 2 The CAMO may use paper form or electronic data processing or a combination of both methods for publication of the CAME. However the CAME should be made available in a form acceptable to the recipients. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 9 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Abbreviation list A/C ACG AD AFM AM AMC AMP AOC APU ARC ARS AWOPS BMVIT CAME CAMO CAT CDL CG CoA CRS CVR DFDR DO DOA EASA ELA 1 aircraft ELT ETOPS EU EU OPS 1 FAA HIL IFR JAR OPS 3 JAR 26 DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Aircraft Austro Control GmbH (Competent Authority) Airworthiness Directive Aircraft Flight Manual Accountable Manager Acceptable Means of Compliance Owner/Operator Aircraft Maintenance Program Air Operator Certificate Auxiliary Power Unit Airworthiness Review Certificate Airworthiness Review Staff All Weather Operations Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation Commercial Air Transport Configuration Deviation List Centre of Gravity Certificate of Airworthiness Certificate of Release to Service Cockpit Voice Recorder Digital Flight Data Recorder Design Organisation Design Organisation Approval European Aviation Safety Agency (Agency) European Light Aircraft Emergency Locator Transmitter Extended Twin-Engine Operations European Union European Union “Commercial Air Transportation Aeroplanes” (Annex III (EEC) No. 3922/91 idgF) Federal Aviation Administration Hold Item List Instrument Flight Rules Joint Aviation Requirement “Commercial Air Transportation Helicopter” Joint Aviation Requirement “Additional Airworthiness Requirements for Operations” 28.10.2009 Page 10 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn LBA LLP LROPS LTA LTH LTZ M.E.L. MM MNPS MSG MO MOM NAA ODAR OMP Part 21 Part-M PCA PFC PIC QM RNAV RVSM SB SIL SRM STC STCH TC TCDS TCH ZLLV DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Luftfahrt- Bundesamt Life limited Parts Long Range Operations Lufttüchtigkeitsanweisung Lufttüchtigkeitshinweis Lufttüchtigkeitszeugnis Minimum Equipment List Maintenance Manual Minimum Navigation Performance Standard Maintenance Steering Group Maintenance Organisation Maintenance Organisation Manual National Aviation Authority Organizational Designated Airworthiness Representatives Operations Manual Annex zur Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1702/2003 Annex I zur Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042/2003 Nominated Post Holder for Continuing Airworthiness (Person responsible for Continuing Airworthiness) Pre Flight Check Pilot In Command Quality Manager Area Navigation Reduced Vertical Separation Minima Service Bulletin Service Information Letter Structure Repair Manual Supplemental Type Certificate Supplemental Type Certificate Holder Type Certificate Type Certificate Data Sheet Type Certificate Holder Zivilluftfahrzeug- und Luftfahrtgerät-Verordnung 28.10.2009 Page 11 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Compliance list EC No. 2042 M.A. ED Decision AMC 301(1) 301 -1- 301(2) 301 -2- 301(3) 301 -3- 301(4) 301 -4- 301(5) 301 -5- 301(6) − 301(7) 301 -7- 301(8) − 302(a) 302 302(b) − 302(c), i,ii 302 (c.1) bis (c.7) 302(d), i, ii 302(d) 302(e) − 302(f) 302(g) 303 304 − 304 305(a) bis (d) 305(d) 305(e) − 305(f) − 305(g) − Content Continuing airworthiness task Pre-flight inspections Continuing airworthiness task Defect rectification of defects to an officially recognised standard (MEL, CDL) Continuing airworthiness task Accomplishment of all maintenance in accordance with the approved AMP Continuing airworthiness task Analysis of the effectiveness of the approved AMP Continuing airworthiness task Continuing airworthiness tasks Continuing airworthiness task Accomplishment of modifications and repairs Continuing airworthiness task Non-mandatory modifications and/or inspections Continuing airworthiness task Maintenance check flights Aircraft maintenance programme Aircraft maintenance programme Amendment and approval by the Competent Authority Aircraft maintenance programme Indirect Approval Aircraft maintenance programme Content of the AMP Aircraft maintenance programme Details of the AMP Aircraft maintenance programme Reliability programme Aircraft maintenance programme Periodic reviews Airworthiness directives Data for modifications and repairs Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system CRS, logbooks, log cards, content Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system Information relevant to any component installed Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system Responsibility Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system Entries CAME Reference 1.11 1.1.a, b, 1.5, 1.8.a, c 1.2 1.5, 2.3 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.13 1.2.a, 1.2.c, 1.2d 1.2.d (3), (4) N/A 1.2 c 1.2c 1.10 1.2d, 5.1i 1.4 1.7 1.1.a, 1.3, 1.4.c, 1.6.e 1.3.b 0.3.b 1.3.b 305(h) 305(h.1) bis (h.5) DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system Retention periods 28.10.2009 1.3.b, c Page 12 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 305(h.6) 305(h.6) 306(a) 306(a) 306(b) 306(b) 306(c) − 307(a) bis (c) 701 702 703 307(a) − − − 703(c) 704(a)1 − 704(a)2 − 704(a)3 − 704(a)4 − 704(a)5 − 704(a)6 − 704(a)7 − 704(a)8 − 704(a)9 704(b) − − 704(1) − 704(2) − 704(3) − 704(4) DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system Owner’s/Operator’s technical log system Content Owner’s/Operator’s technical log system Acceptance and approval by the Competent Authority Owner’s/Operator’s technical log system Retention periods Transfer of aircraft continuing airworthiness records Scope Application Extent of approval Extent of approval Scope Continuing airworthiness management exposition Corporate commitment signed by the AM Continuing airworthiness management exposition CAMO’s scope of work Continuing airworthiness management exposition Title(s) and name(s) of person(s) referred to in M.A.706(a), (c), (d) and (i) Continuing airworthiness management exposition Organisation chart Continuing airworthiness management exposition List of M.A.707 airworthiness review staff Continuing airworthiness management exposition Description and location of the facilities Continuing airworthiness management exposition Procedures specifying how the CAMO ensures compliance with this Part Continuing airworthiness management exposition CAME amendment procedures Continuing airworthiness management exposition List of approved and generic/baseline maintenance programmes Continuing airworthiness management exposition Approval by the Competent Authority Continuing airworthiness management exposition Procedures specifying how the CAMO ensures compliance with this Part Continuing airworthiness management exposition Structure Continuing airworthiness management exposition Document structure for a combined Part-145 and M.A. Subpart G organisation Continuing airworthiness management exposition 28.10.2009 1.3.b, c 1.1.a 1.1.a 1.1.a 1.3.d N/A N/A N/A 0.2.1 0.1 0.2.c 0.4.b 0.4.a 4.1.b, 5.2 0.2.a 0.3, 1. 0.6 0.2.1, 5.4 0.6 0.3, 1. CAME N/A 0.4.c Page 13 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn − 704(5) − 704(6) − 704(7) − 704(8) − 704(9) 705 706(a) bis (d) 705 706 706(e) 706(e.1) 706(e.2) 706(f),(g) 706 706(h) 706 − 706(1) bis 706(4) 706(i) 706(i) 706(j) 707(a.1) 707(a) 707(a.2) 707(a.2) 707(b) 707(b) 707(c) 707(c) 707(d) - 707(e) 707(e) 708(a) − DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Personnel should be familiar with those parts of the CAME that are relevant to their tasks. Continuing airworthiness management exposition Responsibility for the amendment Continuing airworthiness management exposition CAME amendment procedures Continuing airworthiness management exposition Publication form Continuing airworthiness management exposition Corporate commitment signed by the AM Continuing airworthiness management exposition Corporate commitment signed by the AM Facilities Personnel requirements AM, QM, PCA Personnel requirements Acceptance of the PCA by the competent authority Personnel requirements Manpower resources Personnel requirements Training recording Personnel requirements QM, PCA Personnel requirements Extension staff Personnel requirements AM, PCA, Ext. staff Airworthiness review staff Above 2.730 kg MTOM Airworthiness review staff 2.730 kg MTOM and below Airworthiness review staff Acceptance by the competent authority Airworthiness review staff Demonstration of appropriate recent continuing airworthiness management experience Airworthiness review staff Identification by listing each person in the CAME together with their airworthiness review authorisation reference Airworthiness review staff Records Continuing airworthiness management All continuing airworthiness management shall be carried out acc. to the prescriptions of M.A Subpart C. 28.10.2009 0.6.b 0.6 Distribution List, 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2.a 0.3.a, b, e 0.4.b 0.4.c 0.4.c 0.4.b 0.2.1, 4.8 0.4b, 5.2 4, 4.1.1 4, 4.1.1 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.1, 5.2 4.1.3 Refer to M.A.301-M.A.307 Page 14 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 708(b.1) − 708(b.2) − 708(b.3) − 708(b.4) − 708(b.5) − 708(b.6) − 708(b.7) − 708(b.8) − 708(b.9) − 708(b.10) − 708(c) 708(c) 709(a) − 709(b) 709 710(a) 710(a) 710(b) 710(b) and (c) 710(c) 710(b) and (c) 710(d) 710 (d) 710(e) 710(e) 710(f) − 710(g) − 710(h) − 711(a) − 711(b) 711(b) DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Continuing airworthiness management Development and control of aircraft aircraft maintenance programme and reliability programme Continuing airworthiness management Approval of the AMP by the Competent Authority Continuing airworthiness management Management of approval of modification and repairs Continuing airworthiness management Ensure that all maintenance is carried out in accordance with the approved AMP. Continuing airworthiness management Ensure that all applicable AD’s are applied. Continuing airworthiness management Ensure that all defects are corrected by an appropriately approved MO. Continuing airworthiness management Ensure that the aircraft is taken to an appropriately approved maintenance organisation whenever necessary. Continuing airworthiness management Coordination of maintenance Continuing airworthiness management Management and archiving of records Continuing airworthiness management Mass and balance statement Continuing airworthiness management Maintenance contract Documentation Current maintenance data Documentation Generic/Baseline Maintenance Programme Airworthiness review Documented review of the aircraft records Airworthiness review Physical survey of the aircraft Airworthiness review Physical survey of the aircraft Airworthiness review Anticipation of the airworthiness review Airworthiness review airworthiness review certificate Airworthiness review A copy of any airworthiness review certificate issued or extended for an aircraft shall be sent to the Member State of Registry Airworthiness review Airworthiness review tasks shall not be subcontracted Airworthiness review Inconclusive outcome of the airworthiness review Privileges of the organisation Privileges of the organisation Additionally privileges 28.10.2009 1.2.c, 1.10 1.2 0.3.b 0.3.b 1.4 1.8 0.3.b 0.3.b 1.3.b, c 0.3.b, 1.12 0.2., 0.3.b, 3.1 1.2, 1.3 b, 1.4, 1.6, 5.9 0.2.1, 1.2b 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 4 4.6 0.2, 0.2.1 0.2.1, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 Page 15 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 712(a) 712(a) 712(b.1) 712(b.1) 712(b.2) 712(b.2) 712(b.3) 712(b.3) − 712(b.4) − 712(b.5) − 712(b.6) − 712(b.7) − 712(b.8) − 712(b.9) 712(c) − 712(d) − 712(e) − 712(f) 712(f) 713 713 714(a) − 714(b) − 714(c) − 714(d) − 714(e) − 714(f) − 714(g) − − 714(1) bis (6) 715 − 716(a) − 716(b) − DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Quality system Establishment of a quality system Quality system Monitoring of M.A. Subpart G activities Quality system Monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out in acc. with the contract Quality system Monitoring the continued compliance of M.A. Subpart G Quality system Independent audit Quality system Annual check to ensure that all aspects of M.A. Subpart G are fulfilled Quality system Additional locations of the organisation Quality system Audit report Quality system Audit personnel Quality system Quality plan Quality system Records Quality system Combination of the quality system of the CAMO in case of approval with another part Quality system Commercial air transport Quality system Replacing the quality system by an organisational review Changes to the approved continuing airworthiness organisation Record-keeping Record of all details of work carried out Record-keeping If the CAMO has the privilege of M.A.711(b), it shall retain a copy of each ARC and recommendation issued, together with all supporting documents Record-keeping Retention periods Record-keeping Storage Record-keeping Computer hardware used to ensure backup Record-keeping Transfer of CAM Record-keeping Termination of continuing airworthiness management of the CAMO Record-keeping (1) CRS, (2) responsibilities, (3) Acceptable form of continuing airworthiness records, (4) Paper systems, (5) Computer systems, (6) Microfilming or optical storage Continued validity of approval Findings Level 1 Findings Level 2 28.10.2009 2.1.a, b, c, d 0.3.e, 2.1.a, 2.2 0.3.e, 2.5 2.1.a, 2.1.c 2.1.c, 2.6 2.1.b, 2.5 2.1.b 2.1.c 2.6 2.1.b 2.1.d 0.2.a N/A 0.3, 2.1 0.5 1.3 1.3, 4.7 4.7 1.3.c 1.3.c 1.3.d 1.3.d 1.3.b, 1.3.c, 1.3.d 0.1, 0.5.b, 2.1.d 2.1.d 2.1.d Page 16 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 716(c) − 901 901 901(a) 901(a) 901(b) − − 901(b)1 and (b)2 901(c)1 − 901(c)2 901(c)2 901(d) 901(d) 901(e) 901(e) 901(f) 901(g) 901(h) 901(i) 901(j) 901(k) 902(a) 1 − − 902(a)2 902(a)3 − 902(a)4 − 902(b)1 − − 902(b)2 902(b)3 − − 902(b)4 − 902(b)5 902(c) − DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 Findings Corrective action Aircraft airworthiness review Periodically review of aircraft and its continuing airworthiness records Aircraft airworthiness review Issue of airworthiness review vertificate Aircraft airworthiness review Aircraft in controlled environment Aircraft airworthiness review Aircraft outside a controlled environment Aircraft airworthiness review Issue of an ARC for aircraft within controlled environment Aircraft airworthiness review Validity of the ARC for aircraft within controlled environment Aircraft airworthiness review Recommendation to Competent Authority for the issue of ARC Aircraft airworthiness review AR and issue of ARC by competent authority when circumstances exist which show potential safety threat Aircraft airworthiness review Extension of ARC Aircraft airworthiness review ELA 1 Aircraft airworthiness review Potential safety threat Aircraft airworthiness review Review by the authority Aircraft airworthiness review Provision of documents Aircraft airworthiness review Airworthiness of aircraft Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where and ARC becomes invalid Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where and ARC becomes invalid Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where and ARC becomes invalid Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where and ARC becomes invalid Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where an aircraft must not fly Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where an aircraft must not fly Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where an aircraft must not fly Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where an aircraft must not fly Validity of the airworthiness review certificate Cases where an aircraft must not fly Validity of the airworthiness review 28.10.2009 2.1.d 4 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6, 4 4.6, 4 4.5, 4 0.2.1, 4.6, 4 4 N/A 4 4 4 4, 4.6, 4.8 4.6, 4 4.6, 4 4.6, 4 4.6, 4 4.6, 4 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Page 17 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 903(a)1 903(a)1 903(a)2 − 903(b) 903(b) 904(a)1 904(a)1 904(a)2 904(a)2 904(a)3 − 904(b) 904(b) 904(c) − 904(d) − 904(e) − 905(a) − 905(b) − 905(c) − DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 certificate Return of ARC to the Competent Authority Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU Application Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU Application Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU Former ARC validity Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU Importing from a third country Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU Importing from a third country Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU Importing from a third country Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU Recommendation Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU Recommendation Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU Recommendation Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU Recommendation Findings Level 1 Findings Level 2 Findings Corrective action plan 28.10.2009 4.4.a 4.4.a 4.4.a 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.5 2.1, 4.5 Page 18 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Part 0 General organisation 0.1 Corporate commitment by the accountable manager3 This exposition defines the organisation and procedures upon which the M.A. Subpart G approval of …(organisation’s name) CAMO under Part-M is based. These procedures are approved by the undersigned and must be complied with, as applicable; in order to ensure that all the continuing airworthiness activities including maintenance of all aircraft under contract in accordance with M.A.201 (e) with …(organisation’s name) CAMO are carried out on time to an approved standard. It is accepted that these procedures do not override the necessity of complying with any new or amended regulation published by the EASA from time to time where these new or amended regulations are in conflict with these procedures. Austro Control GmbH will approve this organisation whilst it is satisfied that the procedures are being followed. It is understood that Austro Control GmbH reserves the right to suspend, vary or revoke the M.A. Subpart G continuing airworthiness management approval of the organisation, as applicable, if Austro Control GmbH has evidence that the procedures are not followed and the standards not upheld. Suspended or revoked approval could invalidate the CoA. Signed ....................................................... (…name…/Accountable Manager) Dated .................................................. For and on behalf of ...(organisation’s name) CAMO ... 3 The accountable manager's exposition statement should embrace the intent of this paragraph and in fact this statement may be used without amendment. Any modification to the statement should not alter the intent. In the case of proposed changes in personnel not known to the management beforehand, these changes shall be notified at the earliest opportunity. Whenever the accountable manager is changed it is important to ensure that the new accountable manager signs this statement at the earliest opportunity as part of the acceptance by the approving competent authority. Failure to carry out this action invalidates the M.A. Subpart G continuing airworthiness management approval (or the air operator’s certificate). DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 19 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 0.2 General Information a) Brief description of the organisation …(organisation’s name) CAMO... is a Part-M, Subpart G approved organisation which is structured under the management of …(AM’s name)… . A Quality System is established which works independently and monitors all activities on the continuing airworthiness management-system to ensure that it remains in conformity with the applicable Part-M requirements. For the complete management structure refer to the organisations management chart in paragraph 0.4. …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... holds the privileges according Part-M, Subpart G to manage the continuing airworthiness of non-commercial air transport aircraft as listed on the approval certificate. …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... is authorised to develop GMPs and IHPs through the indirect approval procedure. b) Scope The scope reflects the privileges of the organisation (M.A. 711) and should be held common. Extension Generic Maintenance Program X/X/- X/X/- GMP_xyz_C100 Series GMP_xyz_C152 X/X/- X/X/- see example above X/X/- X/X/- see example above X/X/- X/X/- see example above X/X/- X/X/- GMP_xyz_PA28 Series GMP_xyz_PA44 X/- X/- X/- X/- X/- X/- X/- GMP_xyz_A319, 320, 321 Series GMP_xyz_A319 X/X/- X/X/- X/X/- X/X/- Management Cessna 100 Series Cessna 152 X/X/- Cessna 200 Series Cessna 210 X/X/- Cessna 300 Series Cessna 337 X/X/- Cessna 525 Series Cessna 525 A X/X/- Piper PA 28 Series Piper PA 44 X/X/- Airbus A319, A320, A321 Series Airbus A319 X/- Cessna 500 Series Cessna 560 XL 4 Sub contracting tasks - Airworthiness Review Aircraft4 - see examples above TCDS designation DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 20 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Dassault Falcon MF F 900 EX X/- X/- X/- X/- Bombardier Global BD-700-1A10 X/- X/- X/- X/- BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) X/- X/- X/- X/- Learjet 55 Series Learjet 60 X/X/- X/X/- X/X/- X/X/- see examples above see examples above see examples above see examples above The continuing airworthiness management organisation shall provide suitable office accommodation at appropriate locations for the personnel specified in 0.4 in this CAME.5 The location of the office accommodations for the proper performance of the continuing airworthiness management are in … (Organisation’s address)… Office accommodation for aircraft airworthiness reviews includes: a) an office with normal office equipment such as desks, telephones, photocopying machines etc. whereby the continuing airworthiness records can be reviewed. b) a hangar when needed for the physical survey. c) Relationship with other organisations (This paragraph may not be applicable to every organisation.) (1) Subsidiaries / Mother Company For clarity purpose, where the organisation belongs to a group, this paragraph should explain the specific relationship the organisation may have with other members of that group. - e.g. links between …(organisation’s name) CAMO... Airlines, …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... Finance, …(organisation’s name) CAMO ...Leasing, …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... Maintenance, etc... . (2) Consortiums Where the organisation belongs to a consortium, it should be indicated here. The other members of the consortium should be specified, as well as the scope of organisation of the consortium [e.g. specifying this is that consortium maintenance may be controlled through specific contracts and through consortium's policy and/or procedures manuals that might unintentionally override the maintenance contracts. In addition, in respect of international consortiums, the respective competent authorities should be consulted and their agreement to the arrangement clearly stated. This paragraph should then make reference to any consortium's continuing airworthiness 5 Please describe your specific office accommodation. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 21 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn related manual or procedure and to any competent authority agreement that would apply. d) Aircraft managed …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... holds the privileges according Part-M, Subpart G to manage the continuing airworthiness of non-commercial air transport aircraft as listed on the approval certificate. A detailed list of owners/operators and their aircraft …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... is responsible to manage the continuing airworthiness is shown in Part 5.4. e) Type of business The organisation is orientated to manage aircraft from general aviation, pilot’s training schools, commercial hire and commercial operations without AOC (Luftverkehrsbeförderungsunternehmen). DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 22 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 0.3 Management personnel The management personnel will be formally accepted by ACG if the personnel meets the requirements of M.A. 706. Therefore the AM has to forward the filled in EASA Form 4 with the relevant data of the proposed management personnel to ACG. The EASA Form 4 is not necessary for the nomination of the PCA Deputy. It is acceptable for ACG to mention the deputy in chapters 0.3 and 0.4 of this CAME. a) Accountable manager6 The Accountable Manager has the overall responsibility to meet the requirements of Part-M. He is responsible to ensure that all continuing airworthiness activities can be financed and are carried out to the required standards. In particular, he is responsible for ensuring that adequate contractual arrangements exist. This includes, amongst others, provision of: facilities, material and tools, sufficient competent and qualified personnel in relation to the work to be undertaken. All of this with a view to ensure that all due continuing airworthiness activities including maintenance is performed on time and in accordance with the applicable requirements, regulations and approved standards and that the aircraft has a valid Certificate of Airworthiness for all flights undertaken. The Accountable Manager has the financial responsibility for all of the continuing airworthiness activities. b) Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness7 PCA (person responsible for continuing airworthiness) (1) General The PCA is responsible for determining what maintenance is required, when it has to be performed and by whom and to what standard, in order to ensure the continued airworthiness of the aircraft being operated. (2) Responsibilities He/she will, ensure that all maintenance is carried out on time and to an approved standard. For every aircraft managed in the continuing airworthiness organisation the PCA has the following responsibilities: a) Establishment of continuing airworthiness cooperation with the owner/operator. management contract in b) Establishment and development of continuing airworthiness policy, including the approval of the aircraft maintenance programme’s required by Part M.A.302. 6 This paragraph should address the duties and responsibilities of the accountable manager as far as Part M.A. subpart G is concerned and demonstrate that he has corporate authority for ensuring that all continuing airworthiness activities can be financed and carried out to the required standard. 7 Dependent on the size and complexity of the organisation the duties and responsibilities associated with the post holder for continuing airworthiness can be assumed by the AM if competent to do so or a designated person, in support of the AM. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 23 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn c) Presenting on behalf of the owner/operator aircraft maintenance programmes and its amendments to Austro Control GmbH for approval and provide a copy of the programmes to the owner. d) Analysis of the effectiveness of the Aircraft Maintenance Programme as required by Part M.A.708(b) & Appendix 1 to AMC M.A.302. e) Ensuring that the Quality System required by Part M.A.712 is effective in its application and any follow up actions required to address findings. f) Ensuring that owner’s/operator’s technical records are kept as required by Part M.A.305 and in accordance to part 1.3 of this CAME. g) Ensuring the validity of CoA. h) Presenting the continuing airworthiness records to Austro Control GmbH on request. i) Ensuring work planning and follow up j) Ensuring technical follow up k) Ensuring that modifications and repairs (changes) are carried out to an approved standard l) Review of Airworthiness Directive status and ensure embodiment m) Non mandatory modification embodiment policy n) Ensuring that line and base maintenance is contracted whenever necessary o) Ensuring that the Certificate of Airworthiness for each aircraft managed by the company remains valid in respect of; (i) the airworthiness of the aircraft, and (ii) any other condition specified in the Certificate p) Reporting any occurrences (according national law) to register NAA, EASA and the aircraft manufacturers. This includes both operational occurrences and occurrences related to maintenance findings, which fall outside the Mandatory scheme. q) Ensuring that all defects discovered during scheduled maintenance or reported are corrected by an appropriately approved maintenance organisation. r) Ensuring that the aircraft is taken to (i) an approved maintenance organisation whenever necessary, or (ii) that non-complex maintenance -when not performed by a Part-145 or Part M-F organisation- is carried out by authorised persons (Part-66 certified staff, Pilot/Owner) s) To coordinate scheduled maintenance, the application or airworthiness directives, the replacement of service life limited parts and component inspection to ensure the work is carried out properly. t) Ensuring that the mass and balance statement reflects the current status of the aircraft. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 24 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn u) Initiate the airworthiness review or perform the airworthiness review to issue an ARC or send the recommendation to the responsible register NAA. c) Continuing airworthiness coordination8 It is a task for PCA to establish the communication from the owner/operator to the CAMO as specified in the contract. d) PCA Deputy In case of lengthy absence of the PCA, his deputy has to take over his authority. He has, however, to confer with the PCA before making any essential decisions and keep him informed about any major irregularities in technical cases. A deputy PCA has to be nominated. Deputising situations are lengthy absence of the PCA due to vacations, illness or training. His/her qualification to fulfil this position for a period of time will be verified by the PCA and/or the AM. Austro Control GmbH, as the competent authority, shall be informed accordingly for absence longer then the above period and will accept his position if adequate qualification can be shown. e) Quality manager The Quality Manager is responsible for the following functions: a) Monitoring that all M.A. Subpart G activities are being performed in accordance with the approved procedures, and; b) Monitoring that all tasks of continuing airworthiness management are carried out in accordance with the concluded contracts, and; c) Monitoring the continued compliance with the requirements of Subpart G, and; d) Monitoring and amending of the CAME and the submission of proposed amendments to Austro Control GmbH, and; e) Ensuring that all maintenance is performed in compliance to the quality standards defined, and; f) Correspondence with the authority, and; g) Ensuring that all continuing airworthiness documentation is used properly and accordingly, and; h) Monitoring all company hand books, and; i) Performing a quality surveillance on the continuing airworthiness system, and; j) Proposing all corrective action necessary for eliminating non-compliance, and ensuring that these corrective actions are initiated, completed and efficient to meet the intended purpose, and; 8 This paragraph should list the job functions that constitute the "group of persons" as required by M.A.706(c) in enough detail so as to show that all the continuing airworthiness responsibilities as described in Part M are covered by the persons that constitute that group. In the case of small organisations, where the "Nominated Post holder for continuing airworthiness constitutes himself the "group of persons", this paragraph may be merged with the previous one. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 25 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn k) Monitoring all sub-contracted activities, and; l) Review and implementation, as appropriate, of any additional national requirements. The QM when performing audits shall not be involved or responsible for CAMOfunctions. A report of audits carried out must be made to the AM, so that appropriate corrective measures can be taken if deemed necessary. For small organisation without the privilege of M.A.711(b) the quality system can be replaced by an organisational review for a small organisation. Further details are provided in Part 2.1 of this CAME. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 26 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 0.4 Management organisation chart a) General organisation chart9 Accountable Manager Quality Manager PCA - Person responsible for Continuing Airworthiness Continuing airworthiness management Personnel 9 PCA Deputy Airworthiness Review Staff This flow chart should provide a comprehensive understanding of the whole company's organisation. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 27 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn b) Personal data Nominated person (2) PCA - Person responsible for continuing airworthiness & (3) PCA Deputy or group of persons should have: 1. practical experience and expertise in the application of aviation safety standards and safe operating practices; 2. a comprehensive knowledge of relevant parts of operational requirements and procedures; 3. knowledge of quality systems; 4. five years relevant work experience of which at least two years should be from the aeronautical industry in an appropriate position; 5. a relevant engineering degree or an aircraft maintenance technician qualification with additional education acceptable to Austro Control GmbH. ‘Relevant engineering degree’ means an engineering degree from aeronautical, mechanical, electrical, electronic, avionic or other studies relevant to the maintenance and continuing airworthiness of aircraft/aircraft components; The qualification mentioned in this paragraph may be replaced by 5 years of experience additional to those recommended by paragraph 4 above. These 5 years should cover an appropriate combination of experience in tasks related to aircraft maintenance and/or continuing airworthiness management (engineering) and/or surveillance of such tasks. 6. thorough knowledge with the organisation's continuing airworthiness management exposition; 7. knowledge of a relevant sample10 of type(s) of the aircraft gained through a formalised training course; These courses should be at least at a level equivalent to Part-66 Appendix III Level 1 General Familiarisation and could be imparted by a Part-147 organisation, by the manufacturer, or by any other organisation accepted by the competent authority. For all balloons and any other aircraft of 2730 kg MTOM and below the formalised training courses may be replaced by demonstration of knowledge. This knowledge may be demonstrated by documented evidence (e.g. training on the job with signed records by certifying staff) or by an assessment performed by the competent authority. This assessment should be recorded. 8. knowledge of maintenance methods. 9. knowledge of applicable regulations. 10 “Relevant sample” means that these courses should cover typical systems embodied in those aircraft being within the scope of approval. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 28 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn (1) Accountable Manager Name: Nationality: Address: Tel.: Fax: E-mail: Qualifications: Experience: (2) PCA - Person responsible for continuing airworthiness Name: Nationality: Address: Tel.: Fax: E-mail: Qualifications: Experience: (3) PCA Deputy Name: Nationality: Address: Tel.: Fax: E-mail: Qualifications: Experience: (4) Quality Manager Name: Nationality: Address: DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 29 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Tel.: Fax: E-mail: Qualifications: Experience: c) Manpower resources and training policy (1) Manpower resources11 …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... will at all times employ sufficient appropriately qualified staff to ensure, that the expected work can be performed and that all duties can be fulfilled. As of …(date)…, the number of employees dedicated to the performance of the continuing airworthiness management system is the following: Function Full time No. h Part time No. h Freelance No. h AM PCA QM ARS* Sum No. … Number of persons h … Man hours/year * Further details are provided in 5.2 “List of airworthiness review staff” of this CAME. If the amount of aircraft changes, the manpower resources plan should also be updated. (2) Training policy12 Training will be provided by …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... to ensure that each member of staff is adequately trained to carry out the functions of, and satisfy the responsibilities associated with, the Part-M Subpart G continuing airworthiness management functions. Training will be carried out at regular intervals, taking into account of changes in: 11 This paragraph should give broad figures to show that the number of people dedicated to the performance of the approved continuing airworthiness activity is adequate. It is not necessary to give the detailed number of employees of the whole company but only the number of those involved in continuing airworthiness. 12 This paragraph should show that the training and qualification standards for the personnel quoted above are consistent with the size and complexity of the organisation. It should also explain how the need for recurrent training is assessed and how the training recording and follow-up is performed. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 30 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn a) CAME b) Aircraft maintenance programme c) New aircraft type and novel type of aircraft d) Organisation e) New equipment f) Company procedures The staff member shall be made aware of how these changes affect their duties and responsibilities and the company procedures. The PCA will review training needs at intervals not exceeding two years. Continuation Training consists of procedures-, regulation- and technical training. Aircraft type rating training for staff shall be carried out at a training organisation, which is acceptable to Austro Control GmbH. Whenever possible, the PCA shall ensure that the specific type training is carried out at the aircraft manufacturer’s recommended training facility. If practicable and possible, the training may also be carried out by the PCA, as applicable for minor tasks. It’s the responsibility of the PCA that each training is documented and that the training recordings are stored in the personal files required for each staff for at least two years after the relevant staff has left. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 31 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 0.5 Notification procedure to the competent authority regarding changes to the organisation's activities / approval / location / personnel13 a) General When important changes are made within the company, Austro Control GmbH has to be informed prior to incorporating proposed changes so that approval can be granted. These changes include, but are not limited to: a) The name of the organisation b) The location of the organisation c) Additional locations of the organisation d) The accountable manager e) Any of the persons specified in part 0.3 f) Continuing airworthiness management procedures that could affect the approval g) Scope of work / Aircraft managed h) Staff that could affect the approval (functions in Part 0.3 in this CAME and airworthiness review staff in Part 4.1 in this CAME) In the case of proposed changes in personnel not known to the management beforehand, these changes shall be notified at the earliest opportunity. Notifications to Austro Control GmbH are issued by the QM. b) Procedure The changes must be recorded in the CAME and handed over to Austro Control GmbH for approval. The last approved issue of the CAME is valid until the amendments have been approved. Once the approval has been granted, the QM has to ensure that all necessary measures are taken to comply with the revised CAME and shall ensure that the changes are noted in any other existing issues of the CAME. All relevant personnel as stated in the distribution list have to confirm that they have received the amendment by signing a company internal amendment notification (CAME Recognition Certificate (5.1 e))). If the AM is changed, the QM has to ensure that the AM signs the corporate commitment (Part 0.1) at the earliest opportunity. 13 This paragraph should explain in which occasion the company should inform the competent authority prior to incorporating proposed changes. The primary purpose of this paragraph is to enable the continuing airworthiness organisation to remain approved if agreed by the competent authority during negotiations about any of the specified changes. Without this paragraph the approval would automatically be suspended in all cases. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 32 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn If this notification procedure is not applied the Part-M Subpart G approval would automatically be suspended in all cases. Upon surrender or revocation, the approval certificate shall be returned to Austro Control GmbH. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 33 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 0.6 Exposition amendment procedure14 a) General It is necessary to comply with any new or amended regulation published by the authority from time to time. New or amended procedures should not be in conflict with the regulation. Regulation changes as well as any relevant changes within the company that affect the approved CAME therefore call for an amendment thereof. b) Procedure The QM is responsible for any amendments and revisions of the CAME including any associated manuals, as well as for the submission to Austro Control GmbH for approval. The following amendment procedure has to be followed: a) The QM checks if the amendment is in compliance with Part-M. b) In case of amendments or changes of contents the related page has to be replaced. c) Changed text passages have to be marked with a vertical line at the side of the page. d) In the footer the revision number and the date has to be changed. e) In the list of effective pages the revision and date of the appropriate page has to be changed. f) After the approval the revision has to be added to the exposition by replacing the old pages. g) The approved revision pages have to be distributed to the recipients according to the distribution list. h) Each revision has to be entered and noted on the revision list by the holder of the CAME, showing the date of revision and the signature. i) The staff has to be advised about the changes. If agreed by the competent authority minor amendments to the exposition (changes which have no impact on the approval held) may be approved through an indirect approval procedure. Minor amendments are: 14 • Change of number of aircraft used and already approved as type on EASA Form 14 • Change of increasing manpower resources, except personnel needing EASA Form 4 This paragraph should explain who is responsible for the amendment of the exposition and submission to the competent authority for approval. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 34 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn • Adding of new maintenance contracts to chapter 5 after approval of the contract by ACG • Change of the number of aircraft in the maintenance contract when the type is already contained • Editorial changes • Changes in reference to other manuals or paragraphs This approval procedure shall also be stated in the CAME and the related pages shall be forwarded to ACG for notification. For the numbering of revisions, digits for direct amendments and letters for indirect amendments should be used in ascending order (see example below). E.g.: - 1A: First direct amendment and following first indirect amendment of the CAME - 2C: Second direct and following third indirect amendment Hand written amendments or revisions are not permitted. The CAME will be reviewed at intervals not exceeding 12 months or more frequently when significant changes occur which affect the content of the CAME. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 35 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Part 1 Continuing airworthiness management procedures This Part 1 defines the continuing airworthiness management procedures which …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... uses to ensure compliance with the continuing airworthiness aspects of Part-M. Where some aspects of these functions are subcontracted then this will be clearly defined in the text. 1.1 Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system utilisation a) Bordbuch and/or continuing airworthiness record system (1) General The Bordbuch is a main part of the continuing airworthiness record system. The content of an AOC technical log, an aircraft journey log or a Bordbuch are equivalent for the usage in non-commercial air transport. In special cases (technical defects) additional sheets with relevant information can be attached to the Bordbuch. The Bordbuch contains the following information: Section 1 This section details the owner’s/operator’s name and address, the aircraft type and the registration on the first page of the Bordbuch. Section 2 This section contains information about maintenance: Section 3 Section 4 • Details of when the next scheduled maintenance is due, including any out of phase component changes due before the next maintenance check. • The current CRS as a stamp or a sticker (column 14, 15) The following details are provided in this section: • the aircraft type and registration mark • Date and place of take-off and landing (column 2, 6, 8) • The times at which the aircraft took off and landed (column 7, 9) • The running total flying hours (column 11) • Details of any failure, defect or malfunction to the aircraft affecting airworthiness or safe operation (column 15) • The quantity of fuel and oil uplifted (column 12, 13) • The pre-flight inspection signature • The number of landings if relevant for aircraft or aircraft component life This section is normally not used for non-commercial air transport. If it would be used it would contain the acceptable deferred defects pages (hold item list) as column 15 of the Bordbuch. Refer to 1.1 b) M.E.L. application in this CAME. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 36 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Section 5 This section details the maintenance support information on the last pages of the Bordbuch. This includes: Name, address, telephone number, and E-mail address of the CAMO (PCA) In the event that unscheduled maintenance and/or defect rectification is required to be carried out away from main base, by another approved maintenance organisation, the prior agreement of the primary maintenance contractor must be sought. The organisation carrying out such maintenance will be required to issue a Certificate of Release to Service in the Bordbuch. The Bordbuch must be retained 36 months after the date of last entry in a locked, fire and flood resistant area. For a sample see 5.1 a). (2) Instructions for use While the PCA is responsible for maintaining and completing the continuing airworthiness record system, the Bordbuch is completed by the owner or operator’s pilots. It shall always be carried on board. … (organisation’s name) CAMO ... must be informed in regular intervals about the current running total flying hours of the aircraft by the owner/operator for planning the next maintenance event. (3) Aircraft technical log approval If an other document than the Austrian Bordbuch is used as aircraft technical log, this document and also any further changes must be approved by Austro Control GmbH. The PCA is responsible for submitting the aircraft technical log and any subsequent amendment thereto to Austro Control GmbH. Refer to part 5.1. b) M.E.L. application This paragraph does not apply to those types of aircraft that do not have a MEL or are not used for commercial air transport and that are not required to have one. That does not mean that an application of a MEL is not allowed for non-commercial air transport. In this case an application has to be sent to Austro Control GmbH department Flugtechnik. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 37 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.2 Owner/Operator aircraft maintenance programmes development & amendment a) General Maintenance of each aircraft shall be organised in accordance with an approved aircraft maintenance programme. The term “aircraft maintenance programme” includes scheduled maintenance tasks, the associated procedures and standard maintenance practices. The purpose of this aircraft maintenance programme is to provide maintenance planning instructions necessary for the airworthiness of the aircraft. Any aircraft may only be maintained to one approved aircraft maintenance programme at any given time. b) Generic/Baseline Maintenance Programme In order to achieve a scope extension for privately operated aircraft type(s), the PCA has to create a generic/baseline maintenance programme. In this case the Austrian LTH 43A Appendix B shall be used as a guideline. In contrast to the serial numberrelated AMP, generic/baseline maintenance programmes are not subject to approval by ACG. Nevertheless the CAMO has to forward each new generic/baseline programme together with the revised CAME pages to ACG for evaluation. After successful evaluation, ACG will approve the scope extension of the CAMO through the direct approval of the CAME. Generic/baseline maintenance programmes can subsequently be used as a basis for the aircraft maintenance programme by incorporating the additional associated maintenance tasks. Therefore the applicant has to describe the procedures and important points (e.g. no deviation from the maintenance data is permitted, following of repetitive maintenance tasks for modifications and repairs…) for the development of the AMP in the CAME in order to satisfy the competent authority for the proper accomplishment of an AMP. Once these procedures are approved by ACG, the CAMO gets the privilege to approve their self developed AMP (the four-eyes principle has to be used; E.g: Performed by PCA, approved by QM). Nevertheless always the first developed AMP of each type has to be forwarded to ACG for approval! Thereafter all internal approved AMPs have to be forwarded to Austro Control for notification. A current list of generic/baseline maintenance programmes and their associated aircraft series/types is shown in chapter 0.2. For large aircraft paragraph M.A.30215 is applicable only. A detailed list of all owners/operators, their aircraft and the associated AMP’s (organisation’s name) CAMO ... is responsible to manage the continuing airworthiness is shown in Part 5. 15 Appendix I to AMC M.A.302 (a) and M.B.301 (d) should be used as a guideline for developing this paragraph. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 38 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn c) Content of the AMP 16 The aircraft maintenance programme contains the following basic information: a) The type/model and registration number of the aircraft, engines, propellers,… b) The name and address of the owner, operator and continuing airworthiness management organisation. c) Check periods and/or calendar time limits. d) The tasks and periods at which each part of the aircraft and its equipment should be inspected including the type and degree of inspection required. e) The periods at which components should be checked, cleaned, lubricated, replenished, adjusted and tested. f) Details of ageing aircraft system requirements and/or details of specific structural aircraft aircraft maintenance programmes. g) The periods at which overhauls and/or replacements of components should be made. h) Repetitive maintenance tasks derived from modifications and repairs. d) Development (1) Sources The aircraft maintenance programme shall establish compliance with: a) Instructions issued by Austro Control GmbH (LTH, LTA) b) Instructions for continuing airworthiness issued by the holders of the type certificate, restricted type-certificate, supplemental type-certificate, major repair design approval, ETSO authorisation or any other relevant approval issued under Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 and its Annex (Part-21) c) Additional or alternative instructions proposed by the owner or the CAMO if approved by Austro Control GmbH, except for intervals of safety related tasks. These instructions could only be escalated through a direct approval and after sufficient reviews. d) For large aircraft a reliability programme must be used and described in chapter 1.10. (2) Responsibilities The AMP is developed by the PCA based upon the original manufacturer’s maintenance instructions, and endorsed by him. Any aircraft maintenance programme is subject to approval by Austro Control GmbH based by application made by the operator. 16 This paragraph should explain what is (are) the format(s) of the company's owner/operator aircraft maintenance programme(s). Appendix I to AMC M.A.302 (a) and M.B.301 (d) should be used as a guideline to develop this paragraph. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 39 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn A detailed list of all holders of AMP’s … (organisation’s name) CAMO ... is shown in Part 5. (3) Manual amendments If necessary (revision of the manufacturer’s documentation, result from the analysis of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme, change of TC-holder maintenance instructions, etc…), a Manual amendment will be prepared by the PCA and/or the QM. If no other necessities arise, the aircraft maintenance programme shall be reviewed annually by the PCA. A list of items to be checked during the review is attached in 5.1 i of this CAME (example for small aircraft). (4) Approval by the authority After preparation the amendment will be presented to Austro Control GmbH by the PCA for approval and if found acceptable, inserted in the relevant AMP by him. The PCA is responsible for submitting each amendment for approval to Austro Control GmbH. Amendments based on changes of approved data issued by the TCH need not to be approved by Austro Control GmbH. ACG has to be informed about such changes. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 40 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.3 Time and continuing airworthiness records, responsibilities, retention, access a) Hours and cycles recording Flight hours and cycles are recorded in the Bordbuch and thus supplied to the PCA. …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... must be informed in regular intervals, depending on the utilisation, about the current running total flying hours and cycles of the aircraft by the owner/operator for planning the next maintenance event. This has also to be specified in the contract. b) Records Continuing airworthiness records comprise: a) Applicable maintenance data for managed aircraft. a.1) Any applicable requirement, procedure, standard or information issued by Austro Control GmbH, acquired directly from Austro Control GmbH. a.2) Any applicable airworthiness directive, acquired as described under 1.4. a.3) Applicable instructions for continuing airworthiness, issued by type certificate holders, supplemental type certificate holders and any other organisation that publishes such data in accordance with Part 21 (i.e. copies of the relevant AMM and similar documentation and SB’s ordered directly from the issuer). a.4) Any applicable data issued in accordance with 145.A.45(d) if applicable. b) An aircraft logbook. c) Engine logbook(s) d) Propeller logbook(s) e) Records of any service life limited components. f) A certificate of release to service for any completed maintenance. g) A status of airworthiness directives and measures mandated by Austro Control GmbH in immediate reaction to a safety problem. h) A status of modifications and repairs. i) A status of compliance with the aircraft maintenance programme. j) A status of service life limited components (including component life limitation, total number of hours/cycles/calendar time and open hours/cycles/calendar time remaining). k) A mass and balance report which reflects the current status of the managed aircraft. l) A list of deferred maintenance. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 41 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn m) For any component installed, in addition to EASA Form 1 or equivalent, information on m.1) identification of the component. m.2) type, S/N and registration to the aircraft to which it has been fitted. m.3) total flight/calendar time or cycles of the component, as appropriate. m.4) additional information as listed above, as is applicable to the component. All entries made in the aircraft continuing airworthiness records shall be clear and accurate. When it is necessary to correct an entry, the correction shall be made in a manner that clearly shows the original entry. The maintenance organisation to which maintenance has been contracted shall retain and make available information on any work performed and any scheduled maintenance including: a) Maintenance manuals, SB’s, AD’s, etc. b) Information on the condition of all life–limited parts, be it flights or calendar time. c) All work orders and work reports. The release to service shall be entered as soon as practicable but in no case more than 30 days after the day of maintenance action. Despite the maintenance contractor retaining copies of continuing airworthiness records, the overall responsibility for such documentation remains with …(organisation’s name) CAMO … . DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 42 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn …(organisation’s name) CAMO … retains information related to maintenance for the following periods: document required retention period Maintenance data provided by the Duration of the contract closed between owner owner or operator or operator and CAMO Detailed maintenance records 24 months after the aircraft or component was permanently withdrawn from service Total time and flight cycles of the 12 months after the aircraft and all life-limited parts withdrawn from service aircraft has been Time and flight cycles since the last Until superseded by another scheduled scheduled maintenance of the maintenance of equivalent work scope and aircraft or the aircraft component detail Bordbuch 36 months after the date of last entry Current aircraft status of Until superseded by another inspection of compliance with the aircraft equivalent work scope and detail maintenance programme Status of AD’s 12 months after the withdrawn from service aircraft has been Details of modifications and repairs 12 months after the aircraft or component has to the A/C or any component vital to been withdrawn from service flight safety A copy of each airworthiness review 24 months after the aircraft has certificate, recommendation issued permanently withdrawn from service and extended, together with all supporting documents DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 been Page 43 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn c) Preservation of records17 Keeping continuing airworthiness records in a form acceptable to Austro Control GmbH means in paper form or on a computer database or a combination of both methods. Records stored in microfilm or optical disc form are also acceptable. All records should remain legible throughout the required retention period. Paper systems should use robust material, which can withstand normal handling and filing. Computer systems should have at least one backup system, which should be updated at least within 24 hours of any entry. Each terminal is required to contain programme safeguards against the ability of unauthorised personnel to alter the database. Continuing airworthiness records should be stored in a safe way with regard to fire, flood, theft and alteration. Computer backup discs, tapes, etc., should be stored in a different location from that containing the current working discs, tapes, etc. and in a safe environment. The original of the aircraft records is stored at …(organisation’s name) CAMO … location at the PCA’s office. Reconstruction of lost or destroyed records can be done by reference to other records which reflect the time in service, research of records maintained by repair facilities and reference to records maintained by individual mechanics etc. When these things have been done and the record is still incomplete, the owner/operator may make a statement in the new record describing the loss and establishing the time in service based on the research and the best estimate of time in service. The reconstructed records should be submitted to Austro Control GmbH for acceptance. Microfilming or optical storage of continuing airworthiness records may be carried out at any time. The records should be as legible as the original record and remain so for the required retention period. d) Transfer of continuing airworthiness records Where continuing airworthiness management of an aircraft is transferred to another organisation or person, all retained records shall be transferred to the said organisation or person. The time periods prescribed for the retention of records shall continue to apply to the said organisation or person. If the continuing airworthiness management of an aircraft is terminated, all retained records will be transferred to the owner or new operator of the aircraft. The PCA is responsible to transfer all continuing airworthiness records to the new owner/operator of the aircraft. The handover of these documents shall be documented and signed by both parties. 17 Please describe your specific preservation-system. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 44 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.4 Accomplishment and control of Airworthiness Directives a) Airworthiness directive information The CAMO shall hold and use applicable current maintenance data in the performance of continuing airworthiness management tasks. The PCA is responsible to check airworthiness directives periodically and to include them if appropriate into the maintenance planning according AMP. Therefore he/she takes the airworthiness directives published by the competent authority of the state of the type certificate holder of the aircraft/engine/components into account and those of the EASA and Austro Control GmbH using the following internet addresses: EASA: ACG: http://ad.easa.europa.eu Example: Aircraft: DA 40 LTA’s from ACG Engine: Textron Lycoming IO-360 M1A AD’s from FAA Propeller: MT-Propeller MTV-12-B/180-17 LTA’s from LBA Additionally: AD’s and LTA’s of aircraft/engine/components issued from EASA and Austro Control GmbH as state of register. b) Airworthiness directive decision The PCA analyses the airworthiness directive information and checks if the airworthiness directive is applicable or not. A detailed documentation of all airworthiness directives relevant for the managed aircraft type shall be administrated containing the information why the concerned airworthiness directive is applicable or not. If the airworthiness directive is applicable it is included in the maintenance planning and a work order is created in time to implement the airworthiness directive onto the aircraft. The work order together with the airworthiness directive is transferred to the contracted maintenance organisation for implementation. If an emergency airworthiness directive is applicable, the PCA immediately informs the owner/operator. c) Airworthiness directive control The PCA must ensure that a current status list of all AD’s performed for each managed aircraft is administrated. The status list must contain the following: a) Aircraft make/model/serial number b) Engine make/model/serial number c) APU make/model d) Component make/model e) AD/LTA number f) Subject DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 45 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn g) Date and hours/cycles at compliance h) Method of compliance (SB number, AFM/AOM revision required, not applicable by S/N, etc.) i) One time action j) Recurring action (yes/no) k) Next compliance due date (date/hours/cycles), if recurrent action is requested l) Accomplishment information Airworthiness directives must be performed in the period specified in the AD. Any deviation must be submitted to EASA for approval. Deviation request shall state the reason for request and shall include supporting data. Based on the EASA Internal Working Procedure Continuing Airworthiness of Type Design (CAP)18 determination, an approval may be granted. The method of compliance and when such compliance was achieved will be recorded in the aircraft airworthiness records (Log Books) by the contracted approved maintenance organisation. For AD’s with repetitive inspection content then each and every inspection will be recorded on completion in the aircraft airworthiness records. A CRS will be issued every time compliance with an AD is established. The PCA is responsible for control of performing and for request of deviation. He will establish the applicable work orders. The PCA is responsible for incorporation and documentation of performed AD’s. The PCA is responsible to ensure that all applicable AD’s will be performed in time. 18 See 4.7.5 of Continuing Airworthiness of Type Design (CAP), Annex II - List of Reportable Events: http://www.easa.eu.int/doc/Certification/Working_Procedures/EASA_CAP_Issue_2_CF_06022006.pdf DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 46 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.5 Analysis of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme The PCA will analyse and monitor the effectiveness of the Aircraft maintenance programme through regular Liaison Meetings with the owner/operator, the contracted approved maintenance organisation and the quality manager. Liaison Meetings These meetings will address the following areas: a) The Aircraft maintenance programme content. b) The effect on the Aircraft maintenance programme of any ADs, modifications or repairs. c) Changes to the operation (e.g. utilisation), which may affect the Aircraft maintenance programme. d) Maintenance findings. e) Other defect reports i.e. air turn-backs, spares reliability, technical delays, technical incidents, repetitive defects and pilot reports. f) Quality monitoring product samples (aircraft surveys), when performed. g) Changes to the manufacturer's maintenance guidance material, Service Bulletins Service Letters etc. and how these affect the Aircraft maintenance programme. h) Other Quality System findings as they affect upon the contracted approved maintenance organisations. Where appropriate and necessary, amendments to the Aircraft maintenance programme will be promulgated by the PCA for submission to Austro Control GmbH as an amendment. Frequency of Meetings Liaison meetings will be held as required for every managed aircraft and the results of any meeting recorded with any actions required allocated to the responsible person. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 47 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.6 Non-mandatory modification embodiment policy a) General Non-mandatory modifications will normally take the form of manufacturer's Service Bulletins, or will be derived from them. Any other changes (i.e. those not covered by a manufacturer's Bulletin) will be initiated by the PCA in consultation with the contracted approved maintenance organisation or authorised personnel. b) Service Bulletins Service Bulletins and all other necessary technical publications are directly received on the basis of subscriptions from the official dealers. All manufacturer's Service Bulletins applicable to the aircraft managed by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … will be reviewed in the first instance by the PCA for applicability following LTH 7A. Where compliance with the Service Bulletins' may be seen as beneficial in consideration of the technical, operational and economical effects to …(organisation’s name) CAMO … a proposal will be made to the owner/operator. The decision on embodiment will be made by the PCA as specified in the contract with the operator or owner. If the owner/operator decides to implement a SB then the approved MO will be advised by the PCA. All relevant SB’s will be discussed during the Liaison Meetings. c) Modifications All modifications may be considered to fall in one of two categories: • Major modification • Minor modification An approval must be requested from EASA for any modification initiated before the actual beginning of the modification embodiment. Installation of any modification is only approved upon availability of all approved data. d) Minor Modifications The PCA or the owner/operator will establish data for the minor modification (in form of a work report or engineering order). All minor changes have to be agreed by the PCA before starting approval process. In case of using an appropriately approved Part 21 DO, further approval by EASA is not required. e) Recording of Modifications Incorporation of all modifications, whether introduced through Service Bulletins or approved Minor/Major modifications, is to be recorded in the aircraft airworthiness records. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 48 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.7 Major modification / repair standards a) General A major modification / repair is a type design change not listed in the aircraft, engine or component specification that might appreciably affect the weight and balance limits, structural strength, performance, engine operation, systems operation, etc. Any major modifications not originated from the TCH are classified as STC’s. b) Development and approval of major modification and major repairs All major changes (modification or repairs) to type design have to prepared by an appropriately approved Design Organisation. It is in the responsibility of the DO to initiate the classification and approval process. Implementation of changes has to be performed only in accordance with approved data from Part 21 organisations. The PCA has to ensure that approved data’s are available and/or approval has been obtained, as applicable. There are two ways of approval: • Major modification prepared by a DO and approved by EASA (= STC) • Major repairs prepared by a DO and approved by EASA or prepared and approved by the DO of the TCH when authorised to do so As long as approved data (e.g. SRM for repairs) are available no additional design activities are necessary. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 49 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.8 Defect reports The PCA should ensure that the TCH/STCH, Register NAA and EASA receives adequate reports of occurrences for that aircraft type, to enable it to issue appropriate service instructions and recommendations to all owners/operators. Liaison with the TCH/STCH is important to establish whether published or proposed service information will resolve the problem or to obtain a solution to a particular problem. The PCA in cooperation with the contracted approved MO should assign responsibility for coordinating action on airworthiness occurrences and for initiating any necessary further investigation and follow-up activity to a suitably qualified person with clearly defined authority and status. All identified defects occurring on the managed aircraft will result in a defect report (5.1 b)) being forwarded to the PCA and will be subject to review and analysis for their effect upon airworthiness and safe operation of the aircraft. In respect of maintenance, reporting a condition that could seriously hazard the aircraft is normally limited to: 1. Serious cracks, permanent deformation, burning or serious corrosion of structure found during scheduled maintenance of the aircraft or component. 2. Failure of any emergency system during scheduled testing. The defect report shall include details such as: • Date • Aircraft Registration • Aircraft Type and S/N • Effected part or component • Description of discrepancy • Name of responsible pilot in command • Signed by the PCA a) Analysis Bordbuch pages are examined at regular intervals by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … to provide information concerning defects occurring, Pilot's reports, maintenance actions and defects of a repetitive nature. Maintenance input records (work-packs) will also be reviewed for significant findings by the …(organisation’s name) CAMO … and the contracted approved maintenance organisation which may have airworthiness or operational implications. The PCA will assess the findings as necessary and has to agree any action required before implementation. Implementation may take the form of an Aircraft maintenance programme amendment or modification action. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 50 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn b) Liaison with manufacturers and regulatory authorities The PCA is responsible for contacting the aircraft manufacturers and Austro Control GmbH on all matters concerning the airworthiness of …(organisation’s name) CAMO … managed aircraft. Both Austro Control GmbH and the manufacturer will be advised of all matters concerning airworthiness within 72 hours after arising of such events. c) Deferred defect policy …(organisation’s name) CAMO … will seek to ensure by his technical expertise and practices that the minimum number of open Deferred Defects exist. All open Deferred Defects will be monitored by the PCA in consultation with the approved MO to ensure earliest rectification and subsequent closure. Defects such as cracks and structural defects that are not addressed by approved data may only be deferred after evaluation according to 21.A.445. Any limitations shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of 21.A.443. When a deferred defect is raised the PCA will consult with the certifying staff of an appropriately approved maintenance organisation with a view to arranging the earliest possible rectification action to be taken. A Certificate of Release to Service will be issued in the Bordbuch upon clearance of any Deferred Defects. d) Non Deferrable Defects policy Non deferrable defects must be repaired before further flight. If defects are not covered by approved data the TCH has to be involved. Rectification process has to be performed according the procedures of the approved maintenance organisation. e) Repetitive Defects The Bordbuch is monitored by the PCA to identify these defects as and when they arise. Remedial action will be taken by the approved MO in consultation with the PCA. f) Mandatory Occurrence Reporting All incidents and occurrences that fall within the reporting criteria defined in Part M.A.202 (seriously hazards flight safety) has to be reported to state of register, organisation responsible for type design as soon as practicable but in any case within 72 hours. For occurrence reporting a form could be created or the accident/incident form from ACG published on www.austrocontrol.at19 could be used. Part 5 has to contain such form (5.1 b). g) Occurrence Review Meetings All occurrences, which have maintenance implications, will be analysed by the PCA in consultation with the approved MO. Any maintenance occurrence reports raised by the contracted approved MO on …(organisation’s name) CAMO … managed aircraft 19 www.austrocontrol.at / Luftfahrtagentur / Flugbetrieb und Lizenzierung / Meldeformulare / Accident / Incident Report DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 51 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn will also be advised to the PCA. Both organisations will hold copies of any reports that have been raised that affect maintenance. Liaison meetings will be held between the PCA, the contracted approved MO, the QM and any other involved parties to discuss occurrence reports issues. The frequency of these meetings will be held as necessary if required by maintenance findings and/or operational circumstances. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 52 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.9 Engineering activity All engineering is contracted to suitably approved design organisations. Engineering orders dealing with minor changes can be prepared by anyone. Matters of design changes are the responsibility of EASA. For details see part 1.7 in this CAME. 1.10 Reliability programmes A reliability programme is only required for large aircraft whose AMP is based upon MSG logic or includes condition monitored components or does not contain overhaul time periods for all significant system components20. Whereas the complexity of the reliability programme should be tailored to the amount of the aircraft managed. The occurrence of significant problems should be recorded and diagnosed from following sources: • Safety information promulgated by the applicable Part-21 organisation • Pilots Reports • Technical Logs • Maintenance Worksheets • Workshop Reports • Reports on Functional Checks • Reports on Special Inspections • Stores Issues/Reports • Air Safety Reports • Reports on Technical Delays and Incidents The reliability data form an important basis for the escalation or deletion of a maintenance task, as well as the de-escalation or addition of a maintenance task. 20 Appendix 1 to AMC M.A.302 should be used as a basis for the development of a reliability programme. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 53 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.11 Pre-flight inspections The pre-flight inspections are performed by the operating crew using the aircraft flight manual for guidance. The operating crew has to be trained on the performance of such pre-flight inspection. The pre-flight inspections consist of the following items: a) Pre-flight inspection according to aircraft flight manual (walk-around) b) Inspection of the Bordbuch c) Control of refuelling (quality/quantity) d) Control of consumable fluids e) Control of secure baggage loading f) Control of weight and balance g) Control of snow, ice, dust and sand contamination h) Control that all doors are securely fastened i) Control that all covers and locks are removed Uplift of oil or hydraulic fluid as well as necessary tire inflation shall be noted on the Bordbuch. Any defect appeared during the pre-flight inspections is reported to the PCA using the Bordbuch. The PCA manages the performance of any required maintenance resulting from the checks above at the contracted approved MO. 1.12 Aircraft weighing Aircraft weighing is performed by a suitably approved maintenance organisation. The PCA will review the reports produced by that organisation. The PCA in consultation with the approved MO will maintain a record of each aircraft managed. Re-weighing will be carried out at intervals not exceeding 4 years. Outside the regular required intervals, the aircraft requires to be weighed: a) After major repairs b) After major modifications c) After repainting of an aircraft d) When the weight or CG can not be determined in an arithmetical way e) Whenever the cumulative changes to the dry operating mass exceed +/- 0.5% of the maximum landing mass or the cumulative change in CG position exceeds 0.5% of the mean aerodynamic chord. The weighing periods are integrated in the AMP and will be controlled by the PCA. Weight reports will be handed out to the PCA by the MO after completing weighing and CG calculation. The PCA will insert the weighing records after checking in the AFM Weight and Balance section of the affected aircraft. The original records will be retained in the technical files of the aircraft. Copies will stay in the AFM and at the MO. Only the aircraft manufacturer’s published weighing procedures shall be used. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 54 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 1.13 Check flight procedures a) General A technical flight must be performed after special maintenance and/or repair work on aircraft. Only suitable qualified and by the owner/operator accepted pilots shall carry out the flight tests considering Austrian LTH 42. A technical flight is considered necessary after the following events have taken place: a) Any time after maintenance has been performed where the manufacturer of the aircraft or engine requires a test flight. b) Any time maintenance has been performed which could change the flight characteristics of the aircraft. c) Any time after replacement of a primary flight control if required. d) After major repair or modification on the airframe which alters the flight characteristics. e) After change of engine(s). f) During an Airworthiness Inspection when required by the airworthiness review staff. b) Procedures and standards Airworthiness flight testing is not carried out at specific intervals. The test flight must be authorised by the PCA. All technical flights shall be performed by the minimum flight crew, but inspectors and mechanics, who are directly involved in the preceding work may be on board. All technical flight procedures are established in accordance with the applicable AFM. This procedure should also be carried out following maintenance, modification or rectification actions affecting the aircraft performance, handling etc. or where required by the manufacturer. All flight tests are carried out to the flight test schedule generated appropriate to specific need. See also 4.3 d) in this CAME. Prior to any flight test a CRS, stating the work accomplished has to be issued by the approved MO in the Bordbuch. After successful performance of the maintenance check flight the full release is issued. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 55 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Part 2 Quality system 2.1 Continuing airworthiness quality policy, plan and audits procedure a) Continuing airworthiness quality policy This Part 2 of …(organisation’s name) CAMO … CAME defines the continuing airworthiness quality policy, planning and procedures to meet the requirements of Part-M Subpart G. The Quality System and associated Quality Assurance Programme enables monitoring of compliance with Part-M, the Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition and any other standards specified by Austro Control GmbH/EASA, to ensure safe operations and airworthy aircraft. An organisational review is only permitted if the CAMO fulfils following requirements: • small CAMO A small organisation is an organisation with up to 5 full-time staff, including management personnel • with low complexity In behalf of number and type of aircraft, number of different fleets, privilege to perform airworthiness reviews, etc. • which is not managing the continuing airworthiness of aircraft used in commercial air transport • issuing ARCs for aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below. In this case management tasks are not allowed for subcontracting. A detailed procedure should be listed in this chapter in accordance with Appendix XIII to M.A. 712(f). Quality policy21 The AM has the overall responsibility that the managing of continuing airworthiness will be ensured on the aircraft listed in 5.4. The PCA and the QM have at all times direct access to the AM. …(organisation’s name) CAMO … personnel are encouraged to participate actively in the quality system by reporting all discrepancies and suggestions for improvements to the QM or AM. The AM has also the overall responsibility for the quality system including the frequency, format and structure of the internal management evaluation activities as prescribed below. 21 Please enter your specific quality policy. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 56 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn b) Quality plan22 The quality programme (refer to 5.1 c) will be developed by the quality manager in liaison with the PCA. Audits are to be carried out at least once a year in order to review all aspects of continuing airworthiness activities within a period of 12 months. Additional audits are to be carried out: • whenever corrective action has to be performed before the next scheduled audit. • when maintenance procedures are newly established or revised. • upon exchange of the nominated post holders referred to in part 0.3. • before subcontracting of airworthiness management activities take place. c) Quality audit procedure An audit consists of identifying, in an objective fashion, non-conforming practices against the applicable regulation (EASA Part-M) and the procedures set out in this CAME. This independent audit is an objective process of routine sample checks of all aspects of the CAMO including some product audits as the end result of the process. Every audit is subjected to a deviation report. Before distribution, the preliminary conclusions are presented to the person audited. The auditor and the PCA determine in common the corrective actions to be taken, as well as the time allowed for implementation. The corrective action should be determined taking into account the root cause of the finding or concern, so that the corrective action may be designed in order the non-conformity may not reoccur. The audits shall be documented in audit reports and shall then be recorded accordingly in the audit plan. Product audit The QM has to carry out aircraft and product quality audits at random intervals and whenever additionally required to new or unusual circumstances. Sample checks will be performed by the QM, he witnesses any relevant maintenance task and visually inspects the product and the associated documentation. During a sample check performed by the QM, repeat disassembly or testing should not be performed by maintenance staff, unless findings are identified by the QM which requiring such action. An aircraft mainly maintained outside of the quality system of a Part-145 or Part M-F organisation (by Part-66 certified staff or by pilot owner, should be subject to product audits in any case. Delegation of product audits Under special circumstances, the quality control manager can delegate product audits to a qualified certifying staff member of a contracted approved MO, provided these persons have adequate system knowledge, audit training and audit 22 Where the organisation has more than one location approved the quality system should describe how these are integrated into the system and include a plan to audit each location every year. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 57 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn experience. This staff of the approved MO should not be involved in the release of this specific aircraft. d) Quality audit remedial action procedure When objections or defects are determined during an audit, the QM and the PCA are to decide upon corrective actions and/or procedure improvements. The decided corrective actions and/or procedure improvements are then to be conveyed to the AM. The QM monitors the remedial actions and their compliance. The remedial actions are taken by the concerned person. The QM agrees time for correction with the PCA. He shall check if every corrective action has been applied in due course and shall record the corrective actions in his audit reports in the appropriate box. The audit report shall show by whom the corrective action was carried out and when the QM made the check. If no corrective or insufficient action has been taken, the QM shall inform the AM accordingly. Any findings are classified into the following categories: Level 1 finding is any significant non-compliance with Part-M requirements which lowers the safety standard and hazards seriously the flight safety. Level 2 finding is any non-compliance with the Part-M requirements which could lower the safety standard and possibly hazard the flight safety or is a non-compliance to the CAME procedures. Informational The above mentioned levels of findings require rectifications by the responsible management personnel within the following time frame: Level 1 finding immediately Level 2 finding up to 3 months (depending on nature of finding) Notification to Austro Control GmbH is required in regards of changes to the organisation’s activities/approval/location/personnel and whenever an audit finding shows existence of hazard for an aircraft managed (Level 1). After receipt of notification of findings of an audit of Austro Control GmbH according to M.B.705, …(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall define a corrective action plan and demonstrate corrective action to the satisfaction of ACG within a period agreed with ACG. Action will be taken by ACG to suspend in whole or part the approval in case of failure to comply within the timescale granted by ACG. Quality records shall be preserved for a period of at least 2 years. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 58 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 2.2 Monitoring of continuing airworthiness management activities The Audit Plan includes an assessment of the Continuing Airworthiness Management activities against the procedures defined in the CAME and in particular the ability of the PCA’s ability to discharge their responsibilities effectively with respect to Part-M. 2.3 Monitoring of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme(s) The Audit Plan as carried out by the Quality Manager includes a review of the effectiveness of the Aircraft maintenance programme. This review will critically analyse the findings and actions taken as a result of Para. 1.5 of this CAME. 2.4 Monitoring that all maintenance is carried out by an appropriate maintenance organisation The Annual Audit Plan includes verification that the contracted maintenance organisation's approval is relevant to the maintenance being performed on the aircraft managed by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … . Any feed back information requiring amendments to the maintenance contracts for aircraft, engines or components should be reviewed and the contracts amended accordingly. 2.5 Monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the contract, including sub-contractors used by the maintenance contractor The Audit Programme will include a review of all maintenance provided to …(organisation’s name) CAMO … by the contracted approved MO, including subcontractors. This review will assess all of the contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the Maintenance Contract. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 59 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 2.6 Quality audit personnel The quality management is exclusively subordinate to the AM. The QM works independently, should not be one of the nominated post holders and must not be directly involved in the activity he/she has been asked to audit. The QM is responsible for ensuring that the Quality assurance program is properly established, implemented and maintained. The QM must have: • direct access to the AM; • not be one of the nominated post holders; and • have access to all parts of …(organisation’s name) CAMO … The QM has the full authority and support from …(organisation’s name) CAMO … to perform her/his duty within the system. The QM may delegate audits to additional auditors and/or an audit team if he/she deems it necessary. He also establishes the audit and inspection schedule to be completed during a specific calendar period according the present situation. Qualification/Training of QM The nominated QM shall be trained in a manner to fulfil the required knowledge as required to perform quality system tasks. The QM must be trained as a minimum: a) Part-M b) Quality management c) Audit technique d) Technical expertise on the subject audited Auditors Auditors must be trained as the same level as the QM. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 60 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Part 3 Contracted Maintenance This Part 3 of the CAME describes the contracted maintenance arrangements of …(organisation’s name) CAMO … . It includes details of these arrangements, together with the division of responsibility for these arrangements, between …(organisation’s name) CAMO … and the approved MO together with copies of the Maintenance Contracts in force for Base, Line and Engine Off-Wing support, as appropriate. 3.1 Maintenance contractor selection procedure This activity should be carried out in agreement with the aircraft owner. Before any contract is signed with a maintenance organisation the PCA will verify that: a) The maintenance organisation is appropriately approved and has the necessary qualified manpower, facilities, tooling, technical documentation etc. This verification to take into account any engine, propeller, or component maintenance capability that may be required (though this may be available through sub-contract to other suitably approved MOs.) b) It will be confirmed that the MO has adequate capacity to undertake the proposed maintenance support. c) The draft Maintenance Contract will be reviewed and agreed by both parties with a view to ensuring that each has the ability to discharge their responsibilities with respect to Part-M. 3.2 Quality audit of aircraft The purpose of a quality audit of aircraft is to ensure that all required continuing airworthiness tasks are performed on the aircraft. In no way may a quality audit of an aircraft be confused with a periodic airworthiness review carried out by an appropriately approved organisation or Austro Control GmbH. Quality audit of aircraft are tools to have a feedback on the quality level of the organisation to the management staff. Findings of quality audit of aircraft do not affect the airworthiness review certificate but are submitted to the PCA for closure. Quality audit of aircraft are performed by the QM or by quality audit personnel according to part 2.6 of this exposition. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 61 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Performance of quality audit of aircraft a) A quality audit of aircraft report form must be used to record the outcome and findings. b) Quality audits of aircraft are planned in the quality plan (see Part 2.1) regarding flexibility on time scheduling. c) Contents: • Inspections if all approved procedures are complied with. • Inspection if all maintenance was carried out in accordance with the approved AMP and maintenance contract. • Inspection if all maintenance was performed according to standard practices. • Inspection if the requirements of Part-M are complied with. d) All findings of the audit are recorded with a time limit on which the finding has to be closed. e) The report is submitted to the PCA for further management. The quality audit of aircraft is performed by the QM with the assistance of a person having an appropriate maintenance licence for the aircraft type. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 62 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Part 4 Airworthiness Review Procedures This section describes the working procedure for the airworthiness review according EASA Part M, Subpart G M.A.710 and Subpart I. The purpose of the airworthiness review is the verification of the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft. The approval for this privilege is granted by the competent authority (ACG). Airworthiness review tasks can not be sub-contracted. To ensure validity of the aircraft airworthiness certificate an airworthiness review of an aircraft and its continuing airworthiness records have to be carried out periodically. Following aspects are applicable for CAMOs holding AR-privileges according to M.A.711(b): For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft remained within controlled environment under the CAMO ...(organisation’s name) CAMO carries out complete reviews (record review and physical survey) and issues ARCs if the reviewed aircraft is permanently in a controlled environment under the …(organisation's name) CAMO approval. Furthermore ...(organisation’s name) CAMO extends the ARC(s) it has issued twice for a period of one year after it has justified that the aircraft was/were airworthy and remained under controlled environment. For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft listed on scope with review privileges, but remained outside controlled environment under the CAMO ...(organisation’s name) CAMO is approved to carry out complete reviews (record review and physical survey) and issue recommendations for aircraft which are not permanently in a controlled environment under the …(organisation's name CAMO) but when listed with review privileges in the ...(organisation’s name) CAMO scope. ...(organisation’s name) CAMO shall send the recommendation together with the application from the owner/operator to the competent authority. This recommendation should at least be in English when the member state of registry is not Austria. After satisfactory evaluation of the recommendation the competent authority issues the ARC. For aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below - Aircraft remained within controlled environment under the CAMO …(Organisation's name) CAMO carries out complete reviews (record review and physical survey) and issues ARCs if the reviewed aircraft is permanently in a controlled environment under the …(organisation's name) CAMO approval. Furthermore ...(organisation’s name) CAMO extends the ARC(s) it has issued twice for a period of one year after it has justified that the aircraft was/were airworthy and remained under controlled environment. For aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below - Aircraft listed on scope with review privileges, but remained outside controlled environment under the …(organisation´s name) CAMO ...(organisation’s name) CAMO is approved to carry out complete reviews (record review and physical survey) and issue ARCs for aircraft which are not permanently in DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 63 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn a controlled environment under the …(organisation's name) CAMO but when listed with review privileges in the ...(organisation’s name) CAMO scope. The competent staff who is/are responsible for the issuance of extensions is/are named in chapter 5.2. Whenever circumstances show the existence of a potential safety threat, the competent authority shall carry out the airworthiness review itself hand issue the airworthiness review certificate itself. In this case, the owner or operator shall provide the competent authority with: — the documentation required by the competent authority, — suitable accommodation at the appropriate location for its personnel, and when necessary the support of personnel appropriately qualified in accordance with Part-66. Airworthiness review tasks shall not be sub-contracted. CAMOs which does not hold AR-privileges: ...(organisation’s name) CAMO does not hold the privilege to carry out airworthiness breviews. For aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below - managed by …(Organisation's name) CAMO (organisation's name) CAMO takes responsibility to appoint appropriately approved CAMO(s) and/or ACG to carry out airworthiness reviews periodically for the managed aircraft below 2.730 kg MTOM. After satisfactory review the appointed CAMO or the competent authority will issue the ARC(s) and deliver it to (organisation's name) CAMO. If findings have come up during the review, the PCA is responsible to perform corrective actions within the given due date and to store a copy of the ARC together with the aircraft records. ...(organisation’s name) CAMO extends the ARC(s) twice for a period of one year after it has justified that the aircraft was/were airworthy and remained under its controlled environment. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 64 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft remained within controlled environment under the …(organisation´s name) CAMO …(organisation's name) CAMO takes responsibility to appoint approved CAMO(s) to carry out airworthiness reviews periodically for the managed aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM. The appropriately approved CAMO will issue recommendations and send them to the competent authority. After satisfactory evaluation of the recommendation the competent authority will issue the ARC(s) and deliver it to (organisation's name) CAMO. If findings have come up during the review, the PCA is responsible to perform corrective actions within the given due date and to store a copy of the ARC together with the aircraft records. Furthermore ...(organisation’s name) CAMO extends the ARC(s) for a period of one year after it has justified that the aircraft was/were airworthy and remained under controlled environment. For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft managed by …(organisation´s name) CAMO but does not fulfil the controlled environment under the CAMO …(organisation's name) CAMO takes responsibility to appoint approved CAMO(s) to carry out airworthiness reviews periodically. The appropriately approved CAMO will issue recommendations and send them to the competent authority. After satisfactory evaluation of the recommendation the competent authority will issue the ARC(s) and deliver it to the approved CAMO. If findings have come up during the review, the PCA is responsible to perform corrective actions within the given due date and to store a copy of the ARC together with the aircraft records. Following persons are authorised by … (Organisation´s name)… to extend an ARC23: Max Maier Michi Maier Martin Maier 4.1 Airworthiness review staff 4.1.1 Experience, qualification, training and procedure To carry out airworthiness reviews, …(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall have appropriate airworthiness review staff to issue M.A. Subpart I airworthiness review certificates or recommendations. These staff shall have acquired24: a) For Aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM, except Balloons 1. at least five years experience in continuing airworthiness25, and; 23 These persons don´t need to be authorised as Airworthiness Review Staff and therefore don´t need an EASA Form 4 for acceptance by ACG. They will be accepted through the approval of the CAME. 24 For detailed information: ARS Zugangsvoraussetzungen.doc 25 “experience in continuing airworthiness” means any appropriate combination of experience in tasks related to aircraft maintenance and/or continuing airworthiness management (engineering) and/or surveillance of such tasks. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 65 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 2. an appropriate Part-66 licence26 or a nationally recognized maintenance personnel qualification appropriate to the aircraft category or an aeronautical degree or equivalent, and; 3. formal aeronautical maintenance training, and; 4. a position within the approved organisation with appropriate responsibilities27 5. Point 2 may be replaced by five years of experience in continuing airworthiness additional to the five years mentioned in point 1. b) For Aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below and Balloons 1. at least three years experience in continuing airworthiness, and; 2. an appropriate Part-66 licence or a nationally recognized maintenance personnel qualification appropriate to the aircraft category or an aeronautical degree or equivalent, and; 3. appropriate aeronautical maintenance training, and; 4. a position within the approved organisation with appropriate responsibilities; 5. Point 2 may be replaced by four years of experience in continuing airworthiness additional to the three years mentioned in point 1. Following staff could be approved as review staff if it fulfils the above mentioned requirement: • PCA: When he/she was not involved in the release to service of that aircraft he/she makes reviews • QM: When he/she does not perform product audit(s) on that aircraft he/she makes reviews • CAMO-personnel: When it is responsible for the complete continuing airworthiness management process of the particular aircraft • AM • The person of an one-man organisation . Airworthiness review staff nominated by the …(organisation’s name) CAMO … may only be issued an authorisation by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … when formally accepted by Austro Control GmbH after satisfactory completion of an airworthiness review under supervision (assessment). Applications for the nomination of airworthiness review staff shall be submitted through a filled in EASA Form 4 and EASA Form 2 to Austro Control GmbH. 26 An appropriate Part-66 licence is a category B or C licence in the sub-category of the aircraft reviewed. It is not necessary to satisfy the experience requirements of Part-66 at the time of the review. 27 To hold a position with appropriate responsibilities means the airworthiness review staff should have a position in the organisation independent from the airworthiness management process or with overall authority on the airworthiness management process of complete aircraft. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 66 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Formal Aeronautical Maintenance Training a) Review staff for Aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM, except Balloons This means training (internal or external) supported by evidence on the following subjects: • Relevant parts of initial and continuing airworthiness regulations. • Relevant parts of operational requirements and procedures, if applicable. • The organisation’s continuing airworthiness management exposition. • Knowledge of a relevant sample of the type(s) of aircraft gained through a formalised training course. These courses should be at least at a level equivalent to Part-66 Level 1 General Familiarisation and could be imparted by a Part-147 organisation, by the manufacturer, or by any other organisation accepted by the competent authority. “Relevant sample” means that these courses should cover typical systems embodied in those aircraft being within the scope of approval. • Maintenance methods. b) For Aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below and Balloons “Experience in continuing airworthiness” can be full-time or part-time, either as professional or on a voluntary basis. Appropriate aeronautical maintenance training means demonstrated knowledge of the following subjects: • Relevant parts of initial and continuing airworthiness regulations. • Relevant parts of operational requirements and procedures, if applicable. • The organisation’s continuing airworthiness management exposition. • Knowledge of a relevant sample of the type(s) of aircraft gained through training and/or work experience. • Maintenance methods. This knowledge may be demonstrated by documented evidence. 4.1.2 Authorisations Every airworthiness review staff of …(organisation’s name) CAMO … holds an airworthiness review authorisation (permit) that states the individual scope of work (aircraft types). An example of the review staff authorisation is published in chapter 5.2.1. The QM or the AM with consultation with the PCA is responsible for the issuance, restriction and prohibition of the permit. The permit will be issued after assessment to following personal data: DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 67 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn a) Personal licensing. b) Certificates of successfully completed trainings. c) Experience and practice A restriction takes place in case of a restriction of the organisation-authorisation or when the verification of practice for certain authorisations is insufficient. In addition in case of traceable frequently mistakes within the scope of the permit. In case of gross negligence, fatal professional or …(organisation’s name) CAMO … will prohibit the permit. disciplinary mistakes A validity status list is kept in the personal files. A permit is valid for 2 years. When an extension is necessary a new permit will be issued and signed by the AM, PCA and the holder after assessment. The …(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall ensure that aircraft airworthiness review staff can demonstrate appropriate recent continuing airworthiness management experience. This could be achieved through continuing airworthiness management activities for at least six months in every two year period, or through at least one airworthiness review conducted in the last twelve month period. If the staff can not meet the above mentioned experience, the permit becomes invalid. In order to restore the validity of the authorisation, the airworthiness review staff shall conduct at a satisfactory level an airworthiness review under the supervision of the competent authority. A list of airworthiness review staff having recent continuing airworthiness management experience to perform airworthiness reviews is published in chapter 5.2 of this CAME. 4.1.3 Records …(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall maintain a record of all airworthiness review staff in each personal file. The minimum content of the records is listed below: • Personal data • Basic Education, • Experience, • Aeronautical Degree and/or Part-66 qualification and/or nationally-recognised maintenance personnel qualification, • Initial Training received, • Type of Training received, • Continuation Training received, • Experience in continuing airworthiness and within the organisation, • Responsibilities of current role in the organisation, DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 68 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn • Copy of the authorisation. This record shall be retained until two years after the airworthiness review staff have left the organisation. Personal details are kept in the respective personal file. 4.2 Review of aircraft records To satisfy the requirement for an airworthiness review of aircraft, a full documented review of the aircraft records are carried out by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … in order to be satisfied that: 1. airframe, engine and propeller flying hours and associated flight cycles have been properly recorded, and; 2. the flight manual is applicable to the aircraft configuration and reflects the latest revision status, and; 3. all the maintenance due on the aircraft according to the approved aircraft maintenance programme has been carried out, and; 4. all known defects have been corrected or, when applicable, carried forward in a controlled manner, and; 5. all applicable airworthiness directives have been applied and properly registered, and; 6. all modifications and repairs applied to the aircraft have been registered and are approved according to Part 21, and; 7. all service life limited components installed on the aircraft are properly identified, registered and have not exceeded their approved service life limit, and; 8. all maintenance has been released in accordance with this Part, and; 9. the current mass and balance statement reflects the configuration of the aircraft and is valid, and; 10. the aircraft complies with the latest revision of its type design approved by the Agency. As a minimum, sample checks within each document category should be carried out. A checklist (5.1 (f)) will be used to confirm that the above has been reviewed and found in compliance with Part-M. 4.3 Physical survey …(organisation’s name) CAMO … airworthiness review staff shall carry out a physical survey of the aircraft. For this review, airworthiness review staff not appropriately qualified to Part-66 shall be assisted by such qualified personnel who is approved to issue a release to service if required. Nevertheless the review staff who is signing the ARC shall carry out both the document review and the physical survey. The physical survey may be performed up to 90 days before the new expiration date of the ARC that the review can take place during a maintenance check. The review of aircraft records and the physical survey will be carried out within one survey. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 69 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Through the physical survey of the aircraft, the airworthiness review staff shall ensure that: 1. all required markings and placards are properly installed, and; 2. the aircraft complies with its approved flight manual, and; 3. the aircraft configuration complies with the approved documentation, and; 4. no evident defect can be found that has not been addressed according to M.A.403, and; 5. no inconsistencies can be found between the aircraft and the documented review of records. 4.3.1 Physical survey on the aircraft28 In addition to the tasks required above the following checks have to be performed anyway: a) Inspection of the general condition of the aircraft This should include a detailed outside check according AFM. In particular paying attention to: 1. leakages at areas of the engine(s), tank(s), landing gear 2. proper condition of the tyres 3. condition of the brakes (unallowable deformation and coloration of brake discs respectively thickness of brake linings) 4. structure damages (hard landings, strokes of lightning, other indications of overload) 5. condition and function of aircraft systems (e.g. stall warning, pitot/static heater and de-icing systems) Inside the aircraft: 6. equipment (refer to b)) 7. fixation and condition of seats 8. condition of instrument panels, windshields, windows 9. condition and free moving of flight controls (including throttle control, mixture control, propeller control,…), doors 10. critical areas that are typically vulnerable for corrosion depending on the aircraft type b) Inspection of the equipment 11. safety equipment 12. operational equipment 28 The physical survey could require actions categorised as maintenance (e.g. operational tests, tests of emergency equipment, visual inspections requiring panel opening etc.). In this case, after the airworthiness review a release to service should be issued in accordance with Part-M. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 70 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 13. minimum equipment according to ZLLV, Appendix D and LTH 44 14. Additional equipment must be inspected if aircraft is used for towing (gliders, banners) or drop off of skydivers. c) Engine runs An engine run has to be performed on the occasion of every aircraft review. Only instructed and authorised staff shall perform engine runs and only in areas which are suitable therefore. The information of wind direction and velocity has to be included into the consideration how to line up the aircraft for engine run. Devices for towing the aircraft have to be removed during the run up. Suitable and sufficient fire extinguishers and personal instructed with the handling of them shall be ready within a distance of max. 40 meters. All preparations for an engine run have to be performed according the operating handbook. d) Check flights The surveyor has the authorisation to dispose a check flight when he/she deems necessary. Following points must be complied with: 15. A reason for the check flight must be recorded before performing the check flight. This record is a part of the physical review checklist. 16. The operator/owner of the aircraft must agree with the designated pilot. 17. The pilot in command shall have a valid licence for the aircraft and adequate experience (Austrian LTH 42). 18. The surveyor shall not be the PIC. 19. The purpose for the flight and the flight program has to be discussed between the surveyor and the pilot before start of the check flight. An appropriate briefing has to be performed. Depending on the flight program it could be necessary that the PIC needs a valid licence for aerobatics. 20. There must not be a finding or restriction which is being opposed to the flight. Safety first! 21. The review time limit must not be expired and there must not be a reason that the review will fail. 22. Only a negligible deviation from the assigned flight program is allowed. 23. The result of the check flight shall be documented as part of the physical review checklist. A checklist (5.1 (g)) will be used to confirm that the above has been reviewed and found in compliance with Part-M. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 71 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 4.4 Additional procedures for recommendations to competent authorities for the import of aircraft a) Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU When transferring an aircraft registration within the EU, the former Member State will be informed that the aircraft will be registered onto the new register of a Member State. An application will be made to the competent authority for registration for the issuance of a new airworthiness certificate. The former airworthiness review certificate remains valid until its expiry date. The proper transfer of information will be ensured between the two competent authorities during the aircraft transfer process. The PCA will verify that: 1. the competent authority for registration entered the new aircraft registration on the existing airworthiness review certificate and validated the change and, 2. the data package to be provided to ACG according LTH tbd. is collected and assembled and, 3. that the compliance checklists for the applicable operational equipment requirement (EU OPS 1, JAR OPS 3, JAR 26, LTH 44, LTH 47) are produced and submitted to ACG. b) Airworthiness review of used aircraft imported into the EU In case of import of an used aircraft from a third country (Non EU member State) the holder shall apply to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a new airworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21. In this context an airworthiness review has to be carried out by the CAMO. Ensure that: 1. an application to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a new airworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21 is filed; and 2. an airworthiness review carried out by an appropriately approved continuing airworthiness management organisation and all files are available; and 3. all maintenance as requested by approved data of TCH was carried out by the approved maintenance organisation.∗ In order to allow for possible participation of authority personnel, the applicant should inform the competent authority at least 10 working days in advance of the time and location of the airworthiness review. If …(organisation’s name) CAMO … is not approved for the specific aircraft type available, the competent authority may carry out the airworthiness review. In this ∗ Items not applicable for new aircraft with a valid Export CoA or Statement of Conformity (Part 21 Form 52) DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 72 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn case, the airworthiness review should be requested to the competent authority with a 30-day notice. The aircraft and all relevant records will be reviewed to determine the work to be undertaken to establish the airworthiness of the aircraft. Additional items which have to be reviewed are as follows: • Certificates (e.g. Radio Station License, Insurance Certificate, CoA for Export, primary authority information) • Aircraft Maintenance Status (e.g. certified current Time in Service, Times and Cycles since last maintenance, certified Status of Airworthiness Directives including method of compliance, certified inventory of Hard Time Components, Aircraft Accident & Incident Reports) • Maintenance Records (e.g. Technical Logs (min. 2 years), Aircraft-, Engine-, APU log books, non-SRM structural repairs and approvals) • Engine Records (e.g. Airworthiness Directives Status, Service Bulletin Status, certified statement that the engines are not involved in an accident) • APU Records (e.g. Statement of APU Hours and Cycles, LLP status and full traceability to birth) • Component Records (e.g. component AD and SB status, AD compliance report and compliance documentation for appliances, parts needing European parts approval) • Landing Gear Records (e.g. approved LLP listings for each gear) • Manuals (e.g. Airplane Flight Manual, Airplane Operating Manual, Emergency / Abnormal Checklist, Quick Reference Handbook) • Miscellaneous (e.g. maintenance program specifications (previous operator), operator’s approved maintenance program, approved minimum equipment list) • Emergency Equipment (e.g. cockpit configuration, cabin layout, instrument limitations, placards) Maintenance to be carried out is as follows: • maintenance needed for import, such as embodiment of modifications needed to comply with the EASA type certificate, bridging check to comply with the new aircraft maintenance programme • avionics such as radio and navigation equipment, instrument flight rules (IFR) equipment, digital flight data recorder (DFDR) / cockpit voice recorder (CVR) test, ELT 406 MHz code and identification • compass compensation • special operating rules such as extended twin-engine operations (ETOPS) / long range operations (LROPS), reduced vertical separation minima (RVSM), MNPS, all weather operations (AWOPS), RNAV DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 73 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn • aircraft survey including verification of conformity with the flight manual and the datasheet, presence of fire proof identification plates, conformity of markings including registration, presence and serviceability of emergency equipment, internal and external lighting systems • Painting of new registration marks and flag • Installation stainless steel registration placard with new registration • Installation of language placards, where required • check flight including check of control system / cockpit ground check / engine run up • Special national requirements When satisfied that the aircraft is in compliance with the relevant requirements, the continuing airworthiness management organisation shall send a documented recommendation for the issuance of an airworthiness review certificate to the Member State of registry. The owner represented by the PCA shall allow access to the aircraft for inspection by the Member State of registry. A new airworthiness certificate will be issued by the Member State of registry when it is satisfied the aircraft complies with the prescriptions of Part 21. The Member State shall also issue the airworthiness review certificate valid normally for one year unless the Member State has safety reason to limit the validity. The PCA has to support this decision with requested documents. The recommendation sent to the competent authority should contain at least the items described below:29 a) All the information set forth by 4.5 a) to g) in this CAME b) Aircraft information - aircraft assigned registration - state of manufacturer - previous registration∗ - export certificate number - TC and TC data sheet numbers - noise and emissions TC and TC data sheet numbers (if available) - comparison of prior aircraft maintenance programme with the proposed new aircraft maintenance programme (transfer check).∗ c) Documents accompanying the recommendation - copy of the application, and; 29 ∗ For details see: www.austrocontrol / Luftfahrtagentur / Luftfahrzeuge / Lufttüchtigkeit & Zertifizierung / LTZ Items not applicable for new aircraft with a valid Export CoA or Statement of Conformity (Part 21 Form 52) DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 74 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn - original export certificate, and; - copy of the approvals of the flight manual and its supplements, and; - list of AD’s incorporated up to the latest published issue, and; - proposed new aircraft maintenance programme, and; - status of all service life limited components, and; - the valid weight and centre of gravity schedule reflecting the current configuration of the aircraft, and; - Part 21 approval reference for all modifications and repairs. d) Maintenance∗ - a copy of the work packages requested by the subpart G organisation including details of any bridging check to ensure all the necessary maintenance has been carried out. e) Aircraft check flight - a copy of the check flight report c) New aircraft from EU or imported from a third country In case of import of new aircraft from EU or a third country (Non EU member state) the holder shall apply to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a new airworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21. The PCA shall communicate with the Member State of registry and shall ensure that: 1. an application to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a new airworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21 is filed and, 2. the data package to be provided to ACG according LTH tbd. is collected, assembled and provided and, 3. compliance checklists for the applicable operational equipment requirement (EU OPS 1, JAR OPS 3, JAR 26, LTH 44, LTH 47) are produced and submitted to ACG. For new aircraft originating from an EU member state the PCA shall ensure that a statement of conformity according Part 21 is issued by the manufacturer. The conformity with the Austrian additional national requirements and the existence of the required data package has to be ensured by the PCA. For new aircraft imported from a third country the conformity of the aircraft has to be documented by an export CoA stating conformity to an EASA approved type design. Where applicable the compliance inspection may be performed under the procedure agreed between ACG and the exporting authority (ODAR-procedure). In this case the conformity with the Austrian additional national requirements and the existence of the required data package is ensured by the ODAR. If no procedure is available the PCA has to ensure the conformity. ∗ Items not applicable for new aircraft with a valid Export CoA or Statement of Conformity (Part 21 Form 52) DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 75 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 4.5 Recommendations to competent authorities for the issuance of airworthiness review certificates An M.A.902 airworthiness review certificate (EASA Form 15b) or a recommendation form (5.1 h)) is issued by appropriately authorised M.A.707 airworthiness review staff on behalf of …(organisation’s name) CAMO CAMO when satisfied that the airworthiness review has been properly carried out. A copy of both physical review and document review check lists stated above should be sent to the competent authority together with any recommendation issued. This should also include a finding statement with the rectification of findings if necessary. The recommendation sent to the competent authority should contain at least the items described below: a) General information - CAMO name and address - owner name - date and place the document review and the aircraft survey were carried out - period and place the aircraft can be seen if required by the competent authority b) Aircraft information - registration - type - manufacturer - serial number - flight manual reference - weight and centre of gravity data - aircraft maintenance programme reference c) Documents accompanying the recommendation - copy of registration papers - The owners request for a new airworthiness review certificate d) Aircraft status - aircraft total time and cycles - list of persons or organisations having carried out continuing airworthiness activities including maintenance tasks on the aircraft and its components since the last airworthiness review certificate DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 76 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn e) Aircraft survey - copy of the filled out Physical review checklist (chapter 5.1 (g)). f) Findings - a list of all the findings made during the airworthiness review with the corrective action carried out g) Statement - A statement signed by the airworthiness review staff recommending the issue of an airworthiness review certificate. The statement should confirm that the aircraft in its current configuration complies with the following: - airworthiness directives up to the latest published issue, and; - type certificate datasheet, and; - aircraft maintenance programme, and; - component service life limitations, and; - the valid weight and centre of gravity schedule reflecting the current configuration of the aircraft, and; - Part 21 for all modifications and repairs, and; - the current flight manual including supplements, and; - operational requirements. The above items should clearly state the exact reference of the data used in establishing compliance; for instance the number and issue of the type certificate data sheet used should be stated. The statement should also confirm that all of the above is properly entered and certified in the aircraft continuing airworthiness record system and/or in the owner/operator’s Bordbuch. 4.5.1 Findings A level 1 finding is any significant non-compliance with EASA Part-M requirements which lowers the safety standard and hazards seriously the flight safety. In this case, no airworthiness review certificate will be issued until the finding is closed. A level 2 finding is any non-compliance with EASA Part-M requirements which could lower the safety standard and possibly hazard the flight safety. In this case, a due date will be defined (max. 3 months) for the finding. The finding list is included in the Compliance Checklist for aircraft review (chapter 5.1 (f)). This finding list will be signed by the airworthiness review staff and PCA. The PCA defines a corrective action plan and demonstrates corrective actions to the satisfaction of the airworthiness review staff within a period agreed including appropriate corrective actions to prevent reoccurrence of the finding and its root cause. The airworthiness review staff is responsible for the control of the due dates. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 77 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 4.6 Issuance of airworthiness review certificates After successful completion of an airworthiness review, the appropriately authorised airworthiness review staff issues the ARC by using the EASA Form 15b. The ARC has to be numbered with ascending and unique digits. All entries made shall be clear and accurate. When it is necessary to correct an entry, the correction shall be made in a manner that clearly shows the original entry. In this case the correction should be signed and dated by the surveyor. The ARC is valid for one year. If findings have come up during the review, the review staff will classify the finding levels and hand over the airworthiness review finding list together with the ARC to the PCA or to the QM. The classification of findinglevels should be the same as those listed in chapter 2.1 of this CAME. PCA is responsible to perform corrective actions within the given due date and to store the ARC together with the aircraft records. The complete review may be performed up to 90 days before the new expiration date of the ARC without loss of continuity of the airworthiness review pattern in order to have a flexible time period for the physical survey. In this case the reviewed aircraft is still considered as being within controlled environment under ...(organisation’s name) CAMO. Should the outcome of the airworthiness review be inconclusive, the competent authority shall be informed. An ARC will be extended twice for a period of one year each time if the aircraft is within a controlled environment30 and it is verified that: 1. the ARC is valid 2. the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft or any component fitted to the aircraft does meet the requirements of Part-M, and; 3. the aircraft does remain in conformity with the type design approved by the Agency; and 4. the aircraft has been operated within the limitations of the approved flight manual or the airworthiness certificate, and; 5. the aircraft has not been involved in an accident or incident that affects the airworthiness of the aircraft, without subsequent appropriate action to restore airworthiness; and 6. a modification or repair has been approved in accordance with Part 21. The above mentioned requirements shall be documented. Therefore the compliance is stated on the Extension Form and on the EASA Form 15b. The original ARC will be held in the respective aircraft documents. A copy of any airworthiness review certificate issued or extended for an aircraft shall be sent to the 30 An aircraft in a controlled environment is an aircraft continuously managed by an M.A. Subpart G approved continuing airworthiness management organisation, which has not changed organisations in the previous 12 months, and which is maintained by approved maintenance organisations. This includes M.A.803(b) maintenance carried out and released to service according to M.A.801(b)2 or M.A.801(b)3. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 78 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Member State of Registry of that aircraft within 10 days. …(organisation’s name) CAMO CAMO will also retain one copy of each ARC issued (refer to 4.7 in this CAME). 4.6.1 Invalidity of the airworthiness review certificate An airworthiness review certificate becomes invalid if: 1. suspended or revoked; or 2. the airworthiness certificate is suspended or revoked; or 3. the aircraft is not on the aircraft register of a Member State; or 4. the type certificate under which the airworthiness certificate was issued is suspended or revoked. An aircraft must not fly if the airworthiness certificate is invalid or if the above points 1. to 5. are not verified. Upon surrender or revocation, the airworthiness review certificate shall be returned to the competent authority. An airworthiness review certificate shall not be extended if the organisation is aware or has reason to believe that the aircraft is unairworthy. 4.7 Airworthiness review records, responsibilities, retention and access The PCA is responsible that the airworthiness review records are kept in a form acceptable to Austro Control GmbH. Retention takes place according to part 1.3 c) and d) in this CAME. …(organisation’s name) CAMO issues an airworthiness review certificate, or makes a recommendation for the airworthiness review to a Member State of Registry. …(organisation’s name) CAMO retains a copy of each airworthiness review certificate and recommendation issued, together with all supporting documents. …(organisation’s name) CAMO retains a copy of all those records until two years after the aircraft has been permanently withdrawn from service (refer to table of retention periods in 1.3 in this CAME). DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 79 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Part 5 Appendices 5.1 Sample documents a) Bordbuch b) Accident / Incident Report c) Quality plan d) Extension form e) CAME Recognition Certificate DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 80 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn f) Document review checklist (example) Document Checklist ARC Aircraft data: Airworthiness Review Reference Number: Date of Review: Performed by: No. Sign: Description Comply Yes 1 A01 Remarks No REVIEW Airframe, Engine, APU and Propeller hours/cycles have been properly recorded Pls Record the following information: Airframe: S/N: TAH: Manufacturing date: Last inspection: TAC: * ** Engine Daten (Model __________): S/N: Pos: LH TSN: CSN: Hobbs/Tachtime: Last OH: Manufacturing date: Installed: Time at installation: hrs / cyc Engine Daten (Model __________): ** S/N: Pos: RH TSN: CSN: Hobbs/Tachtime: Last OH: Manufacturing date: Installed: Time at installation: hrs / cyc APU Daten (Model __________) S/N: TSN: Last OH: Manufacturing date: Installed: Time at installation: EASA Form One: DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 ** P/N: CSN: ** hrs / cyc 28.10.2009 Page 81 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn No. Description Comply Yes Remarks No Propeller Daten (Model __________) S/N: P/N: TSN: Last OH: Manufacturing date: Installed: Time at installation: EASA Form One: Pos: CSN: ** hrs Propeller Daten (Model __________) S/N: P/N: TSN: Last OH: Manufacturing date: Installed: Time at installation: EASA Form One: A02 Pos: CSN: ** hrs AFM/Pilots Operating Manual/Owners Manual: Verify applicability and revision status. Doc. No.: Revision: Supplements: - A03 A04 A05 A06 Maintenance acc OMP has been carried out: Review of Aircraft/Engine/ Propeller/APU log books . Verify all maintenance due acc OMP has been performed and released i.a.w. Part M. Record all discrepancies and copy actual status. All defects rectified or deferred: Verify all known defects has been corrected or when applicable deferred in a controlled manner. Verify open items conform to MEL or CDL. Verify all open items are known to CAMO and listed. AD Status: ADs issued by EASA and the State of Design or those effective under “grandfather” provisions. Verify all applicable ADs has been applied and properly registered. Record all discrepancies and copy actual status. Modifications: All modifications applied to the Aircraft have been registered including approval status acc Part 21. ( look for STC´s, Mod´s Eo´s, etc..) DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 * * * * Page 82 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn No. Description Comply Yes A06 A06 A07 A08 A09 A10 2 3.2 SB Status: Verify all mandatory SB´s acc to CAMO SB Procedure has been applied and registered. Repair and Damage Records: Repairs previously embodied by Owner(s)/Operator(s), including approval status acc. Part 21 and records containing unrepaired damages. List of Service life limited Components: Verify that all Service life limited Components installed on the aircraft are properly identified, registered and have not exceeded their approved service life limit. All Maintenance has been released acc PART 145: Check a relevant sample of Techlog pages, Workpackages and checks. Aircraft Weighing Report: Individual aircraft weighing record is current and reflect actual configuration. Reference: Airframe, Engine and Propeller TCDS: Verfiy that the aircraft complies with the latest revision of the Type design (described in TCDS) approved by the agency. Remarks No * * * * ** ** REVIEW CONCLUSION Open Item List (Beanstandungsliste): Issuance of the open item list. Allocation of time limits and/or due dates. Hand-over to the representative of the operator. To be signed by an authorized person of the operator. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 *** Page 83 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn g) Physical review checklist Physical review checklist ARC (example) Aircraft data: Airworthiness Review Reference Number: Aircraft Eng1 Eng2 APU Type: Manufacturer Serial Nr.: Total hours Total cycles Date of Review: Performed by: No. Sign: Description Comply Yes 1 1A Remarks No PREPARATION ** Prepare the following documents: List of required Placards Document status LOPA Equipment List List of Modifications Dent and Buckle Chart EU OPS 1 and JAR 26 Checklists List of Approved Kinds of Operation Ops Checks to be performed Flight test Program if necessary 2 REVIEW 2A List of Placards and Markings: In accordance with TCDS, AMM chapter 11, AFM, OPS 1 and/or national regulations. ** AFM/Pilots Operating Manual/Owners Manual: Verify that the aircraft complies with the approved AFM. Verify Type and Config is applicable. Check for Options and Modifications. ** Verify that the Airplane Configuration complies with the approved documentation: Check the items below Cabin Configuration Control: Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with the approved documentation. * 2C DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 * Page 84 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn No. Description Comply Yes Remarks No Engine/APU/Propeller: Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with the approved documentation. ** Approved Modifications: Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with the approved documentation. ** Other Manuals required for operation: (e.g. AOM, QRH, FMS, CDL, …) Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with the approved documentation Evident defects: Verify that no evident defects can be found that have not been addressed. Verify that no inconsistencies exist between the aircraft and the documentation as reviewed during the document review: Check the items below Repair and Damage Records: Verify that no inconsistencies exist between the aircraft and the documentation Equipment List: Verify that no inconsistencies exist between the aircraft and the documentation. ** Modification Status Report: Verify that no inconsistencies exist between the aircraft and the documentation. ** 2F EU OPS 1 / JAR 26 Compliance Report: Operator declaration of compliance with subpart K & L. Deviations have to be notified (refer to 4B) to the ACG department Flight Operations (OPS), unless already approved. ** 2G Operational Checks to ensure compliance: List items: *** 2H List of Areas inspected visually: List areas here or refer to additl Checklist *** 2I Registration marks incl. fire-proof plate: According to ZLLV. 2D 2E 3 3A ** * ** * Verification during Flight *** Check flight found necessary: DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 85 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn No. Description Comply Yes 3B Remarks No *** Check Flight program: Conclusion 4 4A EU OPS Findings Report Forward to ACG Dept. AOT OPS . 4B Open Item List (Beanstandungsliste): Issuance of the open item list. Allocation of time limits and/or due dates. Hand-over to the representative of the operator. To be signed by an authorized person of the operator. DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 *** Page 86 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn h) Recommendation form for issuance of airworthiness review certificates i) Annual Review Checklist OMP –Small AC Aircraft Type/Fleet: OMP – Reviewed: Org./Owner: No. Description 1 PREPARATION Comply Yes 1.1 Remarks No * Fleet and Registrations: Last review performed: 1.2 OMP Manual Revision Status: Verify the latest applicable revision status including temporary revisions, appendices and supplements of Docs listed in 2. * 1.3 Airworthiness Directives /LTA/LTH List: Preparation of AD List from State of Design, ACG and EASA * 1.4 Approved Maintenance Programme: * 1.5 1.6 Bordbuch / Flugaufzeichnungen * * 2 REVIEW Documents 2.1 Maintenance Manual Airframe: Doc. No.: Revision: Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP Maintenance Manual Engine: Doc. No.: Revision: Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP Maintenance Manual Propeller: Doc. No.: Revision: Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP Maintenance Manual others: Doc. No.: Revision: Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP 2.2 2.3 2.4 3 Documents / Programs 3.1A Pilot Reports / Tech Log Review Filtered for "High Trend" Critical ATA (e.g. 26, 27, 32, 34, 78) Check, establish corrective Actions and incorporation into OMP DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 * * * * Page 87 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Aircraft Type/Fleet: OMP – Reviewed: Org./Owner: No. Description Comply Yes 3.1B Remarks No Störungsmeldungen Check, establish corrective Actions and incorporation into OMP if necessary for technical and operational defect notifications 3.2 3.3 3.4 * Maintenance Findings Filtered for "High Trend" Critical ATA (e.g. 26, 27, 32, 34, 78) Check, establish corrective Actions and incorporation into OMP Check Interval Variation Permitted Variations to Maint. Program Frequencies incl. approvals Check if all Variations are i.a.w. the approved OMP procedure (Mfr. Or LTH 36/LL26) Aircraft/Engine/ Propeller Previous Maintenance Records: * Review Work Packs, Log books and or Record System to be checked for: ALI/CMR Compliance Check according actual Docs Airworthiness Directives Status Report Compliance Check according prepared Lists 3.5 3.6 Component Overhaul/Life Limit Status: Details of lives remaining and modification status Modification Status Report: Check for modifications embodied including approval status and incorporation into OMP. Repair and Damage Records: Repairs embodied including approval status * * Review Records containing un-repaired damages and incorporation into OMP of repetitive actions. 3.7 LTH 40, LTH 29, LTA91, LTA 46 compliance: Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP 4 Others DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 * Page 88 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn Aircraft Type/Fleet: OMP – Reviewed: Org./Owner: No. Description Comply Yes 4.1 No * ARC/recommendation for ARC: If applicable 5 Remarks REVIEW CONCLUSION * * 6 POST-PROCESSING * Acting Persons: Function: Date: DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 89 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 5.2 List of airworthiness review staff Airworthiness Review Staff Airworthiness Review Authorisation Reference Extension Aircraft Type Max Mustermann ARS-(Org. name)-001 Michi Mustermann ARS-(Org. name)-002 Martin Mustermann ARS-(Org. name)-003 X X X Cessna 152 X X X Cessna 210 X X X Cessna 337 X X X Piper P28A X X X Challenger 300 x X X Learjet 60 5.2.1 Airworthiness review staff authorisation The authorisation schould contain: • • • • • • • Organisation´s name Approval number of the organisation Authorisation number of the airworthiness review staff Date of issuance Personal data (Name of staff, date of birth, address) Granted aircraft types for the review Signature of issuing personal DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 90 of 91 Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart G of 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn 5.3 List of approved maintenance organisations contracted 5.4 List of contracts with owners/operators and their aircraft …(organisation’s name) CAMO is responsible to manage the continuing airworthiness, as contracted of the following aircraft: Owner/Operator AMP Reg. Manufacturer Type S/N Date of contract Depending on the number of aircraft, this paragraph should be updated as follows: The paragraph is revised each time an aircraft is removed from or added in the list. Every time a change is performed, the PCA will send this list to ACG for information. 5.5 Holders of AMP’s A copy of the aircraft maintenance programme will be held by: Copy number 1. 2. 3. 4. Receiver Publication form Austro Control GmbH Owner/operator Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness Contracted approved maintenance oganisation 5.6 List of sub-contractors 5.7 Copy of contracts with approved maintenance organisations 5.8 Copy of contracts for sub-contracted work 5.9 Copy of contracts for the provision of maintenance data by the owner or operator DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 Page 91 of 91
