ACCA F5 Performance Management Introduction Aims of the course Technical knowledge Application of skills Exam technique PASS the exam Links With Other Courses Advanced Performance Management (P5) Performance Management (F5) Management Accounting (F2) What are you going to do? Study Study Study!!! Part A Specialist Cost and Management Accounting Techniques Outlines 1. Costing 2. Accounting Techniques 2a. Activity Based Costing 2b. Target Costing 2c. Lifecycle Costing 2d. Backflush Accounting 2e. Throughput Accounting Section 1 Costing 成本计量 1. Costing is the process of determine the costs of products, services or activities. Direct Cost Indirect Costs Material Labour Expense Production Non-production Absorbed overhead Product Cost TOTAL COST Under/over absorbed OH 2. The problem of overhead How to treat the indirect costs (or Overheads) ? E.g. Factory rent and rates; supervision costs; machine depreciation; heating and lighting etc. 2.1 Use Absorption Costing method Product cost = direct costs + a portion of all production overhead expenditure Reasons: Inventory valuations Pricing decisions Establishing the profitability of different products 2.2 Use Marginal Costing Method Product cost = all variable costs Absorption costing can be misleading 3. A revision of absorption costing 3 stages: Direct costs + Overhead traceable to cost center + a share of general overhead costs + a share of service cost centers cost Total overhead costs 1. Allocation stage 2. Apportionment stage Using overhead absorption rates to allocated to the production cost: 3. Absorption stage Cost per unit calculation Example: CD Factory 4. Overhead absorption Absorption rate = estimated overhead / budgeted activity level E.g. a rate per machine hour; a rate per direct labor hour E.g. Produce 20,000 CDs Pressing = $13,200/20,000 CDs = $0.66 Packing = $6,800/20,000 CDs = $0.34 $1.00 → add to cost card Problem: Over and under absorption of overheads Because the overhead absorption rate is based on estimates (of both numerator and denominator), it is possible has a variance at the end of period. E.g. the budgeted overhead = $80,000, the budgeted activity level = 40,000 direct labor hours, the actually overheads = $84,000 and 45,000 direct labor hour: 1. absorption rate = $80,000 / 40,000 =$2 2. overhead absorbed = $2 x 45,000 = $90,000 3. overhead incurred (actual) = $84,000 4. over-absorption of overhead = $90,000 - $84,000 = $6,000 5. Marginal costing In marginal costing, inventories are valued at variable production cost whereas in absorption costing they are valued at their full production cost. Contribution = sales revenue – variable (marginal) costs. 6. Absorption Costing and Marginal Costing Compared If opening and closing inventory levels differ, profit reported under the two methods will be different. In the long run, total profit will be same whatever method is used. (a) Production = sales (so inventory is constant) (b) Production < sales (so inventory is falling) AC profit < MC profit (c) Production > sales (so inventory is climbing) AC profit = MC profit AC profit > MC profit You can remember which profit will be highest using SIAM S – Stock (Inventories) I – Increase A – Absorption profit M – More Advantages and disadvantages of absorption costing Advantages of absorption costing. It recognizes that selling prices must cover all costs. It complies with IAS 2 on accounting for inventory, whereby the value of inventory must include an appropriate amount of fixed production overhead. Disadvantages of absorption costing. Profits can be manipulated by simply changing production levels. This is because overheads will be carried forward in closing inventory. It is based on the assumption that overheads are volume related. In the next part we will see that ABC assumes that many overheads are complexity and diversity related, not merely volume related. Advantages and disadvantages of marginal costing Advantages Most appropriate for decision making as it highlights contribution. (It is useful for short-term pricing decisions.) Fixed costs are treated in accordance with their nature, ie as period costs. Profit depends on sales and efficiency not on production levels. Slightly simpler variance analysis. Disadvantages There is a danger that products will be sold on an ongoing basis at a marginal contribution which fails to cover fixed costs. Does not comply with IAS 2, thus need year end adjustments for the preparation of published accounts. Need analysis of mixed costs between fixed and variable. Seasonal variations in a year can cause unnecessary profit variances. (1) Prepare an income statement under absorption costing and marginal costing respectively, and (2) reconcile the profit figures. Solution Direct cost = $2 +$3 +$1= $6 =$6 x 4400 = $8000/4000 x 4400 = ($6+$2) x (4400 – 4200) =8800 - 8500 No proportion of fixed production costs = actual fixed production cost Section 2 a. Activity Based Costing (ABC) 作业成本法 Outline ABC was regularly examined in Paper 2.4 and is a question on the Pilot Paper for F5. It is therefore a crucial topic. You should expect both calculations and interpretation. Having studied this chapter you will be able to: Identify appropriate cost drivers under ABC Calculate costs per driver and per unit using ABC Compare ABC and traditional methods of overhead absorption Explain the implications of switching to ABC for pricing, sales strategy, performance management and decisionmaking 1. Activity Based Costing An alternative to absorption costing is ABC. Traditional absorption costing uses a single basis for absorbing all overheads into cost units for a particular production department cost centre. ABC considers what causes each type of overhead category to occur. Each type of overhead is absorbed using a different basis depending on the cost driver. Steps in ABC 1. Group overheads into activities, according to how they are driven. These are known as cost pools. 2. Identify the cost drivers for each activity, ie what causes the activity cost to be incurred. 3. Calculate a cost per unit of cost driver. 4. Absorb activity costs into production based on usage of cost drivers. Cost driver analysis complex business environment: costs are incurred because cost drivers occur at different levels. For costs that vary with production level in the short term, the cost driver will be volume related (labor or machine hours). Overheads that vary with some other activity should be traced to products using transaction-based cost drivers, such as number of orders received and number of production runs. Identifying Activity Unit-Level Activity Batch-Level Activity A part of the production process for which management wants a separate reporting of the costs of the activity involved. Product-Level Activity OrganizationSustaining Activity Customer-Level Activity Cost Hierarchy Unit-level activities (单位层面作业)Performed when a unit is produced. Batch-level activities (批量层面作业)Performed each time a batch (group) of goods is handled or processed. Depend on volume of output. e.g. maintenance done, supplies used, indirect labour required e.g. placing purchase orders, setups of equipment, shipments to customers Product-level activities (产品层面作业)Performed as needed to support the production of each different type of product. e.g. designing a product, advertising a product Cost Hierarchy Customer-level activities(客户层面作业) relate to specific customers and include activities E.g.: sales calls, catalogue mailings, and general technical support that are not tied to any specific product. Organization-sustaining activities (企业维持作业) Costs of maintaining overall general manufacturing capacity. Cannot be directly traced to units, batches or product lines. E.g.: heating factory, cleaning executive offices, arranging for loans 2. Absorption costing vs ABC Overhead absorption rates using ABC should be more closely linked to the causes of overhead costs. The modern business environment has much wider product ranges than seen before, complex production process and decreasing product lifecycles. ABC recognizes these factors by using multiple cost drivers when absorbing overheads. Overhead absorption rates Stage One: Costs assigned to pools Cost pools (成本池) Indirect Labour Indirect Materials Other Overhead Department 1 Department 2 Department 3 Overhead absorption rates Stage One: Costs assigned to pools Cost pools Stage Two: Costs applied to products Indirect Labour Indirect Materials Other Overhead Department 1 Department 2 Department 3 Products Overhead absorption rates Stage One: Costs assigned to pools Cost pools Stage Two: Costs applied to products Indirect Labour Indirect Materials Other Overhead Department 1 Department 2 Department 3 Direct Labour Hours Machine Hours Raw Materials Cost Products Departmental Allocation Bases Example Bell Co. produces two telephones: a cordless phone and a regular model. The company has the following estimated and actual data. Budgeted overhead Expected activity (in direct labour hours) Actual overhead Actual activity (in direct labour hours) Budgeted OA Fabrication $252,000 Assembly $108,000 $360,000 100,000 $380,000 100,000 TOTAL $360,000 Cost drivers: Assembly department – Direct labour hours (DLH) Fabrication department – Machine hours (MH) Stage One: Pool Formation $252,000 $108,000 Fabrication Assembly Budgeted OA Expected/actual DLH Cordless Regular Total MH Cordless Regular Total Fabrication Assembly TOTAL $252,000 $360,000 $108,000 Fabrication rate: $252,000 ÷ 40,000 MH = $6.30 per MH 7,000 13,000 20,000 3,000 77,000 80,000 10,000 90,000 100,000 4,000 36,000 40,000 1,000 9,000 10,000 5,000 45,000 50,000 Budgeted OH Fabrication Assembly TOTAL $252,000 $360,000 $108,000 Assembly rate: Expected/actual $108,000 ÷ 80,000 DLH = $1.35 per DLH DLH Cordless 7,000 3,000 10,000 Regular 13,000 77,000 90,000 Total 20,000 80,000 100,000 MH Cordless 4,000 1,000 5,000 Regular 36,000 9,000 45,000 Total 40,000 10,000 50,000 Stage Two: Costs Assigned Overhead costs are then assigned to products. The OARs are multiplied by the actual amount of the cost drivers used in each department by each product. Cordless Regular Fabrication $4,050 ($1.35 x 3,000 DLH) $103,950 ($1.35 x 77,000 DLH) Assembly $25,200 ($6.30 x 4,000 MH) $226,800 ($6.30 x 36,000 MH) $29,250 $330,750 Total ABC System 作业成本法 作业成本法的意义: 真正控制成本,不仅要控制成本的数量和成本的分 配,更应确定生成成本的关键因素 (成本动因)。 制造费用不仅随着产量变动,也随制造的差异性和 复杂性而变动。 Example Bell Co. produces two telephones: a cordless phone and a regular model. The company has the following estimated and actual data. Budgeted overhead Expected activity (in direct labour hours) Actual overhead Actual activity (in direct labour hours) $360,000 100,000 $380,000 100,000 Notice: a significant portion of overhead costs is not driven or caused by direct labour hours. Look below. Activity Cost Data (overhead activities) Activity Activity Costs Setup $120,000 Material handling 60,000 Machining 100,000 Testing 80,000 Total $360,000 Setup and materials handling activities (50% of the overhead costs) are batch-level activities related to the number of production runs and material moves, respectively. The following shows the activity usage measures Units produced per yr Prime costs Direct labour hours Machine hours Production runs Number of moves Cordless 10,000 $78,000 10,000 5,000 20 60 Regular Total 90,000 100,000 $738,000 $816,000 90,000 100,000 45,000 50,000 10 30 30 90 Now, let’s compute a rate for each overhead activity, then use these activity rates to assign overhead costs. Activity Cost Data (overhead activities) Activity Activity Activity Rate Costs Measures Setup $120,000 30 runs $4,000/run Material handling 60,000 90 moves $666.67/move Machining 100,000 50,000 MH $2.00/MH Testing 80,000 100,000 DLH $0.80/DLH Total $360,000 Stage One: Pool Formation Allocation of the $360,000 overhead to four cost pools for purpose of computing allocation rates $60,000 $120,000 Setup Machining Testing Materials Handling $80,000 $100,000 Let’s examine the manufacturing overhead cost applied to both models Cordless Applied overhead costs: Setups: ($4,000 x 20 runs) ($4,000 x 10 runs) Material handling: ($666.67 x 60 moves) ($666.67 x 30 moves) Machining: ($2 x 5,000 MH) ($2 x 45,000 MH) Testing: ($0.80 x 10,000 DLH) ($0.80 x 90,000 DLH) Manufacturing costs Regular 80,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 10,000 90,000 8,000 $138,000 72,000 $222,000 Stage Two: Cost Allocation Allocation of the $360,000 manufacturing overhead applied $222,000 $138,000 Cordless Regular The Classic Brass Activity Cost Pools at Classic Brass Activity Cost Pool Customer Orders Product Design Order Size Customer Relations Other Activity Measure Number of customer orders Number of product designs Machine-hours Number of active customers Not applicable Example Dodo Ltd manufactures three products, A, B and C. Data for the period just ended is as follows A B C Output (units) 20,000 25,000 2,000 $/unit $/unit $/unit Sales price 20 20 20 Direct material cost 5 10 10 Labour hours/unit 2 1 1 Wages paid at $5/hr Total production overheads for Dodo Ltd amount to $190,000. Required (a) Calculate the profit per unit obtained on each product if production overheads are absorbed on the basis of labour hours (Traditional Absorption Costing). Solution Total labor hours = 20,000 x 2 + 25,000 x 1 + 2,000 x 1= 67,000 =$2.836 X 2 + 5 +2 X 5 =20,000 unit x2 +25,000 x 2 + 2,000 x 2 = 0.585 x (25,000 x 2) Implications of ABC When ABC should be used: (a) When production overheads are high relative to prime costs (eg service sector) (b) When there is a whole diversity of product range (c) When there are considerable differences in the use of resources by products (d) Where consumption of resources is not driven by volume Benefits of ABC The use of ABC provides opportunities for: (a) Cost control and reduction by the efficient management of cost drivers (b) Better costing information used to assist pricing decisions (c) Reanalysis of production and output/product mix decisions (d) Profitability analysis (by customer, product line etc) (e) A more realistic estimate of costs and profits which can be used in performance appraisal Criticisms of ABC (a) It is time consuming and expensive (b) Will be of limited benefit if overhead costs are primarily volume related (c) Reduced benefit if the company is producing only one product or a range of products with similar costs (d) Complex situations may have multiple cost drivers (e) Some arbitrary apportionment may still exist Implications Before considering a switch to ABC it is important to consider whether the benefits outweigh the costs and to ensure that the appropriate cost drivers can be identified as such a switch will have implications on: Pricing Sales strategy Performance management Decision making Exercise Activity rates in activity-based costing are computed by dividing costs from the firststage allocations by the activity measure for each activity cost pool. In traditional costing systems, all manufacturing costs are assigned to products—even manufacturing costs that are not caused by the products. true If personnel department expenses are allocated on the basis of the number of employees in various departments, then the number of employees in the personnel department itself must be included in the allocation base when the step method is used. true false House Inc. manufactures 2 product on a common assembly line by the same direct laborers. Different direct materials are used in each type and the machinery is retooled for each product. Until now, MO costs have been allocated on the basis of direct labour-hours using a plant-wide rate. The manager is considering the adoption of ABC method. Following information is provided: Required: a. Use ABC and single OAR determine the total manufacturing cost of each of the two product lines and the cost per unit. b. Which of the two products is undercosted / overcosted? How it affects cross-subsidization? Solution- a: i) ABC Solution- a: i) single OAR Solution- b Cross-subsidization can occur with plant-wide costing where overhead, which is not closely connected with the actual activities giving rise to the overhead amounts (i.e., the true cost drivers), is applied to products using differing quantities of those cost drivers. Such a broad application of overhead can distort the true cost of manufacturing those products. For House, the unit cost to manufacture product B is actually higher than it appears using the plant-wide overhead rate, and the unit cost to manufacture product A is less than it appears using the plant-wide overhead rate. This may affect the pricing of the two products, the revenue generated by each product (price may affect demand) and, consequently, the company’s overall profitability. It may also negatively affect management decisions about where to direct new resources available to the company. In this case, product B are being undercosted and are being subsidized by product A, which are being overcosted when a plant-wide overhead rate is used. Section 2 b. Target Costing 目标成本法 Objectives: Derive a target cost in manufacturing and service industries Explain the difficulties of using target costing in service industries Explain the implications of using target costing on pricing, cost control and performance management Suggest how a target cost gap might be closed Exam Context Target costing may form all or part of a question. You should be prepared to not only calculate a target cost but also to discuss the difficulties and implications of using target costing. Overview 1. Cost plus pricing vs Target costing Cost plus pricing traditional approaches Businesses calculate the cost of manufacturing and selling a product, and then add mark up, to give the profit element. A major criticism: they do not consider any external factors (eg demand for product; no. of competitors, etc). They are therefore unlikely to maximise the profits that a business will generate. Target costing Short product life cycles The planning, development and design stage of a product becomes critical. Cost reduction must be considered at early stage of a product’s life cycle, rather than during the production process. Target costing involves setting a selling price for your product by reference to the market. From this your desired profit margin is deducted leaving you with a target cost. 2. Deriving a target cost Implementing target costing (a) Define product specification and estimate anticipated sales volume. (b) Set a target selling price at which the company will be able to achieve the desired market share. (c) Required profit is estimated based on profit margins or return on investment. (d) Calculat target cost (e) The estimated cost of the product is calculated based on the product specification and current cost levels. (f) Estimated Product Cost – Target Cost = Cost Gap (g) Efforts are made to close the cost gap. Aim to "design out" costs before production starts. 3. Implications Target costing turns the traditional cost plus approach to pricing on its head, meaning pricing is the first consideration. Cost control is considered right up front as part of the development of the product not merely as an activity which happens alongside production. Performance management will therefore focus on ensuring sales targets are met: ie have we set the right price and ways of improving processes / development to drive down costs to at least the level of the target cost. 4. Closing a target cost gap How to close a target cost gap? Cheaper materials Fewer parts Cheaper labour No non-value adding activities Training Automation 5. Implications of target costing in service industries The target costing approach is a sensible basis for estimating / driving down costs regardless of the type of business. However, due to the nature of service industries this process is more difficult in these businesses. Unlike manufacturing, service industries have the following characteristics which make cost and performance measurement more difficult: Simultaneity – created at time consumed Heterogeneity – quality / consistency varies Intangibility – of what is provided Perishability – cannot make in advance and store up. In addition to these problems, service organisations will require more qualitative information to arrive at a price and evaluate performance eg Quality of service Repeat customers etc Exam Question (2006) Edward Co assembles and sells many types of radio. It is considering extending its product range to include digital radios. These radios produce a better sound quality than traditional radios and have a large number of potential additional features not possible with the previous technologies. A radio is produced by assembly workers assembling a variety of components. Production overheads are currently absorbed into product costs on an assembly labour hour basis. Edward Co is considering a target costing approach for its new digital radio product. Required: (a) Briefly describe the target costing process that Edward Co should undertake. (3 marks) (b) Explain the benefits to Edward Co of adopting a target costing approach at such an early stage in the product development process. (4 marks) (c) Assuming a cost gap was identified in the process, outline possible steps Edward Co could take to reduce this gap. (5 marks) Solution (a) Target costing process Product specification. Target costing begins by specifying a product an organisation wishes to sell. This will involve extensive customer analysis, considering which features customers value and which they do not. Ideally only those features valued by customers will be included in the product design. Selling price. The price at which the product can be sold at is then considered. This will take in to account the competitor products and the market conditions expected at the time that the product will be launched. Hence a heavy emphasis is placed on external analysis before any consideration is made of the internal cost of the product. Cost calculation. From the above price a desired margin is deducted. This can be a gross or a net margin. This leaves the cost target. An organisation will need to meet this target if their desired margin is to be met. Costs for the product are then calculated and compared to the cost target mentioned above. If it appears that this cost cannot be achieved then the difference (shortfall) is called a cost gap. This gap would have to be closed, by some form of cost reduction, if the desired margin is to be achieved. (b) Benefits of adopting target costing The organisation will have an early external focus to its product development. Businesses have to compete with others (competitors) and an early consideration of this will tend to make them more successful. Traditional approaches (by calculating the cost and then adding a margin to get a selling price) are often far too internally driven. Only those features that are of value to customers will be included in the product design. Target costing at an early stage considers carefully the product that is intended. Features that are unlikely to be valued by the customer will be excluded. This is often insufficiently considered in cost plus methodologies. Cost control will begin much earlier in the process. If it is clear at the design stage that a cost gap exists then more can be done to close it by the design team. Traditionally, cost control takes place at the ‘cost incurring’ stage, which is often far too late to make a significant impact on a product that is too expensive to make. Costs per unit are often lower under a target costing environment. This enhances profitability. Target costing has been shown to reduce product cost by between 20% and 40% depending on product and market conditions. In traditional cost plus systems an organisation may not be fully aware of the constraints in the external environment until after the production has started. Cost reduction at this point is much more difficult as many of the costs are ‘designed in’ to the product. It is often argued that target costing reduces the time taken to get a product to market. Under traditional methodologies there are often lengthy delays whilst a team goes ‘back to the drawing board’. Target costing, because it has an early external focus, tends to help get things right first time and this reduces the time to market. (c) Steps to reduce a cost gap Review radio features Remove features from the radio that add to cost but do not significantly add value to the product when viewed by the customer. This should reduce cost but not the achievable selling price. This can be referred to as value engineering or value analysis. Team approach Cost reduction works best when a team approach is adopted. Edward Limited should bring together members of the marketing, design, assembly and distribution teams to allow discussion of methods to reduce costs. Open discussion and brainstorming are useful approaches here. Review the whole supplier chain Each step in the supply chain should be reviewed, possibly with the aid of staff questionnaires, to identify areas of likely cost savings. Areas which are identified by staff as being likely cost saving areas can then be focussed on by the team. For example, the questionnaire might ask ‘are there more than five potential suppliers for this component?’ Clearly a ‘yes’ response to this question will mean that there is the potential for tendering or price competition. Components Edward Limited should look at the significant costs involved in components. New suppliers could be sought or different materials could be used. Care would be needed not to damage the perceived value of the product. Efficiency improvements should also be possible by reducing waste or idle time that might exist. Avoid, where possible, non-standard parts in the design. Overheads Productivity increases would also help here by spreading fixed overheads over a greater number of units. Equally Edward Limited should consider an activity based costing approach to its overhead allocation, this may reveal more favourable cost allocations for the digital radio or ideas for reducing costs in the business. Assembly workers Productivity gains may be possible by changing working practices or by de-skilling the process. Automation is increasingly common in assembly and manufacturing and Edward Limited should investigate what is possible here to reduce the costs. The learning curve may ultimately help to close the cost gap by reducing labour costs per unit. Clearly reducing the percentage of idle time will reduce product costs. Better management, smoother work flow and staff incentives could all help here. Focusing on continuous improvement in production processes may help. solution 给分 标准 Section 2 c. Life Cycle Costing 生命周期成本法 Objectives: Identify the costs involved at different stages of the life cycle Explain the implications of lifecycle costing on pricing, performance management and decision-making Exam Context Life cycle costing is likely to be examined via a discussion question. You should be aware of not only the stages of the product life cycle but also the implications of the life cycle on pricing. Overview 1. Introduction Life cycle costing aims to cost a product, service, customer or project over its entire lifecycle with the aim of maximising the return over the total life while minimising costs. Traditionally the costs and revenues of a product are assessed on a financial year or period by period basis. Product life cycle costing considers all the costs that will be incurred from design to abandonment of a new product and compares these to the revenues that can be generated from selling this product at different target prices throughout the product's life. Life cycle costs including: R&D costs Training costs Production costs Inventory costs Distribution costs Marketing costs Retirement and disposal costs Etc… 2. Product life cycle The product life cycle (PLC) can be divided into five stages. Characteristics of the PLC Life cycle costing Life cycle costing (LCC) Traditional accounting Cost of a product over its entire lifecycle, with the aim of maximising return over the total life 1. Relates costs and revenues to time periods, hence difficult to see total profitability 2. Excludes R&D costs from the product 7.11 92 Maximizing return over the product lifecycle How to increase the return over a product’s life cycle? (a) Design costs out of products (b) Minimize the time to market This is the time from the conception of the product to its launch. The quicker to get a product to the market place, the better to win market share in the long run. (c) Minimize breakeven time Approximately 70% – 90% costs are determined at the design and development stage. Thus design and production teams must work together to ensure costs are minimized. Pricing strategies will affect both contribution and volumes generated. A short breakeven time is very important for liquidity purposes. (d) maximize the length of the life span For example, product development, finding other uses for a product or staggering the launch of the product in different markets. (e) minimize product proliferation If products are updated or superseded too quickly, the life cycle is cut short and the product may just cover its R&D costs before its successor is launched. (f) Manage the product’s cashflows Impact of PLC in the modern environment Shorter product life cycles. Clearer strategic planning required. 90% of costs to be incurred throughout its life cycle will have been determined before a product reaches the market. The planning, design and development stages of a product’s cycle are therefore critical to an organization’s cost management process. 3. Implications Life cycle costing has implications on pricing, performance management and decision-making. The total costs for each individual product can be reported and compared with revenues generated in the future. The visibility of such cost is increased. Individual product profitability can be better understood by attributing all costs to products. More accurate feedback information is available to the organization. What else can we learn from PLC? Given that there will be different levels of demand for a product over its expected life, it would not be appropriate to set one price for the product's entire life. An understanding of the stages a product goes through enables you to price accordingly to either manipulate demand (low price, demand will rise and the intro stage is shortened) or to maximise profit. All costs relating to a product including R&D are associated with the product. This enables true assessment of a products profitability. Having looked at a product’s PLC it is clear that initially the product will make a loss. Viewing profitability on a periodic basis can put unnecessary pressure on management due to the visibility of the loss and could lead to wrong decisions being taken. Advantages Considers external factors throughout a products expected life. Considers all costs incurred on a product, and therefore leads to cost reduction. Very useful in the modern competitive environment, in which products often have a short life cycle and when a large portion of costs will be committed prior to production commencing. Question Why might Target costing and Product life cycle be useful in providing management information for a manufacturer of mobile phones? Solution Product lifecycle costing The life cycle of mobile phones: Development & Introduction stage: higher costs, eg product development, promotion and other marketing activities. Growth stage: the cost per phone will fall dramatically as the initial start up costs are no longer incurred and economies of scale are achieved. Maturity stage: the cost per phone will continue to fall the main cost being variable costs. Decline stage: sales volumes fall and cost per unit begins to climb. Extra costs associated with discontinuing the product will put upward pressure on the cost per phone. Product lifecycle costing reflects the need for phone manufacturers to assess costs and profitability over the entire life of each of their phones. Target costing considers the price that ought to be charged in order to achieve a desired market share for a given product. Then the level of profit to be earned on the product is decided. The level of profit can be determined on a per unit basis but usually it could be determined for the entire product lifecycle. The balancing figure in the price-cost-profit relationship is cost. The difference between profit and price represents the target cost which would be a significant factor for consideration when designing new phones. Section 2 d. Backflush Accounting 倒推成本法(倒冲法) Objectives: Describe the process of backflush accounting and contrast with traditional cost accounting Explain the implications of backflush accounting on performance management and the control of a manufacturing process Identify the benefits of introducing backflush accounting Evaluate the decision to switch to backflush accounting from traditional process control Exam Context This topic could feature in part or all of a question but you will not have to prepare T accounts. Techniques such as backflush accounting are often compared with the traditional techniques you will have seen in F2. Overview 1. Costing systems and manufacturing philosophy Costing systems have evolved to reflect a manufacturing philosophy that is based on the need to achieve competitive advantages Flexibility and the ability to respond quickly to customer demand are vital. Product life cycles are shorter and products must be brought to the market quickly. New technology has been introduced. Just-in-time(JIT)适时制 JIT is an approach to operations based on the idea that goods and services should be produced only when they are needed. JIT system seeks to hold zero inventories. Problem: a disruption at any point in the system will cause serious trouble to the whole production operation. JIT is an approach to management that encompasses a commitment to continuous improvement and the search for excellence. 2. Backflush accounting A simplified standard costing system Suitable for use in a JIT environment Focuses on the output of an organisations manufacturing process and then using standard costs works backwards to attribute costs to inventory and sales. Cost accounts are simplified to reduce the amount of data handling. In backflush, there are no process accounts. When a sale is made, the following is recorded: All at standard cost. Labour is treated as an indirect cost. Production is dependent on demand and so labour is paid regardless of activity. Trigger points determine when entries are made in the accounting system, for example: Purchase of materials Sale of goods Dr Cost of sales Cr Materials Cr Conversion costs 倒推成本法 指当产品完工或销售时,倒过头来计算在产品、产成品等生 产成本的方法。这与传统的成本计算方法正好相反。 传统的生产成本的记录、归集和分配,是随着材料与产品实 体的转移而转移,即生产成本会计记录和生产成本发生的实 物流是同步的。 但在采用JIT的企业,从收到原材料到产品制成所耗用的时 间大幅缩短,而且期末存货量也变得很小,使得传统的分批 或分步成本法详细记录各类存货(如原材料、在产品及产成 品)的必要性受到怀疑。 出于成本-效益原则,对少量的存货做详尽精确追溯,无疑 得不偿失。为了克服上述问题,倒推成本法便应运而生。 Traditional cost accounting system Raw materials B/f X WIP X Cred X C/f X X X Direct labour Bank X WIP X Prod O/h control Cred X WIP X Finished goods Work-in-progress B/f Mat Lab O/H X FG X C/f X X X X X X B/f WIP X C of S X C/f X X X X To Cost of Sales Note: B/f: Bring forward C/f: Carry forward 7.6 108 Backflush accounting Creditors C of S Trigger = sale of goods X Cred’rs X Conv’n X X Conversion costs C of S Cost of sales To P&L X X X 7.6 109 Traditional costing systems v.s. backflush costing Traditional costing systems use sequential tracking to track costs as units pass from raw materials throughout the production process to their eventual sale. Backflushing costing systmen focuses first on the output of the firm and then works backwards when allocating cost between cost of goods sold and inventories, with no separate accounting for WIP. Backflush accounting Advantages Fewer accounting entries saves time Accounting function can now take on a strategic role Disadvantages 7.7 Does not suit all Not suitable in situations where inventory levels are significant and tend to fluctuate Standard costs need to be accurate Control harder Reconciliation harder When backflush costing is appropriate? 1. It is uitable where inventories is kept to minimum. 2. In an effort to eliminate non-value adding activities, a complex costing system may be replaced by a simplified system focusing on output. 3. Implications of backflush accounting Suitability of backflush accounting It is particularly applicable under the following circumstances: In a JIT environment, or a situation where the overall process time is short, there should be very little inventory of raw materials, WIP and even finished goods, so the bulk of manufacturing costs should be the costs of sale. In a TQM environment, where there are strong relationships with suppliers, costs should be known with a high degree of certainty. Hence there will be minimal variances arising during production. Example Solution ? Section 2 e. Throughput accounting 产出会计 Objectives: Calculate and interpret a throughput accounting ratio (TPAR) Suggest how a TPAR could be improved Apply throughput accounting to a multi-product decision-making problem Exam Context This topic could be the focus of an entire question. Be prepared to perform calculations and to discuss the results. Overview 1. Theory of constraints 限制理论 TOC is an approach to production management which aims to maximize sales revenue less material and variable overhead cost. It focuses on factors such as bottlenecks which act as constraints to this maximization. A JIT environment is operated, with buffer inventory kept only when there is a bottleneck resource. 2. Throughput accounting Throughput accounting is a product management system which aims to maximize throughput, and therefore cash generation from sales, rather than profits. TA emphasizes throughput, inventory minimization and cost control. Three concepts: (a) All factory costs are fixed in the short run, with the exception of material cost. (b) In a JIT environment, producing for inventory is bad. Ideally inventory would be zero. This means accepting some idle time in non-bottleneck operations. WIP should be valued at material cost only, so that no value is added to profit until a sale is made. (c) Profit is determined by the rate at which throughput can be generated, ie how quickly raw materials can be turned into sales to generate cash. Producing just to increase inventory creates no profit and so should not be encouraged. Throughput accounting focuses on maximizing throughput Throughput = sales – materials All labor and variable overheads are seen as fixed in the short term Decisions are made with reference to the Throughput Accounting Rate (TPAR) Limiting factor decisions are based upon return per limiting factor 3. Ratios Example MN Ltd manufactures automated industrial trolleys, known as TRLs: selling price / per = $2,000, material cost /per = $600, Labour and variable overhead are $5,500 and $8,000 per week respectively. Fixed production costs are $450,000 per annum and marketing and administrative costs are $265,000 per annum. The trolleys are made on three different machines. Machine X makes the 4 frame panels required for each TRL, maximum output = 180 frame panels per week. Machine X is old and unreliable, on average, between 15 and 20 hours of production are lost per month. Machine Y can manufacture parts for 52 TRLs per week and machine Z, which is old but reasonably reliable, can process and assemble 30 TRLs per week. The company has recently introduced a JIT system to hold little work-inprogress and no finished goods inventory from week to week. The company operates a 40-hour week, 48 weeks a year. Required Calculate the throughput accounting ratio for the key resource for an average hour. Solution Question What actions could you take to improve a throughput accounting ratio? Answer Increase selling price Buy cheaper materials Decrease labour Decrease overhead Throughput v.s. limiting factor analysis The throughput approach is very similar to the approach of maxmising contribution per unit of scarce resource. Difference: Throughput = sales – material costs Contribution = sales – all variable costs Example: p106 4.3.1 4. Throughput accounting and decision making Ranking production Target for decision making Products/divisions are ranked by TPA ratio. If two or more products are made in the same factory, they can be ranked on return per factory hour, not TPA ratio, since their costs will be identical. The TPA ratio should be greater than one if a product is to be viable. Return/hour enables businesses to make short-term decisions when there is a scarce resource. Priority must be given to products generating the best ratios. Use in performance management A division of a company is not discouraged from inventory building if reported profit is used as a principal performance measure. This is at odds with the JIT philosophy where purchase and production costs should only be incurred if there is to be an immediate return generated. Use of TPAR instead of (or in addition to) profit should resolve this problem. Example Will and Grace operate separate divisions making and selling products with identical cost structures. Sales price per unit $50 Direct materials per unit $12 Direct labour per unit $8 Fixed production overheads of $200,000 per month are absorbed across the normal production level of 10,000 units per month. In each division assume a bottleneck capacity of 20,000 hours. In April, Will makes and sells exactly 10,000 units whilst Grace makes 12,000 units and sells only 9,500. Neither Will nor Grace has any opening or closing inventory of raw materials or components. Required Show which manager would benefit if bonuses were given on (a) Profit (b) Throughput accounting ratios Solution End of Part A!