Running Head: SHORT TITLE
Student.Last.Name 1
Title
Student Name
University Name
Business Statistics
Professor Name
Date
Short Title (50 characters or less)
Introduction
Hook
Background
Thesis
Summary
Paragraph/s
Response
Paragraph/s
Conclusion
Summarize
Restate Thesis
Make a request
Conclusion
Sloan 2
Short Title (50 characters or less)
Sloan 3
References
David, R.A., et al. (2019). Statistics for Business and Economics (14th ed.). Boston, MA:
Cengage Learning.
KnightCite. (2019). In The Heckman Library. Retrieved May 29, 2020, from
https://www.calvin.edu/library/knightcite/index.php
Short Title (50 characters or less)
Sloan 4
Element
Criteria – below
average
D (60-69.9%)
Criteria - average
Supports
Article
Author's Ideas
/ Analysis
-Limited
connections made
between evidence,
subtopics,
counterarguments
& thesis/topic
-lack of analysis.
(0-5)
Many errors,
structural mistakes,
and over 20%
plagiarism (0)
-Some connections
made between
evidence, subtopics,
counterarguments &
thesis/topic showing
analysis. (6-14)
Grammar,
Spelling,
Syntax,
Plagiarism
APA Format
Lacks formatting
altogether, or gross
errors, and
structural mistakes
No cover and
references page.
May lack page
numbers, proper
title, or running
head. (0)
Other
Language
Conventions
& Acumen
- Inconsistent and
improper use of
vocabulary, terms,
and paragraphing.
(0)
Student
Response
-Lack of analysis
and application of
topic and subtopics
with weak
responding ideas.
(0-5)
C (70-81.9%)
Some errors,
structural mistakes,
and between 10-19%
plagiarism
(1-2)
Lack of APA
features; there are
some errors,
structural mistakes,
and spacing. Many
cover and references
page errors. May
lack page numbers,
proper title, or
running head.
(1-2)
-Paragraphs show
some proper use of
statistics vocabulary,
terms, paragraphing,
and limited APA
format. (1-2)
-Adequate analysis
and application of
topic and subtopics
with some
responding ideas
(6-14)
Criteria – above
average
B (82-91.9%)
Criteria – superior
Score
A (92-100%)
-Consistent
connections made
between evidence,
subtopics,
counterarguments &
thesis/topic showing
proper analysis.
(15-24)
Few errors, structural
mistakes, and
between 5-9%
plagiarism (3-4)
-Exceptionally critical,
relevant and consistent
connections made between
evidence, subtopics,
counterarguments &
thesis/topic showing
excellent analysis
(25-30)
Minor errors, structural
mistakes, and less the 5%
plagiarism (5)
/30
Most of APA
features; there are
few errors, structural
mistakes, and spacing
is mostly correct.
Minor cover and
references page
errors. May lack page
numbers, proper title,
or running head.
(3-4)
-The paragraphs are
clear, with mostly
proper vocabulary,
terms, paragraphing,
good APA format.
(3-4)
-Good analysis and
application of topic
and all subtopics with
clear responding
ideas (15-24)
All APA features; there are
few errors, structural
mistakes, but the spacing is
correct. Very few cover and
references page errors. May
have very minor errors. (5)
/5
-The paragraphs are very
concise, clear, with
consistently proper
vocabulary, terms,
paragraphing, and excellent
APA format. (5)
-Excellent analysis and
application of topic with new
information & all subtopics
are appropriately supported
with responding ideas that
leave an impact on the
reader. (25-30)
/5
Total
/5
/30
/75