INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater: BUENA DUENAS
Position: Master Teacher II
Date of Review:
Name of Employee:
Position: Teacher II
Review Period: Juneto March
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Benigno S. Aquino Jr. Elementary School – Quezon City
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
1. TeachingLearning
Process
( 40%)
Objectives
1. Prepared daily lesson
plans/logs of activities within the
rating period with:
Timeline
June to
March
1.1 Complete parts and
description
1.2. Appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials
Weight
per
KRA
10
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
5
All daily lesson plans/logs prepared
had complete parts and description
100% of the daily lesson
plans/logs was submitted
Submitted all daily lesson
plans/logs on time
4
Had one of the complete parts and
description missing
85-99% of the daily lesson
plans/logs was submitted
Submitted all daily lesson
plans/logs an hour late
3
Had two of the complete parts and
description missing
75-84% of the daily lesson
plans/logs was submitted
Submitted all daily lesson
plans/logs two hours late
2
Had three of the complete parts
and description missing
51-74% of the daily lesson
plans/logs was submitted
Submitted all daily lesson
plans/logs three hours late
1
Had four or more of the complete
parts and description missing
50% and below or no daily
lesson plans/logs was
submitted
Did not submit all daily lesson
plans/logs
5
Used 100% of appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in teaching
all lessons
Appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials were 100%
used in teaching a lesson
Used appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in
teaching all lessons daily
4
Used 85-99% of appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in teaching
all lessons
Appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials were 85-99%
used in teaching a lesson
Used appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in
teaching most of the lessons daily
3
Used 75-84% of appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in teaching
all lessons
Appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials were 75-84%
used in teaching a lesson
Used appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in
teaching some of the lessons daily
2
Used 51-74% of appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in teaching
all lessons
Appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials were 51-74%
used in teaching a lesson
Seldom used appropriate, adequate
and updated instructional materials
in teaching all lessons daily
1
No appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials were used in
teaching all lessons
Appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials were 50%
and below used in teaching a lesson
Did not use appropriate, adequate
and updated instructional materials
in teaching all lessons daily
3
June to
March
3
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
Timelin
e
1.3. Higher order
thinking skills (HOTS)
developed
June to
March
Weigh
t per
KRA
2
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
5
All daily lesson plans/logs developed
100% HOTS
HOTS were 100% developed in all daily
lesson plans/logs
Used HOTS in teaching all
lessons daily
All daily lesson plans/logs developed
85-99% HOTS
HOTS were 85-99% developed in all
daily lesson plans/logs
Used HOTS in teaching most of
the lessons daily
All daily lesson plans/logs developed
75-84% HOTS
HOTS were 74-84% developed in all
daily lesson plans/logs
Used HOTS in teaching some
of the lessons daily
All daily lesson plans/logs developed
51-74% HOTS
HOTS were 51-74% developed in all
daily lesson plans/logs
Seldom used HOTS in teaching
all lessons daily
All daily lesson plans/logs developed no
HOTS
HOTS were 50% and below developed in
all daily lesson plans/logs
Did not use HOTS in teaching
all lessons daily
Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work
100% of the desired learning
competencies was attained
Attained the desired learning
competencies within the rating
period
Attained 85-99% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work
85-99% of the desired learning
competencies was attained
Attained 75-84% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work
75-84% of the desired learning
competencies was attained
Attained 51-74% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work
51-74% of the desired learning
competencies was attained
Attained 50% and below of the desired
learning competencies based on the
budget of work
50% and below of the desired learning
competencies was attained
Teaching methods and strategies
elicited 100% interaction from a class
100% interaction was elicited from a
class
Interaction was elicited in all
lessons that require it
Teaching methods and strategies
elicited 85-99% interaction from a class
85-99% interaction was elicited from a
class
Interaction was elicited in most
of the lessons that require it
Teaching methods and strategies
elicited 75-84% interaction from a class
75-84% interaction was elicited from a
class
Interaction was elicited in some
of the lessons that require it
Teaching methods and strategies
elicited 51-74% interaction from a class
51-74% interaction was elicited from a
class
Seldom interaction was elicited
in all lessons that require it
50% and below or no interaction was
elicited from a class
50% and below or no interaction was
elicited from a class
No interaction was elicited in all
lessons that require it
4
3
2
1
1.4. Desired learning
competencies
attained based on the
budget of work
June to
March
2
5
4
3
2
1
2. Facilitated learning
through innovative
teaching strategies
June to
March
10
5
4
2.1. Child-centered
activities
4
3
2
1
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
2.2. Cooperative learning
2.3. ICT Integration
3. Initiated discipline of
learners through setting of
classroom/school rules
and guidelines within the
rating period
No guidance case/issue
reported
Timelin
e
June to
March
June to
March
June to
March
Weight
per
KRA
4
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
5
Cooperative learning strategy was
100% effective when used
100% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
Cooperative learning strategy was
effective when used in all lessons that
require it
4
Cooperative learning strategy was
85-99% effective when used
85-99% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
Cooperative learning strategy was
effective when used in most of the
lessons that require it
3
Cooperative learning strategy was
75-84% effective when used
75-84% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
Cooperative learning strategy was
effective when used in some of the
lessons that require it
2
Cooperative learning strategy was
51-74% effective when used
51-74% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
Seldom cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used in all
lessons that require it
1
Cooperative learning strategy was
never used
50% and below or no cooperative
learning strategy was used
Cooperative learning strategy was not
used
5
ICT Integration is 100% evident for
lessons that require it
100% ICT Integration is evident for all
lessons that require it
ICT Integration was used in all
lessons that require it
4
ICT Integration is 85-99% evident for
lessons that require it
85-99% ICT Integration is evident for
all lessons that require it
ICT Integration was used in most of
the lessons that require it
3
ICT Integration is 75-84% evident for
lessons that require it
75-84% ICT Integration is evident for
all lessons that require it
ICT Integration was used in some of
the lessons that require it
2
ICT Integration is 51-74% evident for
lessons that require it
51-74% ICT Integration is evident for
all lessons that require it
Seldom ICT Integration was used in
all lessons that require it
1
ICT Integration was not evident for
lessons that require it
50% and below or no ICT Integration is
evident for all lessons that require it
ICT Integration was not used in all
lessons that require it
5
Pupils were 100% guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by no
guidance report on student discipline
100% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
Pupils were guided in the observation
of school/classroom rules and
guidelines within the rating period
4
Pupils were 85-99% guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by 1-2
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
85-99% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
2
10
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Output
s
(MFOs)
Key
Result
Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
Timeli
ne
Wei
ght
per
KRA
4. Monitored attendance,
diversity appreciation, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall physical
atmosphere, cleanliness and
orderliness of classrooms
including proper waste
disposal daily
10
4.1. Maintained safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of
floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal
4
4.2. Carried out attendance
checking systematically to
lessen absenteeism
6
Quality
Efficiency
3
Pupils were 75-84% guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by 3-4
instances of guidance report on
student discipline.
75-84% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
2
Pupils were 51-74% guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by 5-6
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
51-74% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
1
Pupils were 50% and below guided in
the observation of classroom rules
and guidelines as evidenced by 7 up
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
50% and below or pupils were not
guided in the observation of
school/classroom rules and guidelines
5
Maintained 100% safety, orderliness
and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal
100% safety, orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal were maintained
4
Maintained 85-99% safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
85-99% safety, orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal were maintained
3
Maintained 75-84% safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
75-84% safety, orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal were maintained
2
Maintained 51-74% safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
51-74% safety, orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal were maintained
1
Maintained 50% and below safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
50% and below or safety, orderliness
and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were not
maintained
5
Attendance checking was
systematically carried out as
evidenced by 90-100% of pupils’
attendance
90-100% of pupils’ attendance was
evident
4
Attendance checking was
systematically carried out as
evidenced by 85-89% of pupils’
attendance
85-89% of pupils’ attendance was
evident
Timeliness
Maintained safety orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal daily
Attendance checking was
systematically carried out daily
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
2. Learner’s
Outcome
(30%)
Objectives
Timeline
1.Monitored, evaluated,
and maintained pupils’
progress within the
rating period through:
1.1 an updated class
record
1.2. Pupils’ portfolio
Wei
ght
per
KRA
10
June to
March
June to
March
Quality
Timeliness
3
Attendance checking was
systematically carried out as
evidenced by 80-84% of pupils’
attendance
80-84% of pupils’ attendance was
evident
2
Attendance checking was
systematically carried out as
evidenced by 75-79% of pupils’
attendance
75-79% of pupils’ attendance was
evident
1
Attendance checking was
systematically carried out as
evidenced by 75% and below of
pupils’ attendance
75% and below of pupils’ attendance
was evident
5
Class record reflected the bases of
100% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled
100% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled was
reflected in the class record
Submitted on or before the scheduled
date every grading period
4
Class record reflected the bases of
85%-99% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled
85-99% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled was
reflected in the class record
Submitted a day after the scheduled
date every grading period
3
Class record reflected the bases of
75%-84% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled
75-84% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled was
reflected in the class record
2
Class record reflected the bases of
51%-74% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled
51-74% of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled was
reflected in the class record
Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
scheduled date
every grading period
1
Class record reflected the bases of
50% and below of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled
50% and below of pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled was
reflected in the class record
Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
scheduled date
every grading period
5
Pupils portfolio contained 100% of his
accomplishment within the rating
period
100% of pupils’ accomplishment are
included in portfolio
Pupils portfolio submitted on or
before the scheduled date every
grading period within the rating period
4
Pupils portfolio contained 85%-99%
of his accomplishment within the
rating period
85-99% of pupils’ accomplishment are
included in portfolio
Submitted a day after the scheduled
date every grading period within the
rating period
3
Pupils portfolio contained 75%-84%
of his accomplishment within the
rating period
75-84% of pupils’ accomplishment are
included in portfolio
Submitted a day after the scheduled
date every grading period within the
rating period
6
2
Efficiency
Submitted a day after the scheduled
date
every grading period
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
1.3 Summative/Unit
Test with Table of
Specifications (TOS)
2. Conducted
remediation/enrichment
programs to _____
pupils to improve
performance indicators
Timeline
June to
March
June to
March
Weigh
t per
KRA
4
5
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
2
Pupils portfolio contained 51%-74%
of his accomplishment within the
rating period
51-74% of pupils’ accomplishment are
included in portfolio
Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
scheduled date
every grading period
1
Pupils portfolio contained 50%-and
below of his accomplishment within
the rating period
50% and below of pupils’
accomplishment are included in
portfolio
Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
scheduled date
every grading period within the rating
period
5
Test questions were 100% logically
sequenced with TOS congruent
between content and skills tested
100% of the test questions were
logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
Administered on or before the
scheduled date every grading period
4
Test questions were 85%99%logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
85-99% of the test questions were
logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
Administered a day after the
scheduled date every grading period
3
Test questions were 75%84%logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
75-84% of the test questions were
logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
Administered 2 days after the
scheduled date every grading period
2
Test questions were 51%74%logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
51-74% of the test questions were
logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
Administered 3 days after the
scheduled date every grading period
1
Test questions were 50% and below
logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
50% and below of the test questions
were logically sequenced with TOS
congruent between content and skills
tested
Were never administered within the
rating period
5
Remediation/enrichment programs is
offered to a 100% of pupils who need
it
100% of pupils was offered
remediation/enrichment programs
Remediation/enrichment programs
were conducted every grading period
4
Remediation/enrichment programs is
offered to a 85%-99% of pupils who
need it
85-99% of pupils was offered
remediation/enrichment programs
3
Remediation/enrichment programs is
offered to a 75%-84% of pupils who
need it
75-84% of pupils was offered
remediation/
enrichment programs
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
Timeline
Weight
per
KRA
Quality
June to
March
Timeliness
Actual
Results
2
3. Attained the required
MPS for Grade Level and
Learning Areas based on
baseline target of
diagnostic test every
grading period
Diagnostic Test _____
1st Quarter Test _____
2nd Quarter Test _____
3rd Quarter Test _____
4th Quarter Test _____
Efficiency
Remediation/enrichment programs is
offered to a 51%-74% of pupils who
need it
51-74% of pupils was offered
remediation/
enrichment programs
1
Remediation/enrichment programs is
offered to a 50% and below of pupils
who need it
50% and below of pupils was offered
remediation/
enrichment programs
5
Attained 10% & above MPS increase
10% MPS increase was attained
4
Attained 7-9% MPS increase
7-9% MPS increase was attained
3
Attained 4-6% MPS increase
4-6% MPS increase was attained
2
Attained 1-2% MPS increase
1-2% MPS increase was attained
1
Attained below 1% MPS increase
Below 1% MPS increase was attained
5
No failure/maintained 0 failure rate of
the previous year
Maintained 0% failure rate/No failure
4
Decreased failure rate by 85-99% of
the previous year
85-99% decreased failure rate
3
Decreased failure rate by 75-84% of
the previous year
75-84% decreased failure rate
2
Decreased failure rate by 51-74% of
the previous year
51-74% decreased failure rate
1
Decreased failure rate by 50% and
below of the previous year
50% and below decreased failure rate
5
No dropout/maintained 0 dropout rate
of the previous year
Maintained 0% dropout rate/No
dropout
4
Decreased dropout rate by 85-99% of
the previous year
85-99% decreased dropout rate
3
Decreased dropout rate by 75-84% of
the previous year
75-84% decreased dropout rate
2
Decreased dropout rate by 51-74% of
the previous year
51-74% decreased dropout rate
1
Decreased dropout rate by 50% and
below of the previous year
50% and below decreased dropout
rate
3
Every grading period
*Note: Objective 2.3 is
applicable if NAT result is not
yet determine.
4. Decreased/Maintained
failure rate by ___% over
previous year
June to
March
5
Previous year _____
Current year _____
5. Decreased/Maintained
dropout rate by ___%
over previous year
5
Previous year _____
Current year _____
End of school year
End of school year
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
Timeli
ne
6. Increased/Maintained
NAT MPS by _____ %
over previous year
June
to
March
Weig
ht per
KRA
3
Quality
1. Conducted
regular/periodic PTA
Meetings/Conferences
within the rating period
2. Visited ___ parents of
pupils needing
academic
monitoring/follow-up
within the rating period
June
to
March
June
to
March
8
5
Timeliness
Actual
Results
5
Increased/Maintained NAT MPS by
90-100% of previous year
90-100% increased/maintained NAT
MPS
4
Increased NAT MPS by 80-89% of
previous year
80-89% increased NAT MPS
3
Increased NAT MPS by 75-79% of
previous year
75-79% increased NAT MPS
2
Increased NAT MPS by 70-74% of
previous year
70-74% increased NAT MPS
1
Increased NAT MPS by 70% and
below of previous year
70% and below increased NAT MPS
5
Conducted at least 8 PTA
Meetings/Conferences with 100%
accomplishment with set agreements
meet
100% PTA Meetings/Conferences was
conducted with accomplishment and
agreements met
PTA Meetings/Conferences was
conducted with accomplishment and
agreements meet within the rating
period
4
Conducted at least 6 PTA
Meetings/Conferences
withaccomplishment producing only
set agreements and partial
accomplishment
85-99% PTA Meetings/Conferences
was conducted producing only set
agreements and partial
accomplishment
PTA Meetings/Conferences was
conducted producing only set
agreements and partial
accomplishment within the rating
period
3
Conducted at least 4 PTA
Meetings/Conferences producing only
set agreements
75-84% PTA Meetings/Conferences
producing only set agreements
PTA Meetings/Conferences
producing only set agreements within
the rating period
2
Conducted at least 2 PTA
Meetings/Conferences with minimal
result
51-74% PTA Meetings/Conferences
with minimal result
PTA Meetings/Conferences with
minimal result within the rating period
1
Had not conducted PTA
Meetings/Conferences
50% and below or not conducted PTA
Meetings/Conferences
PTA Meeting/Conferences was not
conducted within the rating period
5
Accomplished 100% of set visits with
successful intervention and proper
documentation
100% accomplishment of set visits
with successful intervention and proper
documentation
Accomplished set visits with
successful intervention within the
rating period
4
Accomplished 85-99% of set visits
with partial success in implementation
of intervention and proper
documentation
85-99% accomplishment of set visits
with partial success in implementation
of intervention and proper
documentation
Accomplished set visits with partial
success in implementation of
intervention within the rating period
Previous year _____
Current year _____
3. Community
Involvement
(15%)
Efficiency
End of school year
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result Areas
(KRAs)
4. Professional
Growth and
Development
(15%)
Objectives
1. Conducted case
study/research in
classroom/school
district or division
within the rating
period
Timeli
ne
June
to
March
Weig
ht per
KRA
2
Quality
June
to
March
2
Timeliness
3
Accomplished 75-84% of set visits
with suggested planned intervention
and proper documentation
75-84% accomplishment of set visits
with suggested planned intervention
and proper documentation
Accomplished set visits with
suggested planned intervention within
the rating period
2
Accomplished 51-74% of set visits
with planned intervention and proper
documentation
51-74% accomplishment of set visits
with planned intervention and proper
documentation
Accomplished set visits with planned
intervention within the rating period
1
Accomplished 50% and below with no
intervention and proper
documentation
50% and below accomplishment with
no intervention and proper
documentation
Accomplished set visits with no
intervention within the rating period
5
Conducted at least 1 case
study/research with full
documentation on completion,
findings, with interventions and plan
of action duly noted by the
school/district or division
100% of the case study research was
finished on target date of completion
Interventions and plan of action were
done after a month of conducting the
case study/research
4
Conducted at least 1 case
study/research with only 3 indicators
90% of study research was finished on
target date of completion
Interventions and plan of action were
done after 2 months of conducting the
case study/research
3
Conducted at least 1 case
study/research with only 2 indicators
80% of study research was finished on
target date of completion
Interventions and plan of action were
done after 3 months of conducting the
case study/research
2
Conducted at least 1 case
study/research with only 1 indicator
70% of study research was finished on
target date of completion
Interventions and plan of action were
done after 4 months of conducting the
case study/research
60% of study research was finished on
target date of completion
Interventions and plan of action were
done after 5-10 months of conducting
the case study/research
Submitted full documentation of
training/seminar/workshop attended
with pictures and certificates of
attendance and participation
Within the rating period
1
2. Participated in any
training/seminar/
workshop
Efficiency
Proposed case study/research was
not conducted as planned and
approve
5
Attended a 3-day national level
training/workshop seminar
4
Attended a 3-day regional level
training/workshop seminar
Submitted full documentation of
training/seminar/workshop attended
with pictures and certificates of
attendance and participation
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
3. Demonstrated/
Manifested dedication and
commitment to work
through:
3.1. Punctuality
3.2. Attendance
Timelin
e
Weig
ht per
KRA
Quality
3
Attended a 3-day division level
training/workshop seminar
Submitted full documentation of
training/seminar/workshop attended
with pictures and certificates of
attendance and participation
2
Attended a 3-day district level
training/workshop seminar
Submitted full documentation of
training/seminar/workshop attended
with pictures and certificates of
attendance and participation
1
Attended at least 80%of all
training/workshop seminar on the
school level
Submitted full documentation of
training/seminar/workshop attended
with pictures and certificates of
attendance and participation
5
Reported and left school 15 minutes
before and after official time
Not more than 3 times tardy/under
time
4
Reported and left school 10 minutes
before and after official time
4-6 times tardy/under time
3
Reported and left school 5 minutes
before and after official time
7-9 times tardy/ under time
2
Reported and left school on
time/within official time
9-12 times tardy/under time
1
Reported to school after official time
and left before or within official time
More than 13 times tardy/under time
5
Reported to school all the time to
perform his/her teaching duties and
other related functions
Incurred not more than 3 days of
absences
4
Reported to school most of the time
to perform his/her teaching duties and
other related functions
Incurred 4-7 days of absences
3
Reported to school more often than
not to perform his/her teaching duties
and other related functions
Incurred 8-11 days of absences
2
Reported to school sometimes to
perform his/her teaching duties and
other related functions
Incurred 12-15 days of absences
1
Reported to school seldom to perform
his/her teaching duties and other
related functions
Incurred more than 16 days of
absences
June to
March
3
June to
March
3
Efficiency
Timeliness
Daily
Within the rating period
Actual
Results
Rating
Score
Major
Final
Outputs
(MFOs)
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
Objectives
4. Observed demoteachings in a year
5. Pursued graduate/post
graduate studies
Timelin
e
Weig
ht per
KRA
June to
March
3
June to
March
2
Quality
Efficiency
5
Observed 10 demonstration
teachings of colleagues higher in
position than the rating
4
Observed 8 demonstration teachings
of colleagues higher in position than
the rating
3
Observed 6 demonstration teachings
of colleagues higher in position than
the rating
2
Observed 4 demonstration teachings
of colleagues higher in position than
the rating
1
Observed 2 demonstration teachings
of colleagues higher in position than
the rating
5
Graduated/Currently enrolled in
graduate/post-graduate studies
Earned graduate/post-graduate degree
or 12 units and above
4
Currently enrolled in graduate postgraduate studies
Earned 9 units
3
Currently enrolled in graduate postgraduate studies
Earned 3-6 units
2
Sought the approval of the Division
Office
Currently enrolled
1
Prepared requirement for the study
permit
Currently enrolled
Timeliness
Actual
Results
Rating
Submitted certified true copies of
lesson plans and observation sheets
duly signed by the principal/supervisor
Within the rating period
Overall
Rating
BUENA DUENAS
Rater
ARLENE A. DUARTE
Ratee
Score