CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.0 Background of study Management writers have written on the outcome of employee performance and its usefulness to business organization and so performance appraisal as an important personnel management function. Personnel management is concerned with the systematic requirement of a competent working force whose human resources are effectively used through the control of occupational environment in a manner that develop employee's potential and enable them to contribute their services to the organization of which thy are integral part. Thus, it is necessary that the performance of the employees are monitored, evaluated and control within the organization so that they can contribute their best to the attainment of the organization objectives as well as developing themselves. Performance appraisal is defined as the process of reviewing individual's performance and progress in a job assessing his potential for future promotion. It is a systematic method of obtaining, analyzing and recording information about a person that is needed for the followings: 1. for better running of the business. 2: To help the manager improve the jobholder's performance and plan his career. 3. To assist the job holders to evaluate his own performance and develop himself. The usefulness of performance appraisal outcome includes promotion of employees, transfer, demotion and placement of employee on the job in which they are best suited. They study, as a whole tends to link employee development to their performance and establish the fact that there is a correlation between the two. 1:1 Historical Background Of Mtn Nigeria Plc MTN Group Limited, formerly M-Cell is a South African multinational mobile telecommunications company, operating in many African, European and Asian countries. Its head office is in Johannesburg. As of 30 June 2016, MTN recorded 232.6 million subscribers, making it the eighth largest mobile network operator in the world, and the largest in Africa. Active in over 20 countries, one-third of company revenue come from Nigeria, where it holds about 35% market share. On May 16, 2001, MTN became the first GSM network to make a call following the globally lauded Nigerian GSM auction conducted by the Nigerian Communications Commission earlier in the year. Thereafter the company launched full commercial operations beginning with Lagos, Abuja and Port Harcourt. MTN paid $285m for one of four GSM licenses in Nigeria in January 2001. To date, in excess of US$1.8 billion has been invested building mobile telecommunications infrastructure in Nigeria. Since launch in August 2001, MTN has steadily deployed its services across Nigeria. It now provides services in 223 cities and towns, more than 10,000 villages and communities and a growing number of highways across the country, spanning the 36 states of the Nigeria and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Many of these villages and communities are being connected to the world of telecommunications for the first time ever. The company's digital microwave transmission backbone, the 3,400 Kilometre Y'elloBahn was commissioned by President Olusegun Obasanjo in January 2003 and is reputed to be the most extensive digital microwave transmission infrastructure in all of Africa. The Y'elloBahn has significantly helped to enhance call quality on MTN network. The company subsists on the core brand values of leadership, relationship, integrity, innovation and can-do. It prides itself on its ability to make the impossible possible, connecting people with friends, family and opportunities. MTN Nigeria also recently expanded its network capacity to include a new numbering range with the prefix 0806, making MTN the first GSM network in Nigeria to have adopted an additional numbering system, having exhausted its initial subscriber numbering range - 0803. In its resolve to enhance quality customer service, MTN Nigeria has also introduced a self-help toll-free 181 customer-care line through which subscribers can resolve their frequently asked questions free of charge. 1:2 Statement of the Problem There has constantly been the issue of the relationship between performance and appraising such performance objectively. Some employees have seen appraisal as just a mere routine practice that has no relevance to their promotion, placement jobs and planning for their training needs thus having little impact on their development process unlike in Mtn Nigeria Plc where for instance automation is carried out on appraisal system, their customer service is as such that it is timed. A central problem of appraisal is subjectively on the part of those that conduct the appraisal. Other problems this study and ways of solving them are: 1. Errors of appraisal: - type and means of solving them to make appraisal programme valid. 2. Inappropriate use of appraisal methods. 3. Failure of the organization in using standardized appraisal system as a basis for employee promotion, training and placement. When this occur. It could be seen that the whole appraisal programme is a waste of effort and to make it meaningful and worthwhile the study will highlight the benefits of the use of appraisal system and it will also attempt to identify the way operational problem with a view to providing appropriate solutions. 1.3 Objectives of the Study Essentially, the study has its central aim of examining the level of performance appraisal in MTN Nigeria business and its contribution to the employee development. Other objectives of the study are: 1. To examine the performance appraisal programme of Mtn Nigeria plc 2. To examine the extent at which the appraisal result will meet the aspiration of Mtn Nigeria Plc. 1.4 Research Questions As pointed above, the objectives of this study is to find out the relevance of performance appraisal in Mtn Nigeria's productivity. In doing this, the questions to be asked are l. Of what uses is performance appraisal outcome to Mtn Nigeria. 2. Does employees of Mtn Nigeria actually need performance appraisal? 3. Does Mtn Nigeria organization use the result of the appraisal programme for the development of the employee by using it to plan for their training, placement of the job and promoting then? 4. Does the Mtn management believe in performance appraisal system? 1.5 Research Hypotheses Hypotheses I Ho: There is no significant relationship between performance appraisal outcome and employee's productivity. Hypothesis II Ho: There is no significant relationship between performance appraisal outcome attainments of corporate goal. Hypothesis III Ho: There is no significant relationship between' performance appraisal outcome and enhancement of productivity of the employees in an organization. 1.6 Significance of the Study The significance of the study will -be in two folds: Firstly, the study will provide a good base for general knowledge of the concept, as past work on the subject matter will be reviled. More also, it will be useful empirically practical use of performance appraisal in business organization. All problems associate with the use of the programmed will be ex-rayed and necessary solutions provided. Lastly, the study will be useful to organizations in that the recommendation from the finding of this research can be used as a means of improving the efficiency of employees in the organization. And lastly, the findings can be used in designing and effective appraisal system. 1.7 Scope and Limitation of the Study The scope of this research is to examine the impact of performance appraisal outcome on employee's productivity in MTN Nigeria from 2010 to 2018. Also, this research faces a lot of problems among this are the problem of time factor which is grossly, money to execute this research work on the schedule problem of getting necessary on for the respondents and above all, the uncooperative attitude of the workers of the MTN Nigeria in attending to my request. 1.8 Definition of Terms Some of the terms used in this study are defined as follows: Appraisal: It is the evaluation of individuals with respect to their performances on the job. Performance: It is defined from two perspectives: - It is the result that people get on the job. - It is whatever they do that affect results. Productivity: Refer to being productive or level of production of goods, it is also regarded as an output. Employee: Workers in an organization who performs specified functions as given or directed. Development: It aims at adding to the skills of employees, improving their general knowledge and altering their attitudes. Demotion: A shift to a lower position in the hierarchy. Placement: Assigning employees to their different jobs that they are best suited. Promotion: A shift to higher position in the hierarchy, usually with added salary, statues and authority. Recruitment: This is the process of attracting or hiring candidates among the qualified ones. CHAPTER TWO 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW The importance of human resources to any organization either public or private has long been identified. Organization objectives such as profit maximization, share of market and social responsibilities cannot be fulfilled without human beings who coordinates the activities of the organization using other factors of production, the realization of the value of human capital to any organization as led to a proposal by experts that people should be classified as “assets” and to be so recorded in accounting record, investment in human capital is worthy and necessary expenditure if an organization is to discharge its legal statutory and social responsibilities to its owner, its public and society at large (data 1991). For this chapter we shall be considering the various forms of literature review such as the Empirical, Conceptual and Theoretical form of literature review. KOONTZ (1971) that, although we have long been aware of the importance of proper working in an organization for effective and operations of business, government and other enterprises, we have not had until very recently an accurate way of knowing whether workers really adequate for their jobs. Traditional appraisal of workers on the elusive standard of personal traits on work qualities has been both in effective and illusory. KOONTZ goes further to highlight the need for appraisal programme, this saying disillusion by the subjectivity of traits and work qualities and intelligent parishioners have understand looking at what the purpose of organized activities is and the basic task of a worker in acting as an appraise work against the standard of the mentioned criteria of performance, that is settings and achievement of objectives. In its own contribute, Cole (2001) defines performance appraisal as a record of an employee’s job performance usually completed following an annual interview with his superior. Armstrong (1981) defines performance appraisal as the process of reviewing an individual’s performance and progress in a job and accessing its potential for future promotion. It is a systematic method of obtaining, analyzing and recording information about a person that is needed for the following. For the better running of the business By the manager to help him improve the jobholder’s performance and plan his career. By the jobholder to evaluate his own performance and develop himself. Randel, et al. (1994) defines performance appraisal as any procedure which helps the collection, checking, sharing, giving, and using of information collected from and about people at work. Essentially, performance appraisal involves three main activities namely: (i) Assessing an employee’s performance. (ii) Keeping of results derived from the assessments. (iii) Taking of actions base on the result of the assessments to improve the performance of such employee. NOVIT (1979) defines appraisal as the systematic evaluation of the individual with respect for their merit and ability on jobs. Wumbillah (1987) postulate that appraisal can be categorized into both formal and informal appraisal does not make use of any know standard in rating the performance of employee. An example is when people say “This textbook is good” or “this student is good”. Furthermore, informal appraisal particularly as applied to workers is often an accurate because credit given to the worker may be undeserved. For example a lazy but clever worker may suddenly burst into vigorous activities whenever the assessors are around so as to earn their commendation but will relapse into activity when assessor leave. Formal appraisal on the other hand makes use of define standard measurement, which may be based, on result or on specified trait. Thus, formal appraisal is classified into quantitative (result oriented) and qualitative (trait oriented). Trait oriented theorist make attempt to assess how much personal qualities, which are important job performance are present in and exhibited by the employees. Such traits include leadership, qualities and attitude towards other courage and cooperative mess. Although the above factors are not easily qualifiable, the rater may indeed assess how much of each employer has in qualitative terms using numerals alphabets. Maxwell (2001) argues that sometimes referred to as the quantitative approach to merit rating. Here, the assessor attempts to rate employees performance as regards qualifiedly aspect of his work. It is noted that majority of employees performance rating system combine both result and trait rating system. Thayer (1981) note that the logic of performance appraisal system requires that the superiors know or can know what their subordinates do and should do. This problem can explored at two reasonably district levels, one relates to the practical day-to-day world of administration, the other to the deeper well spring of modern scientific knowledge. To this assertion. Thomson (2002) notes that modern managers cannot possibly comprehend the folds of specialized knowledge which their subordinate drawn upon, with the result that employee boss relationship have become curiously distorted and unstable. Drucker (1974) submits in a more direct way that they are being paid for enabling people to do the worker for which those people are been paid. One has to assume that the individual human being as worker knows better than anyone else what make him or her more productive and what is helpful and unhelpful. The person who does the job is likely to know more about it than the person who supervises or to know different thing about it. This is particularly important for people who are putting knowledge and still to work, by definition the skilled worker must know more about his or her job than anyone else in the place, otherwise he or she is not adequately knowledgeable or adequately skilled. Appleby (1981) identifies the following reasons for appraising employee’s performance. These are To reduce element of favoritism. To help staff improve their present job performance and indicate possible career development. To create a more effective organization where staffs know what they are doing and reason to it. Supporting the essence of appraisal system, Thayer (1981); explains that, it cannot be over emphasized. There is need to set a goal and measure performance to determine the attainment of such goal, the result of such appraisal can be used as a controlling or corrective measure for the attainment of such goals. He explains further that the human element is the intricate, most complex of all resources available in organization. It is the same human element that is affected by even the slightest changes be it physical, physiological or psychological here to get the best out of human element in an organization, the appraisal must look for some social cultural forces that contributes to a person’s ability to put forth in other to perform a task effectively. But this, the employee need to be appraised critically to know his potential for growth and development on his job. The need for performance appraisal has been highlighted by Baffa (1992). According to him he classifies the need in two, firstly, the needs arising from the past of the workers and secondly, the needs on the past management. Such needs on the part of worker as he enumerated are: Baffa (1992) postulates that experience has shown that a workers performance below expectation does not always means that he lacks the necessary skills, knowledge and attitude or any other cordials requirements for performance, often one may be missing. The mirror the worker often needs to know what he is supposed to perform, how is supposed to perform it and how he is performing, he needs to know how his peers rate him, this affect his compartment. This is what appraisal supposed to serve. The only mirror image through which he can see himself from eye of management. Argues further on the need of appraisals on the workers part. Baffa (1992) identifies partial or total absence of clear, communicable evaluation system as one of the possible cause of suspicion and rumors. Workers want to be informed in matters relating to his job performance, working environment and indeed their future within the organization and they will want some to answer their question and clear huge clouds of double that may hang over their “bright future” from time to time when they derived this clues through the official organ of evaluation, they have no choice than to resort to telling themselves what they “felt” is happening, evaluation result therefore must be communicated as soon as practical to avoid unnecessary misgiving. Baffa (1992) states that rarely can a person go higher than he thinks, to that extent rarely can any worker perform better than what he understands, his duties to be his role perception. In evaluation, opportunity is presented to dismantle any walls of conferment which might have existed in mind of the worker and thereby enable him broaden his horizon of creative liberty and productivity. He further buttress by a superior who has genuine-rest of the worker at heart, that the sort of gap between management expectation and actual performance by employees could be detected and corrected. On the part of management, the stress the need for a workable evaluation system, this is inherent in the organization itself. Besides, management need to measure employee’s performance to determine whether acceptable standard of performance are being maintained needs also a feedback on his performance and vice visa the standard or other workers. If appraisal indicates poor standard of performance, steps must quickly be taken to correct the abnormally be better job specification, training or retraining whether from or motivation depending on the identified causes of performance. Mcgregor (1991) sees in appraisal technique as means of making evaluation constructive and places the emphasis where it ought to be on performance rather than on personality. Contributing scholar suggested that management by objectives state the specific period of time, so that the work of whole management group is soundly blended at a particular moment of time and that objectives should be set for the employee and appraisal geared to the same standard. Irrespective of the method used the concept of counseling a vital part of performance review if they are to achieve the prime purpose of helping people to improve and develop. The leniency or severely according to Adedeji et al (1992) arise when good observe is capable of some degree of precision and objectivity he takes is rating to mean something accurate about certain aspects of the person being rated. If this is done his assumption may or may not be valid. If the superior is extremely easy, he will rate the employee’s performance very high even when the employee is not performing to the expected level in organization. If the superior is severe he scores the performance of the employee low irrespective of employee performance. In some instances, the hardworking employee are often victims, this will have a direct effect on the productivity level, because they will not be rewarded adequately. To avoid being lenient during performance appraisal process, the following factors should be considered. The superior should not feel that it is necessary to always approve of others to gain approval for him. The superior should not be protecting. The superior should not rare leniently because there exists in culture a response set of approval rather than disapproval. The serve errors can be controlled or eliminated in two ways. By reducing ambiguity in the rating scales improving the definitions for dimensions for the various scales does this. By allocating rating into a forced distribution in which employee are apportioned according to an approximately bell-shape curve. Central tendency error comes about when political considerations dominate. When this occurs, superiors may assign all their subordinate rating than are neither too good nor too loads; the superior avoids using the high and low extreme of operating scales and tends to chicer all rating about the center of all scales; the superior rates everybody averagely, because rating fail to discriminate either with or between people that becomes virtually useless as management decisions making and, as predictors as criteria on for going feedback. The error can be minimized when the superior specifies clearly what the various anchors means more also; superior must be convinced of the value and political uses of merit rating if they are to provide meaningful information. Halo error is the most persuasive error in performance appraisals. The superior has assigns ratings on the basis of a global (good or bad) impression of the employee. If the superior perceived an employee to be bad, that employee is rate bad, even if the employee is hardworking person on the other hand, if the employee is perceived good because they are friendly, the employee gets good rating even though the employee is a lazy worker. Adedeji et al (1992) therefore conclude that superiors must guide against these error in other to maintain high level of morale in the organization. This will in turn generate as high level of employee performance, which has been proven to produce acceptable level of productivity organization. As pointed out by Lawal (1993) performance appraisal can be conducted by: Supervisors whose method of appraisal, where the superior appraises the performance of their subordinate. Although, such appraisals are sometimes, reviewed and appraised by superior boss. Subordinating rating superiors Poor rating where individuals occupying identical position rate each other. Summarizing the individual rating best does the approach. A group of supervisors rating subordinates management committee or series of supervisor. Waiter (1991) stress that the purpose of most, if not all employee and management development programs is to increase the organization’s present and future compatibility in attaining is goal accordingly, one study of objectives in management development program conducted in 167 forms revealed that their main objective was to improve the performance of all managers on the present job while the next most frequent started objectives was to prepare selected manages for possible future promotion thus, managers ere can be substituted to mean employees. Wumbillah (1987), defines employees’ development as a process aimed at an individual growing on his job that is, the employee realizing his potential or future job goals and aspirations. The process will entail the employee acquiring background and general knowledge of subject or discipline not aimed at any particular job and undergoing some training which is series of action aimed at acquiring an individuals with skill to do a particular job, thus when the employee acquire experience useful for the future he has development. In an attempt to employee in any training method are used to provide the employee with the knowledge and skills that will enable him to perform Bureau of National Affairs as cited by Crane (1998) reported that many firms use foreign training programmes while 75% of larger and 70% of smaller from had regular scheduled in plant training meeting for supervisors. Skill the National individual conference Boards has found that more than 1,000 employees had managerial development programs of some sort. More so, seminars in management offered by universities have been adjudge as one of the management development process. He also admits that theoretical development process begins when employee starts work with a firm and continues throughout his tenure of employment. Initial placement orientation, the introduction of the worker to the job, formal and on-the job training, job rotation and promotion on performance evaluation and correction, various skills training program is all a part of the personnel employee development process. However, French (1999) pointed out that training developmental programs can be tailored to the needs of individual and organization. Organization and developmental process is complex flow of event aimed at increasing the individual’s capability for conducting to the attainment of organization goals. He also note that whether planned or unplanned training and development occur within the organization and for optimum validity of this process, systematic attention must be given to determine training and development method to creating an environment conducive to intellectual and emotional growth to applying what is learned. He opens that, to stress the system point of view, it is extremely important that training and development if to be optimally useful take place in an environment which encourages and support application to the job of new knowledge and insight. This effective training and development requires management in which it occurs. In the purpose of employee training and development, it help employee requires and maintain the necessary skills, capability and personal capabilities to more adequately contribute her service towards the fulfillment of the organization objectives. He stress further that newly required employee need training to keep them aware of the changing job requirement and to qualify them for promotions. Employee and management development is achievable through organized developed training programmes. Knootz et al (1981) maintained that management training pertains to the programme that facilitate the learning process and this is based on some premises, which includes: The active support of the top managers to the program. The manager must be well involved and participate in development thus; all employee support is needed to achieve the training and development objectives. Theory and practice must go hand in hand since theory provides an excellent framework for learning. Training is seen as one side of the coin, which is the teaching of theory and the demonstration of techniques, the other is the actual practice of management. Thus; training is paramount to employee’s development. He adds that what many opportunities are found on the job trainees learn aid at the same time contribute to the aims of the organization. For significant importance among the training to employee development at it permits the acquisition of skill necessary to more in line with change at environment. Lippett (1975) notes that rapid change are a phenomenon to future organization which will use many jobs and skills to become absolute at an increasing rate to cope with fresher, training is needed. According to Crane (1974) the rapid advance of cope with the development employees whom formed the functions has been retained in handling of new machines to upgrade their skills. 2.1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MTN NIGERIA PLC MTN Group Limited, formerly M-Cell is a South African multinational mobile telecommunications company, operating in many African, European and Asian countries. Its head office is in Johannesburg. As of 30 June 2016, MTN recorded 232.6 million subscribers, making it the eighth largest mobile network operator in the world, and the largest in Africa. Active in over 20 countries, one-third of company revenue come from Nigeria, where it holds about 35% market share. On May 16, 2001, MTN became the first GSM network to make a call following the globally lauded Nigerian GSM auction conducted by the Nigerian Communications Commission earlier in the year. Thereafter the company launched full commercial operations beginning with Lagos, Abuja and Port Harcourt. MTN paid $285m for one of four GSM licenses in Nigeria in January 2001. To date, in excess of US$1.8 billion has been invested building mobile telecommunications infrastructure in Nigeria. Since launch in August 2001, MTN has steadily deployed its services across Nigeria. It now provides services in 223 cities and towns, more than 10,000 villages and communities and a growing number of highways across the country, spanning the 36 states of the Nigeria and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Many of these villages and communities are being connected to the world of telecommunications for the first time ever. The company's digital microwave transmission backbone, the 3,400 Kilometre Y'elloBahn was commissioned by President Olusegun Obasanjo in January 2003 and is reputed to be the most extensive digital microwave transmission infrastructure in all of Africa. The Y'elloBahn has significantly helped to enhance call quality on MTN network. The company subsists on the core brand values of leadership, relationship, integrity, innovation and can-do. It prides itself on its ability to make the impossible possible, connecting people with friends, family and opportunities. MTN Nigeria also recently expanded its network capacity to include a new numbering range with the prefix 0806, making MTN the first GSM network in Nigeria to have adopted an additional numbering system, having exhausted its initial subscriber numbering range - 0803. In its resolve to enhance quality customer service, MTN Nigeria has also introduced a self-help toll-free 181 customer-care line through which subscribers can resolve their frequently asked questions free of charge. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES MTN’s corporate social investment (CSI) approach is a critical piece of the “hearts and minds” component of our BRIGHT strategy. As one of the largest operators in many markets, MTN makes uses of their resources to make a difference to the communities in which they operate through both MTN Foundations and by encouraging their employees to volunteer their time, skills and services through our 21 Days of Y’ello Care programme. MTN Nigeria social investments are made through MTN Foundations and CSI functions in the countries in which they operate. They focus on four specific areas of critical social needs in the markets namely education, health, enterprise development and national priority requirements. To date, they have primarily invested in supporting education in the markets, as they believe in the expertise, reach and resources will enable them to make the greatest impact in the area. They have now shift attention towards youth empowerment in the markets. MTN Nigeria employees also are encouraged to make a visible and sustainable contribution to the societies in which they operate. The 21 Days of Y’ello Care volunteer programme offers an opportunity for staff to actively contribute to community development and to be inspired by ‘giving back’ through high impact social projects, and to understand and appreciate the challenges faced. Priority is given to supporting rural or disadvantaged communities. The key outcome must be a direct change to the lives of beneficiaries. The goal is to ensure that the volunteering experience is mutually-rewarding for employees, the company and the communities with whom they engage. MTN Nigeria as a business is driven by core belief that everyone deserves the benefits of a modern, connected life. A belief that enables MTN to make the lives of people we a whole lot brighter, over 560 million Africans are under coverage of a high-speed digital highway, while over 30 million Africans have a bank in their pocket with MTN Mobile Money. Also MTN Nigeria has been able to help with employment creation for over 5 million people selling MTN airtime and MoMo services as they empower over 4 million SMEs to make it big. Africa’s youth have been given access to 925 media centers. With every action taken, digital inclusion becomes a reality for the African population. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT OF MTN NIGERIA PLC Group Board Board committees Social & ethics Audit Risk management, compliance and corporate governance Nominations Remuneration and human resources Ignite advisory committee Executive committees Compliance committees Group sourcing Group operations Strategic talent review Group treasury Group transformation CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.0 Introduction According to Azika (1991), the concept of research methodology is a scientific inquiry in to methods to research in any discipline of knowledge. Hence, this chapter emphasizes on the methods employed in carrying out this study. It discussed the study population, sample size and sampling techniques, nature of data collection, formulation of hypotheses and instrument of the analysis. 3.1 Research Design The research design employed in this study is a survey design. A well-structured survey questionnaire was designed and administered to staff of MTN Nigeria Plc. The questionnaire is divided into two section. Section A comprise Bio data of respondents while section B comprise questions from the problem area. These questions examine the relationship between employees’ performance and productivity. 3.2 STUDY POPULATION The survey population sample used in this project is made up of number of staff of MTN Nigeria Plc. the population consists of people, within the company totaling 125. 3.3 SAMPLE SIZE AND SAMPLE TECHNIQUES For the purpose of this research work, the population study is assumed to be the entire workers but as a result of time and financial constraints, I was unable to administer my questionnaire on all the workers thus, I have picked a sample size of 30 workers using simple random sampling in which all the workers in marketing and research department have been given equal chances of being picked as a member of the sample. 3.4 NATURE OF DATA COLLECTION Data collection is defined as the means by which information is obtained from the selected of an investigation. There are two main methods through which a researcher could collect data. These include primary and secondary of data collection. Primary data: - It is statistical and information material which investigator originates to solve some problems at head. Example of primary data is personal interview, questionnaire and observation to mention but few. Secondary Data: - This implies the information, which is not originated by the investigation but which he, or she obtained from someone else. This information is based on what others have recoiled. Example of secondary source of data is magazine, journals, and textbooks to mention buy a few. For the purpose of this project both primary and secondary data were used. The primary sources of data adopted were personal interview and the use of questionnaire. On the other hand, the secondary sources of data employed were mainly from textbooks and some other relevant handout. 3.5 RESTATEMENT OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS As pointed above, the objectives of this study is to find out the relevance of performance appraised to employee's productivity. In doing this, the questions to be asked are l. Of what uses is performance appraisal outcome to the organization. 2. Does employees actually need performance appraised? 3. Do the organization use the result of the appraisal programme for the development of the employee by using it to plan for their training, placement of the job and promoting then? 4. Does your management believe in performance appraisal system? 3.6 RESTATEMENT OF RESEARCH HYPOTHESES HYPOTHESES I The following hypotheses are formulated. Ho: There is no significant relationship between performance appraisal outcome and employee's productivity. Hi: There is significant relationship between performance appraisal outcome and employee's productivity. HYPOTHESIS II Ho: There is no significant relationship between performance appraisal outcome attainments of corporate goal. Hi: There is significant relationship between performance appraisal outcome attainment of corporate goal. HYPOTHESIS III Ho: There is no significant relationship between' performance appraisal outcome and enhancement of productivity of the employees in an organization Hi: There is significant relationship between performance appraisal outcome and the enhancement of productivity of the employee in an organization. 3.7 INSTRUMENT OF ANALYSIS. The main instrument use in this research work is questionnaires. The questionnaires were distributed among an employees in an organization. A. Construction of instrument i.e. questionnaire. The instrument is constructed in to two (2) part, which is section A and B. Section A, contain the data of respondents while section B contains, already prepared questions which introduces us into the subject of the study for which appraiser is prepare for an employees. B. Administration of questionnaire: the questionnaire are legibly arranged in chronological order and made simple so that respondents will be able to give necessary answers to respective questions. The researcher distributed thirty (30) questionnaires to the respondents and all were filled, 3.8 METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS For the purpose of data analysis in chapter four. I have decided to use chi-squared method. Chi-squared method refers to X2 distribution; it is used to test the goodness or reliability of the hypothesis used for instance, to test whether there is any significant difference between expected frequency. It is also to use to each whether two variables are independent of each other purposely used to ensure effective and avoid ambiguity as well as ensuring objectivity of information gathered. Chi-square i.e. X2 distributions as represented by: X2 = ∑ (o-e) 2/e Where e= Expected fervency O= Observed frequency ∑= Sigma or summation of C= Columns R= Rows Significant level=5% or [0.05] D.F=Degree of freed in i.e. [r-I] [c-I] DECISION RULE If the calculated Chi-square (X2) exceeds the Tabulated Chi-square (X2) then we reject the null hypothesis and accept alternate hypothesis. On the other hand, if the Tabulated Chi-square (X2) exceeds the calculated Chi-square (X2) then will accept the null hypothesis and reject the alternatives hypothesis.