CSE 6009-B Coursework Report Assessment
Aspect
0-39%
Statement including
objectives and project
design work etc.
40-49%
Group :
50-59%
60-69%
70+
weight
Fails to
Main objectives and
meet
project design work
the next were stated.
category
Objectives and
project design work
were clearly stated
and linked to the
feasibility study.
+ Innovative and independent
ideas and approach were stated.
Incisive, effective descriptions with
appreciation of design challenge.
5%
Calculation, analysis,
argument and
conclusion to show
your knowledge,
understanding and
innovative ideas in
detailed civil
engineering project
design
Fails to
meet
the next
category
Correct selection and
application of
different design
codes, design
parameters and
formulations with
some minor
mistakes. Correct
calculation, analysis
and discussion with
some mistakes.
Appropriate
argument, summary
of results. All work
showed the teambased efforts. An
accepted amount of
expected work
completed.
Correct selection and
application of
different design
codes, design
parameters and
formulations with
some minor
mistakes. Correct
calculation, analysis
and discussion with
some minor
mistakes.
Appropriate
argument, summary
of results. All work
showed the teambased efforts.
The amount of
expected work
completed
satisfactorily.
Construction
Programme &
Health/Safety/Risk
Assessment
Fails to
meet
the next
category
Demonstrated basic
knowledge and
understanding of
construction plan
and risk assessment.
Demonstrated fair
knowledge and
understanding of
construction plan
and risk assessment.
Objectives and project
design were clearly
defined and linked to
the feasibility study
with appropriate critical
explanations.
Correct selection and
application of different
design codes, design
parameters,
formulations and design
software with
occasional minor
mistakes. Correct
calculation, analysis and
discussion with
occasional minor
mistakes. Appropriate
argument, summary of
results. All work showed
the team-based efforts.
Some calculations,
analyses and
discussions showed
challenging or
innovative.
The amount of expected
work fully completed.
Demonstrated
competent knowledge
and understanding of
construction plan and
risk assessment.
Correct selection and application of 40%
various design codes, design
parameters, formulations and
design software with very few
mistakes. Correct calculation,
analysis and discussion with very
few mistakes. Appropriate
arguments, summary of outcomes.
All work showed the team-based
efforts.
The calculations, analyses and
discussions showed challenging
and innovative ideas.
The amount of expected work fully
completed. Solutions selected from
a wide range of challenging and
innovative alternatives with
rigorous consideration. All
objectives meet a very high
standard and the work approaches
to a professional level.
Demonstrated competent
knowledge and understanding of
construction plan and risk
assessment. With innovative
considerations and suggestions.
10%
Awarded
Mark
Report presentation
including language
and clarity of writing,
referencing and
attribution, report
structure, group
efforts etc.
Fails to
meet
the next
category
Acceptable
presentation and
report structure.
Text written in own
words is clear and
legible.
Demonstrated basic
project design
background,
cited/listed
appropriate
references.
Drawings to show
your knowledge,
understanding and
professional skills in
detailed civil
engineering project
design
Fails to
meet
the next
category
Demonstrated basic
knowledge and skills
to create
engineering
drawings. An
accepted amount of
expected work
completed.
Report Mark
Tutors’ signature
Dennis Lam:
Appropriate length
and reasonable
sequence of
sections. Largely
correct use of page,
section, fig and table
numbering and
captions. Mostly
consistent use of
fonts for body text
and headings, fair
page layout. Fair
project design
background. Mostly
correct listing and
citing of a range of
sources.
Demonstrated fair
knowledge and skills
to create
engineering
drawings. The
amount of expected
work completed
satisfactorily.
Correct preliminary
pages, logical
sections/sub-sections,
references and
appendices. Broad
knowledge and good
understanding of
project design. Correct
listing and citation of a
fair range (including
some advanced)
sources. Clear, concise
and correct use of
language. Good
standard illustrations
liberally used to aid
clarity
Demonstrated
competent knowledge
and skills to create
engineering drawings.
The amount of expected
work completed
satisfactorily with
higher quality.
+ Well-balanced sections, good use
of appendices, consistent subheading depth. Figures and tables
cross-referenced in text. Correctly
generated contents. List of figures
etc. Clear and appropriate styles,
advanced features. Broad and deep
understanding of the project.
Complex ideas are logically
developed and clearly explained.
Use of some complex or insightful
graphic methods
10%
Demonstrated competent
knowledge and skills to create
engineering drawings.
The amount of expected work fully
completed with higher quality to a
professional level and showed a
broad and deep understanding of
civil/structural design.
35%