Uploaded by jimmycooke

Performing Arts Research Carried out

advertisement
Performing Arts Research Carried out and written at
Southampton City College and the
University of Winchester
by
James Cooke B.A.
Abstract to Performing arts Research
by James Cooke B.A.
This academic book is an incomplete representation of this work within the
performing arts industry during James' time as a student at the Southampton
City College and the University of Winchester. The book will show the majority
of James' research through the essays that he wrote on the different areas of
performing arts. However, there are three reasons why this book is incomplete;
the first reason is that there were some essay papers lost from his first year,
which makes this academic book incomplete. Secondly, The dissertation is not
included in this book because the dissertation is a book in its own right called
'Fencing: a Metaphor for Life'. The third and final reason why this book is
incomplete is that like everyone else in the world, James is always learning
and developing in knowledge, and it would be difficult to put everything into an
academic book.
Table of Content
Deconstruction Academic Research Paper
Page 4
Abstract of Deconstruction
Page 5
Introduction of Deconstruction
Page 6
The Theories of Jacque Derrida on Deconstruction
Page 7
Levi-Strauss Ancient and Universal Way of Thinking
Page 8
Deconstruction Conclusion
Page 9
Rudolf Von Laban Academic Research Paper
Page 10
Introduction Rudolf Von Laban Academic Research Paper
Page 11
Deconstruction Academic Research Paper
by
James Cooke B.A.
Abstract of Deconstruction
Deconstruction is post-structuralism which refers to an extension and critique
of structuralism. Primarily as used in critically textual analysis. This short essay
will explore the theories of Deconstruction of Language as proposed by two
well-known theorists (Jacque Derrida and Claude Levi-Strauss) and their
similarities within the post-structuralism of deconstruction.
Introduction of Deconstruction
Deconstruction, through its theories and philosophy, is not what you may think:
the experiences of the impossible and what remains to be considered. It is
logic of destabilisation which is always already on the move and continues to
be on the move in things themselves, including life itself. What makes every
identity at once is itself as well as being different from itself a logic of spectrality.
Example of this would be like seeing yourself in a mirror but seeing the
opposite of who you are or like seeing yourself in a ghostly form compared to
your living self. Theoretical and practical parasitism or virology would be what
is happening today in what is called: society, politics, diplomacy, economics,
historical reality, and so on: the opening of the future itself.
The Theories of Jacque Derrida on Deconstruction:
Jacque Derrida was interested in one
particular opposition: the opposition
between written text and speech.
Deconstruction can show us that it is
never an equivalent, but it is always
Figure 1: Jacque Derrida
hierarchically
ranked. One Pole (presence, the good, truth, man.) is the
https://s-usih.org/2015/12/jacques-de
rrida-what-a-differance-an-a-makes/c
privilege at the expense of the second (absence, evil, lie women.) (Guillemette
ontent/uploads/2016/09/the-art-of-war.jpg
and Cossette, 2008). To help us better understand this, let us ask two
questions to give us an example. How can language decentre the traditional
structure? Also, why is the author dead? For example "I am hungry." In this
statement, only the author knows the real reason for what the character is
saying, but when someone else reads it and speaks it, they will have their
interpretation of what the character is saying. Leads on to the second question.
Why is the author dead? The author is dead because it no longer matters what
the author thinks. For example, the person who reads it after the author has
written it may believe that the character is hungry for food, power or knowledge,
which is what Derrida was trying to tell us (Guillemette and Cossette, 2008).
Saussure's theory supported Derrida's philosophy as he suggested that
speech can convey the inner meaning more than writing can (Prasad, 2007).
Derrida was also interested in binary oppositions in language. These are
words that have the opposite sense to each other such as "happiness",
"sadness" or "good" and "evil." Derrida suggested that binary oppositions
created meanings for abstract ideas and concepts, such as emotions (Linsley
and Profile, 2012).
Levi-Strauss Ancient and Universal Way of Thinking:
Levi-Strauss, however, was interested in
how binary oppositions could expand the
meanings of words, not only through the
words themselves but also through the
relationship between them. For example,
"good" has a purpose, and "evil" has a
meaning. Still, the relationship between
these two words expands the definition,
even more, this was why Levi-Strauss
argued that binary oppositions create a
hierarchy in which there are many layers of
Figure 2: Claude Levi-Strauss
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-me
meaning
(Linsley and Profile,
-claude-levi-strauss4-2009nov04-stor
y.html
2012). However, this theory has been criticised because it does not create a
medium between the two opposites. For example, a person may not be happy,
but they may not be sad either. Also, Saussure noted that words might also
change meaning when they are translated into a different language (Terms,
2016).
Deconstruction Conclusion:
The essay has shown that Derrida and Levi-Strauss were very similar in their
theories of deconstruction and that both theorists focussed on the meanings of
words (Guillemette and Cossette, 2008). However, Derrida was interested in
written text and speech, whereas Levi-Strauss concentrated entirely on binary
oppositions (Linsley and Profile, 2012). There are, however, limitations of both
theories as noted by Saussure (Terms, 2016).
Rudolf Von Laban Academic Research Paper
Choreography of Group Performance
Southampton City College
By
James Cooke
Introduction Rudolf Von Laban Academic Research Paper
Rudolf Laban was also known as Rudolf Von
Laban was born on Monday 15th December
1879 in Bratislava, Austria-Hungary which is
now in Slovakia and died 1st July 1958 just
age 78 in Weybridge, Surrey, England.
During his life, he became a dance theorist
and teacher who studied the movement of the
human body.
Figure 3: Rudolf Von Laban
https://alchetron.com/Rudolf-von-La
ban
Laban is also well known for developing
Labanotation, which is a widely used movement-notation system. The
academic research paper on Laban will talk about his training that he did, how
he influenced dance and drama. What his main concepts were towards
movement choreography and why? The Paper will also give a brief description
of his design for movement notation. What tools, equipment and materials for
everyone who is doing Laban techniques and how this can be applied to their
own contemporary choreography moment pieces.
Download