Module 5:
BUILDING THE TEACHING PORTFOLIO RELATED TO THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MODALITIES
Lesson 1: The Teaching Portfolio and its contents
ACTIVITY 1.
Before you begin to prepare building your Portfolio, you need to make sure that you have completed
all the outputs for this course. Go over the list found in LDM2 Guide for Expected Outputs and find out
whether you have completed all the outputs required for Modules 1-4 of this course.
Answer:
Collection of all outputs from module 1 to 4
1. Course orientation
2. Most Essentials Learning Competencies (MELC)
3A. Designing instruction in the different learning delivery modalities
3B. Learning Resources
4. Planning for Continuing Professional Development and LAC Planning
Activity 2.
Study the Reading on Portfolios from the Glossary of Education Reform. Based on your reading, reflect
on the following questions and jot your answer in your Study Notebook:
1. How will your Portfolio help you in tracking the progress of your teaching practice in your
School’s LDM?
Answer:
My portfolio helps me in tracking the progress of my teaching practice in our school LM in such a
way that it will serve as my guide in the different LDM that takes place during this pandemic
time.
2. What evidence from the previous modules will help capture the progress of your teaching
practice?
Answer:
1|md5
Some evidence from the previous modules help me to capture the progress of my teaching
practice such as doing WHLP/ LAS, SLM targeting some interventions that some of the learners
should have.
3. Why is writing down your reflections an integral part of your Portfolio?
Answer:
In every work or task given it must have a reflection with in. Making of it is an integral part because it
serves us a compilation of our knowledge and understanding towards the topic it also measures our
effectively being our consciousness and even our judgement in a certain topic.
Activity 3.
Familiarized yourself with the List of Suggested Evidence Form. Is the list of evidence enough
to capture the progress of your teaching practice? What other evidence can you think of that
is relevant to the LDM adopted by your School? Write down your answers and other insights
in your Study Notebook.
Answer:
The list of evidence in the learning delivery modality is enough at the moment. Although of course there
might be something else that need to be included as we go on to the implementation of the DL through
the MDL.
In the future LACs, surely our group will suggest of other strategies to use and henceforth the evidence to
prepare.
List of Suggested Evidence in the Learning Delivery Modality
ACTIVITIES
Documentation of Lesson
Delivery
Researching and
Incorporating Teaching
Strategies in the Modalities
Participation in recognized
PDs that are aligned with
their Professional Goals
anchored on Philippine
Professional Standards for
Teachers (PPST)
Organizing the Professional
Portfolio
Submission of Portfolio to
coach/es
2|md5
TIMELINE
August to November
August to November
OUTPUTS
At least 2 recorded lessons
(online learning)
Lesson Plan (at least 2 per
month)
August to November
Certification of Participation
with PD credit units
December
Professional Portfolio
December
Certificate of Submission
Co-Learning with Peers and
coach/es
At least once a month
starting September 2020
Video Recording / PICTURES
Activity 4.
In your LAC Session, discuss your answer and thoughts on the questions from activities 2 and 3
with your colleagues.
Answer:
Activity 2 is all about to evaluate the learning progress and achievement of the pupils in specific
course. To know my strength and weaknesses in terms in my teaching practice.
Activity 3 is all about the list of suggested evidence to capture the progress of our teaching
practices and so with to track the learners progress. And maybe some groups will suggest other
strategies to use as evidence.
Activity 5.
Based on the sharing and discussion in your LAC, finalize your list evidence in the List of
Suggested Evidence Form and submit to your LAC Leader. Make sure that you keep a copy for
yourself.
ACTIVITIES
Documentation of Lesson
Delivery
Researching and
Incorporating Teaching
Strategies in the Modalities
Participation in recognized
PDs that are aligned with
their Professional Goals
anchored on Philippine
Professional Standards for
Teachers (PPST)
Organizing the Professional
Portfolio
Submission of Portfolio to
coach/es
Co-Learning with Peers and
coach/es
3|md5
TIMELINE
August to November
August to November
OUTPUTS
At least 2 recorded lessons
(online learning)
Lesson Plan (at least 2 per
month)
August to November
Certification of Participation
with PD credit units
December
Professional Portfolio
December
Certificate of Submission
At least once a month
starting September 2020
Video Recording / PICTURES
List of suggested Evidence Review Form
Teachers Portfolio
Pupils Portfolio
Certificate of Trainings
Activity Notebook
Copy of Technical Assistance
Written Test
Certificate of Recognition/ Awards
Performance task
Progress Report Card
Nutritional Status
PHIL-IRE and Numeracy Result
Lesson 2: The Evaluation Rubric
Activity 1.
Study the criteria and indicators found in the Evaluation Rubric. What steps will you take to
ensure that you are able to hit the criteria in the Rubric? Write down your answer and any
other thoughts about the Rubric in your Study Notebook.
Answer:
I will make sure that I have access to the things I need before, during and after the implementation
phases of the school LCP. I shall also be guided with the rubrics at hand to ensure that I am on track and
that the Professional Standards are met.
Activity 2.
Discuss and share your thoughts on the Rubric in your LAC Session. Present your steps to make
your outputs and Portfolio responsive to the evaluation criteria and indicators. Take note of
your colleagues’ other insights as well.
4|md5
EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR THE LDM IMPLEMENTATION PORTFOLIO
For Teachers
CRITERIA
EXCELLENT
5
VERY SATISFACTORY
4
SATISFACTORY
3
MARGINAL
2
DEMONSTRATION
OF PROGRESS OF
THE LDM
IMPLEMENTATION
(30%)
The outputs clearly and
adequately captured
the progress of the
implementation of the
LDM, showing
innovations that
contribute to its
smooth
implementation
Reflection describes
the experience in the
LDM implementation,
shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis,
and excellently relates
it to the professional
standards and to
professional and
personal development
goals
The outputs clearly
demonstrate 5 or more
indicators of relevant
strands in professional
standards
The outputs
adequately captured
the progress of the
implementation of
the LDM
The outputs reflect
to a big extent the
progress of the LDM
implementation
The outputs reflect to
a limited extent the
progress of the LDM
implementation
The outputs do not
show the progress
of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes
the experience in the
LDM implementation,
shows some analysis,
and relates it to the
professional
standards and to
professional and
personal
development goals
Reflection describes
the experience and
relates them to the
professional
standards and
personal
development goals
Reflection describes
the experience in the
implementation of
the LDM with limited
attempt to relate it
to the professional
standards and
personal
development goals
Reflection describes
the experience in
the implementation
of the LDM with no
attempt to relate it
to the professional
standards and
personal
development goals
The outputs clearly
demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant
strands in
professional
standards
The ideas are
expressed in clear
language with very
minimal errors in
structure and / or
writing conventions
The outputs clearly
demonstrate 3
indicators of
relevant strands in
professional
standards
The ideas are
expressed well but
with incoherence in
some areas and few
errors in structure
and / or writing
conventions
The outputs do not
demonstrate any
indicator in the
professional
standards
The portfolio is
generally wellorganized with 1-2
items not well
placed in the overall
organization
The output/s is /are
submitted on the
day of the deadline
The outputs clearly
demonstrate 2
indicators of relevant
strands in
professional
standards
The ideas are
expressed using very
basic words and
structure with
incoherence in many
areas and several
errors in structure
and / writing
conventions
The portfolio has 3-4
items not well placed
in the overall
organization
The output/s is /are
submitted 1-3 days
after the deadline
The output/s is /are
submitted more
than 3 days after the
deadline
QUALITY OF
REFLECTION
(25%)
DEMONSTRATION
OF PROFESSIONAL
STANDARDS
(20%)
LANGUAGE
OVERALL
PRESENTATION OF
OUTPUT
(15%)
The ideas are expressed
in clear, coherent, and
appropriately-worded
language with no errors
structure and/or
writing conventions
ORGANIZATION
OF PORTFOLIO
(5%)
The portfolio is logically
organized, is insightful,
and offers new
perspective and
insights
The portfolio is
logically organized
TIMELINESS (5%)
The output/s is /are
submitted more than 3
days ahead of the
deadline
The output/s is /are
submitted 1-2 days
before the deadline
5|md5
UNSATISFACTORY
1
The ideas are
jumbled and difficult
to understand;
errors in structure
and writing
conventions are
found almost
everywhere in the
output
The portfolio does
not follow a logical
order
Prepared by:
FLORINA B. ATISON
ROGELIO A. PANCHACALA
Noted by:
FLORA C. TANEO
6|md5