0. a. Deflection for the given load case where force is applied to the end of a beam, where the opposite end is fixated. Deflection = ๐ฟ = ๐น๐ฟ3 3๐ธ๐ผ where I = ๐โ 3 12 Therefore, for the given case, the following parameters, when substituted into the equation provides: ๐=โ=๐ก โถ ๐ผ= ๐4 ๐4 12 b. Moment ๐ผ = 12 โถ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ (๐ฟ) = ๐ฟ= 4๐น๐ฟ3 ๐ธ๐ 4 4๐น๐ฟ3 ๐ธ๐ 4 โถ ๐ฟ= Rearranging the equation provides 4๐น๐ฟ3 1 ( ) Therefore ๐4 ๐ธ 1 ๐ธ ๐=( ) c. Figure 1. Metal Tungsten alloys possess the highest young’s modulus among metals and thus should provide the least deflection. This is followed by Medium carbon steel, which is closely followed by lo and high carbon steel respectively. Figure 2. Ceramics Withing carbides, Tungsten Carbides (WC) have the highest young’s modulus and are followed by Silicon carbides and Aluminum nitrides. Figure 3. Wood Wood on the other has very low young’s modulus, therefore has higher deflections. Within the category of wood, Hard oak possesses the highest modulus followed by bamboo and then softwood. Figure 4: Metal , Wood & Ceramics It is evident the ceramics have the highest young’s modulus and thus would show a lower deflection than the other materials. Ceramics are followed by metals, with tungsten alloys leading the category. Woods on the other hand have the least young’s modulus and therefore are more susceptible to larger deflections. 1. a. Deflection for the given load case where force is across the length of the beam, where the opposite end is fixated Deflection = ๐ฟ = ๐น๐ฟ3 8๐ธ๐ผ where I = ๐โ 3 12 Therefore, for the given case, the following parameters, when substituted into the equation provides: ๐=โ=๐ โถ ๐ผ= b. Deflection = ๐ฟ = 3๐น๐ฟ3 2๐ธ๐ 4 ๐4 12 โถ ๐ฟ= 12๐น๐ฟ3 8๐ธ๐ 4 − (๐) 3๐น๐ฟ3 = 2๐ธ๐ 4 ๐น = ๐ด. ๐. ๐ − (๐) Substituting (b) in (a) ๐ฟ= 3. ๐ด. ๐. ๐๐ฟ3 3. ๐. ๐. ๐ฟ3 = 2๐ธ๐ 4 2๐ธ๐ 2 โฎ ๐ ๐=( ) ๐ธ ๐โ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ c. Figure 5. Ceramics It can be observed that ceramics such as SiC, AlC & Alumina possess a low Density/E ratio, and therefore provide a lower deflection for the given loading condition. Figure 6. metals Within metals it can be observed that Berylliun, followed by Berylium aluminuma alloy & Ruthenium possess the last Desnity/E ratio and therefore would possess the least defelction, although, the force needs to be taken into consideration as these can be brittle. Figure 7. Wood Withing the category of woods, Sande followed by Spruce, Fir and Mersawa possess the lease Desnity/E ratio and hence would show the least deflection, Figure 8. Wood, Metal & Ceramics Comparing the three Materials, it is evident that ceramics possess the least density/E ratio and therefore show the least deflection. It must also be considered that it is load dependent and that ceramics are brittle. Metals follow ceramics, and possess an intermedia D/E ratio, that is inbetween woods and ceramics. 2. 3๐น๐ฟ3 a. Deflection = ๐ฟ = 2๐ธ๐ 4 ๐ ๐= ๐ด๐ฟ ๐ด = ๐2 โถ ๐ = ๐๐ด๐ฟ โถ ๐ด = ๐2 = 3๐น๐ฟ3 3๐น๐2 ๐ฟ5 3๐น๐2 ๐ฟ5 ๐ฟ= = โถ ๐ = ( ) 2๐ธ๐ด2 2๐ธ๐2 2๐ธ๐ฟ 0.5 ๐ ๐๐ฟ ๐ โฎ ๐ = ( 0.5 ) ๐ธ Or ๐น = ๐ด. ๐. ๐ 0.5 0.5 1 3๐น๐2 ๐ฟ5 3(๐๐ด๐)๐2 ๐ฟ5 3(๐)๐2 ๐ฟ4 ๐2 2 ๐=( ) =( ) ๐ =( ) โฎ๐=( ) 2๐ธ๐ฟ 2๐ธ๐ฟ 2๐ธ๐ฟ ๐ธ ๐โ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐โ๐ก๐ ๐ก ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ Figure 9. Metals Figure 10. Metals ( Method 2) In the case of metals, Magnesium alloys, followed by aluminum and titanium alloys possess the least M ratio and there fore are optimum for choosing a lightweight metal among its group. Figure 11. Ceramics Figure 12. Ceramics (method 2) Ceramics such as BC, SiC, AlN and SiN, possess the lowest M ratio and therefore are ideal light ceramics for use for the given load configuration. Figure 13. Woods Figure 14. Wood ( Method 2 ) Woods such as bamboo, softwood, hardwood, possess the lowest M ratio and therefore are suitable for use for the given load configuration. Figure 15. Wood, Metals and Ceramics. Figure 16. Wood, Metals and Ceramics ( Method 2) It can be observed that the ceramics such as BC, SiC, are ideal light materials for the given load configuration. It is followed by Bamboo and other ceramics. The most optimum metals are Magnesium alloys. 3. a. Deflection for the given load case where force is applied to the end of a beam, where the opposite end is fixated. Deflection = ๐ฟ = ๐น๐ฟ3 3๐ธ๐ผ where I = ๐โ 3 12 Therefore, for the given case, the following parameters, when substituted into the equation provides: ๐4 4๐น๐ฟ3 ๐=โ=๐ก โถ ๐ผ= โถ ๐ฟ= 12 ๐ธ๐ 4 ๐ด = ๐2 = : ๐ = ๐๐ด๐ฟ ๐ฟ= 4๐น๐ฟ3 (๐๐ฟ)2 ๐ธ๐2 = 4๐น๐ฟ3 (๐๐ฟ)2 ๐ธ๐2 ๐ ๐๐ฟ 0.5 4๐น๐ฟ5 (๐)2 ) Therefore ๐ ๐ธ๐ฟ โถ ๐ =( ๐ฟ = ๐ธ 0.5 ๐โ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐โ๐ก๐๐ ๐ก ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ Figure 17. Wood Woods such as bamboo, softwood, hardwood, possess the lowest M ratio and therefore are suitable for use for the given load configuration. Ceramics such as BC, SiC, AlN and SiN, possess the lowest M ratio and therefore are ideal light ceramics for use for the given load configuration. In the case of metals, Magnesium alloys, followed by aluminum and titanium alloys possess the least M ratio and there fore are optimum for choosing a lightweight metal among its group. It can be observed that the ceramics such as BC, SiC, are ideal light materials for the given load configuration. It is followed by Bamboo and other ceramics. The most optimum metals are Magnesium alloys.